Explanation and Evaluation the factors and indicators of the knowledge based cities in the direction of regional development by Entropy Shanon and Topsis combined techniques(Case study: Pardis city)
Subject Areas :Ali Adib 1 , Farah Habib 2 , Zahra Sadat Saeideh Zarabadi 3
1 - Department of Urban Development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran.Iran.
2 - Prof., Department of Urban Development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 - Associate Prof., Department of Urban Development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Knowledge city, Regional development, Knowledge-based urban development, Pardis city,
Abstract :
Knowledge-based urban development is a new form of urban development in the 21st century, which has the potential to bring economic development to contemporary cities. This research, with the aim of achieving a proposed local framework for knowledge-based urban development, explains and evaluates the components and indicators of the knowledge-based city in Pardis city. In order to achieve this goal, the desired components and indicators were determined using documentary studies and theoretical and experimental bases, and a questionnaire with 65 items was distributed among the decision-making group consisting of 40 members of the target group using the Delphi method. In order to extract the best indicators, z-score method was used and based on the Likert spectrum and entropy technique, the weight of components and indicators was calculated and for their prioritization, Topsis technique was used. becameIn the following, the research questions were answered, which are the criteria and indicators necessary to transform Pardis city into a knowledge-based city and what will be their priority to achieve a successful knowledge-based city. In fact, six social , economic, managerial, perceptual, spatial organization and urban infrastructure components were defined as the proposed components for knowledge-based urban development and their related indicators. The results of the research show that the economic component with a coefficient of 0.7878 is in the first place, urban infrastructure is in the second place with a coefficient of 0.5717 and management is in the third place with a coefficient of 0.4489 in terms of importance in Pardis city and in line with each of The mentioned components, the indicators related to them are prioritized and the necessary suggestions are made to transform Pardis city into a knowledge-based city with The goal of regional development was presented
1- آزادي،ع.،دل‌انگيزان،س.، فلاحتي،ع. 1390. بررسی توسعه منطقه‌ای از دولتهای سوم تا یازدهم (1360-1392) در ايران. مجله پژوهشهای اقتصاد و توسعه منطقه‌ای، 26(17): 32-1.
2- ازکیا، م.، غلامرضا غ. 1397. جامعه شناسی توسعه. چاپ سیزدهم. نشرکيهان. 416 صفحه.
3- اشتری،ح.، پرهیز، ف. 1395. شهر دانش محور. چاپ اول. ناشر تیسا. 96 صفحه.
4- برک¬پور، ن.، اسدی،ا. 1397 .مدیریت و حکمروایی شهر. چاپ سوم. انتشارات دانشگاه هنرتهران. 258 صفحه.
5- پورجبلي،ر.،حنفي‌نيري،ک.، بابايي،م. 1401. مسأله شناسی توسعه دانش‌بنیان. فصلنامه پژوهشهای برنامه و توسعه. 9(3): 205-181.
6- تودارو،م. 1397. توسعه اقتصادی در جهان سوم. غلامعلی فرجادی. چاپ بیست و یکم. انتشارات کوهسار. 558 صفحه.
7- جمعه¬پور،م.، عیسی لو،ش.، گودرزی،و.،دوستی سبزی، ب.1396. تدوین راهبردهای شهری با رویکرد توسعه دانش‌بنیان، مورد مطالعه شهر صنعتی اراک. فصلنامه اقتصاد و مدیریت شهری، 20(5): 65-53.
8- رفیعیان، م.، مرتضوی، ماندانا. 1395. اهمیت توسعه دانش‌بنیان شهری و شهر دانش مدار در اقتصاد دانش‌بنیان، اولین همایش بین‌المللی اقتصاد شهری (با رویکرد اقتصاد مقاومتی، اقدام و عمل). تهران، 29 اردیبهشت. 297-289.
9- زمان‌محمدي رئیسی، م.،فتحی،س.،كریمیان،ح. 1399. صنعت بانكداري نوين و توسعه در ايران. نشریه مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران، 1(13): 135- 119.
10- عیسی پور، ر.، حمیدپور، ح.، علی اکبری، ص. 1394. شهر دانش‌بنیان: استراتژی توسعه آینده شهر زنجان به عنوان یک شهر پایدار و خلاق. فصلنامه آمایش محیط، 35(9): 192-171.
11- عابدینی،ا.،خلیلی،ا.، خرم، ف.، قربانی، ش .1399. امکان سنجی اجرای شهر دانش‌بنیان در کلان شهر تبریز با رویکرد توسعه مبتنی بر دانش. نشریه مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 24(7): 175- 155.
12- لطفی،ح. 1395. بررسی تطبیقی تأثیر شکل مدیریت سیاسی فضا بر توسعۀ منطقه‌ای مطالعه موردی جزایر قشم و کیش. فصلنامه آمایش محیط، 32(9):184-169.
13- لفت ويچ، آ. 1399. دموکراسي و توسعه. احمد عليقليان و افشين خاکباز.چاپ سوم.ناشر طرح نو.418 صفحه.
14- ندروين پيترز،ج. 1397. نظريه توسعه (فرهنگ،اقتصاد،جامعه). انور محمدي. چاپ سوم. ناشر گل آذين. 384 صفحه.
15- ملکی،س.، احمدی،ر.1395.تأثیر عامل فاصله از مرکز بر میزان توسعه یافتگی شهرستانهای استان خوزستان. فصلنامه آمایش محیط.32(9):22-1.
16- مؤمنی، م.، خوازرمی، ا.، رهنما، م. 1398. بررسی ابعاد اثرگذار بر کارکرد پارک علم و فناوری خراسان در تبدیل شهر مشهد به شهر دانش.جغرافيا و توسعه فضاي شهري. 2(6): 15-1.
17- نصيري، م. 1399. مروري بر مفهوم و شاخصهاي توسعه و پيشرفت با نگرش اسلامي. مطالعات فرهنگي و اجتماعي حوزه. 7(4): 28- 5.
18- Agudelo-Vera, M., Mels, R. 2011. Resource management as a key factor for sustainable urban planning.Journal of Environmental Management,34(9): 2295-2303.
19- Alraouf,A.2018. Knowledge-Based Urban Development in the Middle East.IGI Global Press.335p.
20- Apostolache, M. 2014. Regional Development in Romania: From Regulations to Practice. Procedia Economics and Finance, (8): 35–41.
21- Chang, D.L.; Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E. 2018. Knowledge based, smart and sustainable cities: a provocation for a conceptual framework. Journal of Open Innovation. 4 (5):1-17.
22- Cheng, S.,Hualin, X., JinfaJiang, Q., 2018, Is Urban Land Development Driven by Economic Development or Fiscal Revenue Stimuli in China, Land Use Policy. 77(21):107-115.
23- Darity Jr., William, A. 2008.International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Second Edition, Macmilan Referense USA Press.554P.
24- Dvir, R., Pasher, E. 2004. Innovation engines for knowledge cities: an innovation ecology perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5): 16-27.
25- Elenaa, C. 2015. The Making of Knowledge Cities in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance. 32(5): 534- 541
26- Jacobson, A. 2012. A Cohesive Downtown from a Knowledge City Perspective–A Study in Urban Planning. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Jönköping.265P.
27- Jovovic, R., Draskovic, M., Delibasic, M., Jovovic, M. 2017. The concept of sustainable regional development – institutional aspects, policies and prospects. Journal of International Studies, 10(2): 255-266.
28- Lerro .,Schiuma.2014. Knowledge-based dynamics of regional development: the case of Basilicata region, Journal of Knowledge Management ,13(5):287-300
29- Nurohmah, A., Priadmojo, A., Kurnia Dewi, M., Satria, M., Saputra, N. 2014. Analysis of Regional Development in Connection with Multi Disaster Susceptibility in Bengkulu Province. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 135(36): 70–75.
30- Rogelio, M., Sergio,T.2018.The contemporary development discourse: Analysing the influence of development studies’ journals, World Development. 109(C):334-335.
31- Shukla, K.P. 2013. A Comparative Analysis of Regional Industrial Development: Pre and Post Economic Reforms with Special Reference to Gujarat. Doctor of Philosophy in Economics, Faculty of Arts, The Gujarat University, Ahmedabad.
32- Sullivan,G.2013. Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 5(4):541-542.
33- 33_ Yigitcanlar, T. 2014. Position paper: Benchmarking the performance of global and emerging knowledge cities, Expert Systems with Applications, (41):5549–5559
34- Yigitcanlar, T. 2011. Position paper: Redefining knowledge-based urban development. International Journal of Knowledge Based Development, 2(4): 340–356
35- Yigitcanlar, T., Inkinen, T. & Makkonen, T. 2015. "Does size matter? Knowledge-based development of second-order city-regions in Finland". disP-The Planning Review. 51(3): 62–77.
36- Ergazakis, K, Metaxiotis, K and Psarras, J .2006 Knowledge cities: the answer to the needs of knowledge-based development. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 36(1): 67–81.
37- Smit, B., Wandel, J. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global environmental change, 16(3): 282-292.
