ارزیابی سیاست های حمایت از تولیدکنندگان و مصرف کنندگان پسته در ایران
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی
فرشاد احمدی
1
(گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان)
فرشید اشراقی
2
(عضو هیات علمی گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان)
فرهاد شیرانی بید آبادی
3
(عضو هیئت علمی گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان)
کلید واژه: ایران, پسته, سیاست‌های حمایتی, شاخص حمایت از تولیدکنندگان (PSE), شاخص حمایت از مصرف‌کنندگان (CSE),
چکیده مقاله :
در این پژوهش به ارزیابی سیاست‌های حمایتی تولیدکننده، مصرف کننده محصول پسته پرداخته شده است. برای این منظور از معیارهای برآورد حمایت از تولید کننده (PSE) و برآورد حمایت از مصرف کننده (CSE) برای برآورد مقدار حمایت از بخش تولید و مصرف محصول پسته طی سالهای 1368 تا 1393 استفاده شد. با توجه به نتایج، بیشترین مقدار حمایت از تولیدکنندگان محصول پسته طی مدت برنامه سوم توسعه اقتصادی به میزان 56/582869 ریال و کمترین مقدار حمایت از تولیدکنندگان مربوط به برنامه اول توسعه اقتصادی به میزان 07/3180782- ریال می‌باشد. نتایج حمایت از مصرف‌کنندگان این محصول نشان داد بیشترین میانگین میزان حمایت از مصرف کننده مقدار 5/2315 ریال است و کمترین مقدار عددی 1/86 ریال مربوط به سال 1379 است. در مجموع، پیشنهاد می‌شود سیاست‌های بهتری از جمله اعطای تسهیلات ارزان قیمت، جایگزین سوخت ارزان‌تر و پایین نگه داشتن قیمت نهاده‌های تولیدی جایگزین گردد.
In this research, we evaluate the supportive policies of the producer, pistachio consumer product. For this purpose, (PSE) and consumer support estimates (CSE) were used to estimate the amount of support for the pistachio production and consumption sector during the years 1989 to 2014. The results of the support of the producers showed that the highest amount of support from pistachio producers to the fixed price of 1997 during the implementation of the third plan of economic development, amounting to 58282869.6 Rials per hectare, and the lowest amount of support from producers related to the first economic development program, amounting to -3180782 Rials per hectare was obtained. The results support the consumers of this product show that the highest average consumer protection rate for the fixed price of 1993 was numerical value of 2315.5 Rials and the lowest numerical value is 86.1 Rials per year in 2000. Based on the results obtained in this study, it is suggested that better policies, such as cheaper facilities, cheaper alternative fuels, and lower farm inputs, will be replaced.
Armstrong, M., Vickers .J. & Zhou. J. (2009). Consumer Protection and the Incentive to Become Informed. Journal of the European Economic Association, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Congress of the European Economic Association. 7(2/3): 399-410.
- Hosseini, S. S., Pakravan Charvadeh, M. R., Salami, H., & Flora, C. (2017). The impact of the targeted subsidies policy on household food security in urban areas in Iran, Cities, 63: 110-117.
- Hosseini, S., & Dourandish, A. (2006). Iran's Pistachio Transfer Model in the Global Market, Journal of Iran’s Agricultural science. 37: 145-153. (In Persian)
- Hosseini, S., & Mehrparvar Hosseini, A. (2014). The effect of foreign exchange policies on indices supporting Iranian agricultural subsectors, Agricultural Economics, 8: 29-43. (In Persian)
- Hosseini, S., Ghorbani, M., Torshizi, M. & Zargham, M. (2010). Choosing the appropriate environmental policy in a long-term program in Iran, Economics and Agricultural Development, 2(24): pp. 129-140. (In Persian)
- Hosseini, S., Rezaei, S. & Rezaei, H. (2009). Evaluating the Effect of Government Support Services Policy on the Total Productivity of Agricultural Production Factors, Agricultural Economics, 3(1): 73-88. (In Persian)
- Hosseini, S., Shahnabati, N. & Abdollahi, M. (2017). Assessing Government Support Policies for Pistachios through Economic Development Programs in Iranian Provinces, Agricultural Economics Researches, 9(2): 243-260. (In Persian)
- Joolaie, R., Jeyran, A. & Yousofzadeh Jahromi, H. (2011). Comparative Advantage and Impact of Supportive Policies on Pomegranate Fars Province, Agricultural Economics, 5(1): 162-185. (In Persian)
- Kožar, M., Pintar, M., Volk, T., Rednak, M., Rac, I. & Erjavec, E. (2016). Agriculture and agricultural policy in Eastern European Neighbourhood, 155th Seminar, September 19-21, 2016, Kiev, Ukraine 245877, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
- Kwiencinski, A. & Tongeren F.V. (2007). Quantitative evaluation of a decade of agricultural policies in china: 1995-2005. OECDs Trade and Agricultural Directorate with Statistical and research Support from Ms.
- Lema, D., & Gallacher, M. (2015). "Argentine Agricultural Policy: Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment Using the Producer Support Estimate (PSE) Approach," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212040, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
- OECD. (2005). Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries, Monitoring and Evaluation. OECD, Paris.
- OECD. (2007). Agricultural policies in non-OECD countries: Monitoring and Evaluation. OECD, Paris.
- Orden, D. Cheng, F. Nguyen, H. Grote, U. Thomas, M. Mullen, K. & Sun, D. (2007). "Agricultural producer support estimates for developing countries: Measurement issues and evidence from India, Indonesia, China, and Vietnam," Research reports 152, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
- Parizan, V & Bakhshoodeh, M. (2008). The role of government support for producers' incomes and expenditures of wheat and rice consumers in Iran, Economic Research, 10(34): 161-176. (In Persian)
- Pasban, F. (2017). Investigation and analysis of agricultural sector (year 2016 compared to 2015). Institute for Planning Research, Agricultural Economics and Rural Development. (In Persian)
- Portugal, L. (2002). Methodology for the Measurement of Support and Use in Policy Evaluation. OECD, Paris.
- Rakotoarisoam M, A. (2008). A Contribution to the Analyses of the Effects of Foreign Agricultural Investment on the Food Sector and Trade in Sub-Saharan Africa. FAO. Research Working Paper No. 33.
_||_