Ecological Potential Modeling for Agricultural and Rangeland Development Using GIS-based FAHP Approach: A Case Study of Razin Watershed
محورهای موضوعی : Modeling
Saeed Mahmoudi
1
(Former Student in Agroecology, Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Razi University)
Mahmud Khoramivafa
2
(Associate Prof. Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran)
Moslem Hadidi
3
(Academic Center for Education, Cultural, and Research, Kermanshah, Iran)
کلید واژه: Ecological capability, land use, Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), Razin watershed, Effective carrying capacity (ECC),
چکیده مقاله :
Determining the environmental capability of optimally using land and preventing the degradation of natural resources arr important steps towards a sustainable development strategy. The present study was conducted in 2014-2017 aiming to assess the ecological capability for agriculture and rangeland of the Razin watershed in Kermanshah province, west of Iran, in seven classes using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the application of Geographic Information System (GIS). The information layers were initially selected by the research group and those layers that were important were selected according to the research literature, then the final screening of the information layers was performed by fuzzy Delphi method. These layers were including land form units (slope, elevation, aspect), soil information (texture, depth, hydrological groups, erosion, granulating, gravel percentage, evolution, organic carbon content, exchangeable cations, available phosphorus), climate, water, land use, vegetation density, and lithology. FAHP technique was used to calculate the importance coefficients of the criteria and sub-criteria entered into the evaluation model. Weighted layer modeling was performed by ArcMap 9.3 software using the weighted linear composition method in overlay tool. The results showed that water, climate, slope, and soil texture criteria with 0.23, 0.132, 0.118, and 0.88, respectively, were the most important in modeling Razin ecological capability. 1776 environmental units with unique ecological characteristics were identified. This area has ecological potential for agricultural and rangeland use in seven classes. In terms of effective carrying capacity (ECC), all classes except class 2 and 5 were sustainable. Due to the very high accuracy of the FAHP-GIS integrated model in the use of agricultural land suitability, it is recommended to use this model instead of other conventional methods.
Alikhah Asl, M., & Rezvani, M. 2018. Assessment of land capability for agriculture and rangeland development using hierarchical analysis method (Case study: Gaz long-Lavar-e Saheli Watershed of Bushehr Province). Geographical Researches Quarterly Journal, 33(1), 109-123.
Baud-Bovy, M., & Lawson, F. 1998. Tourism and recreation: handbook of planning and design: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
Busby, P. J., Wainwright, T. C., Bryant, G. J., Lierheimer, L. J., Waples, R. S., Waknitz, F. W., & Lagomarsino, I. V. 1996. Status review of west coast steelhead from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California.
Chang, D.-Y. 1992. Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision, Optimization Techniques and Applications. World Scientific, Singapore, 1, 352 p.
Dagdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kılınc, N. 2009. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8143-8151.
Dehghan, P., Azarnivand, H., Khosravi, H., Zehtabian, G., & Moghaddam Nia, A. 2018. Design of agricultural ecological and rangeland capability model using integrated approach of FUZZY-AHP (A case study: Eshtehard city). Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 71(1), 11-24.
Fidelis, T., & Roebeling, P. 2014. Water resources and land use planning systems in Portugal-Exploring better synergies through Ria de Aveiro. Land Use Policy, 39, 84-95.
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., West, P. C. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337-342.
Hou, K., Li, X., Wang, J., & Zhang, J. 2016. Evaluating ecological vulnerability using the GIS and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method in Yan’an, China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 25(2).
Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. 1988. Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science: Elsevier Science Inc., New York.
Kharat, M. G., Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., Kamble, S. J., Leal-Filho, W., & Platje, J. 2016. The application of DELPHI and AHP method in environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 27(4).
Khashei-Siuki, A., & Sharifan, H. 2020. Comparison of AHP and FAHP methods in determining suitable areas for drinking water harvesting in Birjand aquifer. Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10, 100328.
Kopacz, M., Kryzia, D., & Kryzia, K. 2017. Assessment of sustainable development of hard coal mining industry in Poland with use of bootstrap sampling and copula-based Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of cleaner production, 159, 359-373.
Lambin, E., Lenton, T., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., Rodhe, H. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472475Rojo C, Cobelas MA, Arauzo M (1994) An elementary, structural analysis of river phytoplankton. Hydrobiologia, 289, 4355.
Li, Y., Liu, H., & Zhou, W. 2016. Evaluation of water resources carrying capacity based on data mining and AHP method. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação(E8), 93.
Li, Y., Tie, J., Peng, L., Zhang, J., Chen, B., & Zhang, Z. 2011. GIS-based seasonal pattern of Rhinopithecus roxellana’s habitat selection in Shennongjia Reserve, Central China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(2), 84-90.
Liefferink, D., Wiering, M., & Uitenboogaart, Y. 2011. The EU Water Framework Directive: A multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 712-722.
Mahdavi, A., Faramarzi, M., & Karami, O. 2013. ANP Application in evaluating ecological capability of range management (Case Study: Badreh Region, Ilam Province). Journal of Rangeland Science, 3(2), 95-107.
Mahmoudi, S., Jalali, A., Ahmadi, M., Abasi, P., & Salari, N. 2019. Identifying critical success factors in Heart Failure Self-Care using fuzzy DEMATEL method. Applied Soft Computing, 84, 105729.
Major, D. C., & Schwarz, S. 2013. Large-scale regional water resources planning: the North Atlantic regional study (Vol. 7): Springer.
Malmir, M., Zarkesh, M. M. K., Monavari, S. M., Jozi, S. A., & Sharifi, E. 2016. Analysis of land suitability for urban development in Ahwaz County in southwestern Iran using fuzzy logic and analytic network process (ANP). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(8), 447.
Mikhailov, L. 2003. Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy sets and systems, 134(3), 365-385.
Mosaffaie, J., Saleh Pourjam, A., & Kamali, M. 2018. Evaluation of the ecological capability of Aqujan watershed for rangeland and agriculture using GIS. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 9(1), 131-144.
Power, A. G. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2959-2971.
Prato, T. 2007. Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty. Land Use Policy, 24(1), 165-174.
Rahmanabadi, H., Hossein Zadeh, M. M., & Mirbagheri, B. 2021. Management and planning of Kangavar geographical area for agricultural and rangeland uses. Town and Country Planning, 12(1), 1-24.
Saaty, T. L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
Socaciu, L., Giurgiu, O., Banyai, D., & Simion, M. 2016. PCM selection using AHP method to maintain thermal comfort of the vehicle occupants. Energy Procedia, 85, 489-497.
Teka, K., & Haftu, M. 2012. Land suitability characterization for crop and fruit production in Midlands of Tigray, Ethiopia. Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science, 4(1), 64-76.
Yu, Z., Fung, B. C., Haghighat, F., Yoshino, H., & Morofsky, E. 2011. A systematic procedure to study the influence of occupant behavior on building energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 43(6), 1409-1417.
Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159-172.
