Sectarian Rhetoric in Contemporary Political Discourse: A Critical Pragmatic Approach Using van Dijk’s Ideological Square
Saeed Mahdi Abdulraheem Al-Azzawi
1
(
Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
Ehsan Rezvani
2
(
Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
Basim Jubair Kadhim Al-Jameel
3
(
Open Educational College, Najaf Center, Ministry of Education, Iraq, Najaf.
)
Bahram Hadian
4
(
Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Sectarian Rhetoric, Critical Discourse Analysis, Political Communication, Ideological Square, Pragmatics,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigates the manifestations and impacts of sectarian rhetoric in contemporary political discourse through a critical pragmatic lens, employing Van Dijk's Ideological Square framework. Drawing on a corpus of 150 political texts, including speeches, campaign materials, and social media posts, the study adopts a mixed-methods approach to analyze the linguistic strategies employed by diverse political factions. Key findings reveal distinct rhetorical patterns: conservative factions predominantly utilize fear-based and exclusionary narratives, emphasizing negative out-group representation (85%), while liberal factions focus on inclusivity, promoting positive in-group representation (70%). Quantitative analyses highlight a strong correlation between sectarian rhetoric and societal polarization (R = 0.82, p < 0.01) as well as diminished institutional trust (R = -0.65, p < 0.01). These results underscore the role of sectarian rhetoric in fostering ideological divides, eroding public trust, and shaping political identities. The implications are far-reaching, offering theoretical advancements in understanding the interplay between political language and societal cohesion. Practically, the study calls for policymakers to adopt more inclusive communication strategies, educators to enhance media literacy programs, and media organizations to counteract divisive narratives. It also highlights the ethical dilemmas posed by AI-driven amplification of sectarian rhetoric on digital platforms, urging further exploration of technology’s role in political communication. By bridging gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the intersection of technology, rhetoric, and societal impacts, this research contributes to ongoing efforts to mitigate polarization and promote democratic dialogue.
چکیده انگلیسی :
This study investigates the manifestations and impacts of sectarian rhetoric in contemporary political discourse through a critical pragmatic lens, employing Van Dijk's Ideological Square framework. Drawing on a corpus of 150 political texts, including speeches, campaign materials, and social media posts, the study adopts a mixed-methods approach to analyze the linguistic strategies employed by diverse political factions. Key findings reveal distinct rhetorical patterns: conservative factions predominantly utilize fear-based and exclusionary narratives, emphasizing negative out-group representation (85%), while liberal factions focus on inclusivity, promoting positive in-group representation (70%). Quantitative analyses highlight a strong correlation between sectarian rhetoric and societal polarization (R = 0.82, p < 0.01) as well as diminished institutional trust (R = -0.65, p < 0.01). These results underscore the role of sectarian rhetoric in fostering ideological divides, eroding public trust, and shaping political identities. The implications are far-reaching, offering theoretical advancements in understanding the interplay between political language and societal cohesion. Practically, the study calls for policymakers to adopt more inclusive communication strategies, educators to enhance media literacy programs, and media organizations to counteract divisive narratives. It also highlights the ethical dilemmas posed by AI-driven amplification of sectarian rhetoric on digital platforms, urging further exploration of technology’s role in political communication. By bridging gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the intersection of technology, rhetoric, and societal impacts, this research contributes to ongoing efforts to mitigate polarization and promote democratic dialogue.
Abbott, P., & Hargrave, M. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in political speech analysis: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Political Analysis, 14(2), 112-130.
Beddoe, C. (2024). The ethical implications of AI-generated content in political discourse. Journal of Political Communication, 12(1), 45-67.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2021). Mediated discourse: The role of intertextuality and recontextualization in shaping political narratives. Discourse & Society, 32(3), 345-360.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cruz, A., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence and personalized political messaging: New strategies for voter engagement. International Journal of Political Science, 15(4), 233-250.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power: An introduction to political discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 12(2), 134-150.
García, R., et al. (2022). Visual rhetoric in political advertising: A multimodal analysis using Van Dijk’s framework. Visual Communication, 21(2), 189-205.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., & García, R. (2022). Multimodal forms of political communication: A shift in discourse analysis towards social media interactions. Journal of Language and Politics, 23(1), 67-82.
Hesse-Biber, S., & Johnson, R. B. (2020). Feminist research practice: A primer. SAGE Publications.
Liu, X., et al. (2023). Social media amplification of polarized discourse: Evidence from recent political campaigns. Journal of Communication Research, 45(3), 301-320.
López-Nicolás, C., et al. (2021). The impact of crisis events on political rhetoric: An analysis during 9the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2180-2199.
Murphy, P. (2024). Critical discourse analysis in the digital age: New methodologies and frameworks. Journal of Language and Politics, 23(1), 67-82.
Pennebaker, J. W., et al. (2015). The role of AI in thematic pattern identification within political discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 48(3), 543-560.
Shinbori, K., et al. (2022). Examining the societal impacts of polarized rhetoric across democratic nations. Political Psychology, 38(5), 789-802.
Tang, L., & Chen, Y. (2023). Emotional appeals in political communication: Strategies for mobilizing voters in the digital age. Political Communication, 40(3), 300-320.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2020). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications.
