نقش واسطه ای فرایندهای نظام خود و هیجان های تحصیلی در رابطه بین محیط حامی خودپیروی و درگیری تحصیلی
محورهای موضوعی : روان‌شناسی بالینی
1 - دانشیار
2 - دانشجوی دکتری
کلید واژه: درگیری تحصیلی, محیط حامی خودپیروی, فرایندهای نظام خود, هیجان تحصیلی, نیازهای بنیادین روان‌شناختی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش تعیین نقش واسطه‌ای فرایندهای نظام خود و هیجان‌های تحصیلی در رابطه میان محیط حامی خودپیروی و درگیری تحصیلی بود. نمونه پژوهش شامل 416 نفر (233 زن و 183 مرد) از دانشجویان دانشگاه شیراز و ابزارهای پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه درگیری تحصیلی (ریو، 2013)، مقیاس نیازهای بنیادین روان‌شناختی (گانیه، 2003)، پرسشنامه محیط حامی خودپیروی (آسور و دیگران، 2002؛ آسور 2012)، مقیاس هیجان امید (پکران و دیگران، 2002)، پرسشنامه کنجکاوی (لیتمن و دیگران، 2010) و پرسشنامه همدلی (وسن و دیگران، 2016) بود. یافتهها نشان داد محیط حامی خودپیروی اثر مستقیم بر فرایندهای نظام خود و درگیری تحصیلی و اثر غیرمستقیم، به واسطه فرایندهای نظام خود و هیجان‌های تحصیلی، بر درگیری تحصیلی دارد. این متغیر، به واسطه فرایندهای نظام خود، اثر غیرمستقیم بر هیجان‌های تحصیلی داشت. فرایندهای نظام خود، اثر مستقیم بر هیجان‌های تحصیلی و درگیری تحصیلی و همچنین به واسطه هیجان‌های تحصیلی، اثر غیرمستقیم بر درگیری داشت. هیجان‌های تحصیلی نیز دارای اثری مثبت و معنادار بر درگیری تحصیلی بود. بر این اساس، فرایندهای نظام خود و هیجان‌های تحصیلی نقش واسطه‌ای بین محیط حامی خودپیروی و درگیری تحصیلی ایفا میکند
purpose of present study was to investigate the mediating roles of self-system processes and academic emotions in the relationship between autonomy supportive environment and academic engagement. The sample consisted of 461 Shiraz University students. The research instruments included academic engagement questionnaire (Reeve, 2013), basic psychological needs scale (Gagne, 2003), autonomy supportive environment questionnaire (Assor et al, 2002 & Assor 2012), hope scale (Pekrun et al, 2002), curiosity questionnaire (Litman et al, 2010), and empathy questionnaire (Vossen et al, 2016). The findings showed that autonomy supportive environment had direct effects on self-system processes and academic engagement and an indirect effect on academic engagement by mediating of self-system processes and academic emotions. Autonomy supportive environment had an indirect effect on academic emotions by mediating of self-system processes. Self-system processes had direct effects on academic emotions and academic engagement, furthermore by mediating of academic emotions had an indirect effect on academic engagement. Academic emotions had a positive and significant effect on academic engagement. Accordingly, self-system processes and academic emotions played mediating roles in relationship between autonomy supportive environment and academic engagement
ابراهیمی، س.، پاکدامن، ش. و سپهری، ص. (1390). روابط بین هدفهای پیشرفت، جو کلاس، توانایی و سودمندی ادراک شده. مجله روان‌شناسی تحولی: روان‌شناسان ایرانی، 8 (29)، 44-35
بشارت، م. و رنجبرکلاگری، ا. (1392). مقیاس ارضای نیازهای بنیادین روان‌شناختی: پایایی، روایی و تحلیل عاملی. فصلنامه اندازهگیری تربیتی، 4 (14)، 168-147.
کدیور، پ.، فرزاد، و.، کاوسیان، ج. و نیکدل، ف. (1388). رواسازی پرسشنامه هیجان‌های تحصیلی پکران. فصلنامه نوآوریهای آموزشی، 8 (32)، 38-7.
کوروشنیا، م. و لطیفیان، م. (1390). بررسی رابطه بین ابعاد الگوهای ارتباطات خانوادگی-دانشگاهی و گرایشهای تفکر انتقادی دانشجویان با واسطهگری ارضای نیازهای روان‌شناختی پایه. فصلنامه خانوادهپژوهی، 7 (28)، 519-493.
میرز، ل.، گامست، گ. و گارینو، ا. (1391). پژوهش چندمتغیری کاربردی. ترجمه ح. حسنآبادی و دیگران. تهران: انتشارات تحول (تاریخ انتشار اثر اصلی، 2006).
Amabile, T., Hill, K., Hennessey, B., & Tighe, E. (1994). The work performance inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 950-967.
Assor, A. (2012). Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: educational practices supporting students’ need for autonomy. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421-439). New York: Springer.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and supporting teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 261-278.
Brandtstadter, J. (1998). Action perspectives on human development. In W. Damon, & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development (pp. 993-1028). Hoboken, NJ: Wiely.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon, & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development (pp. 993-1028). Hoboken, NJ: Wiely.
Buss, A., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression question-naire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459.
Chapman, M. (1984). International action as a paradigm for developmental psychology: A symposium. Human Development, 27, 113-114.
Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2014). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 24-37.
Chi, U. J. (2014). Classroom engagement as proximal level for student success in higher education: what a self-determination framework within a multi-level developmental system tells us. Ph.D. Dissertation in Applied Psychology, Portland State University.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar, & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Self- processes in development (pp. 43-77). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Davis, M. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85-87.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dertmers, S., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Goetz, T. Frenzel, A., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions during homework in mathematics: testing a model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 25-35.
Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S. & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-supportive climates on EFL learners’ engagement, achievement and com-petence in english speaking classrooms. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3890-3894.
Federici, R. A., & Skaalvik (2014). Students’ perception of emotional and instrumental teacher support: relations with motivational and emotional responses. International Education Studies, 7(1), 21-36.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In E. Ashby plan, & P. G. Devine (Eds.), Advances on experimental social psychology (pp. 1-53). Burlington: Academic Press.
Gagne, M. (2003). The role of autonomu support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engage-ment. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199-223.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: it is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600.
Johnston, M., & Finney, S. (2010). Measuring basic needs satisfaction: evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluation of the basic needs satisfaction in general scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 280-296.
King, B., McInerney, D., Ganotice, F., & Vilarosa, J. (2015). Positive affect catalyzes academic engage-ment: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental evidence. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 64-72.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Linnenbrink- Garcia, L., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 13-24.
Litman, J.A., Crowson, H. M., & Kolinski, K. (2010). Validity of interest and deprivation-type epistemic curiosity distinction in non-students. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 531-536.
McIlroy, D., & Bunting, B. (2002). Personality, behavior, and academic achievement. Contemporary Edu-cational Psychology, 27, 326-337.
Marchand, G., & Gutierrez, A. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning setting. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 150-160.
Muis, K., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azavedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168-183.
Mussel, P. (2010). Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 506-510.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implication for educational research and practice. EducationalPsychology Review,18, 315-341.
Pekrun, R. Goetz, T. Titz, W., & Perry, R P. (2002). Academic emotions in student self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105.
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). Inter-national handbooks of emotions in education. New York: Routledge.
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. L., Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421-439). New York: Springer.
Reeve, J. (2009). Understanding motivation and emotion. New York: Wiely.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421-439). New York: Springer.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement. American Psycho-logical Association, 105(3), 579-595.
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding the sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D. McInerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (pp. 31-59). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Reeve, J., & Sickenius, B. (1994). Development and validation of a brief measurement of the three psychological needs underlying intrinsic motivation: the AFS scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 506-515.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryzin, M. J. (2011). Protective factors at school: Reciprocal effects among adolescents’ percep-tions of the school environment, engagement in learning, and hope. Journal of Youth Adole-scence, 40, 1568-1580.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. L. (2009). Engagement and dis-affecttion as organizational constructs in the dyna-mics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 223-245). Malvah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skinner, E. A., Kinderman, T. A., & Furrer, C. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493-525.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421-439). New York: Springer.
Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J., & Brule, H. (2014). The role of emotion in engagement, coping, and the development of motivational resilience. In R. Pekrun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 331-347). New York: Routledge.
Tulis, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2013). Students’ motivational and emotional experiences and their relationship to persistence during academic challenge in mathe-matics and reading. Learning and Individual Differ-ences, 27, 35-46.
Tze, V. M., Klasson, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2014). Patterns of boredom and its relationship with
perceived autonomy support and engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 175-187.
Vossen, H. G., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenborg, P. M. (2015). Development of the adolescence measure of empathy and sympathy (AMES). Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 66-71.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruc-tion, 28, 12-23.
Wonglorsaichon, B., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. (2014). The influence of students’ school engage-ment on learning achievement: A structural equation modeling analysis. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1748-1755.
_||_
