طراحی مدل کیفی سرمایه فکری با رویکرد یادگیری سازمانی در آموزش و پرورش

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

محمود قربانی ¹ (گروه علوم تربیتی، واحدمشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران.)
نازیاسادات ناصری ² (گروه علوم تربیتی، واحدمشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران.)
علی شاه نظری ³ (گروه علوم تربیتی، واحدمشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/01/21 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/05/13 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/04/01

کلید واژه: سرمایه فکری, یادگیری سازمانی, مدل کیفی,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه و هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین مدل کیفی سرمایه فکری با رویکرد یادگیری سازمانی در اداره کل آموزش و پرورش استان خراسان رضوی و نواحی هفتگانه آموزش و پرورش شهرستان مشهد انجام شد. تحقیق از منظر هدف، کاربردی و توسعه ای است.
روش شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش، از منظر روش، آمیخته(کمّی- کیفی)است و از لحاظ شیوه گردآوری داده ها، توصیفی است. جامعه آماری تحقیق، خبرگان دانشگاهی و حرفه ای آموزش و پرورش بودند. نمونه گیری از جامعه آماری به صورت هدفمند انجام شد که در مجموع 25 نفر انتخاب شدند. پس از تعریف موضوع و انجام مطالعات اکتشافی و کتابخانه ای، فهرستی از گزاره ها پیرامون ابعاد و مؤلفه های متغیرهای تحقیق شناسایی شد و پس از اخذ نظرات اصلاحی کیفی و کمّی به لحاظ روایی محتوایی به تأیید خبرگان دانشگاهی و حرفه ای رسید و در قالب پرسشنامه محقق ساخته پس از تعیین و تأیید پایایی با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ در اختیار اعضای دلفی قرار گرفت. داده های حاصل از تحقیق براساس روش های آماری مربوط و با استفاده از نرم افزار ( Spss22) تحلیل شد و ابعاد و مؤلفه های تحقیق با ضریب توافق کندال (723/0) به اجماع خبرگان رسید.
یافته­ ها: براساس یافته های پژوهش، ابعاد و مؤلفه های سرمایه فکری در4 بعد و21 مؤلفه و ابعاد و مؤلفه های یادگیری سازمانی در3 بعد و12 مؤلفه شناسایی شد.
بحث و نتیجه­گیری: نهایتاً تناسب مدل با نظر خبرگان با استفاده از آزمون t تک نمونه ای مورد تأیید قرار گرفت.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction: This study aimed to develop a qualitative model of intellectual capital based on the organizational learning approach in the General Department of Education of Khorasan Razavi Province and the seven districts of the Mashhad Education Department. It was applied-developmental in terms of purpose, mixed (quantitative-qualitative) in terms.
research methodology: This study method and descriptive in terms of data collection. The statistical population consisted of academic and professional education experts, of whom 25 people were selected using the purposive sampling. After defining the subject and conducting library and exploratory studies, a list of the propositions concerning the dimensions and components of the research variables was provided and after receiving the qualitative and quantitative corrective comments, it was confirmed by academic and professional education experts. After determining and confirming the reliability using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient, it was distributed to the Delphi members in the form of a researcher-developed questionnaire. Data were analyzed by the statistical procedures and (SPSS 22) and experts reached a consensus about research dimensions and research components using the Kendall's coefficient of concordance (0.723).
Findings: The results showed there were four dimensions and 21 components of intellectual capital and there were three dimensions and 12 components of organizational learning.
Conclusion: Finally, the appropriateness of the model was confirmed by the experts using one sample t-test.

منابع و مأخذ:

References

 

1. Allameh, S. M. Moghaddami, M.(2009). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Organizational Performance; Case study: Iran Khodro Company's driving force unit, Executive Management Research Journal, 10 (1), pp. 76-99.. [in Persian]


2. Durrah, O. Allil, K.K. Alkhalaf, T.(2018). The intellectual capital and the learning organization: A case study of Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, International Journal of Public Leadership.


3. Ghorbanizadeh,W.(2017). Organizational learning and the learning organization with an attitude towards knowledge management. Tehran: Basabat Publications . . [in Persian]


4. Gasemzadeh Alishahi, A.(2015). The role of intellectual capital and culture of the learning organization on the capacity of organizational learning. Journal of Urmia School of Nursing and Midwifery, 13 (3), p. 180-188. . [in Persian]


5. Galavandi, H. Hassani, M. Sultanzadeh, V.(2012). Program of the Leader of Intellectual Capital with the Learning of the Educational Organization. Journal of Higher Education, 5 (20), pp. 99-166.


6. Gelich Lee, B.(2018). Knowledge management is the process of creating, sharing and applying intellectual capital in businesses. Tehran: Samat Publications. .[in Persian]


7. Hosseini, S. Y. Karimi, S. Bahrami, P.(2013). Employees' perception of internal and external organizational situation & its effect on intellectual capital, Human Resources Management Research, 5 (1), pp. 149-172. .[in Persian]


8. Heydari, M. Nikoui, M.(2018). Investigating the Mediating Role of Intellectual Capital, Innovation, and Organizational Strategies between Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Performance. Educational Management Research, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen Branch, 4 (4), pp.15-33. .[in Persian]


9. Jahanian, R. Haddadi, T.(2016). Investigating the Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Human Resources Innovation and Creativity in the Organization. Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 5 (1), pp. 65-92. . [in Persian]


10. khorshidi, S. Pashazadeh, A.(2012). The Impact of Organizational Intelligence on Emotional Abilities and Organizational Learning. Management Studies (Improvement and Transformation), 22 (69), pp. 25-58. . [in Persian]


11. Khannifar, H. Moslem, N.(2019). The Basics and Principles of Qualitative Research Methods (Vol.2).Tehran: Negah Roshan Publication. .[in Persian]


12. Karimi, M. Haghi Tali, M.(2015). Managing Intellectual Capital in the Organization. Tehran: Office of Cultural Research Publications.. [in Persian]


13. Lyman, B. Lisa A, C. Hannah C, H.(2017). Organizational Learning in a College of Nursing: A Learning History, Nurse Education Today,PII:S0260- 30 (17) :7- 258.


14. Mirkamali, S. M. (2010). Educational Leadership & Administration, Tehran Yastoroon publication. .[in Persian]


15. Mashayekhi, A. Farhangi, A. A. Momeni, M. Ali Dousti, S.(2005). Review of the key factors affecting the application of information technology in government agencies: Application of Delphi Method, Journal of Humanities Lecturer (Special Issue of Management). .[in Persian]


16. Mousavi, S, A. Hosseini, S, Y. Mosleh, A. Bahrami, P.(2013).The effect of intellectual capital on the performance of knowledge-based companies. Management Studies (Improvement and Transformation), 23 (70), pp. 77-101. .[in Persian]


17. Nazim, F. Moutallebi, A.(2011). Presenting a Structural Model of Intellectual Capital Based on Organizational Learning at Shahid Beheshti University. New Approach in Educational Management, (5), pp. 29-49. .[in Persian]


18. Poorkarimi, J. Homayouni Demirchi, A. Gharalghi, S. Karami, M.(2018). The effect of organizational learning intermediation on the relationship between reengineering and organizational performance (Case: Tehran University staff). Journal of New Approach in Educational Management, 9 (3), 263. .[in Persian]


19. Rahimi Rigi, G. Mostafaei. G. Karimi. H.(2016). Mohammadi. Amir Sh. The Impact of Intellectual Capital Components on the Performance of Companies Admitted to Eighteen Tehran Stock Exchange Companies Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model. Auditing Knowledge, 16 (63), pp. 151-166. .[in Persian]


20. Rezvani, H. Rashidayi, A.(2013). Investigating the most important internal and external organizational factors affecting the performance of the new product in the food industry. Modern Marketing, 3 (3), pp. 39-58. .[in Persian]

 

21. Secundo, G. Lombardi, R. Dumay, J.(2018). Intellectual capital in education. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19 (1): 2-9.


22. Sabouri Khosroshahi, Habib. (2010). Education in the age of globalization; Challenges and strategies to face it. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies of Globalization, 1 (1),P. 9.. [in Persian]


23. Shojaee, A. baygi, T. nazaripour, M.(2010). Identifying Interactions between Intellectual Capital Components Using Structural Equation Modeling Technique in Iranian Banking Industry. Productivity Management,4 (14), pp. 19- 48. .[in Persian]


24. Sami Zafarghandi, M. Aghakasiri, N.(2017). Contribution of Intellectual Capital and Teacher Knowledge Management Knowledge. Family and Research, (35), pp.87-103. .[in Persian]


25. Senge, P.(1991). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization; New York: Century Business.