تبیین وتدوین گرایشهای معماری معاصر ایران پس از انقلاب اسلامی
محورهای موضوعی : معماری
1 - دکترای معماری، استادیار دانشکده معماری وشهرسازی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
کلید واژه: Methodology, Attitude, ساختار, معماری, گرایش, سبک, معاصر, شکل, Iranian Contemporary Architecture,
چکیده مقاله :
با نگاهی به معماری معاصر ایران می‌توان دریافت که نمونه‌های برتری در معماری این دوره وجود داردکه بر اساس نوع شاخص‌ها و مولفه‌های نقد معماری، می‌توان آنها را به جریانی ویژه در معماری ایران نه در انطباق کامل با معماری غرب- وابسته دانست.این مقاله در پی آن است تا با تحلیل نشانه‌های موجود در متن این آثار به شناخت گرایشات معماری نمونه های اشاره شده بپردازد و در صورت وجود گرایش های ویژه چه در انطباق با معماری معاصر غرب و چه گرایش های مستقل ، آنها را تبیین و تدوین کند. چنین بحثی به دلیل تازگی و فقدان منابع و مطالعات کافی نمی تواند بدون نقص باشد ، با این وجود تبیین گرایشات این گروه ضمن اینکه می تواند ارزش و اهمیت هر اثر را در رابطه با متن تاریخی کشور ارزیابی کند ، سبب شناخت جامعه معماری از گرایشات مذکور و بالا رفتن خود آگاهی حرفه ای می گردد.
With a brief look to Iranian contemporary architecture, it is found that better samples are existed in this period architecture, which could be known dependent to a special course in Iranian architecture- not in a complete respondence with western architecture - according to the type of indexes and elements of criticism of architecture. This article involved analysing existent allegories in context of this built samples and then recognition of their architectural attitudes es and providing existence of special tendencies, corresponding to western contemporary architecture or independent tendencies explain ,formulation and compile them. Such a discussion could not be without deficiency because of its recency and lack of sufficient information and needful resources. While explaining the attitudes of this group could evaluate value and importance of each work about the state historical context, which will result in recognition of architectural society of the said attitudes and also professional self confident. Iranian contemporary architecture, although in first view relates on architectural evolutions of the European countries, American architectural evolutions and even experiences of the third world and Asian countries in this case, but it is a completely independent phenomenon in its navigate, not only about its historical attitude but also about general nature and encountering manner, is unique and difference. Equally valued image of constructional phenomenon and cultural events, related to Iranian contemporary architecture zone with other architectures in the world between Iranian architects has been breaking out as approximately unawareness and may be emotionally and fashionably. Recognition of real condition of Iranian contemporary architecture is necessary moreover to determination direction of architectural future path, but because of different matters, providing a pattern as its path during the studied period seems difficult as a result of the following reasons: surface recognition of the state's architects of Iranian contemporary architecture and also unpredicted entering of modern architecture with a history fighting structure, economical bourgeoisie of some of the entities or persons with weakness of rules and regulations, executive organization, supervising on constructional activities. Thus, if the contemporary architecture was accounted as its global concept, Iranian contemporary architecture's methodology seems to be incomparable with recognized works of the world because of few remarkable and original works. So, if Iranian contemporary architecture was studied in a more realistic level, we could analyze and study them by so matic study tools. These works, not only because of their natural values, but also for their role in architectural evolution and reflecting methodological and aesthetical characteristics in the said historical period, are focused. From among the builted works in the last three decades, there are some attitudes that are capable of growth of a kind of architecture, connected to global course and also in conformity with the state's society characteristics, culture characteristics and climate qualification. This path shall be followed towards development and evolution of the approaches to the architecture and space and then towards a conceptual approach of it. Applying the current experiences in these stages and accurate study of them could be useful in this matter.
-افشار نادری ،کامران، (1375)،‹معماری امروز ایران ،جستجوی پلی میان شرق وغرب›، مجله آبادی،شماره 21
-افشار نادری ،کامران، (1386)، ‹مبانی نظری تاریخ نگاری انتقادی معماری معاصر ایران›،مجله معماری دیزاین،
http://art-architect.persianblog.ir
-تغابنی،علیرضا، (1387)،«رساله دکتری»،علل ظهورگرایش عوام پسند(کیچ)درمعماری معاصر ایران ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم وتحقیقات
-دی.ویمر،راجرز؛آر.دومینیک،جوزف،(1384) ، تحقیق در رسانه های جمعی،ترجمه کاووس سید امامی،صدا وسیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران،مرکز تحقیقات،مطالعات وسنجش برنامه ای،تهران،سروش
-دهباشی،مزین،(1385) ،‹بررسی فرم ومفهوم آن درمعماری معاصرایران›،سالهای 1385-1360،مجله آبادی،شماره 52
-حبیب، فرح ؛ حسینی، اکرم، (1389) ،‹تحلیلی از معماری معاصر ایران در رویارویی با پدیده جهانی شدن› ،مجله هویت شهر، شماره 6 .
-نگاهی به مهندسی ساختمان ومعماری معاصر ایران،(1377)، وزارت مسکن وشهرسازی،معاونت نظام مهندسی و اجرای ساختمان
_||_