Interaction of Different Kinds of Advance Organizer Strategies and Read-ing Comprehension Skills: Right- and Left-Brain EFL Learners Across Gender
محورهای موضوعی :Fatemeh Amini Asl 1 , Fatemeh Mirzapour 2 , Ali Asghar Yousefi Azarfam 3
1 - Department of English, Sarab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sarab,Iran
2 - Department of English, Sofiyan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sofiyan, Iran
3 - Department of English, Sofiyan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sofiyan, Iran
کلید واژه: Advance Organizers, Graphic Organizers, Left-Brained, Reading Comprehension, Right-Brained, Textual Organizers, Verbal Organizers,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigated the effects of different kinds of advanced organizers, such as graphic, verbal, and textual organizers, on the reading comprehension of left- and right-brained Iranian EFL learners. The participants of the study were 64 female and 54 male intermediate-level EFL learners with ages ranging from 19 to 28 (M = 23) and varying degrees of brain dominance from Mohaghegh Language Institute in Tabriz, Iran. Four intact classes, one control group and three experimental groups including graphic organizer, verbal organizer, and textual organizer groups participated in this study. The design of the study was aquasi-experimental design with a pretest and a posttest. The uniformity of the EFL students was ensured using the Oxford Place-ment Test (OPT). The Alert Scale of Cognitive Style (Crane, 1989) was used to identify left- and right-brained EFL students. The research recreated the pretest and posttest in this study to assess the participants' reading comprehension before and after the intervention. The ANCOVA results demonstrated a significant impact of the use of advance organizers on the participants' reading comprehension scores. The only significant difference in reading comprehension mean scores was between participants who used graphic organizers and textual organizers; there was no sta-tistically significant difference between participants who used verbal organizers and textual or-ganizers. Students with left and right brains performed about equally well in the textual organiz-er group. Students with right-brained personalities outperformed those with left-brained person-alities in the graphic organizer group, but the reverse was true for the verbal organizer group. However, there was little difference in the reading comprehension levels between the groups. Additionally, the results demonstrated that females used advanced organizers more skillfully than males did. The results imply that various advance organizers ought to be included in L2 reading courses.
This study investigated the effects of different kinds of advanced organizers, such as graphic, verbal, and textual organizers, on the reading comprehension of left- and right-brained Iranian EFL learners. The participants of the study were 64 female and 54 male intermediate-level EFL learners with ages ranging from 19 to 28 (M = 23) and varying degrees of brain dominance from Mohaghegh Language Institute in Tabriz, Iran. Four intact classes, one control group and three experimental groups including graphic organizer, verbal organizer, and textual organizer groups participated in this study. The design of the study was aquasi-experimental design with a pretest and a posttest. The uniformity of the EFL students was ensured using the Oxford Place-ment Test (OPT). The Alert Scale of Cognitive Style (Crane, 1989) was used to identify left- and right-brained EFL students. The research recreated the pretest and posttest in this study to assess the participants' reading comprehension before and after the intervention. The ANCOVA results demonstrated a significant impact of the use of advance organizers on the participants' reading comprehension scores. The only significant difference in reading comprehension mean scores was between participants who used graphic organizers and textual organizers; there was no sta-tistically significant difference between participants who used verbal organizers and textual or-ganizers. Students with left and right brains performed about equally well in the textual organiz-er group. Students with right-brained personalities outperformed those with left-brained person-alities in the graphic organizer group, but the reverse was true for the verbal organizer group. However, there was little difference in the reading comprehension levels between the groups. Additionally, the results demonstrated that females used advanced organizers more skillfully than males did. The results imply that various advance organizers ought to be included in L2 reading courses.
Abdulloh, A., & Usman, R. (2021). The Effectiveness of Advance Organizer Learning Approach in Teaching Reading Narrative Text for First Year High School Students. International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture (ISoLEC 2021), Atlantis press.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. Handbook of reading research, 1, 255-291.
Aslrasuli, M., & Bakhshian, M. (2014). The Effect of Teaching English Textual Patterns (Problem-solution, Hypothetical-real, General-specific) on Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Ability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 297-303.
Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267.
Ausubel, D. P. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational research, 48(2), 251-257.
Ausubel, D. P. (2012). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1969). School learning: An introduction to educational psychology. Holt, Rinehart Winston.
Bavand Savadkouhi, Z., Taghi Hassani, M., & Rahmani, R. (2013). The effect of hemispheric dominance on learning vocabulary strategies among Iranian EFL Learners. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 2(2s), pp. 347-361.
Burstall, C. (1975). Factors affecting foreign-language learning: A consideration of some recent research findings. Language teaching, 8(1), 5-25.
Cho, Y., Kim, D., & Jeong, S. (2021). Evidence-based reading interventions for English language learners: A multilevel meta-analysis. Heliyon, 7(9).
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.
Cl, C. (2005). The effects of graphic organizers on Taiwnese tertiary students' EFL reading comprehension and attitudes towards reading in English. Australia: Australian Catholic Univeristy.
Crane, L. D. (1989). The Alert scale of cognitive style. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.
Division, C. o. E. C. f. C. C.-o. E. C. M. L. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Evans, S. (2003). Graphic organizers for Japanese readers of expository texts in English. ICU language research bulletin= 語学研究 , 18, 1-17.
Feldman, L. B. (1989). Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice. Vol. 6. Language and Speech, 32(4), 381-385.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1983). Right hemisphere language following brain bisection: A 20-year perspective. American Psychologist, 38(5), 525.
Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC journal, 33(1), 35-54.
Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 343-351.
Herron, C. (1994). An investigation of the effectiveness of using an advance organizer to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 190-198.
Khanal, G. K. (2013). Improving Reading Comprehension of the Secondary School EFL Learners: An Action Research
Kim, A.-H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of learning disabilities, 37(2), 105-118.
Kitterle, F. L., Christman, S., & Hellige, J. B. (1990). Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 48(4), 297-306.
Lin, C. Y. Y., & Chen, M. Y. C. (2007). Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan. Management research news, 30(2), 115-132.
Lin, H., & Chen, T. (2007). Reading authentic EFL text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment.
Mede, E. (2010). The effects of instruction of graphic organizers in terms of students’ attitudes towards reading in English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 322-325.
Mohammadi, M., Moenikia, M., & Zahed-Babelan, A. (2010). The role of advance organizer on English language learning as a second language. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4667-4671.
Muiruri, M., Wambugu, P., & Wamukuru, K. (2016). Using Advance Organizers to Enhance Pupils' Achievement in Learning Poetry in English Language. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(31), 113-117.
Pant, R., Kanjlia, S., & Bedny, M. (2020). A sensitive period in the neural phenotype of language in blind individuals. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 41, 100744.
Papageorgiou, S., & Bailey, K. M. (2019). Global perspectives on language assessment: research, theory, and practice. Routledge.
Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational technology research and development, 44(2), 43-58.
Rieber, R. W., & Carton, A. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology, including the volume thinking and speech. Springer.
Shoari, E., & Farrokhi, F. (2014). The effects of graphic organizer strategy on improving iranian efl learners’ vocabulary learning. Research in English language pedagogy, 2(1), 71-82.
Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 128.
Togo, D. F. (2002). Topical sequencing of questions and advance organizers impacting on students' examination performance. Accounting Education, 11(3), 203-216.
Ward, G., & Morris, R. (2005). Introduction to the psychology of planning. The cognitive psychology of planning, 1-34.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach (Vol. 5). Cambridge university press Cambridge.
Xie, Q., & Yeung, S. S.-s. (2022). Do vocabulary, syntactic awareness, and reading comprehension in second language facilitate the development of each other in young children? Learning and Instruction, 82, 101682.
Yussof, Y. M., Jamian, A. R., Roslan, S., Hamzah, Z. A. Z., & Kabilan, M. K. (2012). Enhancing reading comprehension through cognitive and graphic strategies: A constructivism approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 151-160.
