Game Theory Approach to Modeling and Analyzing Inheritance Allocation of a Passed-away Couple

Subject Areas : Labor and Demographic Economics

majid sheikhmohammadi ¹ , mostafa abbasi ²

1 - استادیار اقتصاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
2 - دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)

Received: 2016-10-10 Accepted : 2016-10-10 Published : 2016-04-20

Keywords: game theory, Coalition, Equilibrium, Inheritance Allocation, Modeling JEL Classification: C72, C62,

Abstract :

The main aim of this study is to model and analyze the challenge of inheritance allocation remained by a passed-away couple based on the inheritors strategies and objectives by using Game Theory approach. So, by the help of Graph model to analyze the challenges between the inheritors of a passed-away couple based on the laws and regulations in Islamic Republic o Iran. This model contains two kinds of players selected through 64 abstract constructions of the strategies by applying some limitations and analyzed 8 possible cases and finally, 2 cases predicted as more likely. The results represent that this competition has two equilibriums. That is, if the players stand in thie situations, they have no desire to exit. By the coalition of the players, the results will be more appropriate to get more. The findings of the modeling is completely consistent with real results of the challenges.

References:

منابع

-      قانون مجازات جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مصوب سال 1392.

-      قانون مدنی جمهوری اسلامی ایران.

-      پرونده دادگاهی مرحومان موسی و ماندانا عباسی، یاسوج، 1393.    

-        Brams, S. J., & Wittman, D. (1981). Nonmyopic Equilibria in 2× 2 Games, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 6(1): 39-62.

-        Brams, S. J. (1993). Theory of  Moves, American Scientist. 81: 561 – 570.

-        Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution,  John Wiley and sons.

-        Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003a). A Decision -Support System for Interactive Decision Making-Part I: Model Formulation. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 33(1): 42-55.

-        Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003b). A Decision Support System for Interactive Decision Making-Part II: Analysis and Output Interpretation. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 33(1): 56-66.

-        Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions, North-Holland, New York.

-        Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior, Cambridge, MIT Press.

-        Howard, N. (1987). The Present and the Future of Metagame, European Journal of Operational Research.  32, 1: l - 25.

-        Howard, N. (1994). Drama Theory and Its Relation to Game Theory: Dramatic Resolution vs. Rational Solutions, Group Decision and Negotiation. 3: 187 – 206.

-        Nash, J. (1951). Non-Cooperative Games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54(2): 286-295.

-        Sheikhmohammady, M., & Hipel, K.W., & Asilahijani, H., & Kilgour, D. M.  (2009). Strategic Analysis of the Conflict Over Iran's Nuclear Program, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11-14 Oct., San Antonio, TX, 1911-1916.

-        Sheikhmohammady, M., & Bitalebi, H., & Moatti, A., & Hipel, K.W. (2013). Formal Strategic Analysis of the Conflict Over Syria, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Manchester, 13-16 Oct., 2442 – 2447.

-        Takahashi, M.A., & Fraser, N.M. & Hipel. W. (1984). A Procedure for Analyzing Hypergames, European Journal of Operational Research,  18, Issue 1:111-122.

-        Zagare, F. C. (1984). Limited-Move Equilibria in 2× 2 Games. Theory and Decision, 16(1): 1-19.