A Cross-Cultural Scrutiny of Rhetorical, Pragmatic, and Semantic Strategies in Political Discourse: Comparative Manipulation Strategies in English and Arabic Contexts
محورهای موضوعی : TeachingQasim Hawas Hadi Hawas Hadi 1 , Atefesadat Mirsaeedi 2 , Ghanim Jwaid Idan 3 , Sahar Najarzadegan 4
1 - Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, College of Education, University of Karbala, Karbala Iraq
4 - Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: Pragmatic strategies, Rhetorical devices, Semantic analysis, Political discourse, Manipulation, Comparative analysis,
چکیده مقاله :
This study provides a comparative analysis of the rhetorical, pragmatic, and semantic strategies used by English-speaking and Arabic-speaking politicians to manipulate their audiences. By examining political speeches from both linguistic contexts, the research reveals distinct cultural patterns in manipulation. English-speaking politicians often employ direct, fact-based appeals (logos), while Arabic-speaking politicians rely more on emotional and collective identity appeals (pathos). These strategies reflect the cultural and linguistic norms of each group. Additionally, the study highlights the evolving impact of digital media on political communication, showing how manipulative strategies have adapted to new technological platforms. The findings have important implications for political communication strategists, media professionals, and educators. They underscore the need for culturally nuanced communication strategies in cross-cultural political discourse, offer insights for enhancing public media literacy to combat manipulation, and provide a framework for further research into the role of digital platforms in shaping political rhetoric.
Additionally, the study highlights the evolving impact of digital media on political communication, showing how manipulative strategies have adapted to new technological platforms. The findings have important implications for political communication strategists, media professionals, and educators. They underscore the need for culturally nuanced communication strategies in cross-cultural political discourse, offer insights for enhancing public media literacy to combat manipulation, and provide a framework for further research into the role of digital platforms in shaping political rhetoric.
This study provides a comparative analysis of the rhetorical, pragmatic, and semantic strategies used by English-speaking and Arabic-speaking politicians to manipulate their audiences. By examining political speeches from both linguistic contexts, the research reveals distinct cultural patterns in manipulation. English-speaking politicians often employ direct, fact-based appeals (logos), while Arabic-speaking politicians rely more on emotional and collective identity appeals (pathos). These strategies reflect the cultural and linguistic norms of each group. Additionally, the study highlights the evolving impact of digital media on political communication, showing how manipulative strategies have adapted to new technological platforms. The findings have important implications for political communication strategists, media professionals, and educators. They underscore the need for culturally nuanced communication strategies in cross-cultural political discourse, offer insights for enhancing public media literacy to combat manipulation, and provide a framework for further research into the role of digital platforms in shaping political rhetoric.
Additionally, the study highlights the evolving impact of digital media on political communication, showing how manipulative strategies have adapted to new technological platforms. The findings have important implications for political communication strategists, media professionals, and educators. They underscore the need for culturally nuanced communication strategies in cross-cultural political discourse, offer insights for enhancing public media literacy to combat manipulation, and provide a framework for further research into the role of digital platforms in shaping political rhetoric.
Fetzer, A. (2018). Pragmatics as political discourse: Explorations of politics and politeness. John Benjamins Publishing.
Gurevich, M. (2022). Frame semantics in political discourse: A cross-linguistic perspective. Pragmatics and Society, 13(4), 579-600. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21011.gur
Jasim, H., & Mustafa, M. (2020). Emotional appeals in Arabic political rhetoric: A cultural approach. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 27(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/xxx.xxxxx
Pan, X. (2024). Digital media and the evolution of rhetorical strategies in political communication. Journal of Media Studies, 31(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/
Shah, R. (2020). Rhetoric and persuasion in Western and Middle Eastern political speeches: A comparative analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(3), 395-415. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20034.sha
Van Dijk, T. A. (2020). Discourse and manipulation: A critical discourse analysis of political language. Discourse & Society, 31(5), 542-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520917207
