Exploring Variability in Cognitive Load across Different Writing Modes

محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies

1 - Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1403/09/20 تاریخ پذیرش : 1403/10/02 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/11/09

کلید واژه: density, diversity, readability, task complexity, task conditions ,

چکیده مقاله :

This study examined the effect of cognitive load on L2 learners’ descriptive and expository essay writings reflected in their obtained readability indices by taking a mixed-method approach. Randomly selected 58 out of 83 intermediate to upper-intermediate EFL learners in three groups underwent varying methods of Topic-Only, Topic-plus Argument/Counter-argument, and Topic-plus Mechanics, followed by retrospective interviews. The writings were analyzed in terms of density, diversity, and syntactic complexity based on the certain variables. Following the research interventions, 12 (five boys and seven girls) participants, randomly selected, attended retrospective semi-structured interviews. ANCOVA results indicated that, unlike descriptive writings, expository ones virtually underwent significant changes, and learners’ attentions were highly affected. The results obtained in the quantitative writing analysis were consistent with the records in the interviews. The study revealed that participants performed better when they received either no or meta-cognitive supports. The results suggest that content support may decrease the load and facilitate linguistic encoding. The findings corroborate cognitive load theory and emphasize adopting sensitive measures to meet increasing task demands in writing tasks.

چکیده انگلیسی:

منابع و مأخذ:

Anmarkrud, Ø., Andresen, A., & Bråten, I. (2019). Cognitive load and working memory in multimedia learning: Conceptual and measurement issues. Educational Psychologist, 54(2), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1554484
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human Memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181
Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1245
Ayres, P., Lee, J. Y., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2021). The validity of physiological measures to identify differences in intrinsic cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702538
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
Bannert, M. (2002). Managing cognitive load—Recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00021-4
Berndt, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Fischer, F. (2022). Impact of sender and peer-feedback characteristics on performance, cognitive load, and mindful cognitive processing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101197
Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7
Carlson, R., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Learning and understanding science instructional material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.629
Chalmers, K. A., & Freeman, E. E. (2019). Working memory power test for children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917731458
Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023). A Cognitive Load Theory Approach to Defining and Measuring Task Complexity Through Element Interactivity. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w
Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., Sweller, J., & Baddeley, M. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Performance Improvement, 45(9), 46–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930450920
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory (1st ed., pp. 62–101). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001
Hochberg, K., Becker, S., Louis, M., Klein, P., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Using smartphones as experimental tools—a follow-up: Cognitive effects by video analysis and reduction of cognitive load by multiple representations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09816-w
Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: Towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5
Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480587
Kalyuga, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effect and its instructional implications: Introduction to the special issue. Instructional Science, 38(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9102-0
Kastaun, M., Meier, M., Küchemann, S., & Kuhn, J. (2021). Validation of cognitive load during inquiry-based learning with multimedia scaffolds using subjective measurement and eye movements. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703857
Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., & An, S. G. (2012). The foreign-language effect: thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23(6), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611432178
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009b). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008
Kirschner, P. A., Ayres, P., & Chandler, P. (2011). Contemporary cognitive load theory research: The good, the bad and the ugly. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.025
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano R., J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
Klepsch, M., & Seufert, T. (2020). Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Instructional Science, 48(1), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09502-9
Klepsch, M., & Seufert, T. (2021). Making an effort versus experiencing load. frontiers in education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.645284
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2018). Differentiating different types of cognitive load: A comparison of different measures. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9404-8
Krell, M., Xu, K. M., Rey, G. D., & Paas, F. (2022). Editorial: Recent approaches for assessing cognitive load from a validity perspective. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.838422
Kuldas, S., Ismail, H. N., Hashim, S., & Bakar, Z. A. (2013). Unconscious learning processes: Mental integration of verbal and pictorial instructional materials. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-105
Larmuseau, C., Cornelis, J., Lancieri, L., Desmet, P., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Multimodal learning analytics to investigate cognitive load during online problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1548–1562. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12958
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2008). The imagination effect increases with an increased intrinsic cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1373
Leppink, J. (2017). Cognitive load theory: Practical implications and an important challenge. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 12(5), 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.05.003
Leppink, J., & Van Den Heuvel, A. (2015). The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(3), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-015-0192-X
Liu, Q., Yu, S., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Xu, S. (2021). The effects of an augmented reality based magnetic experimental tool on students’ knowledge improvement and cognitive load. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 645–656. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12513
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
Moos, D. C., & Pitton, D. (2014). Student teacher challenges: Using the cognitive load theory as an explanatory lens. Teaching Education, 25(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.754869
Moreno, R. (2006). When worked examples don’t work: Is cognitive load theory at an Impasse? Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.006
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994a). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213420
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994b). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 27–42). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.004
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2021). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 73–81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.009
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Aubteen Darabi, A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504795
Paas, F., Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: new conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9133-8
Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17(4), 398–422. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202613
Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive load theory (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744
Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0
Reed, S. K. (2012). Cognition: Theories and applications. CENGAGE learning.
Rikers, R. M. J. P., Van Gerven, P. W. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Cognitive load theory as a tool for expertise development. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021807.49315.31
Shin, S.-S. (2020). Structured query language learning: Concept map-based instruction based on cognitive load theory. IEEE Access, 8, 100095–100110. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997934
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. ACER Press.
Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 215–266). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01015-6
Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021808.72598.4d
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (1st ed., pp. 19–30). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.003
Sweller, J. (2008). Evolutionary bases of human cognitive architecture: Implications for computing education. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1404520.1404521
Sweller, J. (2010a). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive Load Theory (1st ed., pp. 29–47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.004
Sweller, J. (2010b). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. Mestre & B. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Sweller, J. (2012). Human cognitive architecture: Why some instructional procedures work and others do not. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues. (pp. 295–325). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-011
Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
Sweller, J. (2023). The development of cognitive load theory: Replication crises and incorporation of other theories can lead to theory expansion. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185–233. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1
Sweller, J., & Paas, F. (2017). Should self-regulated learning be integrated with cognitive load theory? A commentary. Learning and Instruction, 51, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.005
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Szarkowska, A., Krejtz, K., Dutka, Ł., & Pilipczuk, O. (2016). Cognitive load in intralingual and interlingual respeaking – a preliminary study. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2016-0008
Turan, Z., Meral, E., & Sahin, I. F. (2018). The impact of mobile augmented reality in geography education: achievements, cognitive loads and views of university students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(3), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1455174
Van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of concurrent monitoring on cognitive load and performance as a function of task complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 584–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1726
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504793
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006). Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1250
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Three worlds of instructional design: State of the art and future directions. Instructional Science, 29, 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011904127543
Verhoeven, L., Schnotz, W., & Paas, F. (2009). Cognitive load in interactive knowledge construction. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.002
Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Gebrim, J. B., Bowers, C., Carper, T. M., & Nicholson, D. (2011). Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: Which best leads to efficient, deep learning?: CLT vs. constructivism for learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00381.x
Young, J. Q., & Sewell, J. L. (2015). Applying cognitive load theory to medical education: Construct and measurement challenges. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(3), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-015-0193-9
Yu, Z. (2021). The effect of teacher presence in videos on intrinsic cognitive loads and academic achievements. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(5), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1889394
Zavgorodniaia, A., Duran, R., Hellas, A., Seppala, O., & Sorva, J. (2020). Measuring the cognitive load of learning to program: A replication study. United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research Conference., 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3416465.3416468

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله

Exploring Variability in Cognitive Load across Different Writing Modes

سکوی نشر دانش

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی