ارزیابی زیست پذیری شهری در کلانشهر مشهد با تاکید بر شاخص حمل و نقل
محورهای موضوعی : مطالعات برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ایمحمد قنبری 1 , محمد اجزاء شکوهی 2 , محمد رحیم رهنما 3 , امید علی خوارزمی 4
1 - رئیس گروه تحول و بهبود فرآیندهای شهرداری مشهد و دانش آموخته دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
3 - استاد گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
4 - استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
کلید واژه: حمل و نقل, زیست پذیری شهری, شاخص عینی و ذهنی, کلانشهر مشهد,
چکیده مقاله :
امروزه عوامل متعددی در زیست پذیری یک مکان تأثیر دارند که از جمله آن‌ها می‌توان به حمل ونقل، حضور مردم، اختلاط کاربری، مسکن، ایمنی و امنیت، حس تعلق، کارایی و پاکیزگی محیطی و... اشاره کرد. موضوع حمل و نقل به طور بالقوه بازتابی از اهمیتی است که حمل و نقل در زندگی روزمره ایفا می‌کند. حمل و نقل برای یک جامعه عملگرا لازم است از آنجایی که مردم را قادر می‌سازد به اشتغال، تحصیلات، مواد غذایی، بهداشت و خدمات اجتماعی و دیدار با خانواده و دوستان دسترسی داشته باشند. هدف اصلی این پژوهش تحلیل زیست پذیری شهری کلانشهر مشهد با تاکید بر شاخص حمل و نقل می‌باشد. روش تحقیق این پژوهش به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و به لحاظ روش، توصیفی- تحلیلی می‌باشد. با استفاده از نرم افزار GIS نقشه‌های مربوط به وضعیت هر کدام از زیر شاخص‌های عینی براساس محدوده مناطق کلانشهر مشهد ترسیم گردیده است. برای شاخص ذهنی که دارای 6 گویه است، از پرسشنامه استفاده گردید. حجم نمونه در کل مناطق شهر مشهد برابر با 402 نفر بوده است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که منطقه 11 کلانشهر مشهد، بهترین منطقه از نظر شاخص حمل و نقل می‌باشد. پس از منطقه 11، مناطق 1 و 8 به لحاظ حمل و نقل دارای بهترین شرایط می‌باشند. بدترین منطقه هم به لحاظ حمل و نقل، به ترتیب مناطق 6، 5 و 2 می‌باشند. حدود 54 درصد مناطق شهر مشهد در سطح بسیار نامطلوب حمل و نقل به لحاظ زیست پذیری شهری قرار دارند.
Nowdays, multiple factors affect the livability of a place, of which can note transportion, the presence of people, mixed use, housing, safety and security, sense of belonging, efficiency and the environment. The subject of transportation is potentially a reflection of the importance transport plays in day-to-day life. transportation is necessary for a functioning society as it enables people to access employment, education, food, health and social services, and meet with family and friends. The main goal of this research is the analysis of urban livability with emphasis on transportation indicator in Mashhad metropolis. The research method of this research is practical in terms of goal, and is descriptive – analytical in terms of methodology. By using the GIS Software, maps related to the status of each of objective sub-indicators based on the limits of Mashhad metropolis's zones were drawn. For mental indicator, which includes 6 questions, questionnaire was used for a sample size of 402 persons in all zones of Mashhad. The results of this research show the zone 11 of Mashhad metropolis is the best zone in terms of transportation indicator, followed by zones 1 and 8, respectively. By contrast, zones 6, 5 and 2 had the worst conditions in terms of transportation indicator, respectively. About 54 % of Mashhad's zones are at transportation very unfavorable level with respect to the urban livability.
AARP Public Policy Institute. (2005). livable communities and evaluation guide, Public Policy Institute, Washington.
Abbaszadeh, Gh.R. (2016). Transition from sprawl to compact city from corridor development along path 1 urban train of Mashhad, Ph.D thesis of Geography and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian).
Akbari, H. Taheri, A. Seghateleslami, E. & Naghizadeh, M. (2011). The theory of transport oriented development and criteria for identifying and investigating the potential of its centers (case study: the path 1 of urban train of Mashhad city). National conference of sustainable development and urban development, Isfahan. (In Persian).
Amir, A.L. Puspitaningtyas, A. & Santosa, H.R. (2015). Dwellers Participation to Achieve Livable Housing in Grudo Rental Flats. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 179, 165-175.
Badland, H. Whitzman, C. Lowe, M. Davern, M. Aye, L. Butterworth, I. Hes, and Giles-Corti, B (2014). Urban livability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 111, 64-73.
Badri, S.A. & Taeibi, S. (2012). Factors affecting the costs of religious tourism: A case study of Mashhad, Iran. Journal of tourism planning and development. 1(1), 153-177. (In Persian).
Bandar Abad, A.R (2010). Codification of principles of spatial development pattern and Iranian form of livable city, Case study: zones 1, 15 and 22 of Tehran. Ph.D. thesis of urbanism, Islamic Azad University. (In Persian).
Beaglehole, R. Bonita, R. Horton, R. Adams, C. Alleyne, G. & Asaria, P. (2011). Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis, The Lancet, 377. 1438-1447.
Blassingame, L. (1998). Sustainable cities: oxymoron, utopia or inevitability? Social science Journal, 35, 1-13.
Consult engineering of sustainable movement. (2008). bicycling Integrated System Studies of Mashhad. Report of the first stage, sections 1, 2 and 3. Deputy of transportation and traffic of Mashhad Municipality. (In Persian).
Deputy of planning and development of Mashhad Municipality. (2013). Statistical Yearbook of Mashhad in 1392. Mashhad Municipality. (In Persian).
Deputy of transportation and traffic of Mashhad Municipality. (2013). 9th Statistical Yearbook of transportation of Mashhad city, Deputy of studies and planning of transportation and traffic organization of Mashhad Municipality, Mashhad Municipality. (In Persian).
Evans, P. (2002). Livable cities: urban struggle for livelihood and sustainability. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ewing, R. & Cervero, R. (2001). Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780. 87-114.
Ewing, R. Schieber, R. & Zegeer, C. (2003). Urban sprawl as a risk factor in motor
vehicle occupant and pedestrian fatalities. American Journal of Public Health, 93. 1541-1545.
Flynn, P. Berry, D. & Theodore, H. (2002). Sustainability & quality of life indicators: towards the integration of economic, social and environmental measure, The journal of social health, 4 (2), 1-23.
Gehl, J. (2001). Life between Building: using public space. Washington: - Covelo - London: Island Press.
Ghanbari, M. (2017). Livability, A new approach in urban planning (case study: Mashhad metropolis). Ph.D Thesis, Mashhad, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian).
Haji Nejhad, A. Rafieian, M. & Zamani, H. (2011). Assessment and Ranking of the Effective Factores on level of Citizen Satisfaction with Environmental Quality of Life (Case Study: Old and New Urban Pattern of Shiraz City). Human Geography Research Quarterly, 43 (77), 129-143. (In Persian).
Hayati, S. (2012). The analysis of smart city indicators in Mashhad. MA. Thesis of geography and urban planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian).
Khastoo, M. & Saeedi Rezvani, N. (2010). The Effective Factors on Urban Spaces Vitality (Creating a Lively Urban Space with Emphasizing the Concept “Pedestrian Mall”). Identity Journal, 4 (6), 63-74. (In Persian).
Larice, M.Z. (2005). Great neighborhood: the livability and morphology of high density neighborhoods in urban North America, PhD thesis in University of California, Berkeley.
Lau Leby, J. & Hashim, A.H. (2010). Liveability dimensions and attributes: their relative importance in the eyes of neighbourhood residents. Journal of construction in developing countries, 15 (1), 67-91.
Leby, L.J & Hashim, A.H. (2010). Liveability dimensions and attributes: their relative importance in the eyes of neighbourhood residents. Journal of construction in developing countries, 15 (1). 67-91.
Litman, T. & Burwell, D. (2007). Issues in sustainable transportation. International Journal of Global Environmental, 6 (4). 331-347.
Lowe, M. Whitzman, C. Badland, H.M. Davern, M. Hes, D. Aye, L. Butterworth, I. Giles-Corti, B (2013). Liveable, Healthy, Sustainable: What are the Key Indicators for Melbourne Neighbourhoods? McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne University.
Madani, P. (2013). Dealing with segregation, improving livability in a segregated neighborhood, Ms Thesis, Department of urbanism and building sciences, Faculty of Architecture, TU Delft.
Mccrea, R. & Walters, P. (2012). Impacts of Urban Consolidation on Urban Liveability:
Comparing an Inner and Outer Suburb in Brisbane, Australia, Housing, Theory and society Journal, 2 (29), 190-206.
Momeni, M. Sarafi, M & Ghasemi khuzani, M. (2008). The Structure and Function of Religious-Cultural Tourism and the Necessity of Integrated Management in Mashhad Metropolis. Journal of Geography and Development, 6 (11), 13-38. (In Persian).
Mosavi Noor, S.A. Varesi, H.R. & Mohammadi, J. (2016). Evaluation and analysis of viability in 22 districts of Tehran Metropolis. Geogrphy Journal, 14 (51), 237-258. (In Persian).
Norris, T. & Pittman, M. (2000). The health community’s movement and coalition for healthier cities and communities. Public Health Reports, 115, 118-124.
Shaharudin, I. Abdul, S. Abdul Hadi, H. & Ahmad Fariz, M. (2008). Spatial urban metabolism for livable city. Blueprints for Sustainable Infrastructure Conference, 9-12 December 2008 Auckland, New Zealands.
Soleimani Mehrenjani, M. Tavallai, S. Rafieian, M. Zanganeh, A. & Khazaei Nezhad. F. (2016). Urban Livability: Concept, Principles, Aspects and Parameters, Journal of Geography and urban planning research, 1 (4), N.1, 27-50.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2015). A Summary of the Liveability Ranking and Overview, London, England.
Van Dorst, M. (2010). Sustainable liveability: Privacy zoning as a physical condition for social sustainability, in Environment, health, and sustainable development, A. Abdel-Hadi, M. Tolba, and S. Soliman, Editors. Hogrefe Publishing: Cambridge, MA. Pp. 111-125.
Vanzerrr, M & Seskin, S. (2011). Recommendations Memo #2 Livability and Quality of Life Indicators, Memorandum.
Williams, C. Zhou, N. He, G & Levine, M. (2012). Measuring in All the Right Places: Themes in International Municipal Eco-City Index Systems, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1-15.
Wilson, G. & Baldassare, M. (1996). Overall ‘sense of community’ in a suburban region: the effects of localism, privacy and urbanization. Environment and Behavior, 28. 27-43.
Young, D. (2013). Universal design and livable communities. Home and community health special interest section Quarterly/American occupation therapy association. 20 (1), Pp. 1-4.
_||_
