تبیین عوامل اثرگذار انتخاب سبک دلبستگی فرزندان بر مبنای سبک های دلبستگی ناایمن اجتنابی و دوسوگرای والدین
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسیفاطمه بابانوری 1 , رضا رستمی 2 , مهدی رضا سرافراز 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، تهران، ایران
2 - دکتری تخصصی روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 - دکتری تخصصی روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
کلید واژه: اجتنابی و دوسوگرا, سبک دلبستگی ناایمن, والدین, فرزندان,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده مقدمه: سبک های دلبستگی والدین اثرات فراوانی بر سبک دلبستگی فرزندان دارند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین نقش عوامل اثرگذار بازدارنده و تسهیل¬گر در سبک های دلبستگی ناایمن اجتنابی و دوسوگرای والدین بر انتخاب سبک دلبستگی فرزندان انجام شد. روش پژوهش: این مطالعه یک پژوهش کیفی با رویکرد نظری مبنا بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه افراد 25 تا 40 ساله مراجعه کننده به کلینک آتیه شهر تهران در 1400 بود که از بین آنها 60 نفر انتخاب و سپس از بین این 60 نفر، 25 نفر که شرایط ورود به پژوهش را داشتند به صورت هدفمند به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. داده ها به صورت همزمان جمع آوری و به روش گراندد تئوری کدگذاری (باز، محوری وگزینشی) و تحلیل شدند. یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که عوامل اثرگذار شامل: 38 طبقه اولیه،4 طبقه اصلی و یک طبقه مرکزی در فرایند تبیین سبک های دلبستگی والدین در تعیین سبک دلبستگی فرزندان استخراج گردید. 4 طبقه اصلی شامل بستر لغزان امنیت، تکاپو برای انسجام جسم و روان از مسیر قدرت، پیچ و خم مسیر، و چتر حمایتی بودند. نتیجه گیری: در راستای انتخاب سبک دلبستگی فرزندان در خانواده با دو والد ناامن، باید به مولفه های بستر لغزان امنیت، تکاپو برای انسجام جسم و روان از مسیر قدرت،پیچ و خم مسیر، چتر حمایتی توجه گردد
Abstract Introduction: Parents' attachment styles have many effects on children's attachment styles. The present study was conducted with the aim of explaining the role of the inhibitory and facilitating factors in parents' insecure, avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles on the choice of children's attachment style. Research Methods: This study was a qualitative research with a theoretical approach. The statistical population of the research included all people aged 25 to 40 who referred to the Atiyeh Clinic in Tehran in 2021, from which 60 people were selected, and then 25 people who had the conditions to enter the research were purposefully selected as a sample. The data were collected simultaneously and analyzed using grounded theory coding method (open, axial and selective). Findings: The results showed that the influencing factors including 38 primary classes, 4 main classes and one central class were extracted in the process of explaining the attachment styles of parents in determining the attachment style of children. The 4 main floors included the sliding bed of security, striving for the integration of body and soul from the path of power, the maze of the path, and the umbrella of support. Conclusion: In order to pay attention to the choice of children's attachment style in a family with two insecure parents, attention should be paid to the components of the sliding bed of security, striving for the integration of body and mind from the path of strength, the twists and turns of the path, and the umbrella of support.
Eagle M. Clinical implications of attachment theory. Psychoanalytic Inquiry. 2003;23(1):27-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351692309349025
Parkes CM, Stevenson-Hinde J, Marris P. Attachment across the life cycle: Routledge; 2006. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203132470
Fraley RC, Shaver PR. Attachment theory and its place in contemporary personality theory and research. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. 2008;3:518-41.
Yakeley J. Psychoanalysis in modern mental health practice. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(5):443-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30052-X.
Malekpour M. Effects of attachment on early and later development. The British Journal of Development Disabilities. 2007;53(105):81-95. https://doi.org/10.1179/096979507799103360
Crittenden PM. Attachment and psychopathology. Attachment theory: Routledge; 2013: 379-418.
Henry ME. Formula use in a breastfeeding culture: changing perceptions and patterns of young infant feeding in Vietnam: Johns Hopkins University; 2015.
Bedair K, Hamza EA, Gladding ST. Attachment style, marital satisfaction, and mutual support attachment style in Qatar. The Family Journal. 2020;28(3):329-36. DOI:10.1177/1066480720934377
DiCorcia JA, Sravish AV, Tronick E. The everyday stress resilience hypothesis: Unfolding resilience from a perspective of everyday stress and coping. Adaptive and maladaptive aspects of developmental stress. 2013:67-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5605-6_4
Delvecchio E, Di Riso D, Lis A, Salcuni S. Adult attachment, social adjustment, and well-being in drug-addicted inpatients. Psychological reports. 2016;118(2):587-607. doi: 10.1177/0033294116639181. PMID: 27154381.
Smrtnik Vitulić H, Gosar D, Prosen S. Attachment and family functioning across three generations. Family process. 2022:e12787.
Fuertes M, Faria A, Beeghly M, Lopes-dos-Santos P. The effects of parental sensitivity and involvement in caregiving on mother–infant and father–infant attachment in a Portuguese sample. Journal of Family Psychology. 2016;30(1):147. doi: 10.1037/fam0000139. Epub 2015 Oct 5. PMID: 26437145.
Kubik MY, Lee J, Fulkerson JA, Gurvich OV, Sirard JR. School-based secondary obesity prevention for eight-to twelve-year-olds: results from the students, nurses, and parents seeking healthy options together randomized trial. Childhood Obesity. 2021;17(3):185-95.
Muller RT, Sicoli LA, Lemieux KE. Relationship between attachment style and posttraumatic stress symptomatology among adults who report the experience of childhood abuse. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. 2000;13(2):321-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1007752719557. PMID: 10838678.
Howland MA, Sandman CA, Davis EP, Glynn LM. Prenatal maternal psychological distress and fetal developmental trajectories: Associations with infant temperament. Development and Psychopathology. 2020;32(5):1685-95.
Witte AM, de Moor MH, Szepsenwol O, van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Shai D. Developmental trajectories of infant nighttime awakenings are associated with infant-mother and infant-father attachment security. Infant Behavior and Development. 2021;65:101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101653
Kim CY, Fredman SJ, Teti DM. Quality of coparenting and infant–mother attachment: The mediating role of maternal emotional availability. Journal of Family Psychology. 2021;35(7):961. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000846
Cassidy J, Jones JD, Shaver PR. Contributions of attachment theory and research: A framework for future research, translation, and policy. Development and psychopathology. 2013;25(4pt2):1415-34. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000692.
Acharya S, Sharma K. Lived Experiences of Mothers Raising Children with Autism in Chitwan District, Nepal. Autism Research and Treatment. 2021: 21.
Hautamäki A, Hautamäki L, Neuvonen L, Maliniemi-Piispanen S. Transmission of attachment across three generations: Continuity and reversal. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry. 2010;15(3):347-54. doi: 10.1177/1359104510365451. PMID: 20603422.
Negrini LS. Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver (Eds.), New York: Guilford Press, 2016; 1: 68, ISBN 978‐1‐4625‐2529‐4. Wiley Online Library; 2018.
Le TL, Geist R, Bearss E, Maunder RG. Childhood adversity and attachment anxiety predict adult symptom severity and health anxiety. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2021;120:105216. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105216.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research techniques, 1998.
Corbin J, Strauss A. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Basics of qualitative research. 2008:15.
Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation. 2007; 2007(114): 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.223
Besharat MA, Jabbari A, Saadati M. Predicting Children's Attachment Indices According to Parental Attachment: An Intergenerational Study. Evolutionary Psychology: Iranian Psychologists. 2016;13(49):3-12. http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-204-en.html [in Persian]
Shah PE, Fonagy P, Strathearn L. Is attachment transmitted across generations? The plot thickens. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry. 2010;15(3):329-45.
Brisch K. Familiäre Bindungen. Die transgenerationale Weitergabe familiären Bindungsverhaltens. Psychoanalyse der Familie Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag. 1999:7-16.
Zimmermann P, Grossmann K, editors. Transgenerational aspects of stability in attachment quality between parents and their adolescent children. biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; 1996.
Adshead G, Bluglass K. A vicious circle: transgenerational attachment representations in a case of factitious illness by proxy. Attachment & human development. 2001;3(1):77-95. doi: 10.1080/14616730010024780. PMID: 11708385.
Serbin L, Karp J. Intergenerational studies of parenting and the transfer of risk from parent to child. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2003;12(4):138-42. DOI:10.1111/1467-8721.01249
Ahmadnia B, ghanipour a. Investigating the relationship between attachment styles and social adjustment of male and female high school students. Family and Health. 2022;12(A):137-53.
Karimi H, MirzaieJahed A. Prediction of interpersonal problems based on narcissism and attachment. Family and Health. 2020;10(2):49-60. https://journal.astara.ir/article_247584.html