تأثیر خرد رهبران بر رفتار شهروند سازمانی با نقش میانجی فرهنگ‌سازمانی در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی (مورد: شهر تهران)

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت نوآوری های آموزشی

فرزانه شاهرخی ¹ (استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد امارات متحده عربی)
بهزاد شوقی ² (مربی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران غرب)
شیما شعله کار ³ (مربی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران شمال)

تاریخ دریافت : 1396/04/12 تاریخ پذیرش : 1396/07/29 تاریخ انتشار : 1396/09/01

کلید واژه: خرد رهبران, رفتار شهروند سازمانی, فرهنگ‌سازمانی,

چکیده مقاله :

این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تأثیر خرد رهبران بر رفتار شهروند سازمانی با نقش میانجی فرهنگ سازمانی در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی شهر تهران انجام شد.روش پژوهش برحسب هدف کاربردی، از نظر روش گرداوری داده ها توصیفی- همبستگی و همین طور از نظر نوع داده کمی بود.جامعه آماری پژوهش اساتید هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه های آزاد شهر تهرانبودند که با استفاده از محاسبه حجم نمونه در معادلات ساختاری و روش نمونه گیری تصادفی خوشه ای مرحله ای، تعداد 700 نفر به عنوان حجم نمونه انتخاب شد که همگی اعضای هیئت‌علمی تمام‌وقت بودند. به منظور گرداوری داده ها از سه پرسشنامه استاندارد خرد آردلت (2003)،رفتار شهروند سازمانی اورگان و کانوسکی (1996) و فرهنگ‌سازمانی دنیسون (2000) استفاده شد.پس از جمع آوری پرسشنامه ها، توصیف داده ها از طریق میانگین، انحراف معیار و ... از طریق نرم افزار Spss-21 و استنباط آماری داده ها از طریق مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و به کمک نرم‌افزار LISREL-v8.80 انجام پذیرفت.ویژگی های فنی پرسشنامه شامل پایایی، روایی همگرا و روایی واگرا بررسی گردید.ضرایبمسیر و ضرایب معناداری نرم‌افزار برای بررسی فرضیه های پژوهش مورد استفاده قرار گرفتند.نتایج نشان داد، درجه تناسب مدل ارائه شده با توجه به مؤلفه های پژوهش مناسب بود؛ هم چنین خرد رهبران بر رفتار شهروند سازمانی با نقش میانجی فرهنگ‌سازمانی تأثیر داشت.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of leaders’ wisdom on organizational citizenship behavior with the mediating role of organizational culture among Azad university faculty members of Tehran City. The research method was practical and descriptive type and quantitative. The population consisted of 700 full time faculty members in Tehran Azad University that were selected through cluster random sampling method. To collect the data, three standard questionnaires were used: (a) organizational wisdom by Ardlet (2003), (b) organizational citizenship behavior by Organ and Kanofski (1996), and organizational culture by Dennison (2000). After collecting the data, they were desescribed in terms of the mean and standard deviation through SPSS-21 software and inferential statistics was carried out through structural equation modeling with the help of LISREL-v8.80 software. Technical characteristics of the questionnaires were assessed including reliability, validity, convergent and divergent validity. Path coefficient and significant ones were used to test the hypotheses. The results showed that the degree of appropriateness of the proposed model was ideal with regard to research components. Also the results of the study indicated that leader wisdom had significant impact on organizational citizenship behavior with the mediating role of organizational culture among Azad university faculty members.  

منابع و مأخذ:

• اسماعیلی، ا (1393). بررسیتأثیرابعادفرهنگ‌سازمانی بررفتارهایشهروندیسازمانیکارکنان. مدیریتمنابعدرنیرویانتظامی، 2(1)، 178-153.


• حاجی­زاده، ا و اصغری، م (1390). روش­هایوتحلیل­هایآماریبانگاهبهروشتحقیقدرعلومزیستیو بهداشتی. تهران، جهاد دانشگاهی.


• حسینی سرخوش، س. م (1389). چارچوب مفهومی تأثیر رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر فرهنگ‌سازمانی. دوماهنامه توسعه انسانی پلیس، 7(3)، 59-72


• رامین مهر، ح؛ هادی زاده مقدم، ا و احمدی، ا (1388). بررسی رابطه بین ادراک از عدالت سازمانی و رفتار شهروندی سازمانی موردمطالعه: (شرکت ملی پخش فرآورده‌های نفتی ستاد تهران). پژوهش‌نامه مدیریت تحول، 1(2)، 89-65.


• میرسپاسی، ن و معمارزاده، غ (1390). بررسی رابطه رفتار شهروند سازمانی و عملکرد شغلی کارکنان شهرداری. شهرداری­ها، 11(100)، 109-93


• هومن، ح. ع. (1384). مدلیابی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزار لیزرل. تهران: سمت.

 

• Ahmadi, B., Salimi, M., & Shahmohammadi, N. (2016). Comparison of organizational culture and organizational citizenship behavior of Azad and state universities faculty members in Qazvin. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED BIOTECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH, 7, 1279-1286.


• Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on aging, 25(3), 275-324.‏


• Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American psychologist, 55(1), 122.


• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (pp. 43-44). Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.


• Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Sage.


• Choudhary, N., Kumar, R., & Philip, P. J. (2016). Effects of Transformational Leadership on Follower's Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Culture. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(7), 23-35.


• Christensen, E. W., Bierly, P. E., & Kessler, E. H. (2000). Organizational Wisdom as a Strategic Weapon. Strategies and Tactics in Business Management for The New Millennium, 13-37.


• Clayton, V. P., & Birren, J. E. (1980). The development of wisdom across the life span: A reexamination of an ancient topic. Life-span development and behavior, 3, 103-135.


• Davis, J. (2016). The Greats on Leadership: Classic Wisdom for Modern Managers. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.


• Deery, S., Rayton, B., Walsh, J., & Kinnie, N. (2016). The Costs of Exhibiting Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Human Resource Management.


• Denison, D. R. (2000). Organizational culture: Can it be a key lever for driving organizational change. The international handbook of organizational culture and climate, 347-372.


• Devece, C., Palacios-Marqués, D., & Alguacil, M. P. (2016). Organizational commitment and its effects on organizational citizenship behavior in a high-unemployment environment. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1857-1861.


• Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2016). the nature and outcomes of destructive leadership behavior in Organizations. Risky Business: Psychological, Physical and Financial Costs of High Risk Behavior in Organizations, 323.


• FREDENDALL, L. D., & ROBBINS, T. L. (2006, August). ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND QUALITY PRACTICES IN SIX SIGMA. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2006, No. 1, pp. F1-F6). Academy of Management.


• Guillaume, O., & Austin, A. (2016). Understanding organizational culture to transform a workplace behavior: Evidence from a liberal arts University. Scholedge International Journal of Management & Development ISSN 2394-3378, 3(4), 89-96.


• Hammond, M. M., Lester, G., Clapp-Smith, R., & Palanski, M. (2017). Age Diversity and Leadership: Enacting and Developing Leadership for All Ages. In The Palgrave Handbook of Age Diversity and Work (pp. 737-759). Palgrave Macmillan UK.


• Hart, T. A., Gilstrap, J. B., & Bolino, M. C. (2016). Organizational citizenship behavior and the enhancement of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3981-3988.


• Harwiki, W. (2016). The Impact of Servant Leadership on Organization Culture, Organizational Commitment, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) and Employee Performance in Women Cooperatives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 283-290.


• HAYS, J. (2016). Transformation and Transcendence for Wisdom: The Emergence and Sustainment of Wise Leaders and Organizations. A Handbook of Practical Wisdom: Leadership, Organization and Integral Business Practice, 17.


• Islam, T., Khan, M. M., & Bukhari, F. H. (2016). The role of organizational learning culture and psychological empowerment in reducing turnover intention and enhancing citizenship behavior. The Learning Organization, 23(2/3).


• Kooshki, A. S., & Zeinabadi, H. (2016). The role of organizational virtuousness in organizational citizenship behavior of teachers: The test of direct and indirect effect through job satisfaction mediating. International Review, (1-2), 7-21.


• Kriger, M., & Zhovtobryukh, Y. (2016). Strategic Leadership Wisdom. In Strategic Leadership for Turbulent Times (pp. 93-114). Palgrave Macmillan US.


• Küpers, W. (2016). A handbook of practical wisdom: Leadership, organization and integral business practice. Routledge.


• Law, A., & Staudinger, U. M. (2016). Eudaimonia and wisdom. In Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being (pp. 135-146). Springer International Publishing.


• Mathis, R. L., Jackson, J. H., Valentine, S. R., & Meglich, P. (2016). Human resource management. Nelson Education.


• Mickler, C., & Staudinger, U. M. (2008). Personal wisdom: validation and age-related differences of a performance measure. Psychology and aging, 23(4), 787.


• Mitroff, I. I. (2016). Wisdom: How the Leaders of Purpose-Driven Organizations Manage from Their Values. In Combatting Disruptive Change(pp. 47-63). Palgrave Macmillan US.


• Murtaza, G., Abbas, M., Raja, U., Roques, O., Khalid, A., & Mushtaq, R. (2016). Impact of Islamic work ethics on organizational citizenship behaviors and knowledge-sharing behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 325-333.


• Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.


• Park, G. (2016). Collaborative Wisdom: From Pervasive Logic to Effective Operational Leadership. Routledge.


• Rooney, D. (2016). Knowledge appreciates your generosity: exploring a meeting point between knowledge and wisdom. Prometheus, 1-16.


• Rooney, D., & McKenna, B. (2007). Wisdom in organizations: Whence and whither. Social Epistemology, 21(2), 113–138.


• Saeidipour, B., Kazemi, S. M. M., Mohamadabadi, A. J., & Azizi, M. (2016). The Study of the Relationship between Transformative Leadership and Individual Creativity of Staff in Organizations. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4 S1), 234.


• Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture (Vol. 45, No. 2, p. 109). American Psychological Association.


• Shepherd, D. A., McMullen, J. S., & Ocasio, W. (2016). Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management Journal.


• Spohrer, J., Bassano, C., Piciocchi, P., & Siddike, M. A. K. (2017). What Makes a System Smart? Wise?. In Advances in The Human Side of Service Engineering (pp. 23-34). Springer International Publishing.


• Srivastva, S., & Cooperrider, D. L. (1998). Organizational wisdom and executive courage. Lexington Books.


• Stanley, D. J., & Meyer, J. P. (2016). 15. Employee commitment and performance. Handbook of Employee Commitment, 208.


• Staudinger, U. M., & Pasupathi, M. (2003). Correlates of wisdom‐related performance in adolescence and adulthood: Age‐graded differences in “paths” toward desirable development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(3), 239-268.


• Sternberg, R. (2016). Wisdom Applied: The secret sauce that has allowed me already to have achieved immortality. Education Review//Reseñas Educativas, 23.


• Tang, Y. Y., Tang, Y. Y., Tsaur, S. H., & Tsaur, S. H. (2016). Supervisory support climate and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality: The role of positive group affective tone. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(10), 2331-2349.


• Trong Tuan, L. (2016). Knowledge Sharing in Public Organizations: The Roles of Servant Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-13.


• Vaill, P. B. (2007). Interpersonal Relations in Organizations and the Emergence of Wisdom. Handbook of organizational and managerial wisdom, 327.


• Vivek, S. A. (2016). Impact of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Managerial Effectiveness. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(2), 7-18.


• Weikamp, J. G., & Göritz, A. S. (2016). Organizational citizenship behaviour and job satisfaction: The impact of occupational future time perspective. Human Relations, 0018726716633512.


• Xhelili, D. (2016). Organizational culture and leadership: A qualitative study assessing the impact of leaders on organizational culture.


• Yan, A., & Xiao, Y. (2016). Servant leadership and employee voice behavior: a cross-level investigation in China. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1595.