Iraqi Kurdish Supervisees` Perceptions of their Thesis Supervisors

محورهای موضوعی : Teaching

Zina Tahir Ghazi ¹ (Department of English, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran )
Javad Gholami ² (Department of English, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran )

تاریخ دریافت : 1403/03/26 تاریخ پذیرش : 1403/04/25 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/04/03

کلید واژه: EFL instructors, Google translate, Supervision, Thesis writing,

چکیده مقاله :

Writing a thesis is crucial in the master's or PhD study process. There is no denying the supervisor's responsibility in this situation. Therefore, this study attempts to investigate the Kurdish students` perceptions toward their supervisors at various universities in Iraqi Kurdistan. In this study, two groups of students took part: 13 master students and 11 PhD students. Students, both male and female, who were studying at different universities in Kurdistan were included. They were all in their last year of studies and writing their theses and dissertations. A questionnaire and interviews were conducted to collect the data. The results revealed that students perceived the supervisors as a supporter, a leader, and a knowledgeable person who give them continuing feedback. The major point regarding the characteristics of effective supervisors was their knowledge of students` research topics, requiring supervisors to acquire enough knowledge and information on the topics of students` theses.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Writing a thesis is crucial in the master's or PhD study process. There is no denying the supervisor's responsibility in this situation. Therefore, this study attempts to investigate the Kurdish students` perceptions toward their supervisors at various universities in Iraqi Kurdistan. In this study, two groups of students took part: 13 master students and 11 PhD students. Students, both male and female, who were studying at different universities in Kurdistan were included. They were all in their last year of studies and writing their theses and dissertations. A questionnaire and interviews were conducted to collect the data. The results revealed that students perceived the supervisors as a supporter, a leader, and a knowledgeable person who give them continuing feedback. The major point regarding the characteristics of effective supervisors was their knowledge of students` research topics, requiring supervisors to acquire enough knowledge and information on the topics of students` theses.

منابع و مأخذ:

Abdelhafez, A. M. (2007). Postgraduate Research Students' Knowledge and Attitudes towards Good Supervisory Practice at the University of Exeter. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Exeter]. Online submission.
Ali, P., Watson, P., & Dhingra, K. (2016). Postgraduate research students’ and their supervisors’ attitudes towards supervision. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 227-241. https://doi.org/10.28945/3541
Al Makhamreh, M., & Stockley, D. (2020). Mentorship and well-being: Examining doctoral students’ lived experiences in doctoral supervision context. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0013
Arvidsson, A. F. (2011). Research supervisors’ different ways of experiencing supervision of doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education, 7-19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903402151
Ayua, G. A., Samuel, K., & Agbidye, A. (2022). Science Education Students’ Expectation on Research Project Supervision and Attitude to Its Writing in Nigerian Universities. AJSTME, 8(7). 615-621.
Azure, J. A. (2016). Students’ perspective of effective supervision of graduate programmes in Ghana. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 163-169.
Bailey, K. M. (2006). Language teacher supervision: A case-based approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bailey, K. M. (2009). Language teacher supervision. The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 269-278.
Bazrafkan, L., Yousefy, A., Amini, M., & Yamani, N. (2019). The journey of thesis supervisors from novice to expert: a grounded theory study. BMC medical education, 19(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1739-z
Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2010). The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119201
Boehe, D. M. (2016). Supervisory styles: A contingency framework. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927853
Bolin, F. S., & Panaritis, P. (1992). Searching for a common purpose: A perspective on the history of supervision. In C. Glickman (Ed.), Supervision in transition: 1992 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 30-43). ASCD.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brown, M. K. (1988). Working the street: police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Butler, B. M., & Diacopoulos, M. M. (2016). Re/learning student teaching supervision: A co/autoethnographic self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 12(2), 117-134.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2016.1192034
Chen, W., Mason, S., Staniszewski, C., Upton, A., & Valley, M. (2012). Assessing the quality of teachers’ teaching practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9134-2
Cullen D. J, P. M. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra: Division, Australian Government Publishing.
Denis, C., Colet, N. R., & Lison, C. (2019). Doctoral Supervision in North America: Perception and Challenges of Supervisor and Supervisee. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 30-39.
https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p30

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). (pp. 1-28). London: Sage.
Diacopoulos, M. M., & Butler, B. M. (2020). What do we supervise for? A self-study of learning teacher candidate supervision. Studying Teacher Education, 16(1), 66-83.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2019.1690985
Dimitrova, R. (2016). Ingredients of good PhD supervision-evidence from a student survey at Stockholm University. Education and Learning, 10(1), 40-52.
Erichsen, E. A., Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2014). Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher education, 39(2), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709496
Farhadi, H. (2008). Research methods in applied linguistics. Payam Noor University Press.
Filippou, K., Kallo, J., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2021). Supervising master’s theses in international master’s degree programmes: roles, responsibilities and models. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1636220
Franke, A., & Arvidsson, B. (2011). Research supervisors’ different ways of experiencing supervision of doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 7-19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903402151
Glanz, J. (1995). Exploring Supervision History: An Invitation and Agenda. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 10(2), 95-113.
Glanz, J. (2000). Supervision for the Millennium: A Retrospective and Prospective. Focus on Education. Fall.
Gruzdev, I., Terentev, E., & Dzhafarova, Z. (2020). Superhero or hands-off supervisor? An empirical categorization of PhD supervision styles and student satisfaction in Russian universities. Higher Education, 79, 773-789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00437-w
Gurr, G. M. (2010). Negotiating the Rackety Bridge: a dynamic model for aligning supervisory style with research student development. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924360120043882
Hawari, O. M. D. A., Al-Shboul, Y., & Huwari, I. F. (2022). Supervisors' Perspectives on Graduate Students' Problems in Academic Writing. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.545
Hill, L. H., & Conceição, S. C. (2020). Program and instructional strategies supportive of doctoral students’ degree completion. Adult Learning, 31(1), 36-44.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159519887529
Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200109
Kitchener, K. S., & Anderson, S. K. (2011). Foundations of ethical practice, research, and teaching in psychology and counseling. Routledge.
Kumar, R. (2009). Research Methodology: New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley.
Lessing, A. C. (2011). The role of the supervisor in the supervisory process. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(5), 921-936. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC37722
Lindén, J., Ohlin, M., & Brodin, E. M. (2013). Mentorship, supervision and learning experience in PhD education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 639-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.596526
Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Ethical issues in doctoral supervision: The perspectives of PhD students in the natural and behavioral sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 24(3), 195-214.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2013.830574
Macharia, B. M. A (2019). Review of the Roles of Dissertation Supervisors as Mentors. African Research Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 6(1), 77-86.
Mhunpiew, N. (2013). A Supervisor's Roles for Successful Thesis and Dissertation. Online Submission, 3(2), 119-122.
Mohammadkarimi, E. (2022). Analytic Assessment of TEFL Undergraduate Students' Writings: Diagnosing Areas of Strength and Weakness. International Journal of Language Testing 12(2), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijlt.2022.157123
Neupane Bastola, M. (2022). Engagement and challenges in supervisory feedback: Supervisors’ and students’ perceptions. RELC Journal, 53(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220912547
Neupane Bastola, M., & Hu, G. (2021). Supervisory feedback across disciplines: does it meet students’ expectations?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1780562
Nunan, D. (1999a). So you think that language teaching is a profession, part 1. TESOL Matters, 9(4), 3.
Nunan, D. (1999b). So you think that language teaching is a profession, part 2. TESOL Matters, 9(3), 3.
Oliver, P. (2013). Writing your thesis. Sage.
Paltridge, B. &Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in thesis writing in a second language: A hand book for supervisors. New York: Routledge.
Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2015). Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: Doctoral students and supervisors perceptions about the supervisory activities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981836
Schultz, T., Yoo, H., Kellums Baraka, M., & Watson, T. (2021). Does this apply here?: Ethical considerations in transnational supervision settings. Ethics & Behavior, 31(4), 270-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1754215
Sharma, U. N. (2017). The role of supervisor and student for completing a thesis. Tribhuvan University Journal, 31(1-2), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v31i1-2.25358
Siddiek, A. G. (2012). The Effective Role of Language Supervisor in the Enhancement of Foreign Language Education in Developing Countries. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.1.39-50
Sundström, A., Widforss, G., Rosqvist, M., & Hallin, A. (2016). Industrial PhD students and their projects. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 739-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.219
Tahir, I. M., Ghani, N. A., Atek, E. S. E., & Manaf, Z. A. (2012). Effective supervision from research students' perspective. International Journal of Education, 4(2), 211-222.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ije.v4i2.1531
Titus, S. L., & Ballou, J. M. (2014). Ensuring PhD development of responsible conduct of research behaviors: Who’s responsible?. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9437-4
Vilkinas, T. (2008). An exploratory study of the supervision of Ph.D. research students’ theses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(5), 297-311.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-007-9057-5
Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Woolderink, M., Putnik, K., van der Boom, H., & Klabbers, G. (2015). The voice of PhD candidates and PhD supervisors. A qualitative exploratory study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the relational aspects of PhD supervision in the Netherlands. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 217-235.
Yusuf, A., Ebubechukwu, A. O., & Tarnum, I. M. (2017). Assessment of gender difference on students’ perception of undergraduate research project supervisor. European Journal of Education Studies. 3(4), 498-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.438056
Zainal Abiddin, N. (2005). The role of an effective supervisor: Case studies at the University of Manchester, United Kingdom. The Role of an Effective Supervisor: Case Studies at the University of Manchester, United Kingdom (December 2005). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.962228