The effect of cognitive-based learning on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension components
محورهای موضوعی : Instructional Design, Planning, and Strategies including ELT
Shahrzad Pirzad mashak
1
,
Neda Gharagozloo
2
,
Neda Hedayat
3
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English Translation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran.
2 - Department of English Translation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran.
3 - Department of English Translation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, Iran.
کلید واژه: Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cognitive-based Learning, EFL Learners, Reading Comprehension Components, Synchronous Online Interactions,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aimed at examining the effect of cognitive-based learning on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension components; identifying the main idea, making Inferences, recognizing unfamiliar vocabulary, text organization, and information recall. In doing so, the researchers selected 84 homogeneous intermediate level male and female EFL learners with the age range 18 to 25 out of 110 conveniently nominated sample of students majoring in different fields in a Vocational and Technical college in Dezful. A standard version of Quick Oxford Placement Test (QPT) was used to homogenize the participants and the selected ones whose scores were within one SD above and below the mean, were considered as the experimental (i.e., cognitive-based learning, n=41) and control (n=43) groups in line with the nature of convenience non-random sampling. Then, the learners in both groups experienced the processes of pretesting, 12 sessions of intervention which were presented through synchronous online Interactions using Adobe Connect, and post-testing. A validated researcher-made L2 reading comprehension test tapping different reading components was used to collect the data. The results of Analysis of Covariates (ANCOVA) and Multivariate Analysis of Covariates (MANCOVA) proved the effectiveness of cognitive based learning, using Bloom’s Taxonomy levels in developing L2 reading and its components among the participants. The findings can be used to enrich cognitive learning and analytical views in the L2 reading classroom, helping both teachers and learners in this regard.
This study aimed at examining the effect of cognitive-based learning on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension components; identifying the main idea, making Inferences, recognizing unfamiliar vocabulary, text organization, and information recall. In doing so, the researchers selected 84 homogeneous intermediate level male and female EFL learners with the age range 18 to 25 out of 110 conveniently nominated sample of students majoring in different fields in a Vocational and Technical college in Dezful. A standard version of Quick Oxford Placement Test (QPT) was used to homogenize the participants and the selected ones whose scores were within one SD above and below the mean, were considered as the experimental (i.e., cognitive-based learning, n=41) and control (n=43) groups in line with the nature of convenience non-random sampling. Then, the learners in both groups experienced the processes of pretesting, 12 sessions of intervention which were presented through synchronous online Interactions using Adobe Connect, and post-testing. A validated researcher-made L2 reading comprehension test tapping different reading components was used to collect the data. The results of Analysis of Covariates (ANCOVA) and Multivariate Analysis of Covariates (MANCOVA) proved the effectiveness of cognitive based learning, using Bloom’s Taxonomy levels in developing L2 reading and its components among the participants. The findings can be used to enrich cognitive learning and analytical views in the L2 reading classroom, helping both teachers and learners in this regard.
Abenojar, M. B. (2024). Effectiveness of directed reading thinking activity (DRTA) in improving the reading comprehension of grade three pupils. International Journal of Open-access, Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center (iJOINED ETCOR), 3(2), 435-446.
Adnan, G., Zulfikar, T., Armia, M. S., Gade, S. & Walidin, W. (2021). Impacts of inquiry learning model on students’ cognitive and critical thinking ability. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 16(3), 1290-1299. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i3.5851
Ahmadi, S. A. R. (2020). Exploring metacognitive learning strategies toward reading comprehension: A case study in a public university in Afghanistan (Master's thesis), Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Ahmadian, M., Sanaeifar, S. H., & Marzban, A. (2024). Augmenting Iranian students’ autonomy and reading comprehension through implementation of dynamic assessment. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 70-89. http://doi.org/10.71664/jals.2024.2302-1074/
Akbari, J., Tabrızi, H. H., & Chalak, A. (2021). Effectiveness of virtual vs. non-virtual teaching in improving reading comprehension of Iranian undergraduate EFL students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 272-283. http://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.907585
Albeckay, E. M. (2014). Developing reading skills through critical reading programme amongst undergraduate EFL students in Libya. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 175-181. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1412
Alfaki, I. M. (2014). Sudan English language syllabus: Evaluating reading comprehension questions using Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(3), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13
Allen, L. K., Snow, E. L., Crossley, S. A., Tanner Jackson, G., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Reading comprehension components and their relation to writing. L’Année psychologique, 114(4), 663-691. http://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503314004047
Almulla, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2023). Integrated social cognitive theory with learning input factors: The effects of problem-solving skills and critical thinking skills on learning performance sustainability. Sustainability, 15(5), 3978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053978
Amiri. M., & Maftoon, P. (2010). Awareness of reading strategies among Iranian high school students. EDULEARN10 Proceedings CD, 6782-6791. ISBN: 978-84-613- 9386-2, IATED, Valencia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296695303
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.
Aránguiz Améstica, A. C. (2021). Strengthening critical thinking to enhance reading comprehension skills in 10th-grade students at Liceo Manuel Arriarán Barros (Doctoral dissertation), UCSH.
Assaly, I. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2015). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of master class textbook’s questions. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 100- 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p100
Azmoode, M., Kiyani, G. R., & Abbasian, G. R. (2024). On the effect of diagnostic self-, and peer-assessment on reading comprehension: Examining EFL learners’ diagnostic rating accuracy across various genres. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 11(2), 53-64.
Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 2(1), 1-34.
Bag, H. K., & Grsoy, E. (2021). The effect of critical thinking embedded English course design to the improvement of critical thinking skills of secondary school learners. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(12),100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100910
Bakhtiari Moghadam, Z., Haddad Narafshan, M., & Tajadini, M. (2023). The effect of implementing a critical thinking intervention program on English language learners’ critical thinking, reading comprehension, and classroom climate. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), 15-33. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00188-3
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Berthold, M. (2011). Reliability of quick placement tests: How much faith can we place on quick paper or internet-based placement tests. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 674-698.
Bilki, Z., & Irgin, P. (2022). Towards becoming critical readers and writers: ELT students’ perceptions on the effectiveness of critical reading and writing instruction. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(2), 987-1003.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. David McKay.
Boeren, E., & Iniguez-Berrozpe, T. (2022). Unpacking PIAAC’s cognitive skills measurements through engagement with Bloom’s taxonomy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73(November 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101151
Bozan, M. A. (2024). We read but how: Research on reading and reading comprehension skills. e-KafkasJournal of Educational Research, 11, 178-192. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt. 1370135
Brandon, H. (2021). Inclusive math and science spaces through professional development: A qualitative study focusing on educator views of multilingual learners and educator identity (Doctoral dissertation), Illinois State University. https://doi.org/10.30707/ETD2021.20220215070316389298.999998
Chen, F., & Abdullah, R. (2024). Scientific mapping of research on English as a foreign language (EFL) reading instruction: A thirty-year perspective. Heliyon, 10(3), e25217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25217
Childs, J., & Taylor, Z. W. (2022). The internet and K-12 education: Capturing digital metrics during the COVID-19 era. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(4), 1357–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09612-y
Crystal, D. (1999). The future of Englishes. English Today, 15(2), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400010816
Davidson, M. M. (2021). Reading comprehension in school-age children with autism spectrum disorder: Examining the many components that may contribute. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(1), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00010
Djallel, B. (2022). A comparative evaluation of the Algerian and the French EFL textbooks (getting through and fireworks 2 De) using Bloom’s digital taxonomy. Algerian Journal of Research and Studies, 5(2), 876-891.
Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
Ekalia, Y. J., Selamat, E. H., Jemadi, F., Jelimun, M. O., & Setiawan, A. A. (2022). Implementing Bloom’s revised taxonomy in analyzing the reading comprehension questions. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i1.17823
Elias, M. J. (2014). The importance of asking questions to promote higher-order competencies. Retrieved February 13, 2016 from https://www.edutopia.org
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165-184.
Facione, P.A. (2023). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 23, 1-30. Retrieved from https://cmecourses.som.uab.edu/pdf
Fastiggi, W. (2014). Applying Bloom’s taxonomy to the classroom. [Online] 2014. [Accessed on 05. 03 2023.] Retrieved from https://technologyforlearners.com/ applying-blooms taxonomy-to-the-classroom.
Febrina, F., Usman, B., & Muslem, A. (2019). Analysis of reading comprehension questions by using revised Bloom’s taxonomy on higher order thinking skill (HOTS). English Education Journal, 10(1), 1-15.
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2023). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Routledge.
Field, A. (2024). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS, Statistics for Statistics (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fitri, D., Rizal, S., & Andriadi, A. (2024). Reading activities in English textbook based on revised bloom’s taxonomy used in curriculum 2013. GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 5(3), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v3i3.712
Fitriani, S. S., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Zumara, A. (2021). The use of cognitive domain in questions: The perception of students and lecturers of public universities in Aceh. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(Special Issue 1), 122-138. http://www.jlls.org/
Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment. Routledge.
Gershon, M. (2018). How to use Bloom's taxonomy in the classroom: The complete guide. Learning Sciences International.
Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2019). The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners’ reading strategy use. Cogent Education, 6(1), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522
Horváthová, B., & Naďová, L. (2021). Developing critical thinking in reading comprehension of texts for specific purposes at all levels of Bloom's taxonomy. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2101001H
Huang, K. J. (2024). Evaluating GPT-4’s cognitive functions through the Bloom’s taxonomy: Insights and clarifications. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26(1), e56997. https://doi.org/10.2196/56997
Huyen, T. T. N., & Ngoc, N. B. (2024). Exploring critical thinking skills used among English majors in reading comprehension. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 25017136. http://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/5458
Koksal, D., & Ulum, G. (2018). Language assessment through Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 76-88. www.jlls.org
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Mackey, D., Asplin, W., Blass, L., Gordon, D., & March, M. (2012). Read this! intro student's book: Fascinating stories from the content areas. Cambridge University Press.
Maruf, N., Husain, D., & Arifin, S. (2024). Cognitive processes in EFL learners' reading comprehension: A comparative analysis of WhatsApp and traditional group-driven reading. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(3), 623-635. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i3.66945
Marzban, A. (2011). Improvement of reading comprehension through computer-assisted language learning in Iranian intermediate EFL students. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.003
Meneghetti, C., Carretti, B., & De Beni, R. (2006). Components of reading comprehension and scholastic achievement. Learning and individual differences, 16(4), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.11.001
Motallebzadeh, K., & Nematizadeh, S. (2011). Does gender play a role in the assessment of oral proficiency? English Language Teaching, 4(4), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p165
Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Ahmad Tilwani, S., & Gilakjani, A. (2022). The impact of authentic materials on reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety among Iranian male EFL learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1892001
Nasir, S. H., Munawir, A., Syafriwana, N., & Zulmuawinah, F. (2022). Developing speaking materials using revised bloom’s taxonomy and pro-active learning activities. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 9(3), 22-30.
Nor, H. M., & Sihes, A. J. (2021). Critical thinking skills in education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 198-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11529
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2014). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension. Routledge
Okasha, M. A. (2020). Using strategic reading techniques for improving EFL reading
skills. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11, 25-36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1265902.pdf
Paige, D., Rupley, W. H., & Ziglari, L. (2024). Critical thinking in reading comprehension: Fine tuning the simple view of reading. Education Sciences, 14(3), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030225
Pakpahan, S. F., Pakpahan, S., Purba, I. D. S., & Nasution, J. (2021). Analysis reading comprehension questions by using revised bloom's taxonomy on higher order thinking skill (HOTS). IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(1), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i1.1904
Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual (6th ed.). Allen & Unwin.
Persaud, C. (2018). Bloom’s Taxonomy: The ultimate guide. [Online] [Accessed on 25. 03 2023.] Retrieved from https://tophat.com/blog/blooms-taxonomy-ultimate-guide.
Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget's theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th edition). Vol. 1. Wiley.
Piñero, N., & Cañedo, L. (2024). Learners’ reading comprehension skills. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(6), 974-988. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12507621
Ramezani, R., Modaberi, A., & Moonesan, F. (2016). The relationship between critical thinking and Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension ability. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 4(1), 12-18.
Rassouli, A., & Osam, N. (2019). English language education throughout Islamic Republic reign in Iran: Government policies and people’s attitudes. SAGE Open, 9(2), 2158244019858435. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019858435
Richards, J. B., Hayes, M. M., & Schwartzstein, R. M. (2020). Teaching clinical reasoning and critical thinking: From cognitive theory to practical application. Chest, 158(4), 1617-1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.525
Scully, D. (2017). Constructing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order thinking. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (PARE), 22(4), 56-66. Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=22&n=4
Shabatura, J. (2018). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to write effective learning objectives. [Online]. [Accessed on 22. 03 2023.] Retrieved from: https://tips.uark.edu/using-bloomstaxonomy/
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
Soltani, F., & Taghizadeh, M. (2023). Investigating high and low achieving talented students’ strategy use, perceptions, and challenges of reading comprehension. Language Related Research, 14(5), 141-171. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.14.5.6
Stevani, M., & Tarigan, K. E. (2023). Evaluating English textbooks by using Bloom’s taxonomy to analyze reading comprehension question. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 4(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v0i0.526
Sudarmin, S., Mursiti, S., & Asih, A. G. (2018, April). The use of scientific direct instruction model with video learning of ethnoscience to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 10(1), 012011. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012011
Todorova, M. (2024). Cognitive processes in reading comprehension: A theoretical framework for foreign language acquisition. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 8(3),162-170. https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/34370
Tong, X., Yu, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2024). A meta-analysis of the relation between syntactic skills and reading comprehension: a cross-linguistic and developmental investigation. Review of Educational Research, 00346543241228185. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241228185
Ulin, S. (2020). The link between personality types and reading comprehension achievement of the eleventh-grade senior high school students. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.19109/ejpp.v7i1.5698
Ulum, Ö. G. (2022). Is the revised bloom’s taxonomy revisited in the EFL/ESL reading textbooks? Opus Journal of Society Research, 19(45), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1062878
Valentiyo, R. (2024). Higher order thinking skill questions in reading comprehension test made by English teacher of junior high school based on the implementation of Merdeka curriculum: A descriptive research on SMPN 01 Rejang Lebong (Doctoral dissertation), Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup.
Van Le, H., & Chong, S. L. (2024). The dynamics of critical thinking skills: A phenomeno-graphic exploration from Malaysian and Vietnamese undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101445
Vaughn, S., Boardman, A., & Klingner, J. K. (2024). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties. Guilford Publications.
Wistner, B., Sakai, H., & Abe, M. (2009). An analysis of the Oxford Placement Test and the Michigan English placement test as L2 proficiency tests. Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters, Hosei University, 58, 33-44.
Yan, Z. (2021). English as a foreign language teachers’ critical thinking ability and L2 students’ classroom engagement. Frontiers of Psychology, 12, 773138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773138
Yilmaz, K. (2011). The cognitive perspective on learning: Its theoretical underpinnings and implications for classroom practices. The Clearing House, 84, 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.568989
Yousefi, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2015). Critical thinking and reading comprehension among postgraduate students: The case of gender and language proficiency level. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 802-812. http://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.23
Yusuf, F. N., Sukyadi, D., & Zainurrahman, Z. (2024). Text readability: Its impact on reading comprehension and reading time. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1422-1432. http://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21724
