A Critical Review of Sustainable Pro-Environmental Behavior Theories
محورهای موضوعی : Environmental policy and managementامیرحسین پیرمرادی 1 , فرحناز رستمی 2 , عبدالحمید پاپ زن 3
1 - دکتری توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
3 - دانشیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
کلید واژه: Documentary research, decision-making, behavioral theories, critical review, pro-environmental behavior,
چکیده مقاله :
Agricultural production decision-making is becoming more complicated due to the inherent complexity of the interaction between natural and human processes as the heart of agricultural systems. Predicting the behavior of agricultural systems is critically important for sustainability issues. Since agriculture is a human activity that is dependent on its main actors, farmers’ behavior needs to be investigated in terms of the extent to which their activities are consistent with sustainable agriculture initiatives. This study is based on the documentary research method conducted by a systematic literature review. The main goal was to review and analyze pro-environmental behavior theories in terms of their strengths and weaknesses during the time period of 1975-2016. The strengths and weaknesses of each theory were described after the introduction of each theory. On the other hand, a comparison of the theories based on seven indicators is presented too. About 14 theories were reviewed to reach agent-based theories of decision-making, in which feedback is provided on the system. Based on the results, the agent-based integrated theories are diagnosed to be the most suitable and comprehensive for the study and prediction of farmers’ behaviors among the studied theories.
تصمیم گیری در مورد چگونگی تولید محصولات کشاورزی به دلیل پیچیدگی ماهیت تعامل بین فرآیندهای طبیعی و انسانی، به عنوان رکن اصلی سیستم های کشاورزی ، پیچیده تر می شود. پیش بینی رفتار سیستم های کشاورزی در مورد مسائل پایداری بسیار مهم است. از آنجا که کشاورزی یک فعالیت انسانی است و به بازیگران اصلی آن وابسته است ، رفتار کشاورزان باید بررسی شود، تا مشخص شود که تا چه حد فعالیت های آنها با اصول کشاورزی پایدار سازگار است. این مطالعه بر اساس روش تحقیق اسنادی است که با استفاده از یک مرور سیستماتیک ادبیات انجام شده است. بنابراین ، هدف اصلی در این مقاله بررسی و تجزیه و تحلیل نظریه های رفتار حامی محیط زیست از نظر نقاط قوت و ضعف آنها در طی یک بازه زمانی از 1975-2016 بوده است. نقاط قوت و ضعف هر نظریه پس از معرفی هر نظریه به ویژه با جزئیات در جدول (1) شرح داده شد. از سوی دیگر ، مقایسه بین نظریه ها بر اساس هفت شاخص در جدول (2) نشان داده شده است. حدود 14 نظریه برای دستیابی به نظریه های تصمیم گیری مبتنی بر عامل که شامل بازخورد سیستم است، بررسی شده است. نتایج نشان داد که نظریه های تلفیقی مبتنی بر عامل، مناسب تر و کامل تر از سایر نظریه های شناسایی شده برای مطالعه و پیش بینی رفتار کشاورزان تشخیص داده شده است.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T.(1986). Predictions of goal-directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Allean, J.B. & Ferrand, J. (2010) Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and pro- environmental behavior: a test of Geller’s actively caring hypothesis, Environment and Behavior, 31(3), pp. 338–353.
Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen,Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behaviour, 35 (2), 264–285.
Beedell, J., & Rehman, T. (2000). Using social-psychology models to understand farmers’ conservation behaviour. Journal of rural studies, 16(1), 117-127.
Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value–action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257–278.
Boldero, J. (1995). The Prediction of Household Recycling of Newspapers: the role of attitudes, intentions and situational factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(5), 440-462.
Boudon, R.(1985). Il posto del disordine. Critica delle teorie del mutamento sociale. Il Mulino, Bologna.
Burgess, J., Harrison,C. and Filius, P.(1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 30, 1445–1460.
Burton, R.J.F.(2004). Reconceptualising the “behavioural approach” in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective, Journal of Rural studies, 20, 359–371.
Dahlstrand, U ., & Biel, B.(1997). Pro-environmental habits: propensity levels in behavioural change, Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 27, 588-601.
Feola,G., & Binder, C.R.(2010). Towards an improved understanding of farmers' behaviour: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework, Ecological Economics, 69, 2323–2333.
Fietkau, H. J., & Kessel, H.(1981). Umweltlernen: Veraenderungsmoeglichkeite n des Umweltbewusstseins, Modell-Erfahrungen (Koenigstein, Hain).
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.(1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: an introduction to theory and research,Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Gagnon, M.P., Godin, G., Gagné, C., Fortin, J.P., Lamothe, L., Reinharz, D. And Cloutier, A.(2010). Multi-level analysis of electronic health record adoption by health care professionals: A study protocol, Implementation Science, 5(1), 30.
Galt, R.E.(2008). Toward an Integrated understanding of pesticide use intensity in Costa Rican vegetable farming, Human Ecology, 36, 655–677.
Giddens, A.(1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press.
Gunnell, D.,& Eddleston, M.(2003). Suicide by intentional ingestion of pesticides: a continuing tragedy in developing countries, International Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 902–909.
Hghighatian, M., Rabbani, R. and Kazemi, S. (2005). The impact of social capital on the career activities of middle school teachers in Esfahan city, Journal of Research in Educational Sciences (XVII and XVIII) 164-147
Han, H., & Yoon, H. J.(2015). Hotel customers’ environmentally responsible behavioural intention: Impact of key constructs on decision in green consumeris, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 45, 22-33.
Hins, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. and Tomera, A.N.(1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible pro-environmental behaviour: a meta-analysis, The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.
Hopper, J ., & Nielsen, J.(1991). Recycling as Altruistic Behaviour: normative and behavioural strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program, Environment and Behaviour, 23, 195-220.
Karimi, L.(2013). Investigation of Sociological Factors Affecting Environmental Behaviours (Case Study: Water Consumption). [Dissertation], Payame Noor University of Tehran.
Kings, D.(2014). Farmers’ Understandings of Weeds and Herbicide Usage as Environmental Influences on Agricultural Sustainability, Journal of Environmental Protection, 5, 923-935.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J.(2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour?, Environmental education research,8(3), 239-260.
Loloei, M., Zolala, F. and Razzaghi, A.(2014). Farmers’ Pesticide Using Behaviours: A Case Study on Pistachio Farms in Kerman, Iran, Health Scope, 3(2), 1-4.
Moody, G. D., & Siponen, M.(2013). Using the theory of interpersonal behaviour to explain non-work-related personal use of the Internet at work, Information & Management, 50(6), 322-335.
Passel, S.V., Nevens, F., Mathijs, E. and Huylebroeck, G.V.(2007). Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency, Ecological Economics, 62, 149 – 161.
Pretty, N.J.(1995). Regenerating agriculture, policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance, Earthcan Publication Limited, London.
Raksanam, B., Taneepanichskul, S., Siriwong, W., and Robson, M.G.(2012). Factors Associated with Pesticide Risk Behaviours among Rice Farmers in Rural Community, Thailand, Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 2(2), 32-39.
Schwartz, Sh.(1977). Normative Influences on Altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 222-279.
Stern, P.(2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behaviour, Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
Stern, P., Dietz, T., Abel,T., Guagnano, G. and Kalof, G.(1999). A Value-Belief Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: the case of environmental concern, Human Ecology Review,1999, 6: 81-97.
Triandis, H.(1977). Interpersonal Behaviour. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Van der Werff, E., & Steg, L.(2015). One model to predict them all: predicting energy behaviours with the norm activation model, Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 8-14.
Vining, J ., & AEbreo,Z. (1990). What Makes a Recycler? A comparison of recyclers and non-recyclers, Environment and Behaviour, 22, 55-73.
Vining, J ., & AEbreo,Z .(1992). Predicting Recycling Behaviours from Global and Specific Environmental Attitudes and Changes in Recycling Opportunities, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1580-1607.
Vogel, S.(1996). Farmers' environmental attitudes and behaviour: A case study for Austria, Environment and Behaviour, 28(5), 591-613.
Wicker, A. W.(1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioural responses to attitude objects, Journal of social issues, 25(4), 41-78.
Willock, J., Deary, I. J., Edwards‐Jones, G., Gibson, G. J., McGregor, M. J., Sutherland, A., and Grieve, R.(1999). The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: Business and environmentally‐oriented behaviour in Scotland, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(2), 286-303.
