• صفحه اصلی
  • Application of SEM Analysis for Designing Strategic Model for Agricultural Sustainable Development (ASD) in Iran

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : IJASRT-2303-1266 (R1) بازدید : 135 صفحه: 87 - 102

20.1001.1.22517588.2023.13.2.3.1

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

Application of SEM Analysis for Designing Strategic Model for Agricultural Sustainable Development (ASD) in Iran

محورهای موضوعی : Extension of Sustainability

Keivan Torfi 1 (Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran)
Ahmad Reza Ommani 2 (Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran)
Azadeh Noorollah Noorivandi 3 (Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran)
Mohammadsadegh Sabouri 4 (Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/12/13 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/04/09 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/04/09

کلید واژه: strategy, Iran, SEM, Sustainable Agricultural Development,

چکیده مقاله :

The main purpose of this study is identifying strategies for agricultural sustainable development in Iran. This research is a mixed exploratory research and has been carried out in a combination of qualitative and quantitative parts. In the qualitative part, various methods such as semi-structured interviews and focus group techniques were used. In a quantitative part, the population of the study consisted of wheat farmers of Khouzestan province, Iran. The stratified random sampling method was selected as the research sampling method. In order to formulate strategic planning, the model of analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) was used. Also, in the quantitative part of the research through Structural Equation Model (SEM), the role of the identified strategies was evaluated and the designed model was approved. Based on the results, it can be found that the predictive positive effect of WO1 (β=0.512, t-value=3.453, p<0.001), WO2 (β=0.533, t-value=3.516, p<0.001), WO3 (β=0.581, t-value=4.129, p<0.001), WO4 (β=0.916, t-value=5.821, p<0.001), WO5 (β=0.861, t-value=4.523, p<0.001), WO6 (β=0.823, t-value=5.123, p<0.001), WO7 (β=0.694, t-value=5.212, p<0.001), WO8 (β=0.761, t-value=4.928, p<0.001), WO9 (β=0.832, t-value=5.257, p<0.001) and WO10 (β=0.621, t-value=4.153, p<0.001) on the ASD. Based on the results, the amount of R2=0.74 was estimated. This indicates that 10 strategies and 34 construct have the ability to explain 74% of the ASD variance. Based on the results obtained, the overall goodness of the fitting statistics showed that the structural model is well consistent with the data. The designed strategic plan can play an effective role in the sustainable development of agriculture.

چکیده انگلیسی:

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Aare, A. K., Lund, S., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. (2021). Exploring transitions towards sustainable farming practices through participatory research – The case of Danish farmers' use of species mixtures, Agricultural Systems, Volume 189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103053.
    2.
  2. Abdeshahi, A., Mardani Najafabadi, M., Zeinali, M. (2020). Determining the Optimal Cropping Pattern of Agricultural Crops in Mollasani Coumty of Iran: Application of Robust Multi-Objective Optimization Model. Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(3), 175-203. doi: 10.30490/aead.2020.304989.1090
    3.
  3. Ag News. (2020). Iran pesticide production up 31% in eight months. Retrives 20 Juanary 2020 Frome: http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---33612.htm
    4.
  4. Alam, A. S. A. F., Begum, H., Masud, M. M., Al-Amin, A., and Filho, W. L. (2020). Agriculture insurance for disaster risk reduction: A case study of Malaysia, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume 47, ISSN 2212-4209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101626.
    5.
  5. Amanpour, S., Abiyat, M., abiyat, M., Abiyat, M. (2021). Investigation of the Effect of Land Use Change on Soil Erosion and Sediment Production in Ramhormoz Basin Using Object-Oriented Classification and RUSLE Model. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(3), 635-649. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2021.316628.668863
    6.
  6. Arcolin, I., Godi, M., & Corna, S. (2021). Which model best assesses gait in healthy elderly? A confirmatory factor analysis of existing conceptual gait models, Gait & Posture, in press, ISSN 0966-6362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.10.007.
    7.
  7. Ataei P, Sadighi H, Aenis T, Chizari M, Abbasi E. (2021). Challenges of Applying Conservation Agriculture in Iran: An Overview on Experts and Farmers’ Perspectives. Air, Soil and Water Research. January 2021. doi:10.1177/1178622120980022
    8.
  8. Bani Assadi, N., Samari, D., Farajollah Hosseini, S. J., & Omidi Najafabadi, M. (2021). Development model for palm processing industries with emphasis on total innovation management https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07587.
    9.
  9. Berthet, E. T., Hickey, G. M & Klerkx, L. (2018). Opening design and innovation processes in agriculture: Insights from design and management sciences and future directions, Agricultural Systems, Volume 165, Pages 111-115,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.06.004.
    10.
  10. Branko, M., Zoran, S., & Tomislav, B. (2018). Strategic Planning of Sustainable Development of Agriculture of Lajkovac Municipality, Ekonomika Poljoprivrede; Belgrade Vol. 65, Issue 2, (2018): 475-491. DOI:10.5937/ekoPolj1802475M
    11.
  11. Bull, J.W., Jobstvogt, n., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Mascarenhas, a., Sitas, N., Baulcomb, C., Lambini, C. K. et al. (2016). Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework, Ecosystem Services, 17, 99-111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.012.
    12.
  12. Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Janzen, C. and Maginnis, S. (2016). Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xiii+97pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en.
    13.
  13. Development Context: A Polish Case Study. Energies, 14, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144208
    14.
  14. Doulabian, S., Shadmehri Toosi, A., Calbimonte, G., Ghasemi Tousi, E., & Alaghmand, S. (2021). Projected climate change impacts on soil erosion over Iran, Journal of Hydrology, Volume 598, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126432.
    15.
  15. (2020). World Food and Agriculture - Statistical Yearbook 2020. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1329en
    16.
  16. Gaurav, S., and Chaudhary, V. (2021). Do farmers care about basis risk? Evidence from a field experiment in India, Climate Risk Management, Volume 27, ISSN 2212-0963, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2019.100201.
    17.
  17. Geography and Sustainability, Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 99-106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.001.
    18.
  18. Gorji Kheili, H.A.; Mirdamadi, S.M.; Omidi Najafabadi, M. (2019). Ways of reducing environmental hazards of chemical waste intakes from the viewpoints of Agri-Jihad and Environment Organization experts in the city of Sari. Agric. Educ. Res. 2019, 12, 1–14.
    19.
  19. Grivins, M., Thorse, M. H., & Maye, D. (2021). Financial subjectivities in the agricultural sector: A comparative analysis of relations between farmers and banks in Latvia, Denmark and the UK, Journal of Rural Studies, Volume 86, Pages 117-126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.006.
    20.
  20. Hartmann, T.E., Guzman-Bustamante, I., Ruser, R.,, Müller, T. (2020). Turnover of Urea in a Soil from the North China Plain as Affected by the Urease Inhibitor NBPT and Wheat Straw. Agronomy 2020, 10, 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060857
    21.
  21. Hesampour, R., Hassani, M., Hanafiah, M. M., & Heidarbeigi, K. (2021). Technical efficiency, sensitivity analysis and economic assessment applying data envelopment analysis approach: A case study of date production in Khuzestan State of Iran, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, IN PRESS, 2021, ISSN 1658-077X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.08.003.
    22.
  22. Hyuncheol Kang, Jung-Won Ahn, Model Setting and Interpretation of Results in Research Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Checklist with Guiding Questions for Reporting, Asian Nursing Research, Volume 15, Issue 3, 2021, Pages 157-162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2021.06.001.
    23.
  23. (2021). Public Summary Medium-Term Fertilizer Outlook 2021 – 2025, Market Intelligence Service, International Fertilizer Association. Available on the https://www.ifastat.org/market-outlooks
    24.
  24. Kang, H and Ahn, J. (2021). Model Setting and Interpretation of Results in Research Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Checklist with Guiding Questions for Reporting, Asian Nursing Research, Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 157-162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2021.06.001.
    25.
  25. Khatibi, S. and Arjjumend, H. (2019). Water Crisis in Making in Iran. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 2(3): 45-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.02034
    26.
  26. Kiani, E., Noorollah Noorivandi, A., Ommani, A.R. and Maghsoodi, T. (2021). Identifying Strategies for Adapting Agricultural Cooperatives to Learning Organization in Iran: Application of SWOT and SEM Models, J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (2021) Vol. 23(6): 1225-1238.
    27.
  27. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
    28.
  28. Lerdpornkulrat, T., Poondej, C., & Koul, R. (2017). Construct reliability and validity of the shortened version of the information-seeking behavior scale. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(2), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2017040103
    29.
  29. Łuczka, W., Kalinowski, S., Shmygol, N. (2021). Organic Farming Support Policy in a Sustainable
    30.
  30. Mahapatra, D., Satapathy, K., and Panda, B. (2022). Biofertilizers and nanofertilizers for sustainable agriculture: Phycoprospects and challenges, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 803, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149990.
    31.
  31. Maleksaeidi, H., Jalali, M and Eskandari, F. (2021). "Challenges Threatening Agricultural Sustainability in the West of Iran: Viewpoint of Agricultural Experts" Sustainability 13, no. 6: 3537, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063537
    32.
  32. Moridsadat, P., Roknoddin Eftekhari, A. (2018). Strategic Analysis of Sustainable Agriculture with Entrepreneurial Approach (Case Study: Khuzastan Province). Regional Planning, 8(30), 31-50.
    33.
  33. (2016). North Central Victoria Regional Sustainable Agriculture Strategy, North Central Catchment Management Authority. PO Box 18 Huntly Vic 3551, T: 03 5448 7124 F: 03 5448 7148.
    34.
  34. Nhamo, N and Lungu, O. (2017). Chapter 7 - Opportunities for Smallholder Farmers to Benefit From Conservation Agricultural Practices, Editor(s): Nhamo Nhamo, David Chikoye, Therese Gondwe, Smart Technologies for Sustainable Smallholder Agriculture, Academic Press, Pages 145-163, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810521-4.00007-4.
    35.
  35. Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C and Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (MEE), Volume9, Issue1, Special Feature: Qualitative methods for eliciting judgements for decision making, Pages 20-32.
    36.
  36. Oberc, B.P. & Arroyo Schnell, A. (2020). Approaches to sustainable agriculture. Exploring the pathways towards the future of farming. Brussels, Belgium: IUCN EURO.
    37.
  37. Ommani , A. R. (2019). Analysis of sustainable water resources management (SWRM) in agriculture in Khuzestan Province, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 9 (5), pp. 001-006,
    38.
  38. Ommani, A. R. (2011). Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis for farming system businesses management: Case of wheat farmers of Shadervan District, Shoushtar Township, Iran. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 9448-9454.
    39.
  39. Pishbahar, E., Shahbazi, P., Hosseinzad, J. (2021). Prediction of Production, Export and Import of Iran´s Agricultural Sector: The Combination of Econometrics and System Dynamics Methods. Agricultural Economics, 15(1), 1-28. doi: 10.22034/iaes.2021.526889.1829
    40.
  40. Rani, L., Thapa, K., Kanojia, N., Sharma, N., Singh, S., Grewal, A. S., Srivastav, A. L., Kaushal, J. (2021). An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124657.
    41.
  41. Razeghi, F., Haghi, E., Yunesian, M. (2018). Data about knowledge and tendency towards organic foods use in Tehran, Data in Brief, Volume 16, Pages 955-958.
    42.
  42. Sidhu, R., Kumar, R., Rana, P. S., & Jat, M. L. (2021). Chapter Five - Automation in drip irrigation for enhancing water use efficiency in cereal systems of South Asia: Status and prospects, Editor(s): Donald L. Sparks, Advances in Agronomy, Academic Press, Volume 167, Pages 247-300, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.01.002.
    43.
  43. Tentama, F & Anindita, W. (2021). Employability Scale: Construct Validity and Reliability. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 9, Issue 04, 3166-3170.
    44.
  44. Trémolet, S., Atwell, B., Dominique, K., Matthews, N., Becker, M ., & Muñoz, R. (2021). Funding and financing to scale nature-based solutions for water security, Editor(s): Jan Cassin, John H. Matthews, Elena Lopez Gunn, Nature-based Solutions and Water Security, Elsevier, Chapter 15, Pages 361-398, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819871-1.00007-5.
    45.
  45. Žalėnienė, I., & Pereira, P. (2021). Higher Education for Sustainability: A Global Perspective,
    46.
  46. Zhang, X., Yao, G., Vishwakarma, S., Dalin, C., Komarek, A., Kanter, D., et al. (2021). Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations, One Earth, Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages 1262-1277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.015.
    47.
  47. Zou, X., Li, Y., Cremades, R., Gao, Q & Wan, Y. (2013). Cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving irrigation technologies based on climate change response: A case study of China, Agricultural Water Management, Volume 129, Pages 9-20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.07.004.
    48.

سکوی نشر دانش

سند یا سکوی نشر دانش ،سامانه ای جهت مدیریت حوزه علمی و پژوهشی نشریات دانشگاه آزاد می باشد

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]