The Centralized Resource Allocation under Semi-Additive Production Technology in DEA
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه ریاضی
1 - Department of Mathematics, Shiraz branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
کلید واژه: Data envelopment analysis, Semi-additive production technology, Centralized resource allocation, Target setting. ,
چکیده مقاله :
Centralized resource allocation (CRA) models are usually presented under variable returns to scales (VRS) technology. In these models, the evaluation of the efficiency of the decision-making units (DMUs) is done only on the basis of the observed DMUs. In this paper, we introduce CRA models in semi-additive production technology. In this technology, in addition to the observed DMUs, aggregation of production units is present in the process of performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis (DEA). We prove that we can solve this model only based on observational DMUs in order to reduce the number of calculations. In the following, we develop this model for a general case based on the approach provided by Fang [6]. The proposed models adjust the inputs and outputs to achieve the total input contraction by the central decision-maker (DM). We can only consider adjustments to inefficient DMUs instead of all DMUs in the CRA model. The proposed model maximizes the efficiency of individual DMUs at the same time that total input consumption is minimized or total output production is maximized. We obtain the efficient targets corresponding to all DMUs on the efficiency frontier of semi-additive production technology by solving only one model. We illustrate our approach with an empirical example.
Centralized resource allocation (CRA) models are usually presented under variable returns to scales (VRS) technology. In these models, the evaluation of the efficiency of the decision-making units (DMUs) is done only on the basis of the observed DMUs. In this paper, we introduce CRA models in semi-additive production technology. In this technology, in addition to the observed DMUs, aggregation of production units is present in the process of performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis (DEA). We prove that we can solve this model only based on observational DMUs in order to reduce the number of calculations. In the following, we develop this model for a general case based on the approach provided by Fang [6]. The proposed models adjust the inputs and outputs to achieve the total input contraction by the central decision-maker (DM). We can only consider adjustments to inefficient DMUs instead of all DMUs in the CRA model. The proposed model maximizes the efficiency of individual DMUs at the same time that total input consumption is minimized or total output production is maximized. We obtain the efficient targets corresponding to all DMUs on the efficiency frontier of semi-additive production technology by solving only one model. We illustrate our approach with an empirical example.
[1] M. Asmild, J.C. Paradi and J.T. Pastor, Centralized resource allocation BCC models, Omega, 37(1) (2009) 40–49.
[2] R. Banker, A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30 (9) (1984) 1078–1092,
[3] A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6) (1978) 429-444.
[4] D. Deprins, L. Simar and H. Tulkens, Measuring labor-efficiency in post offices, Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, Springer, (2006).
[5] J. Du, L. Liang, Y. Chen, G. Bi, DEA-based production planning, Omega, 38 (1-2) (2010)
105–112.
[6] L. Fang, A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation, European Journal of Operational Research, 228 (2) (2013) 405–12.
[7] L. Fang and H. Li, Centralized resource allocation based on the cost–revenue analysis, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85 (2015) 395–401.
[8] L. Fang, Centralized resource allocation based on efficiency analysis for step-by-step improvement paths, Omega, 51 (2015) 24–28.
[9] J. Gerami, Strategic alliances and partnerships based on the semi-additive production technology in DEA, Expert Systems with Applications, 251 (2024) 123986.
[10] M. Ghiyasi, A DEA production technology and its usage for incorporation of collaboration in efficiency analysis: an axiomatic approach, International Transactions in Operational Research, 26 (2016) 1118–34.
[11] M. Ghiyasi and W. D. Cook, Modelling the semi-additive production technology in DEA, Omega, 103 (2021) 102385.
[12] M. Ghiyasi and W. D. Cook, Semi-Additive Integer-Valued Production Technology for Analyzing Public Hospitals in Mashhad, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595924500040
[13] R.H. Green and W. D. Cook, A free coordination hull approach to efficiency measurement. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10) (2004)1059–1063.
[14] A. Hakim, A. Seifi, A. Ghaemi, bi-level formulation for DEA-based centralized resource allocation under efficiency constraints, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 93 (2016) 28–35.
[15] F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, A. A. Noora, G.R. Jahanshahloo, J. Gerami and M. R. Mozaffari, Centralized resource allocation for enhanced Russell models, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 235 (1) (2010) 1–10.
[16] F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, N. Nematollahi, M. H. Behzadi, M. Mirbolouki and Z. Moghaddas, Centralized resource allocation with stochastic data, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 236(7) (2012) 1783–1788.
[17] P. Kamyab, M. R. Mozaffari, J. Gerami and P. F. Wankei, Two-stage incentives system for commercial banks based on centralized resource allocation model in DEA-R, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70 (2) (2021) 427-458.
[18] M. Karami Khorramabadi, M. Yarahmadi and M. Ghiyasi, Cost Efficiency Evaluation Based on a Data Envelopment Analysis Approach by Considering Undesirable Outputs on the Basis of the Semi-Disposability Assumption, Mathematical and Computational Applications, 25 (1) (2020) 4.
[19] T.C. Koopmans, Examples of production relations based on micro data, In Harcourt, G.C. (ed.) The Microeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomic. Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke, 1977 (1977) 144–178.
[20] P. Korhonen and M. Syrjänen, Resource allocation based on efficiency analysis, Management Science, 50 (8) (2004) 1134–1144.
[21] S. Lozano and G. Villa, Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment Analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22 (2004) 143–161.
[22] S. Lozano, G. Villa and R. Brännlund, Centralized reallocation of emission permits using DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 193 (3) (2009) 752–60.
[23] S. Lozano and I. Contreras, Centralised resource allocation using Lexicographic Goal Programming. Application to the Spanish public university system, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 84 (2022) 101419.
[24] C. Mar-Molinero, D. Prior, M. M. Segovia and F. Portillo, On centralized resource
utilization and its reallocation by using DEA, Annals of Operations Research, 221 (2014) 273-283.
[25] E. Momeni, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, R. Farzipoor Saen, E. Najafi, Centralized DEA-based reallocation of emission permits under cap and trade regulation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 234 (2019) 306-314.
[26] J. Sadeghi and A. Dehnokhalaji, A comprehensive method for the centralized resource allocation in DEA, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127 (2019) 344–352.
[27] X. Xiong, Guo-liang. Yang, De-qun. Zhou and Zi-long. Wang, How to allocate multi-period research resources? Centralized resource allocation for public universities in China using a parallel DEA-based approach, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82 (2022) 101317.
[28] Fu‐Chiang. Yang, Centralized resource allocation and target setting of a two‐stage production process using data envelopment analysis, International transactions in operational research, 31 (2) (2024) 889-917.
[29] W. Zhu, Y. Huang, Y. Yu, DEA model for partial centralization resource allocation among independent subset of DMUs, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 176 (2023) 109013.
