Body Weight Prediction of Dromedary Camels Using the Machine Learning Models
محورهای موضوعی : Camel
N. Asadzadeh
1
(Department of Animal Production Mnangement, Animal Science Research Institute of Iran (ASRI), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran)
M. Bitaraf Sani
2
(Department of Animal Science, Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran)
E. Shams Davodly
3
(Department of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran)
J. Zare Harofte
4
(Department of Animal Science, Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran)
M. Khojestehkey
5
(Department of Animal Science, Qom Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Qom, Iran)
S. Abbaasi
6
(Department of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran)
A. Shafie Naderi
7
(Department of Animal Science, Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran)
کلید واژه: Regression, body weight, dromedary camel, machine learning models,
چکیده مقاله :
The study aimed to compare the accuracy of seven Machine Learning methods for estimating the weight of dromedary camels, during birth-240 day of age, using the body measurements. With this mind, in overall, 458 records, including body weight and also 12 biometric linear measurements collected from dromedary camels at different stage of life, were used. The seven machine learning methods, including bayesian regularized neural network (BRNN), extreme learning (EL), random forest (RF), support vector machine with linear kernel (LSVM), polynomial kernel (PNLSVM), and radial basis kernel (RNLSVM) and linear regression (LR) were compared to estimate the body weight of camels. The performance of the models was evaluated based on mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, R-squared, mean squared error, and root mean squared error. A 10 repeated 10-fold cross-validation was used to check the stability of the models and averaged the results. Except the tail length, abdomen width, and abdomen to hump height, most predictors had good correlation (r>0.7) with body weight. Among predictive variables, the highest correlation was 0.96 between heights at whither and height at hump, as well as abdomen width and abdomen to hump height (P<0.01). The accuracy of seven machine learning methods, including BRNN, EL, RF, LSVM, PNLSVM, RNLSVM and LR were 94.93, 93.22, 94.61, 93.2, 95.43, 94.93 and 93.15, respectively. As final conclusion, the outputs of this report showed that, although all compared models had an acceptable and high performance in predicting the weight based on height of camels, However, the PNLSVM can be suggested candidate model due to expressing the higher accuracy than the others considering all studied criteria.
Afolayan R.A., Adeyinka I.A. and Lakpini C.A.M. (2006). The estimation of live weight from body measurements in Yankasa sheep. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 51(8), 343-348.
Aiken L.S. and West S.G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. SAGE Publication, Inc., London, United Kingdom.
Ali M., Eyduran E., Masood Tariq M., Tirink C., Abbas F., Ahmad Bajwa M., Baloch M.H., Nizamani A.H., Waheed A., Awan M.A., Shah S.H., Ahmad Z. and Jan S. (2015). Comparison of artificial neural network and decision tree algorithms used for predicting live weight at post weaning period from some biometrical characteristics in Harnai sheep. Pakistan J. Zool. 47(6), 1579-1585.
Atta M. and El-Khidir O.A. (2004). Use of heart circumstance withers height and scapuloischial length for prediction of love weight of Nilotic sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 55(1), 233-237.
Bahashwan S., Alrawas A.S., Alfadli S. and Johnson E.S. (2016). Dofari cattle growth curve prediction by different nonlinear model functions. Livest. Res. 27(12), 122-129.
Breiman L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learn. 45, 5-32.
Burden F. and Winkler D. (2008). Bayesian regularization of neural networks. Methods Mol. Biol. 458, 25-44.
Cannas A. and Boe F. (2003). Prediction of the relationship between body weight and body condition score in sheep. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 2, 527-529.
Celik S. and Yilmaz O. (2017). Comparison of different data mining algorithms for prediction of body weight from several morphological measurements in dogs. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 27, 57-64.
Drucker H., Chris J.C., Kaufman L. and Smola A. (1997). Support vector regression machines. Adv. Neural Inform. Proc. Syst. 9, 155-161.
Du C. and Sun D. (2006). Learning techniques used in computer vision for food quality evaluation: A review. J. Food Eng. 72, 39-55.
Durosaro M.S., Oyetade B.M., Ilori A.S., Adenaike O., Olowfeso M., Wheto S.A. and Amus S.O. (2013). Estimation of body weight of Nigerian local turkeys from zoometrical measurements at 4,8 and 12 weeks of weight. Glob. J. Sci. Front. Res. 13(1), 1-5.
Francis J., Sibanda S., Hermansen J. and Kristrerrsen T.E. (2002). Estimating body weight of cattle using linear body measurements. Zimbabwe Vet. J. 33, 15-21.
Huang G.B., Zhou H., Ding X. and Zhang R. (2011). Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B. 42(2), 513-529.
Huma Z.E. and Iqbal F. (2019). Predicting the body weight of Balochi sheep using a machine learning approach. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 43, 500-506.
Iqbal Z.M., Javed K., Abdollah M., Ahmad N., Ali A., Khalique A., Aslamand N. and Younas U. (2014). Estimation of body weight from different morphometric measurement in Kali lambs. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 24(3), 700-703.
Kadim I.T., Mahgoub O. and Purchas R.W. (2008). A review of the growth and the carcass and meat quality characteristics of the one humped camel. Meat Sci. 80(3), 555-569.
Khojastehkey M., Abbasi M.A., Akbari Sharif A. and Hassani A.M. (2016). Estimating the weight of new born lambs using digital images processing. Anim. Sci. J. (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi). 29(112), 99-104.
Khojastehkey M., Jafari Arvari A., Yeganehparast M., Asadzadeh N. and Khaki M. (2019). Biometric measurement of one-humped camels using machine vision technology. J. Rumin. Res. 7(1), 19-32.
Kohler-Rollefson I., Mundy P. and Mathias E. (2001). A Field Manual of Camel Diseases. Intermediate Technology Group Publishing, London, United Kingdom.
Kuhn M. (2012). The Caret Package. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://cran. r-project. org/package=caret.
Mahmud M.A., Shaba P. and Zubairu U.Y. (2014). Live body weight estimation in small ruminants-A review. Glob. J. Anim. Sci. Res. 2(2), 102-108.
Mehta S.C., Bapna D.L. and Bhure S.K. (2010). Mathematical function of growth in India dromedary genotypes. J. Biopest. 80(2), 148-151.
Norouzian M.A. and Vakili M. (2016). Comparison of artificial neural network and multiple regression to estimate fat tail weight of sheep. Iranian J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 4(6), 895-900.
Refaeilzadeh P., Lei T. and Huan L. (2009). Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, New York.
Saberioon M.M., Císar P., Labbé L., Souˇcek P., Pelissier P. and Kerneis T. (2018). Comparative performance analysis of support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression and k-nearest neighbours in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) classification using image-based features. Sensors. 18, 1027- 1042.
Salau J., Haas J., Junge W., Bauer U., Harms J. and Bieletzki S. (2014). Feasibility of automated body trait determination using the SR4K time-of-flight camera in cow barns. Springer Plus. 3(1), 225-239.
Tsegaye D., Belay B. and Haile A. (2013). Linear body measurement as predictor of body weight in Haraghe Highland goat under farmers environment Ethiopia. Glob. Vet. 11(5), 649-656.
Van der Heide E.M.M., Veerkamp R.F., van Pelt M.L., Kamphuis C., Athanasiadis I. and Ducro B.J. (2019). Comparing regression, naive Bayes, and random forest methods in the prediction of individual survival to second lactation in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 102, 9409-9421.
Wangchuk K., Wangdi J. and Mindu M. (2017). Comparison and reliability of techniques to estimate live cattle body weight. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 46(1), 1-4.
White B.J., Amrine D.E. and Larson R.L. (2018). Big data analytics and precision animal agriculture symposium: Data to decisions. J. Anim. Sci. 96, 1531-1539.
