Optimizing the Risk of Building Environments Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
محورهای موضوعی : Research paper
Eghbal Sekhavati
1
(Department of Environmental Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.)
Reza jalilzadeh
2
(Department of Environmental Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.)
کلید واژه: MCDM, AHP, Risk Evaluation, Building Environments,
چکیده مقاله :
Construction industry is known as one of the most dangerous industries in the field of air pollution which causes damage to environment and endangers human health. Therefore, in order to reduce and control risks by construction industry, planning is done. The method which is used to discuss the risks is MCDM. After interview with experts who were 15 people, the weights of scales were discussed .Some criterion is used to risks, in this study, the insights and suggestions are used which are risk comprehension, risk evaluation, safety risk and safety performance. Weight of four main scales was performed by Super Decision software. Paired comparison of main scales is performed in terms of 9 hourly quantitatively scale and is same as AHP process. According to the research, the more weight was pertinent to risk comprehension and the less weight is pertaining to safety insight. The results show that in order to control risks, risk comprehension has high priority in building environments.
Abbasianjahromi H, Etemadi A, Aminneghad B, (2022). Analysis of formal and informal network relations in construction industry to enhance project safety using social network analysis approach. J. Struct. Constr, 8(Special Issue 4). DOI: 10.22065/jsce.2020.186515.1866.
Abootorabi SM, Mehrno H, Omidvari M, (2014). Proposing a model for safety risk assessment in the construction industry using gray multi-criterion decision-making. Saf. Health Work. 10;4(3):67-74.
Aminbakhsh S, Gunduz M, Sonmez R, (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects . J. Safety Res. 1;46:99-105.
Brauers WK, Zavadskas EK, Peldschus F, Turskis Z, (2008). Multi‐objective decision‐making for road design. Transport. 23(3):183-93.
Darko A, Chan AP, Ameyaw EE, Owusu EK, Pärn E, Edwards DJ, (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. Int. J. Constr. Manag.19(5):436-52.
Fataei E, (2020). The Assessment of Environmental and Health Risks in Sabalan Dam Basin Using WRASTIC Model. J. Health, 11(4):555-73.
Fataei E, Mohammadian A, (2015). Industrial state site selection using MCDM method and GIS in Germi, Ardabil, Iran. J. Ind. Inf. Integration,3(4).
Fataei E, Torabian A, Hosseinzadeh Kalkhoran M, Alighadri M, Hosseinzadeh S, (2013). Selection of Optimum Municipal Wastewater Treatment Process Using AHP (Case Study: Ardebil, Tabriz, and Uremia). J. Health.4(3):260-72.
Halabi Y, Xu H, Long D, Chen Y, Yu Z, Alhaek F, Alhaddad W, (2022). Causal factors and risk assessment of fall accidents in the US construction industry: A comprehensive data analysis (2000–2020). Saf. Sci, 146:105537. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105537.
Hashemi M, Pourzamani HR, Chavoshani A, Mengelizadeh N, Parseh I, Heidari Farsani M, Heidari F, Rezaei S, (2017). Industrial landfill site selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process (Case study: Razi industrial town of Isfahan-Iran). J Adv Environ Health Res, 5(1):51-8.
Hashemi M, Pourzamani HR, Fadaei S, Heidari F, Safa G, Parseh I, Mohammadi H, Parastar S, (2016). Locating industrial landfill using analytical hierarchy process (AHP)(Case study: Natanz-Isfahan industrial suburbs). J Adv Environ Health Res, 4(4):182-9.
Ilbahar E, Karaşan A, Cebi S, Kahraman C, (2018). A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system.
Saf. Sci, 03:124-36.
Jafari MJ, Gharari M, Ghafari M, Omidi L, Fardi GR, Akbarzadeh A, (2014), An epidemiological study of work-related accidents in a construction firm. Safety Promot. Inj. Prev. (Tehran), 2(3):196-203.
Jozi SA, Shoshtary MT, Zadeh AR, (2015). Environmental risk assessment of dams in construction phase using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. Hum Ecol Risk Assess, 21(1):1-6.
Lingard HC, Cooke T, Blismas N, (2010). Safety climate in conditions of construction subcontracting: a multi‐level analysis. Constr. Manag. Econ. 28(8):813-25.
Liu HT, Tsai YL (2012) A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Saf. Sci, 50(4):1067-78.
Mapar M, Jafari MJ, Mansouri NA, Maheronnaghsh S, (2019). Proposing an Index to Determine the Contract Level at the Pre-Contract Stage from the Viewpoint of Health, Safety and Environment (HSE). Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health, 3(1):41-52.
McDonald MA, Lipscomb HJ, Bondy J, Glazner J, (2009). Safety is everyone's job: The key to safety on a large university construction site. J Safety Res, 40(1):53-61.
Mohammadi M, Ghasemi S, Parvaresh H, Dehghani Ghanateghestani M, (2021). Comparing the Performance Evaluation Models of Gas Refineries using AHP and TOPSIS. J Adv Environ Health Res, 9(4). DOI: 10.22102/JAEHR.2021.300098.1238.
Mohandes SR, Zhang X, (2021). Developing a Holistic Occupational Health and Safety risk assessment model: An application to a case of sustainable construction project. J. Clean. Prod, 291:125934.
Piao Y, Xu W, Wang TK, Chen JH, (2021). Dynamic fall risk assessment framework for construction workers based on dynamic Bayesian network and computer vision. J. Constr. Eng. Manag, 147(12):04021171.
Rozenfeld O, Sacks R, Rosenfeld Y, Baum H, (2010). Construction job safety analysis. Saf. sci. 48(4):491-8.
Sekhavati E, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R, (2021). Investigation and optimization of air pollution risk by a multi criteria decision making method using fuzzy TOPSIS (a case study of construction workers). J Adv Environ Health Res, 9(4). DOI: 10.22102/JAEHR.2021.292921.1229.
Sharma J, (2018). Economics of Decision Making: Exploring Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). Theor. Econ. Lett, 8(14):3141.
Xu M, Nie X, Li H, Cheng JC, Mei Z, (2022). Smart construction sites: A promising approach to improving on-site HSE management performance. J. Build. Eng, 104007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104007
Zarei E, Sarsangi V, Falah H, Gholami A, Miri SS, Mortazavi A, (2014). aziz rahimi zadeh,[Risk assessment of different units in brake pads manufacture by using Frank Morgan method]. J. Neyshabur Univ. Med. Sci, 2(2):32-7.
Zhang Z, Xu J, (2014). Applying nonlinear MODM model to supply chain management with quantity discount policy under complex fuzzy environment. J. Ind. Eng, 7(3):660-80.
