Nano-Alumina Effects on Lepidium draba: Morphological Properties, H2O2 Scavenging Enzymes Activity, Content of Sulforaphane and Flavonoid, and Bioaccumulation of Aluminum

محورهای موضوعی : Biochemistry

Leila Esmaeeli ¹ , Ali Riahi-Madvar ² , Mojtaba Mortazavi ³ , Kiarash Jamshidi Goharrizi ⁴

1 - Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and High Technology, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
2 - Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Kosar University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran
3 - Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran.
4 - Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, California, USA.

تاریخ دریافت : 1402/11/09 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/12/17 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/06/17

کلید واژه: bioavailability, catalase, peroxidase, nanoparticle, Antioxidant system,

چکیده مقاله :

Nanoparticles have broad applications in various industries, that it can be expected them find a way to enter into the environment and affected the living organism with unexpected consequences. Alumina nanoparticle is one of the most applicable nanoparticles, so in this study we assesed its effects on Lepidium draba plant. Some morphological and biochemical characteristics of the 7-day-old seedlings that were grown in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 0, 25, 50, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/L particles were measured in compared to the bulk form. The results revealed that nano and bulk particles lead to decreasing the seed germination rate and the root and shoot elongation, such that in the highest concentration, it was more significant by the nanoparticle. While sulforaphane contents decreased approximately the same for the nano- and bulk alumina treated seedlings, the flavonoid content increased by the increase in particles concentrations in media, but it was more significant by the nanoparticle. While the peroxidase activity significantly increases only in the presence of nanoparticle, the catalase activity significantly increased in the treated seedlings by both particles, that it was more significant by the nanoparticle. Based on the bioaccumulation data, aluminum can be absorbed by the roots and transported to the shoots from both media, but maximized by nano. Overall, it may be concluded that oxidative stress upon absorbed of these particles is responsible for decreasing more the plant growth in the presence of nanoparticles than bulk ones.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Nanoparticles have broad applications in various industries, that it can be expected them find a way to enter into the environment and affected the living organism with unexpected consequences. Alumina nanoparticle is one of the most applicable nanoparticles, so in this study we assesed its effects on Lepidium draba plant. Some morphological and biochemical characteristics of the 7-day-old seedlings that were grown in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 0, 25, 50, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/L particles were measured in compared to the bulk form. The results revealed that nano and bulk particles lead to decreasing the seed germination rate and the root and shoot elongation, such that in the highest concentration, it was more significant by the nanoparticle. While sulforaphane contents decreased approximately the same for the nano- and bulk alumina treated seedlings, the flavonoid content increased by the increase in particles concentrations in media, but it was more significant by the nanoparticle. While the peroxidase activity significantly increases only in the presence of nanoparticle, the catalase activity significantly increased in the treated seedlings by both particles, that it was more significant by the nanoparticle. Based on the bioaccumulation data, aluminum can be absorbed by the roots and transported to the shoots from both media, but maximized by nano. Overall, it may be concluded that oxidative stress upon absorbed of these particles is responsible for decreasing more the plant growth in the presence of nanoparticles than bulk ones.

منابع و مأخذ:

Akdemir, H. 2021. Evaluation of transcription factor and aquaporin gene expressions in response to Al2O3 and ZnO nanoparticles during barley germination. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 166, 466-476.
Aminizadeh, M., A. Riahi-Madvar, M. Mohammadi, 2014. Effects of iron and cupper ions on sulforaphane content and peroxidase activity in Lepidium draba seedlings. Ethno-Pharmaceutical Products 1(1), 8-14.
Aminizadeh, M., A. Riahi-Madvar, M. Mohammadi, 2016. Nano-Metal oxides induced sulforaphane production and peroxidase activity in seedlings of Lepidium draba (Brassicaceae). Progress in Biological Sciences, 6(1 ):75-83.
Amirkhanlou, S. and S. Ji. 2020. A review on high stiffness aluminum-based composites and bimetallics. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, 45, (1) 1-21.
Avellan, A., J. Yun, B. P. Morais, E. T. Clement, S. M. Rodrigues and G. V. Lowry. 2021. Critical review: Role of inorganic nanoparticle properties on their foliar uptake and in planta translocation. Environmental science & technology, 55, (20) 13417-13431.
Baruah, S. and J. Dutta, 2009. Nanotechnology applications in pollution sensing and degradation in agriculture: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 7(3), 191-204.
Behra, R. and H. Krug, 2008. Nanoparticles at large. Nature nanotechnology 3, 253.carried out for ECETOC. Part Fibre Toxicol 3, 11.
Bhat, R. and D. Vyas. 2019. Myrosinase: insights on structural, catalytic, regulatory, and environmental interactions. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 39, (4) 508-523.
Brunner, T.J., P. Wick, P. Manser, P. Spohn, R. N. Grass, L. K. Limbach, A. Bruinink and W. J. Stark, 2006. In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol 40(14), 4374-4381.
Cárcamo-Fincheira, P., M. Reyes-Díaz, R. P. Omena-García, J. R. Vargas, M. Alvear, I. Florez-Sarasa, L. Rosado-Souza, Z. Rengel, A. R. Fernie and A. Nunes-Nesi. 2021. Metabolomic analyses of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cultivars revealed mechanisms of resistance to aluminum toxicity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 183, 104338.
Chandlee, J.M., A. S. Tsaftaris and J. G. Scandalios, 1983. Purification and partial characterization of three genetically defined catalases of maize. Plant Science Letters 29(2), 117-131.
Chehregani, A. and B. E. Malayeri, 2007. Removal of heavy metals by native accumulator plants. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 9(3):462-465.
Chen, L.S., Y. P. Qi and X. H. Liu, 2005. Effects of aluminum on light energy utilization and photoprotective systems in citrus leaves. Ann Bot 96(1), 35-41.
Chhajed, S., I. Mostafa, Y. He, M. Abou-Hashem, M. El-Domiaty and S. Chen. 2020. Glucosinolate biosynthesis and the glucosinolate–myrosinase system in plant defense. Agronomy, 10, (11) 1786.
Delhaize, E. and P. R. Ryan, 1995. Aluminum Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants. Plant physiology 107(2), 315-321.
Dhindsa, R.S., P. Plumb-Dhindsa and T. A. Thorpe, 1981. Leaf Senescence: Correlated with Increased Levels of Membrane Permeability and Lipid Peroxidation, and Decreased Levels of Superoxide Dismutase and Catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany 32(1), 93-101.
Dimkpa, C.O.,U. Singh, P. S. Bindraban, I. O. Adisa, W. H. Elmer, J.L. Gardea-Torresdey and J. C. White, 2019. Addition-omission of zinc, copper, and boron nano and bulk oxide particles demonstrate element and size -specific response of soybean to micronutrients exposure. Science of The Total Environment 665, 606-616.
Divyapriya, G., S. Rathinavelu, R. Srinivasan and I. M. Nambi. 2022. Advanced Treatment Technologies to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Urban Wastewater. Legacy and Emerging Contaminants in Water and Wastewater: Monitoring, Risk Assessment and Remediation Techniques, 291-321.
Đulović, A., F. Burčul, V. Č. Čulić, M. Ruščić, P. Brzović, S. Montaut, P. Rollin and I. Blažević. 2021. Lepidium graminifolium L.: glucosinolate profile and antiproliferative potential of volatile isolates. Molecules, 26, (17) 5183.
Exbrayat, J.M., E. N. Moudilou and E. Lapied, 2015. Harmful Effects of Nanoparticles on Animals. Journal of Nanotechnology 2015, 10.
Filaček, A., M. Živčák, L. Ferroni, M. Barboričová, K. Gašparovič, X. Yang, M. Landi and M. Brestič. 2022. Pre-acclimation to elevated temperature stabilizes the activity of photosystem I in wheat plants exposed to an episode of severe heat stress. Plants, 11, (5) 616.
Frantzios, G.,B. Galatis and P. Apostolakos, 2001. Aluminum Effects on Microtubule Organization in Dividing Root-Tip Cells of Triticum turgidum. II. Cytokinetic Cells. Journal of Plant Research 114(2), 157-170.
Hajiboland, R., C. K. Panda, O. Lastochkina, M. A. Gavassi, G. Habermann and J. F. Pereira. 2023. Aluminum toxicity in plants: Present and future. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 42, (7) 3967-3999.
Han, D. and K. H. Row, 2011. Separation and purification of sulforaphane from broccoli by solid phase extraction. International journal of molecular sciences 12(3), 1854-1861.
Handy, R.D.,R. Owen and E. Valsami-Jones, 2008. The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology 17(5), 315-325.
Hayes, K. L., J. Mui, B. Song, E. S. Sani, S. W. Eisenman, J. B. Sheffield and B. Kim. 2020. Effects, uptake, and translocation of aluminum oxide nanoparticles in lettuce: A comparison study to phytotoxic aluminum ions. Science of the Total Environment, 719, 137393.
Jamshidi Goharrizi, K., F. Fatehi, M. Nazari, F. Salehi and M. Maleki. 2020. Assessment of changes in the content of sulforaphane and expression levels of CYP79F1 and myrosinase genes and proteomic profile of Lepidium draba plant under water-deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol. Acta physiologiae plantarum, 42, 1-18.
Jiang, W., H. Mashayekhi and B. Xing, 2009. Bacterial toxicity comparison between nano- and micro-scaled oxide particles. Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) 157(5), 1619-1625.
Jośko, I., M. Kusiak, B. Xing and P. Oleszczuk. 2021. Combined effect of nano-CuO and nano-ZnO in plant-related system: From bioavailability in soil to transcriptional regulation of metal homeostasis in barley. Journal of hazardous materials, 416, 126230.
Kah, M., N. Tufenkji, and J. C. White,2019. Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nature nanotechnology 14(6), 532-540.
Kargozar, S. and M. Mozafari. 2018. Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine: Start small, think big. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5, (7) 15492-15500.
Kato, M. and S. Shimizu, 1985. Chlorophyll Metabolism in Higher Plants VI. Involvement of Peroxidase in Chlorophyll Degradation. Plant and Cell Physiology 26(7), 1291-1301.
Khan, I., K. Saeed and I. Khan, 2017. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 12(7): 908-931.
Khan, M., M. S. A. Khan, K. K. Borah, Y. Goswami, K. R. Hakeem and I. Chakrabartty. 2021. The potential exposure and hazards of metal-based nanoparticles on plants and environment, with special emphasis on ZnO NPs, TiO2 NPs, and AgNPs: a review. Environmental Advances, 6, 100128.
Kleinstreuer, C. and J. Li, 2008. Discussion: Effects of Various Parameters on Nano fluid Thermal Conductivity(Jang, SP, and Choi, SDS, 2007, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 129, pp. 617–623). Journal of Heat Transfer 130(2), 025501.
Krizek, D.T.,S. J. Britz and R. M. Mirecki, 1998. Inhibitory effects of ambient levels of solar UV-A and UV-B radiation on growth of cv. New Red Fire lettuce. Physiologia Plantarum 103(1), 1-7.
Laoué, J., C. Fernandez and E. Ormeño. 2022. Plant flavonoids in mediterranean species: A focus on flavonols as protective metabolites under climate stress. Plants, 11, (2) 172.
Lee, An, Y.J., H. Yoon, and H. S. Kweon, 2008. Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environmental toxicology and chemistry 27(9), 1915-1921.
Liang, H., Q. Yuan and Q. Xiao, 2006. Effects of metal ions on myrosinase activity and the formation of sulforaphane in broccoli seed. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 43(1), 19-22.
Lichtenthaler, H.K., 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes, Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press, pp. 350-382.
Liu, W., F. Xu, T. Lv, W. Zhou, Y. Chen, C. Jin, L. Lu and X. Lin. 2018. Spatial responses of antioxidative system to aluminum stress in roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 462-469.
Lowry, G.V.,A. Avellan and L. M. Gilbertson, 2019. Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution. Nature nanotechnology 14(6), 517-522.
Mangla, B., S. Javed, M. H. Sultan, P. Kumar, K. Kohli, A. Najmi, H. A. Alhazmi, M. Al Bratty and W. Ahsan. 2021. Sulforaphane: A review of its therapeutic potentials, advances in its nanodelivery, recent patents, and clinical trials. Phytotherapy Research, 35, (10) 5440-5458.
Marienfeld, S., N. Schmohl, M. Klein, W. H. Schröder, A. J. Kuhn and W. J. Horst, 2000. Localization of Aluminum in Root Tips of Zea mays and Vicia faba. Journal of Plant Physiology 156(5), 666-671.
Meng, X., W.-W. Chen, Y.-Y. Wang, Z.-R. Huang, X. Ye, L.-S. Chen and L.-T. Yang. 2021. Effects of phosphorus deficiency on the absorption of mineral nutrients, photosynthetic system performance and antioxidant metabolism in Citrus grandis. PloS one, 16, (2) e0246944.
Muhammad, I., A. Shalmani, M. Ali, Q.-H. Yang, H. Ahmad and F. B. Li. 2021. Mechanisms regulating the dynamics of photosynthesis under abiotic stresses. Frontiers in plant science, 11, 615942.
Mukherjee, A., J. R. Peralta-Videa, J. Gardea-Torresdey and J. C. White, 2016. Effects and uptake of nanoparticles in plants. Engineered nanoparticles and the environment: biophysicochemical processes and toxicity. Wiley, Hoboken.
Murashige, T. and F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia plantarum 15(3), 473-497.
Nair, R., 2016. Effects of Nanoparticles on Plant Growth and Development. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Nhan le, V., C. Ma, Y. Rui, S. Liu, X. Li, B. Xing and L. Liu, 2015. Phytotoxic Mechanism of Nanoparticles: Destruction of Chloroplasts and Vascular Bundles and Alteration of Nutrient Absorption. Sci Rep, 5, 11618.
Pagano, L., F. Pasquali, S. Majumdar, R. De la Torre-Roche, N. Zuverza-Mena, M. Villani, A. Zappettini, R. E. Marra, S. M. Isch and M. Marmiroli, 2017. Exposure of Cucurbita pepo to binary combinations of engineered nanomaterials: physiological and molecular response. Environmental Science: Nano 4(7), 1579-1590.
Pagano, L.,A. D. Servin, R. De La Torre-Roche,A. Mukherjee, S. Majumdar, J. Hawthorne, M. Marmiroli, E. Maestri, R. E. Marra, S. M. Isch, O.P. Dhankher, J.C. White and N. Marmiroli, 2016. Molecular Response of Crop Plants to Engineered Nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology 50(13), 7198-7207.
Panakkal, H., I. Gupta, R. Bhagat and A. P. Ingle. 2021. Effects of different metal oxide nanoparticles on plant growth. Nanotechnology in Plant Growth Promotion and Protection: Recent Advances and Impacts, 259-282.
Perreault, F.,S. P. Melegari, C.F. Fuzinatto, N. Bogdan, M. Morin, R. Popovic and W.G. Matias, 2014. Toxicity of PAMAM-coated gold nanoparticles in different unicellular models. Environ Toxicol 29(3), 328-336.
Plewa, M.J., S. R. Smith and E. D. Wagner, 1991. Diethyldithiocarbamate suppresses the plant activation of aromatic amines into mutagens by inhibiting tobacco cell peroxidase. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 247(1), 57-64.
Radchuk, V. and L. Borisjuk, 2014. Physical, metabolic and developmental functions of the seed coat. Frontiers in plant science 5, 510-510.
Rajput, V. D., Harish, R. K. Singh, K. K. Verma, L. Sharma, F. R. Quiroz-Figueroa, M. Meena, V. S. Gour, T. Minkina and S. Sushkova. 2021. Recent developments in enzymatic antioxidant defence mechanism in plants with special reference to abiotic stress. Biology, 10, (4) 267.
Riahi-Madvar, A., F. Rezaee and V. Jalali, 2012. Effects of alumina nanoparticles on morphological properties and antioxidant system of Triticum aestivum. Plant Physiology 3(1), 595-603.
Riedl, M.A.,A. Saxon and D. Diaz-Sanchez, 2009. Oral sulforaphane increases Phase II antioxidant enzymes in the human upper airway. Clin Immunol 130(3), 244-251.
Roco, M.C., 2003. Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 14(3), 337-346.
Sajid, M., M. Ilyas, C. Basheer, M. Tariq, M. Daud, N. Baig and F. Shehzad, 2015. Impact of nanoparticles on human and environment: review of toxicity factors, exposures, control strategies, and future prospects. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(6), 4122-4143.
Shabnam, N. and H. Kim, 2018. Non-toxicity of nano alumina: A case on mung bean seedlings. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 165, 423-433.
Shakour, Z. T., N. G. Shehab, A. S. Gomaa, L. A. Wessjohann and M. A. Farag. 2022. Metabolic and biotransformation effects on dietary glucosinolates, their bioavailability, catabolism and biological effects in different organisms. Biotechnology advances, 54, 107784.
Shrestha, S., B. Wang and P. Dutta. 2020. Nanoparticle processing: Understanding and controlling aggregation. Advances in colloid and interface science, 279, 102162.
Silva, I.R., T. J. Smyth, D. F. Moxley, T. E. Carter, N. S. Allen and T. W. Rufty, 2000. Aluminum accumulation at nuclei of cells in the root tip. Fluorescence detection using lumogallion and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Plant physiology 123(2), 543-552.
Wang, X., C. Sun, S. Gao, L. Wang and H. Shuokui, 2001. Validation of germination rate and root elongation as indicator to assess phytotoxicity with Cucumis sativus. Chemosphere 44(8), 1711-1721.
White, J.C. and J. Gardea-Torresdey, 2018. Achieving food security through the very small. Nature nanotechnology 13(8), 627-629.
Xinghui, L., R. Periakaruppan, R. Mohanraj and S. Dhanasekaran. 2023. Nanometal Oxides in Horticulture and Agronomy. Elsevier.
Yan, L., M. Riaz, J. Liu, M. Yu and J. Cuncang. 2022. The aluminum tolerance and detoxification mechanisms in plants; recent advances and prospects. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 52, (9) 1491-1527.
Yadav, V., N. Arif, J. Kováč, V. P. Singh, D. K. Tripathi, D. K. Chauhan and M. Vaculík. 2021. Structural modifications of plant organs and tissues by metals and metalloids in the environment: A review. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 159, 100-112
Yang, L. and D. J. Watts, 2005. Particle surface characteristics may play an important role in phytotoxicity of alumina nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett 158(2), 122-132.
Yeshi, K., D. Crayn, E. Ritmejerytė and P. Wangchuk. 2022. Plant secondary metabolites produced in response to abiotic stresses has potential application in pharmaceutical product development. Molecules, 27, (1) 313.
You, R., C. Domínguez, V. Matamoros, J. M. Bayona and S. Díez. 2019. Chemical characterization and phytotoxicity assessment of peri-urban soils using seed germination and root elongation tests. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 34401-34411.

Zafar, H., A. Ali, J. S. Ali, I. U. Haq and M. Zia, 2016. Effect of ZnO Nanoparticles on Brassica nigra Seedlings and Stem Explants: Growth Dynamics and Antioxidative Response. Frontiers in Plant Science 7(535).
Zhou, P.,L. Su, A. Lv, S. Wang, B. Huang and Y. An, 2016. Gene Expression Analysis of Alfalfa Seedlings Response to Acid-Aluminum. International Journal of Genomics 2016, 13.