کد مقاله : 202405051119047 بازدید : 136 صفحه: 35 - 62

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

A comparative study of novice and experienced EFL teachers’ remotivational strategies: Ecological systems and Self-determination theories in perspective

محورهای موضوعی : Curriculum Design and Development

Hadis Sadr Alavian ¹ (Department of English Language, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran)
Hasssan Asadollahfam ² (Department of English Language, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran)
Mohammadhossein Yousefi ³ (Department of English Language, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab. Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1402/12/09 تاریخ پذیرش : 1403/03/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/04/10

کلید واژه: Ecological Systems Theory (EST), Motivation, Remotivational Strategies, Self-determination Theory (SDT), Teaching Experience,

چکیده مقاله :

This study, drawing on a dual theoretical standpoint constituting ecological systems theory (EST) and self-determination theory (SDT), compared Iranian novice and experienced EFL teachers’ remotivational strategies. The participants, selected based on convenience sampling technique, comprised two equal 32-member groups of novice and experienced EFL teachers teaching different proficiency levels at six language institutes. To gather data, semi-structured interviews were conducted. The results of thematic data analysis indicated that novice and experienced teachers were approximately similar in terms of the emerging theme instances situated within the integrative SDT/EST framework. Nonetheless, novice and experienced teachers were markedly different concerning the number of theme instances for each SDT facet positioned in the EST layers. Moreover, the results of Chi-square test demonstrated significant differences between novice and experienced teachers in terms of the number of themes existing in the SDT/EST frame. The results, enhancing teacher educators’ understanding of the similarities and disparities between novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies, can provide teachers and teacher educators with awareness concerning how remotivational strategies are nested across multiple systems while simultaneously being informed by a certain motivation-specific theory.

چکیده انگلیسی:

منابع و مأخذ:

Afshari, A., Tajeddin, Z., & Abbasian, G. R. (2019). Sources of demotivation among English language learners: Novice and experienced teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 6(4), 81-59. https://dio.org/10.30479/jmrels.2019.10475.1305
Akiri, E., & Dori, Y. J. (2022). Professional growth of novice and experienced STEM teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09936-x
Alamer, A., Al Khateeb, A., & Jeno, L. M. (2023). Using WhatsApp increases language students' self‐motivation and achievement, and decreases learning anxiety: A self‐determination theory approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12753
Albalawi, F. H., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2021). From Demotivation to remotivation: A mixed-methods investigation. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211041101
Al-Qahtani, F. M., & Alwaheebi, E. W. (2023). Using motivational strategies to develop university EFL students’ reading skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(1), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.09
Amali, N. A. K., Ridzuan, M. U. M., Rahmat, N. H., Seng, H. Z., & Mustafa, N. C. (2023). Exploring Learning Environment Through Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 144-162. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/16516
Auerbach, C. E., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.
Bennett, S. V., Brown Jr, J. J., Kirby-Smith, A., & Severson, B. (2013). Influences of the heart: Novice and experienced teachers remaining in the field. Teacher Development, 17(4), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.849613
Berliner, D. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6
Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). The development of clinical reasoning expertise; Implications for teaching. In J. Higgs, M. Jones, S. Loftus, & N. Christensen (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions (3rd ed., pp. 113–121). Butterworth-Heineman/Elsevier.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
Brown, A. Danaher, P. (2017). CHE principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(3),1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1379987
Cheng, H. F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185851
Chong, S. W. (2021). Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765
Chong, S. W., Isaacs, T., & McKinley, J. (2023). Ecological systems theory and second language research. Language Teaching, 56(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000283
Csizer, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1),19-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00263.x
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2021). Investment and motivation in language learning: What's the difference? Language Teaching, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000057
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determinism in human behavior. Plenumi.
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 580-590. https://doi.org/87394281c5824203470014d0761f4360062b99c2
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/330107
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Longman.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivation in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and application. Blackwell.
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation (3rd edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351006743
Estaji, M., & Ghiasvand, F. (2022). Classroom supervision and professionalism: Matches and mismatches in the perceptions of novice and experienced teachers. Applied Research on English Language, 11(3), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2022.131707.1817
Falout, J. (2012). Coping with demotivation: EFL learners’ remotivation processes. TESL-EJ, 16(3), 1-29. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ995738.pdf
Falout, J., Murphey, T., Fukuda, T., & Trovela, M. (2013). Japanese EFL learners’ remotivation strategies. In M. Cortazzi & L. Jin (Eds.), Researching cultures of learning (pp. 328-349). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296344_17
Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Novice-service language teacher development: Bridging the gap between preservice and in-service education and development. TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), 435-449 https://dio.org/10.1002/tesq.36
Fitriyah, I., Masitoh, F., & Widiati, U. (2022). Classroom-based language assessment literacy and professional development need between novice and experienced EFL teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46539
Gao, L., Liu, H., & Liu, X. (2022). Exploring senior high school students’ English learning demotivation in mainland China. Frontiers in Psychology,13,76.
Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers' classroom behavior: Novice and experienced ESL teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086286
Ghasemi, F. (2021). L2 motivational self-system in practice: Alleviating students’ learned helplessness through a vision-based program. School Mental Health, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09464-4
Ha, X. V., & Murray, J. C. (2023). Corrective feedback: Beliefs and practices of Vietnamese primary EFL teachers. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 137-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820931897
Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (1996). The role of information reduction in skill acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 304–337. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0009
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147665
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822276
Hu, R. (2011). The relationship between demotivation and EFL learners’ English language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 88-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p88
Jalilzadeh, K., & Coombe, C. (2023). Constraints in employing learning-oriented assessment in EFL classrooms: teachers’ perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00222-8
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Teachers’ use of motivational strategies in the synchronous online environment: A self-determination theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11656-1
Jung, S. K. (2011). Demotivating and remotivating factors in learning English: A case of low-level college students. English Teaching, 66(2), 47-72. http://journal.kate.or.kr/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/kate_66_2_3.pdf
Karimi, M. N., & Asadnia, F. (2022). Variations in novice and experienced L2 teachers’ pedagogical cognitions and the associated antecedents in tertiary-level online instructional contexts. Language Awareness, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2033251
Khanzadeh Darabi, A., & Memari Hanjani, A. (2024). The comparative impact of reasoning gap tasks and opinion gap tasks on young EFL learners’ classroom engagement. Curriculum Research Journal, 13(4), 56. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/1104091
Kic-Drgas, J., Seferoğlu, G., Kılıçkaya, F., & Pereira, R. (2023). Polish, Portuguese, and Turkish EFL teachers’ perceptions on the use of OER language processing technologies in MALL: A replication study. ReCALL, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000058
King, R. B. (2021). Sociocultural and ecological perspectives on achievement motivation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12507
Koni, I., & Krull, E. (2018). Differences in novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of planning activities in terms of primary instructional tasks. Teacher Development, 22(4), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1442876
Loewen, S., & Reinders, H. (2011). Key concepts in second language acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan.
Maeng, U. & S.-M. Lee (2017). EFL teachers’ behavior of using motivational strategies: The case of teaching in the Korean context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.010
Merriam, S. B. (1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Noels, K. A., Clement, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (2001). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations of French-Canadian learners of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(5), 424-442. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.424
Pae, T. (2008). Second language orientation and self-determination theory: A structural analysis of the factors affecting second language achievement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07309509
Ramage, K. (1990). Motivational factors and persistence in foreign language study. Language Learning, 40(2), 189-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb01333.x
Rink, J. E., French, K., Lee, A. M., Solmon, A., & Lynn, S. K. (1994). A comparison of pedagogical knowledge structures of preservice students and teacher educators in two institutions. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.13.2.140
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Author et al., (2022)
Sahragard, R., & Ansaripour, E. (2014). Demotivating and remotivating factors among MA students of TEFL: An Iranian case. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language (IJSCL), 2(1), 88-107. http://www.ijscl.net/article_4502_fca54c061bd252b2c06d0af5b594f3b7.pdf
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Howard, S. K., & Tondeur, J. (2023). The more experienced, the better prepared? New evidence on the relation between teachers’ experience and their readiness for online teaching and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107530
Shvarts, A., & Bakker, A. (2019). The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26, 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1574306
Simpson, A., Day, C., Goulding, J., & Asha, J. (2022). Australian teachers' perceptions of effectiveness in a performative culture. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103542
Song, B., & Kim, T. Y. (2017). The dynamics of demotivation and remotivation among Korean high school EFL students. System, 65, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.010
Sumi, K., & Sumi, A. (2023). Need support and need satisfaction in Arabic language classes in Japanese universities from the viewpoint of self-determination theory. In Positive psychology and positive education in Asia: Understanding and fostering well-being in schools (pp. 175-191). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-5571-8_10
Sun, J. (2018). An analysis of English learning demotivation factors of minority high-school students in Western China. A case study of a county high school in Qiannan autonomous prefecture in Guizhou Province. Advances in Higher Education, 2(2), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v2i2.1085
Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Understanding novice and experienced teachers’ cognitions and practices for sustainable teacher development: The case of form-focused instruction in English language teaching. Sustainability, 14(8), 4711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084711
Tim, S.O., Daniel, L. & Pun, H.Y. (2021). The feasibility of motivational strategies in language classrooms: A tentative teacher-oriented definition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103470
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, L., Lee, I., & Park, M. (2020). Chinese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100890
Wang, S., & Littlewood, W. (2021). Exploring students’ demotivation and remotivation in learning English. System, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102617
Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200407
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2017). See and tell: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.015
Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Scott Chen Hsieh, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2020). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: the use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1567556
Yang, Z & Sanchez, H., S. (2021). Teachers’ pedagogical intentions while using motivational strategies, ELT Journal, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab070
Zhang, X., Dai, S., & Ardasheva, Y. (2020). Contributions of (de) motivation, engagement, and anxiety to English listening and speaking. Learning and Individual Differences, 79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101856
Zheng, Y., Lu, Y., & Li, J. (2023). Motivating and demotivating factors for Chinese as a foreign language learner in a British CLIL program. Foreign Language Annals, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12681

متن کامل:

Curriculum Research		Volume 5, Issue 2 Jun. 30, 2024
A comparative study of novice and experienced EFL teachers’ remotivational strategies: Ecological systems and Self-determination theories in perspective
Article info	Abstract
Article Type:	This study, drawing on a dual theoretical standpoint constituting ecological systems theory (EST) and self-determination theory (SDT), compared Iranian novice and experienced EFL teachers’ remotivational strategies. The participants, selected based on convenience sampling technique, comprised two equal 32-member groups of novice and experienced EFL teachers teaching different proficiency levels at six language institutes. To gather data, semi-structured interviews were conducted. The results of thematic data analysis indicated that novice and experienced teachers were approximately similar in terms of the emerging theme instances situated within the integrative SDT/EST framework. Nonetheless, novice and experienced teachers were markedly different concerning the number of theme instances for each SDT facet positioned in the EST layers. Moreover, the results of Chi-square test demonstrated significant differences between novice and experienced teachers in terms of the number of themes existing in the SDT/EST frame. The results, enhancing teacher educators’ understanding of the similarities and disparities between novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies, can provide teachers and teacher educators with awareness concerning how remotivational strategies are nested across multiple systems while simultaneously being informed by a certain motivation-specific theory.
Original Research
Authors:
Hadis Sadr Alavian¹ Hassan Asadollahfam² Mohammad Hossein Yousefi³


Article History:
Received: 2024.02.28 Accepted: 2024.06.15 Published: 2024.06.30
	Keywords: Ecological Systems Theory (EST), Motivation, Remotivational Strategies, Self-determination Theory (SDT), Teaching Experience

[1] 1. Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English Language, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran.

[2] . Department of English Language, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran, (Corresponding Author): asadollahfam@gmail.com

3. Department of English Language, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab. Iran.

[3]

1. Introduction

Motivation, characterized as the students’ incentive and desire to engage in sustained learning (Darvin & Norton, 2021; Loewen & Reinders, 2011), is construed to play a cardinal role in the process of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) (Dörnyei, 2020). Foregrounding the paramount importance of motivation and its integral role in language learning, Dörnyei (2001, 2020) contends that motivation is the prominent driving force behind the SLA process. Confirming the centrality of motivation, researchers (Hu, 2011; Zheng et al., 2023) have also found that a great number of English language learners believe that their lack of success in learning ESL/EFL is rooted in demotivation. Such empirical evidence has encouraged many researchers (e.g., Csizer & Dörnyei, 2005; Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2011; Gao et al., 2022; Pae, 2008; Ramage, 1990) to attempt to identify the sources of demotivation among second language learners from both learners and teachers’ perspectives.

Not only having an insight into the sources of demotivation is of great assistance in removing the obstacles to motivation, but also determining the practical ways or intervening strategies to remotivate learners is also pivotal (Afshari et al., 2019). In essence, measures should be taken to remotivate learners who become demotivated during the language learning process (Sun, 2018; Wang & Littlewood, 2021; Wu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). However, as stated by Dörnyei and Ushioda (2011), the main problem is that teachers are not completely familiar with the strategies that can be used to decrease the impacts of demotivational factors to remotivate learners and maintain their motivation. Therefore, studies are required to contribute toward the identification of the strategies which can assist teachers in remotivating their demotivated learners (Song & Kim, 2017; Wang & Littlewood, 2021). A distinction should be made here for differentiating between motivational and remotivational strategies as the focus of the current investigation is on remotivational strategies and not motivational strategies. While motivational strategies are characterized as those strategies employed by teachers to initiate and sustain learners’ motivation (Cheng & Dörnyei, 2007; Tim et al., 2021; Yang & Sanchez, 2021), remotivational strategies refer to those strategies which are employed by teachers to motivate the demotivated learners and bring back motivation online again (Falout, 2012; Falout et al., 2013; Song & Kim, 2017; Wang & Littlewood, 2021). Remotivational strategies can be subject to influences from teacher-related factors such as teaching experience.

As the review of literature indicates teaching experience, as an important factor, influences teachers’ beliefs, cognitions (Sun & Zhang, 2022), and interpretations regarding classroom events (Wolff et al., 2017), which can affect their instructional practices. Therefore, teaching experience, as an antecedent to the formation of teachers’ cognition and perceptions, should be investigated when it comes to psychological constructs such as motivation and remotivational strategies. However, there is a paucity of research exploring novice and experienced teachers in terms of their perceptions of remotivational strategies. Moreover, the results of previous studies have yielded conflicting findings in terms of novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions in general. While some investigations (e.g., Gatbonton, 2008; Karimi & Asadnia, 2022; Koni & Krull, 2018; Shvarts & Bakker, 2019; Sun & Zhang, 2022; Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2007; Westerman, 1991; Wolff et al., 2017) have revealed disparities between novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions, others (e.g., Fitriyah et al., 2022; Estaji & Ghiasvand, 2022; Bennett et al., 2013) have divulged similarities in this respect. Accordingly, the issue of teaching experience in relation to teachers’ perceptions merits more research to partially offer a resolution to such contradictory findings.

A review of extant empirical investigations into teachers’ perceptions in general (e.g., Jalilzadeh & Coombe, 2023; Kic-Drgas et al., 2023), novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions (e.g., Fitriyah et al., 2022; Scherer et al., 2023), and teachers’ perceptions of motivational strategies (e.g., Al-Qahtani & Alwaheebi, 2023; Jeon & Lee, 2023) in particular, indicates that such studies have adopted single theoretic perspectives. However, in this study, we capitalized on an integrative framework encompassing the quadripartite EST, consisting of microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem layers (Bronfenbrenner, 1979), and the tripartite SDT including autonomy, relatedness, and competence dimensions (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Such a dual vantage point can provide a holistic framework to unravel teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies (Author et al., 2022).

2. Review of the Related Literature

2.1. Remotivational Strategies

Motivation as a factor intertwined with engagement stands at the center of the language acquisition processes (Dörnyei, 2020: Khanzadeh Darabi & Memari Hanjani, 2024). Accordingly, it is highly important to remotivate the demotivated learners in the learning process. Remotivational strategies refer to those specific steps that teachers take in an attempt to maintain learners’ motivation or help learners become motivated again (Jung, 2011). In today's educational programs, assisting demotivated learners in maintaining their motivation or becoming motivated again is an important aspect and consequently teachers should accommodate remotivational strategies in their teaching (Ghasemi, 2021). Awareness about the strategies to remotivate learners can assist teachers help demotivated learners in a systematic way and, thus, pave the way for taking appropriate measures in dealing with those EFL learners who have lost their motivation along the course of language learning (Falout, 2012). Therefore, researchers (e.g., Albalawi & Al-Hoorie, 2021; Falout, 2012; Falout et al., 2013; Jung, 2011; Sahragard & Ansaripour, 2014; Song & Kim, 2017; Wang & Littlewood, 2021) have realized that it is vital to investigate teachers’ remotivational strategies.

As Maeng and Lee (2017) maintain, while studies have investigated the role of motivation in learning and teaching, more research on teachers’ motivational strategies is required. Moreover, although there have been several studies investigating motivational strategies, the area of teachers’ remotivational strategies is quite underexplored (Wang & Littlewood, 2021). Furthermore, not adequate attention has been paid to teachers’ remotivational strategies from an integrative perspective encompassing the Ecological Systems Theory (EST) and Self-determination Theory (SDT) (Author et al., 2022). Additionally, remotivational strategies have their roots in the construct of motivation and any motivation-related construct such as remotivation is a complex and multifaceted construct. Thus, exploring the remotivational strategies necessitates an integrative framework in which remotivational strategies can be viewed through a multi-layered and multi-faceted lens and a more holistic picture of motivation and remotivational strategies is provided (King, 2021).

2.2. Ecological Systems Theory (EST)

The EST postulated by Bronfenbrenner (1979) examines human development based on ecosystems, which are comprised of four layers: microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem. As the innermost layer the microsystem has to do with the immediate setting where the person is undergoing development. There is a close relationship between this layer and a face-to-face interaction among persons and objects in the immediate situation. The mesosystem is concerned with a setting where the developing person is in situations beyond the immediate setting. The exosystem has to do with the linkages and processes occurring between two or more settings, with one of them lacking the developing person; however, the events take place here that indirectly influence processes in an individual’s immediate setting (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Finally, the macrosystem contains micro-, meso-, and exosystems as a reflection of a culture or subculture. The strand of very recent studies (e.g., Amali et al., 2023; Chong, 2021; Chong et al. 2023), adopting an EST perspective in addressing a lens offering the potential to conduct layered-analysis, substantiate the rigor of this framework for studying complex constructs including remotivational strategies. As Bronfenbrenner (1979) holds, EST has the potential to provide a quadripartite layered and interconnected lens helping to map the developmental patterns of an individual in relation to a specific construct.

2.3. Self-determination Theory (SDT)

One of the most applicable theories of motivation in educational psychology is self-determination theory (SDT) (Dorniye & Ushioda, 2021). Dorniye and Ushioda (2021), highlighting the uniqueness of SDT, assert that this theory places emphasis on “people’s inherent motivational propensities” (p. 17), which renders this theory as an important motivational theory with the potential to offer immense contributions to the study of motivation in L2 settings (Alamer et al., 2023; Sumi & Sumi, 2023). Deci and Ryan (1985) distinguished between different types of motivation based on different reasons or goals that give rise to an action in SDT. According to this theory and based on Deci et al., (1989), “to be self-determining means to experience a sense of choice in initiating and regulating one’s own actions” (p. 580). Accordingly, self-determination is seen as a prerequisite for any behavior to be inherently satisfying (Dörnyei, 1994).

Based on SDT, individuals seek to meet three innate psychological needs including autonomy, relatedness, and competence (Deci & Ryan, 1985). As Ryan and Deci (2000) hold, relatedness is characterized as the learners’ established feelings of being welcomed on the part of the teachers and the speaking community. Competence refers to the learners’ feelings of capability in learning the subject matter. Autonomy features the learners' feelings of their ability in choosing the subject under instruction and the ways to independently use the learning materials rather than the external impositions being excreted on the learners' choices.

2.4. Teaching Experience

Novice and experienced teachers display variations and differences in terms of their perceptions, which result in disparities in terms of their instructional practices (Berliner, 2001; Farrell, 2012; Sun & Zhang, 2022; Tsui, 2003). Novices need to take into account the potential effect of all available information and actively search for information since they have not yet developed the type of knowledge that allows for efficient and effective cognitive processing (Boshuizen & Schmidt, 2008; Haider & Frensch, 1996). Therefore, extensive practice for experienced teachers leads to accumulation of knowledge, which can help such teachers implement instructional practices more effectively and efficiently. In contrast, novice teachers due to a lack of knowledge gained from extensive experience cannot make informed and efficient instructional decisions (Fitriyah et al., 2022).

A review of extant empirical literature indicates that novice and experienced teachers are different in terms of self-efficacy beliefs (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2007), interpretations of problematic classroom management events (Wolff et al., 2017), decision making (Westerman, 1991), pedagogical knowledge (Gatbonton, 2008), professional growth dimensions and teaching efficacy (Akiri & Dori, 2022), cognitions and practices in terms of sustainable teacher development (Sun & Zhang, 2022), student-teacher interaction patterns (Sha et al., 2022), language assessment literacy (Fitriyah et al., 2022), perceptions about classroom supervision and professionalism (Estaji & Ghiasvand, 2022), pedagogical cognitions in online instructional contexts (Karimi & Asadnia, 2022), factors antecedents to retaining teachers in the field (Bennett et al., 2013), and perceptions in regard to sources of demotivation among learners (Afshari et al., 2019). However, previous investigations lack a rigorous conceptual framework for studying teachers’ perceptions in general and teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies in particular. Thus, the current study, situated in an integrative theoretic framework encompassing SDT and EST, aimed at investigating Iranian novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies. It should be noted that the SDT and EST exist in isolation in the extant literature. However, in this study, in a novel attempt, we integrated these two theories to provide a multi-layered and multi-faceted analysis of teachers’ remotivational strategies.

To address the objective of this study, the following research question was formulated:

· RQ: What are the areas of matches and/or mismatches between the perceptions of Iranian novice and experienced EFL teachers for the strategies they adopt to remotivate Iranian EFL learners from an integrative EST/SDT perspective?

3. Methodology

3.1. Design

This study mainly adopted a qualitative design in which only qualitative data were collected and analyzed. However, to check the significance of the similarities/differences between experienced and novice teachers’ perceptions, statistical analyses were also employed. Thus, semi-structured interviews were used to gather the required data. The collected data became then subject to thematic analysis to unravel novice and experienced EFL teachers’ remotivational strategies from an EST and SDT theoretical perspective.

3.2. Participants

The participants comprised a total of 64 Iranian EFL teachers teaching different levels of language proficiency in six language institutes in Isfahan and Hamedan provinces. All the participants were native speakers of Persian selected based on convenience sampling technique from both male (N=34) and female (N=30) teachers. Their age ranged between 21 and 45. The teachers with less than three years of teaching experience (N=32) were considered novices and teachers with more than three years of experience (N=32) were regarded as experienced teachers in line with Farrell (2012). Since this study aimed to compare the remotivational strategies between novice and experienced teachers, an equal number of novice and experienced teachers was recruited. The participants were selected only from among those teachers teaching at language institutes and EFL teachers teaching in public state schools were excluded due to two reasons. Firstly, it was not manageable for the researcher to choose participants from public schools. Moreover, delimiting the participants to a specific educational context would yield more consistent results as remotivational strategies are context-sensitive (Noels et al., 2001).

3.3. Instruments

Semi-Structured Interviews

Semi-structured interviews were conducted to uncover the strategies Iranian EFL teachers perceive to use to remotivate Iranian EFL learners. To develop the interview questions, first, the literature related to remotivational strategies (e.g., Albalawi & Al-Hoorie, 2021; Falout, 2012; Falout et al., 2013; Jung, 2011; Sahragard & Ansaripour, 2014; Song & Kim, 2017; Wang & Littlewood, 2021) was extensively reviewed and an initial list of 12 questions was prepared. Following that, the questions were situated within the integrative EST/SDT theoretic perspective. This list of questions became subject to expert opinions in a panel of three Ph.D. holders in the field of TEFL to assure content validity and the relevance of the questions to the adopted theoretic framework. Afterward, the list of questions was reviewed and minor modifications were made. Moreover, three questions were discarded due to having overlapping content and a final list of nine questions won the approval of the panel. Thus, the list of questions consisted of nine questions in which the first two questions addressed remotivational strategies from a general perspective to help set the stage for the whole interview process. Questions 3, 4, 5, and 6 addressed the EST perspectives in regard to remotivational strategies, and the last three questions tapped into teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies via an SDT lens. Next, this list of questions was piloted on five teachers to modify any vagueness and ambiguity in regard to content in an attempt to enhance the readability and clarity of the questions. The final list of questions (See Appendix) was prepared after minor changes based on the teachers’ comments at the piloting stage. It should be noted that the interviews in the present study were of a semi-structured type and thus the questions developed were just used for initiating the interview process as the whole process of the interview was conducted in a dialogic manner (Brown & Danaher, 2017).

3.4. Data Collection and Analysis Procedure

At the onset of the study, a group of 64 language teachers were recruited to collect the required data through semi-structured interviews. Before conducting the interviews, these teachers were briefed regarding the objectives of the study. To observe ethical considerations, the participants were informed that the collected data would be used only for research purposes. Moreover, they were told that the collected data would be kept confidential. Following that, they were given a short demographic questionnaire to identify the novice and experienced teachers. To categorize teachers into experienced and novice, Farrell’s (2012) classification was employed. Based on Farrell’s (2012) classification, in this study teachers with less than three years of teaching experience were considered novices and those with above three years of teaching experience were regarded as experienced ones. Subsequently, through making proper arrangements and checking class hour schedules of the teachers, they were interviewed for the strategies they adopted to remotivate Iranian EFL learners. The duration of interviews was within the range of 45 minutes to 1.5 hours. The interviews were carried out face-to-face in Persian which was the mother tongue of the participants. The reason behind using participants’ mother tongue was that they felt more convenient with Persian compared to English as they were able to express their perceptions without the possible hindrance caused by a second language. Note should be taken that although the participants were English teachers and speculatively had a satisfactory level of English language proficiency, the researcher gave them the choice of either of the two languages for the interview process and all the participants selected their mother tongue. The interview contents were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for content analysis. The excerpts reported in the current manuscript are the translated versions from Persian into English.

To analyze the data, the procedures of thematic analysis proposed by Auerback and Silverstein (2003) were followed. As Auerback and Silverstein (2003) maintain, six stages should be conducted in the analysis of qualitative data. These phases are: getting familiar with the data, coming up with initial codes, looking for themes among codes, reviewing the themes, defining and labeling the themes, and producing the final report. All these stages were followed strictly by the two analyzers to produce the final report. To establish trustworthiness, as an important step in qualitative research, in line with Merriam (1997), the results of the analysis were submitted to 10 participants, 5 from each group, to make sure that the interpretation of the data had been carried out appropriately. To establish credibility, the researcher and a research assistant with a Ph.D. degree in applied linguistics independently categorized the data. Following that, the degree of agreement was calculated based on Holsti’s (1969) coefficient of reliability. The value turned out to be 0.89, which indicated an acceptable level of consistency.

4. Results

4.1. Comparing novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions in the microsystem layer

The microsystem includes elements such as individuals and objects existing in the immediate context (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Thus, the microsystem in an EFL context constitutes instructional materials and learners’ interactions among themselves and with the teacher in the immediate teaching-learning environment. Moreover, SDT constitutes autonomy, relatedness, and competence (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Tables 1 and 2 present the results of thematic analysis for novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies in the microsystem layer of EST and the three facets of SDT.

Table 1. Results of Thematic Analysis for the Microsystem Layer of EST and SDT Dimensions for Novice Teachers

No	Autonomy	Frequency and Percentage	Relatedness	Frequency and Percentage	Competence	Frequency and Percentage	Total
1	Giving learners control over the learning content	2 (6.25%)	Encouraging learners to speak together	10 ( 31.25%)	Complementing learners who have good performance	24 (75%)	36
2			Asking learners to respect each other’s opinions	20 (62.5%)			20
Total		2		30		24	56

Table 2. Results of Thematic Analysis for the Microsystem Layer of EST and SDT Dimensions for Experienced Teachers

No	Autonomy	Frequency and Percentage	Relatedness	Frequency and Percentage	Competence	Frequency and Percentage	Total
1	Giving learners control over learning content.	25 (78.12%)	Encouraging learners to cooperate in learning.	27 (84.37%)	Encouraging learners to self-assess themselves.	31 (96.87%)	83
2	Encouraging learners to voice their needs and wants	24 (75%)	Asking learners to respect each other’s opinions	25 (78.12%)	Encouraging learners to compare their performance with others	30 (93.75%)	79
3			Teaching learners to empathize with other classmates	23 (71.87%)	Complementing learners who have good performance	28 (87.5%)	51
Total		49		75		89	213

Table 3 displays the results of the thematic analysis for comparing the theme instances of novice and experienced teachers in regard to the microsystem layer.

Table 3. Comparing the Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Results of Thematic Analysis for the Microsystem Layer

Experience level	Autonomy	Relatedness	Competence	Total Mentions
Novice	2	30	24	56
Experienced	49	75	89	213

As indicated in Table 3, both novice and experienced teachers mentioned themes in regard to the three facets of SDT (autonomy, relatedness, and competence) in the microsystem layer. Nevertheless, novice and experienced teachers are markedly different not only in the total mentions related to SDT dimensions but also in the individual dimensions of SDT in the microsystem layer. As shown in Table 3, the total number of themes for novice teachers was 56 while that of experienced teachers equals 213. Moreover, novice teachers had two theme mentions for the autonomy aspect of SDT whereas the corresponding number for experienced teachers is 49. Likewise, the number of theme instances for the relatedness aspect of SDT for novice and experienced teachers was 30 and 75, respectively. Similarly, the number of theme instances with respect to the competence dimension of SDT for novice and experienced teachers was 24 and 89.

To investigate if there existed a significant difference between the number of theme instances for the novice and experienced teachers in the microsystem layer, a Chi-square test was run. Table 4 portrays the results of the Chi-square test.

Table 4. Results of the Chi-square Test for the Theme Instances between Novice and Experienced Teachers in the Microsystem Layer

Test Statistics
	Novice and Experienced Microsystem
Chi-Square	91.632a
df	1
Asymp. Sig.	.000

As indicated in Table 4, there was a significant difference in the number of theme instances between novice and experienced teachers in the microsystem layer (χ2 = 91.63, df = 1, p=.00 < 0.001). In other words, there was a significant difference between the frequency of theme mentions in the microsystem layer for novice (Frequency=56) and experienced (Frequency=213) teachers.

4.2. Comparing novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions in the mesosystem layer

The mesosystem encompasses the settings existing beyond the immediate context while such settings have a close relevance to the developing person (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Thus, the mesosystem in an EFL context encompasses other teachers and colleagues. Tables 5 and 6 depict the results of thematic analysis for novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies in the mesosystem layer of EST and the three facets of SDT.

Table 5. Results of Thematic Analysis for the Mesosystem Layer of EST and SDT Dimensions for Novice Teachers

Autonomy

Frequency and Percentage

Relatedness

Frequency and Percentage

Competence

Frequency and Percentage

Total

Asking other teachers about how they acknowledge learners’ preference

(3.12%)

Seeking colleagues’ advice concerning the improvement of interpersonal relationships between learners

(21.85%)

Seeking more experienced teachers’ expertise in learners’ self-assessment techniques

(46.87%)

Total

Table 6. Results of Thematic Analysis for the Mesosystem Layer of EST and SDT Dimensions for Experienced Teachers

No	Autonomy	Frequency and Percentage	Relatedness	Frequency and Percentage	Competence	Frequency and Percentage	Total
1	Enquiring the supervisor about the ways learner control can be promoted	22 (68.75%)	Seeking colleagues’ advice concerning the improvement of interpersonal relationships between learners	20 (62.5%)	Seeking more experienced teachers’ expertise in learners’ self-assessment techniques	16 (50%)	58
2	Asking other teachers about how they acknowledge learners’ preferences	21 (65.62%)	Asking the board of managers for holding sessions on how to cultivate rapport among learners	19 (59.37%)	Asking the board of education for holding sessions on self-assessment	15 (46.87%)	55
Total		43		39		31	113

Table 7 presents the results of the thematic analysis for comparing the theme instances of novice and experienced teachers with respect to the mesosystem layer.

Table 7. Comparing the Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Results of Thematic Analysis for the Mesosystem Layer

Experience level	Autonomy	Relatedness	Competence	Total Mentions
Novice	1	7	15	23
Experienced	43	39	31	113

As shown in Table 7, both novice and experienced teachers have mentioned themes in relation to the three facets of SDT in the mesosystem layer. Nonetheless, novice and experienced teachers are substantially different not only in the total number of mentions related to SDT dimensions but also in the individual aspects of SDT (autonomy, relatedness, and competence) in the mesosystem layer. As presented in Table 7, the total number of themes for novice teachers was 23 whereas experienced teachers mentioned 113 themes. Furthermore, novice teachers had only one theme mentioned for the autonomy aspect of SDT whereas the corresponding number for experienced teachers was 43. Similarly, the number of theme instances for the relatedness aspect of SDT for novice and experienced teachers were 7 and 39, respectively. In a similar vein, the number of theme instances with respect to the competence dimension of SDT for novice and experienced teachers were 15 and 31.

To explore whether there was a significant difference between the number of theme instances for the novice and experienced teachers in the mesosystem layer, a Chi-square test was conducted. Table 8 portrays the results of the Chi-square test.

Table 8. Results of the Chi-square Test for the Theme Instances between Novice and Experienced Teachers in the Microsystem Layer

Test Statistics
	Novice and Experienced Mesosystem
Chi-Square	59.559a
df	1
Asymp. Sig.	.000

As presented in Table 8, there was a significant difference in the number of theme instances between novice and experienced teachers in the mesosystem layer (χ2 = 59.55, df = 1, p=.00 < 0.001). In other words, there was a significant difference between the frequency of theme mentions in the mesosystem layer for novice (Frequency=23) and experienced (Frequency=113) teachers.

4.3. Comparing novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions in the exosystem layer

The exosystem layer covers the relationships, linkages, and processes taking place between the previous layers (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). As Bronfenbrenner explains further, the exosystem layer at a conceptual level shows the linkages between the microsystem and mesosystem layers via a process-oriented lens. Tables 9 and 10 display the results of thematic analysis for novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies in the exosystem layer of EST and the three facets of SDT.

Table 9. Results of Thematic Analysis for the Exosystem Layer of EST and SDT Dimensions for Novice Teachers

Autonomy

Frequency and Percentage

Relatedness

Frequency and Percentage

Competence

Frequency and Percentage

Total

Explaining the linkages between cooperative learning and motivation in professional meetings

(12.5%)

Emphasizing a process-oriented perspective towards learners’ competence in teacher development sessions

(15.62%)

Total

Table 10. Results of Thematic Analysis for the Exosystem Layer of EST and SDT Dimensions for Experienced Teachers

No	Autonomy	Frequency and Percentage	Relatedness	Frequency and Percentage	Competence	Frequency and Percentage	Total
1	Explaining how learners’ autonomy is related to motivation in professional meetings	18 (56.25%)	Explaining the linkages between cooperative learning and motivation in professional meetings	17 (53.12%)	Emphasizing a process-oriented perspective towards learners’ competence in teacher development sessions	15 (46.87%)	50
2	Drawing colleagues’ attention to promoting learners’ autonomy in teacher development sessions	17 (53.12%)	Explicating how teachers’ acknowledgment of the benefits of cooperation lead to more motivation in teachers’ meetings	16 (50%)	Explaining the linkages between colleagues’ perceptions of competence and development of learners’ competence in teachers’ meetings	15 (46.87%)	48
Total		35		33		30	98

Table 11 demonstrates the results of thematic analysis for comparing the theme instances of novice and experienced teachers in relation to the exosystem layer.

Table 11. Comparing the Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Results of Thematic Analysis for the Exosystem Layer

Experience level	Autonomy	Relatedness	Competence	Total Mentions
Novice	0	4	5	9
Experienced	35	33	30	98

According to the information in Table 11, both novice and experienced teachers mentioned themes in regard to the relatedness and competence aspects of SDT in the exosystem layer. However, novice teachers did not generate any themes concerning the autonomy aspect of SDT at the exosystem layer. As shown in Table 11, novice and experienced teachers were markedly different not only in the total mentions related to SDT dimensions but also in the individual dimensions of SDT in the exosystem layer. Based on the information in Table 11, the total number of themes for novice teachers in the exosystem layer was 9 while that of experienced teachers equaled 98. Moreover, novice teachers had no theme mentions for the autonomy aspect of SDT whereas the corresponding number for experienced teachers was 35. Likewise, the number of theme instances for the relatedness aspect of SDT for novice and experienced teachers were 4 and 33, respectively. Similarly, the number of theme instances in respect to the competence dimension of SDT for novice and experienced teaches were 5 and 30.

To probe the significant difference between the number of theme instances for the novice and experienced teachers in the exosystetm layer, a Chi-square test was applied. Table 12 shows the results.

Table 12. Results of Chi-square Test for the Theme Instances between Novice and Experienced Teachers in the Exosystem Layer

Test Statistics
	Novice and Experienced Exosystem
Chi-Square	74.028a
df	1
Asymp. Sig.	.000

As seen in Table 12, there was a significant difference in the number of theme instances between novice and experienced teachers in the exosystem layer (χ2 = 74.02, df = 1, p=.00 < 0.001). Put it another way, there was a significant difference between the frequency of theme mentions in the exosystem layer for novice (Frequency=9) and experienced (Frequency=98) teachers.

4.4. Comparing novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions in the macrosystem layer

The macrosystem is characterized as the realization of a specific culture or subculture as the consequence of the combination of micro-, meso-, and exo systems (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). As Bronfenbrenner maintains further, the macrosystem is concerned with holding and promoting a multi-dimensional perspective towards the development taking place in the environment. Tables 13 and 14 demonstrate the results of thematic analysis for novice teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies in the macrosystem layer of EST and the three facets of SDT.

Table 13. Results of Thematic Analysis for the Macrosystem Layer of EST and SDT Dimensions for Novice Teachers

Autonomy

Frequency and Percentage

Relatedness

Frequency and Percentage

Competence

Frequency and Percentage

Total

Holding and promoting a multidimensional view towards cooperative learning

(6.25%).

Total

Table 14. Results of Thematic Analysis for the Macrosystem Layer of EST and SDT Dimensions for Experienced Teachers

Autonomy

Frequency and Percentage

Relatedness

Frequency and Percentage

Competence

Frequency and Percentage

Total

Holding and promoting a holistic view towards accommodating learners’ control and preferences

(37.5%)

Holding and promoting a multidimensional view towards cooperative learning

(43.75%)

Holding and promoting a multi-perspective, competence-development view in teaching and learning

(34.37%)

Total

Table 15 illustrates the results of thematic analysis for comparing the theme instances of novice and experienced teachers in relation to the macrosystem layer.

Table 15. Comparing the Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Results of Thematic Analysis for the Macrosystem Layer

Experience level	Autonomy	Relatedness	Competence	Total Mentions
Novice	0	2	0	2
Experienced	12	14	11	37

As displayed in Table 15, experienced teachers mentioned the themes concerning the three facets of SDT in the macrosystem layer. Conversely, novice teachers failed to make any mentions regarding the autonomy and competence dimensions of SDT and only generated two theme instances concerning the relatedness aspect of SDT. Nevertheless, novice and experienced teachers were substantially different not only in the total number of mentions related to SDT dimensions but also in the individual aspects of SDT in the macrosystem layer. As presented in Table 15, the total number of themes for novice teachers in the macrosystem layer was 2 whereas experienced teachers mentioned 37 themes. Furthermore, novice teachers mentioned no theme for the autonomy aspect of SDT whereas the corresponding number for experienced teachers was 12. Similarly, the number of theme instances for the relatedness aspect of SDT for novice and experienced teachers was 2 and 14, respectively. Moreover, the number of theme instances with respect to the competence dimension of SDT for novice and experienced teachers ranged between 0 and 11.

To explore whether there was a significant difference between the number of theme instances for the novice and experienced teachers in the macrosystem layer, a Chi-square test was performed. Table 16 exhibits the results.

Table 16. Results of the Chi-square Test for the Theme Instances between Novice and Experienced Teachers in the Macrosystem Layer

Test Statistics
	Novice and Experienced Macrosystem
Chi-Square	31.410a
df	1
Asymp. Sig.	.000

As noticed in Table 16, there was a significant difference in the number of theme instances between novice and experienced teachers in the macrosystem layer (χ2 = 31.42, df = 1, p=.00 < 0.001). As such, there was a significant difference between the frequency of theme mentions in the macrosystem layer for novice (Frequency=2) and experienced (Frequency=37) teachers.

5. Discussion

Drawing on a dual theoretical standpoint constituting ecological systems theory (EST) and self-determination theory (SDT), this study aimed at comparing Iranian novice and experienced EFL teachers’ remotivational strategies. The results showed both similarities and differences between the perceptions of novice and experienced teachers towards the strategies they adopted to remotivate Iranian EFL learners. As for similarities, the results demonstrated that both novice and experienced teachers touched upon all the SDT (microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem) and EST facets (relatedness, autonomy, and competence) dimensions concerning the adoption of remotivational strategies. However, experienced teachers were markedly different from novices in the number of theme instances both from an SDT perspective and EST lens.

Consistent with the results of the current study, revealing similarities between novice and experienced teachers, some studies have shown that novice and experienced teachers are similar in terms of their perceptions. For instance, Fitriyah et al.’s (2022) results revealed similarities between novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceptions in fundamental principles in language assessment and using them in the classroom. In a similar vein, Estaji and Ghiasvand’s (2022) findings showed that both novice and experienced teachers had similar perceptions towards supervision. Similarly, Bennett et al.’s (2013) results indicated that both novice and experienced teachers had similar perceptions concerning the factors which made them stay in the teaching profession.

The similarities between novice and experienced teachers in terms of remotivational strategies can be ascribed to the holistic lens provided by the integrative SDT/EST theoretic perspective adopted in this study. As Van Lier (1997) maintains EST offers a lens “to look at the learning process, the actions and activities of teachers and learners, the multi-layered nature of interaction and language use, in all their complexity and as a network of interdependencies among all the elements in the setting” (p. 3). Additionally, the SDT has the protentional to address different dimensions and processes involved in motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000) and consequently the motivational and remotivational strategies (Sadr Alavian et al., 2022). Accordingly, the multi-dimensional and holistic attributes of the integrative theoretic perspective adopted in this study provided the lens to capture the intricate nature of both novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions regarding remotivational strategies.

The results of the present study concerning the differences between novice and experienced teachers resonate with the findings of previous studies such as those by Afshari et al. (2019). Similar to the findings of the current study, Afshari et al.’s results indicated marked differences between novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions. Likewise, Gatbonton’s (2008) findings revealed differences between novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions in terms of different knowledge categories. Moreover, Sun and Zhang (2022) showed that both novice and experienced teachers favored a focus on instruction but novice teachers failed to implement their perceptions in practice, whereas the experienced counterparts carried it out consistently. Additionally, Karimi and Asadnia’s (2022) results demonstrated disparities in the pedagogical cognitive frameworks of novice and experienced teachers.

The results concerning the differences between novice and experienced teachers in terms of remotivational strategies can be attributed to various approaches that experienced and novice teachers interpret information in the teaching process. As Rink et al. (1994) contend, experienced teachers pay attention to various facts, interpreting information differently than novices. Studies have shown that experienced teachers seek to combine knowledge of teaching and learning when analyzing classroom events, while novices focus on surface-level concerns, including teacher and learner characteristics or behavior as well as disciplinary concerns (Tsui, 2003). In a similar vein, Shvarts and Bakker (2019) note that experienced teachers are more supportive and capable of promoting learner autonomy as one of the facets of SDT. Moreover, previous studies (Berliner, 2001; Farrell, 2012) show that expert teachers are characterized by having sophisticated, contextualized knowledge of classroom events, the ability to adapt and integrate their knowledge of types of events and students, and being more perceptive to the multidimensional complexity of classroom reality compared with novices. Therefore, the extensive practice and the more expanded repertoire of knowledge by experienced teachers may impact their capability to look for relevant cues in a more effective and efficient manner as compared with their novice counterparts.

5. Conclusion

The results of this study substantiated the findings of previous investigations concerning the similarities and differences between novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions. Such findings underscore the importance of acknowledging and accommodating the potential of integrative frameworks in unraveling teachers’ perceptions in general and teachers’ perceptions of remotivational strategies in particular. The potential of integrative frameworks, such as the SDT/EST perspective, lies in that they provide a robust, multi-dimensional, and holistic perspective that can lend itself to uncovering the complexities and multi-dimensionalities inherent in language teachers’ perceptions. The findings of the present study, apart from enriching the theoretical and empirical literature, shed light on how novice and experienced teachers conceptualized remotivational strategies.

In addition to the theoretical implications, the findings of the current research hold practical value in informing the creation of workshop resources within teacher education programs aimed at enhancing teachers' array of remotivational tactics for pedagogical implementation. More specifically, teacher educators need to develop their awareness in addressing novice teachers’ repertoire of remotivational strategies as the findings of the current study indicated that they perceived to adopt fewer number of remotivational strategies in comparison with their experienced counterparts. Novice teachers’ awareness concerning the autonomy dimension of SDT needs to be fostered by teacher educators as the findings revealed that there were substantially fewer instances of autonomy-related themes in informing their remotivational strategies compared to other facets of SDT. Likewise, experienced teachers’ awareness in regard to higher layers of EST needs to be raised as such teachers’ perceptions were more inclined towards the microsystem and mesosystem layers and showed less tendency towards the upper layers of EST in informing their remotivational strategies.

In this study, only teachers’ perceptions were sought via semi-structured interview content. Future research on the actual practice of remotivational strategies is recommended as previous investigations (Ha & Murray, 2023; Wang et al., 2020) have revealed incongruence between teachers’ perceptions and their practices. Other investigations may compare teachers’ remotivational strategies across private and public educational contexts as previous studies (Ghasemi, 2022; Simpson et al., 2022) have demonstrated contextual variations as factors contributing to teachers’ perceptions. Future research may draw on other extant theoretical frameworks related to motivation such as motivational self-system to enrich the literature in terms of teachers’ remotivational strategies in the light of EST.

References

Afshari, A., Tajeddin, Z., & Abbasian, G. R. (2019). Sources of demotivation among English language learners: Novice and experienced teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 6(4), 81-59. https://dio.org/10.30479/jmrels.2019.10475.1305

Akiri, E., & Dori, Y. J. (2022). Professional growth of novice and experienced STEM teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09936-x

Alamer, A., Al Khateeb, A., & Jeno, L. M. (2023). Using WhatsApp increases language students' self‐motivation and achievement, and decreases learning anxiety: A self‐determination theory approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12753

Albalawi, F. H., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2021). From Demotivation to remotivation: A mixed-methods investigation. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211041101

Al-Qahtani, F. M., & Alwaheebi, E. W. (2023). Using motivational strategies to develop university EFL students’ reading skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(1), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.09

Amali, N. A. K., Ridzuan, M. U. M., Rahmat, N. H., Seng, H. Z., & Mustafa, N. C. (2023). Exploring Learning Environment Through Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 144-162. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/16516

Auerbach, C. E., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.

Bennett, S. V., Brown Jr, J. J., Kirby-Smith, A., & Severson, B. (2013). Influences of the heart: Novice and experienced teachers remaining in the field. Teacher Development, 17(4), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.849613

Berliner, D. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6

Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). The development of clinical reasoning expertise; Implications for teaching. In J. Higgs, M. Jones, S. Loftus, & N. Christensen (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions (3rd ed., pp. 113–121). Butterworth-Heineman/Elsevier.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

Brown, A. Danaher, P. (2017). CHE principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(3),1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1379987

Cheng, H. F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185851

Chong, S. W. (2021). Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765

Chong, S. W., Isaacs, T., & McKinley, J. (2023). Ecological systems theory and second language research. Language Teaching, 56(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000283

Csizer, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1),19-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00263.x

Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2021). Investment and motivation in language learning: What's the difference? Language Teaching, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000057

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determinism in human behavior. Plenumi.

Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 580-590. https://doi.org/87394281c5824203470014d0761f4360062b99c2

Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/330107

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Longman.

Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivation in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and application. Blackwell.

Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.

Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.

Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation (3rd edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351006743

Estaji, M., & Ghiasvand, F. (2022). Classroom supervision and professionalism: Matches and mismatches in the perceptions of novice and experienced teachers. Applied Research on English Language, 11(3), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2022.131707.1817

Falout, J. (2012). Coping with demotivation: EFL learners’ remotivation processes. TESL-EJ, 16(3), 1-29. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ995738.pdf

Falout, J., Murphey, T., Fukuda, T., & Trovela, M. (2013). Japanese EFL learners’ remotivation strategies. In M. Cortazzi & L. Jin (Eds.), Researching cultures of learning (pp. 328-349). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296344_17

Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Novice-service language teacher development: Bridging the gap between preservice and in-service education and development. TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), 435-449 https://dio.org/10.1002/tesq.36

Fitriyah, I., Masitoh, F., & Widiati, U. (2022). Classroom-based language assessment literacy and professional development need between novice and experienced EFL teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46539

Gao, L., Liu, H., & Liu, X. (2022). Exploring senior high school students’ English learning demotivation in mainland China. Frontiers in Psychology,13,76.

Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers' classroom behavior: Novice and experienced ESL teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086286

Ghasemi, F. (2021). L2 motivational self-system in practice: Alleviating students’ learned helplessness through a vision-based program. School Mental Health, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09464-4

Ha, X. V., & Murray, J. C. (2023). Corrective feedback: Beliefs and practices of Vietnamese primary EFL teachers. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 137-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820931897

Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (1996). The role of information reduction in skill acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 304–337. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0009

Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147665

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822276

Hu, R. (2011). The relationship between demotivation and EFL learners’ English language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 88-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p88

Jalilzadeh, K., & Coombe, C. (2023). Constraints in employing learning-oriented assessment in EFL classrooms: teachers’ perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00222-8

Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Teachers’ use of motivational strategies in the synchronous online environment: A self-determination theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11656-1

Jung, S. K. (2011). Demotivating and remotivating factors in learning English: A case of low-level college students. English Teaching, 66(2), 47-72. http://journal.kate.or.kr/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/kate_66_2_3.pdf

Karimi, M. N., & Asadnia, F. (2022). Variations in novice and experienced L2 teachers’ pedagogical cognitions and the associated antecedents in tertiary-level online instructional contexts. Language Awareness, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2033251

Khanzadeh Darabi, A., & Memari Hanjani, A. (2024). The comparative impact of reasoning gap tasks and opinion gap tasks on young EFL learners’ classroom engagement. Curriculum Research Journal, 13(4), 56. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/1104091

Kic-Drgas, J., Seferoğlu, G., Kılıçkaya, F., & Pereira, R. (2023). Polish, Portuguese, and Turkish EFL teachers’ perceptions on the use of OER language processing technologies in MALL: A replication study. ReCALL, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000058

King, R. B. (2021). Sociocultural and ecological perspectives on achievement motivation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12507

Koni, I., & Krull, E. (2018). Differences in novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of planning activities in terms of primary instructional tasks. Teacher Development, 22(4), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1442876

Loewen, S., & Reinders, H. (2011). Key concepts in second language acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan.

Maeng, U. & S.-M. Lee (2017). EFL teachers’ behavior of using motivational strategies: The case of teaching in the Korean context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.010

Merriam, S. B. (1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Noels, K. A., Clement, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (2001). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations of French-Canadian learners of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(5), 424-442. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.424

Pae, T. (2008). Second language orientation and self-determination theory: A structural analysis of the factors affecting second language achievement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07309509

Ramage, K. (1990). Motivational factors and persistence in foreign language study. Language Learning, 40(2), 189-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb01333.x

Rink, J. E., French, K., Lee, A. M., Solmon, A., & Lynn, S. K. (1994). A comparison of pedagogical knowledge structures of preservice students and teacher educators in two institutions. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.13.2.140

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Sahragard, R., & Ansaripour, E. (2014). Demotivating and remotivating factors among MA students of TEFL: An Iranian case. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language (IJSCL), 2(1), 88-107. http://www.ijscl.net/article_4502_fca54c061bd252b2c06d0af5b594f3b7.pdf

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Howard, S. K., & Tondeur, J. (2023). The more experienced, the better prepared? New evidence on the relation between teachers’ experience and their readiness for online teaching and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107530

Shvarts, A., & Bakker, A. (2019). The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26, 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1574306

Simpson, A., Day, C., Goulding, J., & Asha, J. (2022). Australian teachers' perceptions of effectiveness in a performative culture. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103542

Song, B., & Kim, T. Y. (2017). The dynamics of demotivation and remotivation among Korean high school EFL students. System, 65, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.010

Sumi, K., & Sumi, A. (2023). Need support and need satisfaction in Arabic language classes in Japanese universities from the viewpoint of self-determination theory. In Positive psychology and positive education in Asia: Understanding and fostering well-being in schools (pp. 175-191). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-5571-8_10

Sun, J. (2018). An analysis of English learning demotivation factors of minority high-school students in Western China. A case study of a county high school in Qiannan autonomous prefecture in Guizhou Province. Advances in Higher Education, 2(2), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v2i2.1085

Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Understanding novice and experienced teachers’ cognitions and practices for sustainable teacher development: The case of form-focused instruction in English language teaching. Sustainability, 14(8), 4711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084711

Tim, S.O., Daniel, L. & Pun, H.Y. (2021). The feasibility of motivational strategies in language classrooms: A tentative teacher-oriented definition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103470

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003

Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Wang, L., Lee, I., & Park, M. (2020). Chinese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100890

Wang, S., & Littlewood, W. (2021). Exploring students’ demotivation and remotivation in learning English. System, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102617

Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200407

Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2017). See and tell: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.015

Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Scott Chen Hsieh, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2020). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: the use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1567556

Yang, Z & Sanchez, H., S. (2021). Teachers’ pedagogical intentions while using motivational strategies, ELT Journal, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab070

Zhang, X., Dai, S., & Ardasheva, Y. (2020). Contributions of (de) motivation, engagement, and anxiety to English listening and speaking. Learning and Individual Differences, 79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101856

Zheng, Y., Lu, Y., & Li, J. (2023). Motivating and demotivating factors for Chinese as a foreign language learner in a British CLIL program. Foreign Language Annals, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12681

Appendix

Semi-Structured Interview Questions

· Have you ever thought about how you usually remotivate your learners?

· What do you think about remotivating your learners in general? What does remotivating your learners entail?

· What strategies do you use to remotivate your learners related to the immediate classroom setting and the objects in this context?

· What strategies do you use to remotivate your learners related to the situations beyond the classroom?

· What strategies do you use to remotivate your learners related to the interconnection between the classroom setting and the situations beyond the immediate classroom setting?

· What strategies do you use to remotivate your learners related to the creation of a culture of remotivating your learners encompassing the immediate classroom setting, the situations beyond the classroom, and the interconnection between the classroom setting and the situations?

· Do you use strategies which help learners develop a sense of autonomy?

· Do you use strategies which help learners develop a sense of relatedness so that they help learners in experiencing closeness and mutuality in interpersonal relationships?

· Do you use strategies which help learners develop a sense of competence in learners in a way that they assist learners in experiencing personal effectiveness?

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله

A comparative study of novice and experienced EFL teachers’ remotivational strategies: Ecological systems and Self-determination theories in perspective

سکوی نشر دانش

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی