رابطه بین عارضههای سازمانی و کیفیت زندگی کاری با اثر بخشی مدیریت سازمان
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش
محمد رضا اردلان
1
(دانشیار دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان)
سیروس قنبری
2
(دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان.)
الهام محمدی شاهد
3
(دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان)
کلید واژه: کیفیت زندگی کاری, عارضههای سازمانی, اثر بخشی مدیریت سازمان,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از این پژوهش بررسی رابطه بین عارضههای سازمانی و کیفیت زندگیکاری با اثربخشی مدیریت سازمان در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد همدان بوده است. روش پژوهش توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری آن شامل کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد همدان به تعداد 346 نفر است. حجم نمونه با استفاده از روش تصادفی طبقهای نسبی و از جدول کرجسی و مرگان به تعداد 186 آزمودنی انتخاب شده است.برای تجزیه و تحلیل دادههای گرد آوری شده و آزمون پرسشها از روشهای توصیفی در حد، فراوانی، درصد، میانگین، انحراف معیار و از روشهای آمار استنباطی در حد ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و آزمونt برای گروههای مستقل، تحلیل واریانس یک سویه، تحلیل رگرسیون با روش هم‌زمان و آزمون تعقیبی توکی استفاده شده است. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آنند که میانگین عارضههای سازمانی ،کیفیت زندگیکاری و اثر بخشی مدیریت سازمانی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد همدان بالاتر از حد میانگین 3 است. بین عارضههای سازمانی و کیفیت محیط کاری، هم‌چنین، بین عارضههای سازمانی و اثربخشی مدیریت سازمان در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد همدان رابطه منفی و معناداردر سطح 01/0 وجود دارد. تفاوت عارضههای سازمانی، کیفیت زندگی کاری و اثربخشی مدیریت براساس تحصیلات معنادار است.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between Organizational diagnosis and quality of life work whit organizational management effectiveness in Islamic Azad University, Hamadan branch, from the perspective of employees in the 1391-1392 academic year. The research design of the study is Descriptive and correlational. The population included 346 people (all employees). Out of this population 186 participants were selected through Krejcie and Morgan table using a stratified random sampling. To analyze the collected data and to examine the research question, descriptive method was shown in the form of: the limit, frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. Inferential statistical procedures were displayed through Pearson correlation coefficient and t-tests for Independent groups, one-way ANOVA of variance and regression analysis. With simultaneous and post hoc, Tukey test was used. The results of the study showed that Organizational diagnosis, QWL (quality of work life) and organization management effectiveness in The Islamic Azad university, Hamedan branch are above average the most rate organizational diagnosis. There is a negative and significant relationship of the level of 0/01 between Organizational diagnosis and quality of life work, as well as between organizational diagnosis and organizational management effectiveness in Islamic Azad University, Hamadan branch.The difference of Organizational diagnosis, the quality of working life and the effectiveness of management in terms of education is significant.
-Akdere, M. (2006)."improving quality of work life implication for human resources rivew,vol.1,p173.
-Akhavan Saraf, A.R. (2005). The Diagnosis of Industrial Units, National Conference 2nd of Performance Management.
- Allameh, M. (1999). Developed Quality of work life model Walton Based on the reduced value (of With emphasis on nahj) And the effect of It reduces mental stress. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
- Barlow, D. Harrison. (2005). “Abnormal Psychology, Wads Worth”; Belmont, CA. 3. Binder, F. (1995); Promoting Human Performance Technology Innovation: A Return to Our Natural Science Roots”; PerformanceImprovement Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 95-113.
- Bissell, B. (2008). “Organizational Diagnosis: The Role of Contagion Groups”; International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 16, No. ½, pp. 7-17.
- Blanchard, Celine M. (2009). “A Combination of Work Environment Factors and Individual Difference Variables in Work Interfering with Family”; International Journal of Workplace Health Management, Vol.2, No. 1, pp. 63-90.
- Bolhari, A.R. Rezaeean, A. Bolhari, J. Bairamzadeh, S. & Arzi Soltan, A. (2011). The Relationship between Quality of Work Life and Demographic Characteristics of Information Technology Staffs. International Conference on Computer Communication and Management, IACSIT Press, Singapore, 5, 374-378. Retrieved 26 November 2011 From world wide web: http: //www.ipcsit.com/vol5/67-ICCCM2011-C009.pdf
-Cassio Wayne, F. (1998). managing human resource;boston:mc graw.hill
- Che Rose, R. Beh, L. S. Uli, J. & Idris, K. (2006). Quality of work life:Implications of career dimensions. Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2).
- Cummings, T.G. & Worley, C.G. (2005). Organization Development and Change; 8th Edition, Ohio: South.Western Thompson, Chapter 5.
- Gautam, D. K., & Adhikani, D. R. (2010). Labor legislations for improving quality of work life. International Jounal of Law and Management, 52(1), 40-53.
- Ghasemi, M. (2000). investigate effect of quality of work life on productivity human force thesis masters,theran university.
- Glaser, J.M. (2004). Improving the Quality of Work Life and Improving;http://eric , Ed .gov /Eric web.
- Harrison, M. I. (1994). Diagnosing Organizations: Methods, Models and Process; 2nd Ed, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Hooman, H.A. (2006). The Multivariate of Data Analysis in BehavioralResearch; Publication of Farhang.
- Jamali, D. (2008). “Learning Organization: Diagnosis and Measurement in a Developing Country Context”; The Learning Organization,Bradford, Vol. 15, pp. 1, 58.
- Johnsrud, P. K. (2002). “Faculty Member's Morale and their Intention to Leave”; The Journal of Organization Development and Change, Vol.10, No. 2, P. 136.
- Jomrog, J. (2004). Overholt, Miles H. Measuring HR and Organizational effectiveness, Employment Relations Today, 31,61-70
- Knoble, M. (2005). Implications for Policy and Digital Divides in Education, Policy Options and Models for Birding Digital Divides,Conference Global Challenges of Development Project.
- Koonmee, K., Singhapakdi, A. Virakul, B. & Lee, D. J. (2010). Ethicsinstitutionalization, quality of work life, and employee job-related outcomes: A survey of human resource managers in Thailand. Journal of BusinessResearch, 63(1), p. 20. Retrieved 24 may 2011 From world wide web:http: //www.emeraldinsight.com/
- Koozehchian, H. and et (2010). Relationship between entrepreneurial structure and organizational effectiveness in the Physical Education Organization of Islamic Republic of Iran, Journal of Sport Management. 1(6), 5-27.
- Layer, J. K. Karwowski, W. & Furr, A. (2009). The Eeffect of Cognitive Demands and Perceived Quality of Work Life on Human Performance in Manufacturing Environments, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39, 413-421.
- Lejeune, C. & Alain, V. (2009). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness in business in business schools. jest of the accreditation impact, journal of manage ment Development, 28(8),628-441.
- Lewis, D. and et al. (2007). "extrinsic and intrinsic determinants of quality of work life";international journal of health care quality assurance,vol,14,
- Luthans, F. (1998). organizational behavior; English edition; mc graw-hill,p.205
- Marginean, I., Precupetue, I., Tzanov, V., Preoteasa, A. M., & Voicu, B. (2006). First European quality of life survey: Quality of life in Bulgaria and Romania. European Foundation for the Improvement ofLiving and Working Conditions,3, 1-75.
- Mirkamali, S.M.(2005). "the increase of teachers job satisfacition with the meaningfulness of teaching career" quarterly journal of educational management,vol.37,38,39,40(in Persian)
- Mir Sepasi, N. (1997). Human resource management and labor relations(strategic approach)printing,Tehran,shervin publications
- Mohebali, D. (1997)."the better work life:A factor in incrensing productivity";quarterly of management studies,vol,13&14,pp.54(in Persian)
- Newstrom, J. W., & Davis, K. (2002). Organizational behavior: Human behavior at work, 11thed.London: McGraw-Hill.
- Nikookar, Gh. H. (2009). “The Setting of Dimensions of Organizational Diagnosis in Center of Iran Carpet; The Journal of Business Management, Vol. 3, No. 165.
-Payne Roy, L.(2000)."eupschian management and millennium",journal of managerial psychology,vol15(3),pp219-226
- Polities, J. (2005). “Dispersed Leadership Predictor of the Work Environment for Creativity and Productivity”; The Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 182-204.
- Raduan, Ch. R. (2006). “Quality of Work Life Implications of Career Dimensions; Journal of Social Sciences, pp. 61-67.
- Ramazani, T. (2008). The Study of Relationship between QWL and Management Performance in High Schools, MA Dissertation,University of Tehran (in Persian)
- Ramstad, E. (2009). Promoting performance and the quality of working life simultaneously. International Journal of Productivity and Performance
- Rasooli. J. (2011). “Foundations of organizational intelligencen deffectiveness”;Alvand publications
- Roslan, A. Russayani, I. & Nor azam, A. (2010). The Relationship between Social Capital and Quality of Life Among Rural Households in Terengganu, Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 01, No. 05, pp. 99-106
- Salmani, D. (2005). Quality ofwork life and improvement organizational behavior. Tehran, management college ,Tehran university.
-Shahbazi, B. Vaezi, M. & Sanayeporr, H. (2009). showing the relation between job life and function of education managers of Esfahan, governmental management journal, first edition, no-3,page 69-84.
- Shahrani, A. (2008). The Diagnosis, Challenges and Obstacles'Empowerment; International Management Conference.
- Shareef, R. (1990). "owl programs facilitate change";personnel journal,vol.69,pp.50-67
- Sirgy, et al, (2001)."A new mesure of quality of work life based on need satisfaction and spill ver theories";social indicators research,vol.55,p.247
- Vicic, V. (2009). Necessary Organizational Changes According toBurke- litwin Model in the Head Nurses System of Management in Health Care and Social Welfare Institution; Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
- Viswesvaran, C. (2005). “Convergence between Measures of Work-to-Family and Family-to Work Conflict”; Journal of Vocational Behavior, No. 67. pp. 215-232.
- Walton, R. E. (1973). Quality of work life:what is it?"sloan management review journal,fall,pp11-21
- Wayne, K. Hoy, C. & Miskel, G.(Authors)(2006) Educational administration Theoryresearch and practice, Mirmohammad Seied Abbaszadeh(Translators),Urmia
- Weisbord, M. (1976). “Organizational Diagnosis, Six Places to Look for Trouble with or Without a Theory”; The Journal of Group and Organizational Management, Vol .1, No. 4, pp. 430-447.
- Zaki, et al (2006). Organizational effectiveness of school education, Isfahan (Parsons model test). Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University.
_||_
