طراحی بستة بازیدرمانی مبتنی بر کارکردهای اجرایی برای کودکان چاق
محورهای موضوعی : روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی
آریان رضائی
1
,
اکرم دهقانی
2
,
سیّد عباس حقایق
3
1 - دانشجوی دکترای تخصصی روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، واحد نجفآباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
2 - استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد نجفآباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
3 - دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد نجفآباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
کلید واژه: بازیدرمانی, کارکردهای اجرایی, کودکان چاق,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: به دلیل آنکه تقویت سه کارکرد اجرایی مرکزی شامل حافظة فعال، بازداری پاسخ و انعطافپذیری شناختی بنا بر نظریة خودتنظیمی زمانی هال و فونگ، الگوی عصبروانشناختی مهار وزن گتنز و گورین و الگوی نظری دیاموند دارای توان لازم برای ارتقاء رفتارهای سالم و سلامت روانی فرض شده است، هدف این پژوهش استفاده از این توان بالقوه بهمنظور طراحی یک بستة بازیدرمانی برای کودکان چاق بود.
روش: در قالب یک طرح ترکیبی، در مرحلة نخست با نظرسنجی در مورد بستة بازیدرمانی طراحیشده از 11 متخصص انتخابشده بهروش نمونهگیری هدفمند از جامعة روانشناسان شهرهای اصفهان و تهران، با استفاده از پرسشنامة سنجش روایی محتوا و فهرست تطبیق سنجش تناسبپذیری مواد، روایی محتوا و تناسب بسته بررسی شدند. در مرحلة دوّم با اجرای بسته در قالب یک طرح شبه-آزمایشی بر 16 زوج والد-کودک انتخابشده به روش نمونهگیری در دسترس از جامعة مراجعهکنندگان به مراکز سلامت ایرانیان-شهر اصفهان، توسط سیاهة رتبهبندی رفتار کارکرد اجرایی و مقیاس تناسبپذیری-قابلیت پذیرش، روایی سازه و تناسب بسته مورد سنجش قرار گرفتند.
یافته ها: نتایج این پژوهش در وهلة نخست، حاکی از مطلوب بودن روایی محتوا و تناسب بستة طراحیشده (88/0CVI=، 89/0CVR=؛ 60/1S=)، از دید متخصصان بود و در وهلة دوّم، کفایت روایی سازة بسته را از طریق آثار معنادار اجرای آن بر تقویت سه کارکرد اجرایی مرکزی (05/0P<)، و تناسب آن (85/2S=) از دید شرکتکنندگان نشان داد.
نتیجه گیری: یافتههای پژوهش، با نشاندادن توان بستة بازیدرمانی طراحیشده برای تاثیرگذاری بر کارکردهای اجرایی کودکان چاق، حاکی از امکان استفادة از آن در کاربستهای بالینی توسط پژوهشگران علاقمند است.
Background and purpose: Because of the strength of the three core executive functions (including working memory, response inhibition, and cognitive flexibility), and according to the Hall and Fong's Temporal Self-Regulation Theory, the Gettens and Gorin's Neuropsychological Model of Weight Control, aa well as the Diamond's Theoretical Model are assumed to have the necessary ability to enhance healthy behaviors and mental health. The purpose of this research was to use this potential to design a play therapy package for obese children.
Method: In the form of a mixed plan, in the first stage, the designed play therapy package studied by 11 experts selected by purposive sampling method from the society of psychologists of Isfahan and Tehran, by the Content Validity Assessment Questionnaire and the Suitability Assessment of Materials Checklist, the content validity and suitability of the package were examined. In the second stage, by implementing the package in the form of a Quasi-Experimental design on 16 parent-child pairs selected by convenience sampling method from the community of referrals to Iranian Health Centers-Isfahan city, by using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and the Suitability-Acceptability Scale, the construct validity and suitability of the package were measured.
Findings: The results of this research, in the first place, indicated the desirability of the content validity and suitability of the designed package (CVI=0.88, CVR=0.89; S=1.60), from the experts' point of view, and in the second place, it showed the adequacy of the construct validity of the package through meaningful effects of its implementation on the strengthening of 3 core executive functions (p<0.05), and its suitability (S=2.85), from the participants' point of view.
Conclusion: The findings of the research, while showing the power of the play therapy package designed to influence the executive functions of obese children, indicates the possibility of using it in clinical applications by interested researchers.
1. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. [internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 2024 1 Mar] Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
2. Fakhri M, Sarokhani D, Sarokhani M, Dehkordi AH, Jouybari L. Prevalence of obesity in Iranian children: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Medical Specialities. 2019 Oct 1;10(4):190-200. [DOI:10.4103/INJMS_2_19]
3. Sharma V, Coleman S, Nixon J, Sharples L, Hamilton‐Shield J, Rutter H, et al. A systematic review and meta‐analysis estimating the population prevalence of comorbidities in children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years. Obesity Reviews. 2019 Oct;20(10):1341-9. [DOI:10.1111/obr.12904]
4. Smith JD, Fu E, Kobayashi MA. Prevention and management of childhood obesity and its psychological and health comorbidities. Annual review of clinical psychology. 2020 May 7;16:351-78. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-100219-060201
5. Flegal KM, Ioannidis JPA, Doehner W. Flawed methods and inappropriate conclusions for health policy on overweight and obesity: the Global BMI Mortality Collaboration meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Feb;10(1):9-13. [DOI:10.1002/jcsm.12378]
6. De Lorenzo A, Romano L, Di Renzo L, Di Lorenzo N, Cenname G, Gualtieri P. Obesity: A preventable, treatable, but relapsing disease. Nutrition. 2020 Mar 1;71:110615.[DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2019.110615]
7. Jastreboff AM, Kotz CM, Kahan S, Kelly AS, Heymsfield SB. Obesity as a disease: the obesity society 2018 position statement. Obesity. 2019 Jan;27(1):7-9. [DOI:10.1002/oby.22378]
8. Elsner RJ. Changes in eating behavior during the aging process. Eat Behav. 2002 Mar 1;3(1):15-43. [DOI:10.1016/s1471-0153(01)00041-1]
9. World Health Organization. More active people for a healthier world: global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
10. San-Cristobal R, Navas-Carretero S, Martínez-González MÁ, Ordovas JM, Martínez JA. Contribution of macronutrients to obesity: implications for precision nutrition. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020 Jun;16(6):305-320. [DOI:10.1038/s41574-020-0346-8]
11. Liu TT, Liu XT, Chen QX, Shi Y. Lipase Inhibitors for Obesity: A Review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Aug 1;128:110314.[DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110314]
12. Davison GM, Monocello LT, Lipsey K, Wilfley DE. Evidence base update on behavioral treatments for overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 2023 Sep 3;52(5):589-603. [DOI:10.1080/15374416.2023.2251164]
13. Skjåkødegård HF, Conlon RP, Hystad SW, Roelants M, Olsson SJ, Frisk B, et al. Family‐based treatment of children with severe obesity in a public healthcare setting: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Obesity. 2022 Jun; 12(3):e12513. [DOI:10.1111/cob.12513]
14. Nordmo M, Danielsen YS, Nordmo M. The challenge of keeping it off, a descriptive systematic review of high‐quality, follow‐up studies of obesity treatments. Obesity reviews. 2020 Jan;21(1):e12949. [DOI:10. 1111/obr.12949]
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What Is Children’s Mental Health? [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 August 5].
16. Weiss F, Barbuti M, Carignani G, Calderone A, Santini F, Maremmani I, Perugi G. Psychiatric aspects of obesity: a narrative review of pathophysiology and psychopathology. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020 Jul 23;9(8):2344. [DOI:10.3390/jcm9082344]
17. McCafferty BJ, Hill JO, Gunn AJ. Obesity: scope, lifestyle interventions, and medical management. Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology. 2020 Mar 1;23(1):100653. [DOI:10.1016/j.tvir.2020.100653]
18. Smith KE, Mason TB. Psychiatric comorbidity associated with weight status in 9 to 10 year old children. Pediatric obesity. 2022 May;17(5):e12883. [DOI:10.1111/ijpo.12883]
19. Steinhart A, Tsao D, Pratt JS. Pediatric metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surgical Clinics. 2021 Apr 1; 101(2):199-212. [DOI:10.1016/j.suc.2020.12.007]
20. United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General. Report of the Surgeon General's Conference on Children's Mental Health: A national action agenda. Health and Human Services Department; 2000. [ISBN-10: 0-16-050637-9]
21. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). [DOI:10.1037/a0020168]
22. Palmer EN, Pratt KJ, Goodway J. A review of play therapy interventions for chronic illness: Applications to childhood obesity prevention and treatment. International Journal of Play Therapy. 2017 Jul;26(3):125. [DOI:10.1037/pla0000045]
23. Jensen SA, Biesen JN, Graham ER. A meta-analytic review of play therapy with emphasis on outcome measures. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2017 Oct;48(5):390. [DOI:10.1037/pro0000148]
24. Taylor SE, Fredericks EM, Janisse HC, Cousino MK. Systematic review of father involvement and child outcomes in pediatric chronic illness populations. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 2020 Mar;27:89-106. [DOI:10.1007/s10880-019-09623-5]
25. Esteban-Cornejo I, Reilly J, Ortega FB, Matusik P, Mazur A, Erhardt E, Forslund A, Vlachopapadopoulou EA, Caroli M, Boyland E, Weghuber D, Thivel D. Paediatric obesity and brain functioning: The role of physical activity-A novel and important expert opinion of the European Childhood Obesity Group. Pediatr Obes. 2020 Sep;15(9):e12649. [DOI:10.1111/ijpo.12649]
26. Hall PA, Fong GT. Temporal self-regulation theory: Integrating biological, psychological, and ecological determinants of health behavior performance. In Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. New York, N.Y.: Springer; 2013 May 27, pp. 35-53. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-6852-3_3]
27. Gettens KM, Gorin AA. Executive function in weight loss and weight loss maintenance: a conceptual review and novel neuropsychological model of weight control. Journal of behavioral medicine. 2017 Oct; 40(5):687-701. [DOI:10.1007/s10865-017-9831-5]
28. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual review of psychology. 2013 Jan 3;64(1):135-68. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750]
29. Malloy-Diniz LF, Miranda DM, Grassi-Oliveira R. Executive functions in psychiatric disorders. Frontiers in psychology. 2017 Sep 5;8:1461. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01461]
30. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 1975 Dec 1; 28(4):563-75.
31. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. AJN The American Journal of Nursing. 1996 Dec 1; 96(12):16M. [DOI:10.1097/00000446-199612000-00022]
32. Shalani B, Azadfallah P, Farahani H, Roshan R, Esrafilian F. Practical Steps in Designing Therapeutic, Interventional and Educational Packages in Psychological Researches: Intervention Mapping Approach. Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2022 Aug 23; 20(1):177-97. [DOI:10.22070/cpap.2022.16313.1235]
33. Gioia GA, Guy SC, Isquith PK, Kenworthy L. Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Lutz, FL: Psychological assessment resources; 1996.
34. Abdolmohamadi K, Alizadeh H, Ghadiri Sourman Abadi F, Taiebli M, Fathi A. Psychometric properties of Behavioral Rating Scale of Executive Functions (BRIEF) in children aged 6 to 12 years. Quarterly of Educational measurement. 2017 Dec 22; 8(30):135-51. [DOI: 10.22054/jem.2018.24457.1596]
35. Waltz CF, Bausell BR. Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis. Davis Fa; 1981 Jan 1. [ISBN:0803690401,9780803690400]