Types of Decision-Making and Teacher Effectiveness among Iranian EFL Teacher

محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمه

Zahra Bayani ¹ , Seyyed Hassan Seyyed Rezaei ² , Ghasem Barani ³ , Zari Sadat Seyyedrezaei ⁴

1 - Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Iran
2 - Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
3 - Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
4 - Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/03/22 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/04/25 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/02/07

کلید واژه: Cognitive Style (CS), Decision-Making types (DMT), Teaching Effectiveness (TE), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM),

چکیده مقاله :

The universe has no fixed agenda. Once you make any decision, it works around that decision. In educational system, majority of innovative decisions tend to be made are the result of systematic thought and critical thinking skills of the teachers. Hence, the aim of this inquiry was to investigate the different dimensions of teachers' decision-making style and its relationship with the effectiveness of teaching in the classroom among Iranian EFL teachers. To meet this end, 147 adult male and female EFL teachers that were from different language institutes in northern cities of Iran, including Gorgan, Gonbad and Aliabad e katoul being selected as the participants of the study through convenience sampling method. The quantitative data was collected using DMQ and QTE questionnaires. The process of analyzing the collected data was through the SmartPLS software and statistical package for social sciences (SPSS-v26). The result of the descriptive statistics section and this correlation' findings showed that there is a strong relationship between decision-making types and teacher’s effectiveness. It is concluded that decision-making styles would be remarkably beneficial if they could generally distinguish between high and low quality decision makers. This study has implications for language instructors, policy makers, and decision makers in the era of education and also everyone who considers teachers' quality a vital feature to the future prospects of a country.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The universe has no fixed agenda. Once you make any decision, it works around that decision. In educational system, majority of innovative decisions tend to be made are the result of systematic thought and critical thinking skills of the teachers. Hence, the aim of this inquiry was to investigate the different dimensions of teachers' decision-making style and its relationship with the effectiveness of teaching in the classroom among Iranian EFL teachers. To meet this end, 147 adult male and female EFL teachers that were from different language institutes in northern cities of Iran, including Gorgan, Gonbad and Aliabad e katoul being selected as the participants of the study through convenience sampling method. The quantitative data was collected using DMQ and QTE questionnaires. The process of analyzing the collected data was through the SmartPLS software and statistical package for social sciences (SPSS-v26). The result of the descriptive statistics section and this correlation' findings showed that there is a strong relationship between decision-making types and teacher’s effectiveness. It is concluded that decision-making styles would be remarkably beneficial if they could generally distinguish between high and low quality decision makers. This study has implications for language instructors, policy makers, and decision makers in the era of education and also everyone who considers teachers' quality a vital feature to the future prospects of a country.

منابع و مأخذ:

Andersen, J. A. (2000). Intuition in managers: Are intuitive managers more effective? Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/0268394001
Aydin, A., Uysal, S., & Sarier, Y. (2012). The effect of gender on job satisfaction of teachers: a meta-analysis study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 356-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.122
Baiocco, R., Laghi, F., & D'Alessio, M. (2009). Decision-making style among adolescents: Relationship with sensation seeking and locus of control. Journal of adolescence, 32(4), 963-976. 963-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.08.003
Berk, R. A. (2002). Teaching portfolios used for high-stakes decisions: You have technical issues. National Evaluation Systems, how to find and support tomorrow’s teachers, 45-56. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ronald-Berk
Biddle, B. J. (2011). The integration of teacher effectiveness research. Contemporary research on teacher effectiveness, 1-40. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/8742
Borkar, U. (2013). A study of teacher effectiveness of secondary school teachers about teacher stress. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(12), 13-16. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/32748923/C0212020130
Bouckenooghe, D., Vanderheyden, K., Mestdagh, S., & Van Laethem, S. (2007). Cognitive motivation correlates with coping style in decisional conflict. The Journal of Psychology, 41(6), 605-626. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.141.6.605-626
Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(5), 938. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-06231-012
Buchanan, J. (2012). Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning: A Teacher-as-learner-centred Approach. International Journal of Learning, 18(10). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?di-rect=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authty
Calderhead, J. (2003). Teachers' classroom decision-making. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Cohen, J. (1988). Set Correlation and Contingency Tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014662168801200410
Crossley, C. D., & Highhouse, S. (2005). Relation of job search and choice process with subsequent satisfactionJournal of Economic Psychology, 26(2), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.04.001
De Heredia, R. A. S., Arocena, F. L., & Gárate, J. V. (2004). Decision-making patterns, conflict styles, and self-esteem. Psicothema, 110-116. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge. https://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume10
Dörnyei, Z. (2018). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/applin/amz056
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 390. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1996-06400-015
Finucane, M. L., Mertz, C. K., Slovic, P., & Schmidt, E. S. (2005). Task complexity and older adults' decision-making competence. Psychology and Aging, 20 (1), 71. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.71
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224378101800104
Gambetti, E., Fabbri, M., Bensi, L., & Tonetti, L. (2008). A contribution to the Italian validation of the General Decision-making Style Inventory. Personality and individual differences, 44(4), 842-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.017
Germeijs, V., & De Boeck, P. (2003). Ca-reer indecision: Three factors from decision theory. Journal of Vocation-al Behavior, 62(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00055-6
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An up-dated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
Harren, V. A. (2004). A model of career decision-making for college students. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90065-4
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2008). Teacher training, teacher quality, and student achievement. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509656
Hassaskhah, J., & Vahabi, M. (2010). An in-depth analysis of the relationship between age and attribution in EFL contexts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2126-2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.425
Hayes, D. (1999). Decisions, decisions, decisions: the process of ‘getting better at teaching’. Teacher Development, 3(3), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00068.x
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Hulland, J. S. (1999). The effects of country-of-brand and brand name on product evaluation and consideration: A cross-country comparison. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v11n01_03
Hunt, R. G., Krzystofiak, F. J., Meindl, J. R., & Yousry, A. M. (2003). Cognitive style and decision making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 44(3), 436-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90018-6
Irvine, J. (2019). Relationship between Teaching Experience and Teacher Effectiveness: Implications for Policy Decisions. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1216895
Judge, T. A., & Robbins, S. P. (2006). Or-ganizational behavior. (12th ed.). Canada: Prentice Hall. https://books.google.com/books?id=9
Juliusson, G., Lazarevic, V., Lehmann, S., Derolf, Å. R., Möllgård, L., Garelius, H., & Höglund, M. (2014). Improved survival of patients with acute mye-loid leukemia following implementa-tion of Swedish National Guidelines: Results from the AML Registry 1997-2013. Blood, 124(21), 2269. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V124.21.2269
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psy-chologist, 58(9), 697. doi=10.1037%2F0003-066X.58.9.697
Katoch, K. S. (2011). Teacher effectiveness and temperament. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 204-212. https://doi: 10.52634/mier/2011/v1/i2/161
Kosgei, A., Mise, J. K., Odera, O., & Ayugi, M. E. (2013). Influence of teacher characteristics on students' academic achievement among secondary schools. Journal of Education and practice, 4(3), 76-82. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article
Lee, Y. J. (2005). A summary of construct validation of an English for academic purposes placement test. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment Volume 3 2005, 1001, 113. https://www.proquest.com/openview/fd78feb683a3ad98030d885a790b5923/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Loewenthal, K. M., Cinnirella, M., Evdoka, G., & Murphy, P. (2001). Does faith conquer all? Beliefs about the role of religious factors in coping with de-pression among different cultural‐religious groups in the UK. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74(3), 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711201160993.
Loo, R. (2000). A psychometric evaluation of the general decision-making style inventory. Personality and individual differences, 29(5), 895-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00241-X
Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory—25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7-21. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/58928
Reed, A. E., Mikels, J. A., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2012). Choosing with confidence: Self-efficacy and preferences for choice. Judgment & Decision Making, 7(2). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.419.4943&rep=rep1&type.
Robert, K., Owiti, D. S. O., & Ongati, O. (2013). Teachers’ gender and primary school pupils' achievement in mathe-matics in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(25), 122-127. http://62.24.102.115:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2630/Ongati
Sadler‐Smith, E. (2005). An examination of the general decision-making style questionnaire in two UK samples. Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510579777.
Sarafidou, J. O., & Chatziioannidis, G. (2013). Teacher participation in decision making and its impact on school and teachers. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541311297586.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (2007). Deci-sion-Making Style, the development and of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 818-831. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164495055005017.
Singh, R., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2004). The relation between career decision-making strategies and person-job fit A study of job changers. Journal of vocational behavior, 64(1), 198-221. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406416683230.
Spicer D. P., & Sadler-Smith E. (2006). Or-ganizational Learning in Smaller Manufacturing Firms. International Small Business Journal, 24(2), 133-158.
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004, June). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 739-742).https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michel-Tenenhaus-2/ publication/ 28446 2849_A _global_goodness
Thunholm, P. (2008). Decision-making style: habit, style, or both? Personality and individual differences, 36(4), 931-944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00640.x
Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A New Approach to Assessing Strategic Learning: The Case of Self-Regulation in Vocabulary Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami046
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 177-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284