Predicting Online Classroom Engagement by Causality Orientation, Goal Contents, and Organismic Integration Theories
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمهElham Hajibabaei 1 , Mehrdad Sepehri 2 , Fariba Rahimi 3
1 - English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 - English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
3 - English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
کلید واژه: Engagement, Motivation, Organismic Integration Theories, Self-Determination Theory ,
چکیده مقاله :
This research endeavor aimed to investigate the extent to which cognitive evaluation and organismic integration theories contribute to accounting for the motivational factors influencing Iranian EFL learners' engagement in online classrooms. To achieve this objective, a survey study was conducted wherein the participants completed four distinct questionnaires pertaining to their classroom engagement, academic motivation, goal contents, and learning self-regulation. The questionnaires utilized in the study were developed by Fredricks et al. (2005), Vallerand et al. (1992), and Black & Deci (2000); Williams & Deci (1996). The sample comprised 200 Iranian intermediate EFL learners, aged between 19 and 25, who were selected based on the convenience sampling technique from Isfahan and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Provinces. These participants were both male and female students pursuing their Bachelor's degrees in English at Islamic Azad University. To ensure the homogeneity of their language proficiency, an Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT) was administered. The data collection phase involved the distribution of the four questionnaires to the participants electronically via the Google Doc Web application. The collected data underwent a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) statistical analysis, which revealed that the motivational variables examined in the study exerted a significant influence on online classroom engagement. Consequently, it can be inferred that English language educators who possess knowledge of the potential relationships between online classroom engagement and learners' motivation within the framework of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) can enhance their effectiveness as educational facilitators, supporters, and counselors.
This research endeavor aimed to investigate the extent to which cognitive evaluation and organismic integration theories contribute to accounting for the motivational factors influencing Iranian EFL learners' engagement in online classrooms. To achieve this objective, a survey study was conducted wherein the participants completed four distinct questionnaires pertaining to their classroom engagement, academic motivation, goal contents, and learning self-regulation. The questionnaires utilized in the study were developed by Fredricks et al. (2005), Vallerand et al. (1992), and Black & Deci (2000); Williams & Deci (1996). The sample comprised 200 Iranian intermediate EFL learners, aged between 19 and 25, who were selected based on the convenience sampling technique from Isfahan and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Provinces. These participants were both male and female students pursuing their Bachelor's degrees in English at Islamic Azad University. To ensure the homogeneity of their language proficiency, an Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT) was administered. The data collection phase involved the distribution of the four questionnaires to the participants electronically via the Google Doc Web application. The collected data underwent a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) statistical analysis, which revealed that the motivational variables examined in the study exerted a significant influence on online classroom engagement. Consequently, it can be inferred that English language educators who possess knowledge of the potential relationships between online classroom engagement and learners' motivation within the framework of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) can enhance their effectiveness as educational facilitators, supporters, and counselors.
Abubakari, M. S., & Mashoedah. (2021). Online Learning Engagement Model for International Students in Indonesia amid Covid-19 Period: A Conceptual Model Proposal. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 6(2), 15–30.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive
and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument.
Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445.
Azevedo, R. (2009). The role of the learner in the learning process: A cognitive and affective perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 232-244.Azila-Gbettor, Christopher Mensah, Martin K. Abiemo & Marian Bokor | (2021) Predicting student engagement from self-efficacy and autonomous motivation: A crosssectional study, Cogent Education, 8:1, 1942638, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1942638
Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Benlahcene, A. (2022). Flourishing and student engagement in Malaysian University students: The mediating role of personal best (PB) goals. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(2), 137–146.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self‐determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
Chiu, T. (2021). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on
student engagement. Springer Science & Business Media
Collier, L. (2015). Grabbing students. American Psychological Association, 46(6). Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/monitor/2015/06/grabbingstudents.
Cook, S., Bingham, T., Reid, S., & Wang, L. (2015) Going massive: Learner engagement in a MOOC environment. Paper presented at the THETA: The Higher Education Technology Agenda, Gold Coast, Australia.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–40). New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, Y., & Demiröz, H. (2017). Multidimensional classroom engagement in EFL contexts. In D. Köksal (Ed.), Researching ELT: Classroom methodology and beyond (pp. 91-102). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Dincer, A., Yeşilyurt, S., Noels, K. A., & Vargas Lascano, D. I. (2019). Self-determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners: A mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853913
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Motivation and self-motivation. In Z. Dörnyei, (Ed.), The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 65-119).
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 312–331
Ellis, R. (2015). The psychology of language learning. Routledge.
Fathali, S., & Okada, T. (2016). On the importance of out-of-class language learning environments: A case of a web-based e-portfolio system enhancing reading proficiency. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 4(8), 77-85.
Filak, V. F., & Nicolini, K. M. (2018). Differentiations in motivation and need satisfaction based on course modality: a self-determination theory perspective. Educational Psychology, 38(6), 772–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1457776
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Importance and theoretical perspectives. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 606-614.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305-321). New York: Springer.
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763-782). New York: Springer.
Granic, A., & Marangunic, N. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model in Educational Context: A Systematic Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 1-40.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2015). Student Engagement Scale: Development, Reliability and Validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 587-610.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938019
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference: L@S ’14 (pp. 41–50). New York, NY: ACM.
Hagger, M. S., Koch, S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2015). The effect of causality orientations and positive competence-enhancing feedback on intrinsic motivation: A test of additive and interactive effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 107-111.
Harnett, M., St. George, A., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining motivation in online distance learning
environments: Complex, multifaceted, and situation-dependent. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 20-37.
Helme, S., Clarke, D. (2001). Cognitive engagement in the Mathematics Classroom. In: Clarke, D. (eds) Perspectives on Practice and Meaning in Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Mathematics Education Library, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47228-7_7
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53
Jacobi, L. (2018). What motivates students in the online communication classroom? An exploration of Self Determination Theory. Journal of Educators Online, 15(2).
Retrieved from: https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2018_15_2/jacobi
Jafari, S., & Chalak, A. (2016). The role of WhatsApp in teaching vocabulary to Iranian EFL learners at junior high school. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p85
Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 81–97.
Losier, G. F., Perreault, S., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2001). Examining individual differences in the internalization of political values: Validation of the self-determination scale of political motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(1), 41-61.
Mercer, N. and Dawes, L. (2008). The value of exploratory talk. In N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson. (Eds.) (2008). Exploring Talk in Schools. London: SAGE Publications.
Ng, B. L., Liu, W. C., & Wang, J. C. (2016). Student motivation and learning in mathematics and science: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1359-1376.
Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 291–306.
Orsini-Jones, M., & Cerveró Carrascosa, A. (2019). BMELTET – Blending MOOCs into English language teacher education with tele-collaboration. In A. Plutino, K. Borthwick & E. Corradini (Eds), New educational landscapes: innovative perspectives in language learning and technology (pp. 47-53). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/ rpnet.2019.36.955
Park, S. (2020). Goal contents as predictors of academic cheating in college students. Ethics & Behavior, 30(8), 628-639. DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2019.1668275
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement.
In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). New York, NY: Springer.
Peltier, J. W., Schibrowsky, J. A., & Drago, W. (2007). The interdependence of the factors
influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: A causal model.
Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 140-153.
Philp, J. & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36 50-72.
Razavi, S. & Salehi, H. (2019). The Effect of an Online Learning Group Program on Learning Motivation of English as a Foreign Language among Iranian University Students. Journal of Sign and Meaning. Vol 1, Num 2, Fall & Winter 2019
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York, NY: Springer.
Rosli, M.S., Saleh, N.S., Ali, A. Md. & Abu Bakar, S. (2022). Self-Determination Theory and Online Learning in University: Advancements, Future Direction and Research Gaps. Sustainability, 14, 14655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114655
Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1–56). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press, New York.
Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 97.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self‐determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 411-433.
Tavakoli, H., Lotfi, A. & Reza Biria, R. (2019) Effects of CALL-mediated TBLT on motivation for L2 reading, Cogent Education, 6:1, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1580916
Trad, L., Katt, J., & Neville Miller, A. (2014). The effect of face threat mitigation on instructor credibility and student motivation in the absence of instructor nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education, 63(2), 136–148.
Vaezi, Z. (2009). Language learning motivation among Iranian undergraduate students. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 3(1), 79-104.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017.
Van Egmond, M. C., Hanke, K., Omarshah, T. T., Navarrete Berges, A., Zango, V., & Sieu, C. (2020). Self‐esteem, motivation and school attendance among sub‐Saharan African girls: A self‐determination theory perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 55(5), 842-850.
Van Horn, S., Pearson, J. C., & Child, J. T. (2008). The online communication course: The challenges. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 9(1), 29–36.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004a). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic role of intrinsic goals and autonomy support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., Matos, L., & Lacante, M. (2004b). “Less is sometimes more”: Goal-content matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 755–764.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19–31.
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation
for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical
students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate
glucose control in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 21, 1644-1651.
Xie, Y. P., and Huang, M. J. (2014). Social network, entrepreneurial learning and entrepreneurial competence based on empirical research on entrepreneurs of small and micro enterprises. Stud. Sci. Scie. 32, 400–409. Doi: 10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2014.03.005
Yumei L., Jinping, L. and Yi Y. (2021). Students’ motivation and continued intention with online self-regulated learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Z Erziehungswiss (2021) 24:1379–1399https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01042-3
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Self-regulation and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives, Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
