ارزیابی کیفیت شنیداری صداگاه در میدان نقش جهان اصفهان با استفاده از بررسی طیف فرکانسی منابع صوت

محورهای موضوعی : معماری و شهرسازی

عباس غفاری ¹ (دکتری معماری، استادیار، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز. *(مسوول مکاتبات))
نسرین محسن حقیقی ² (دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی اسلامی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز.)
محسن دادخواه ³ (دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی اسلامی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1396/08/06 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/06/27 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/05/01

کلید واژه: تفکیک طیف فرکانس, صداگاه, فضای شهری, کیفیت صوتی,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: صداگاه به عنوان یکی از ارکان غیربصری منظر شهری مستلزم ارزیابی و بازطراحی است که نیازمند ارزیابی منظر شنیداری و شناخت نقاط دارای مساله و سپس اقدام بر اساس ارزیابی های دقیق می باشد. میدان نقش جهان به عنوان یک فضای شهری پذیرای افراد از رده های سنی و اجتماعی مختلف بایستی به لحاظ منظر شنیداری مورد ارزیابی قرار گیرد. هدف از پژوهش حاضر ارزیابی کیفیت شنیداری صداگاه در میان نقش جهان اصفهان و با استفاده از بررسی طیف فرکانسی منابع صوت بود. روش بررسی: جهت انجام پژوهش، از دستگاه صوت سنج ST-8851 جهت رکورد صدای منابع صوتی استفاده گردید. شبکه ای شطرنجی از 429 نقطه مورد برداشت قرار گرفته و مجموع لگاریتمی تراز های طیف های فرکانسی پایین، میانه و بالا حساب شد و در قالب نقشه های GIS با مختصات دقیق مکانی ارائه گردید. یافته ها: با بررسی طیف فرکانسی منابع منفرد نوفه، حوزه های شنیداری مختلف در میدان بر اساس فرکانس های بالا، میانه و پایین مشخص شد. بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان داد در فرکانس های پایین، نقشه ی همترازی تقریبا بصورت همگن بود. در فرکانس های میانه، مسیر حرکت اسب ها و نیز اطراف حوض میانی و ورودی بازار قیصریه از سطوح بالایی برخوردار بودند که نشان دهنده ی تراکم منابع صوتی فرکانس های میانه، مانند اصوات انسانی است. در فرکانس های بالا فقط مسیرهای عبور حمل و نقل سواره، گاری ها و آب نماها از سطوح بالایی برخوردار بودند و این به علت تمرکز منابع منفرد مرتبط با طیف فرکانسی بالاتر از 4000 هرتز می باشد. در انتها راهبردها و سیاست ها بر اساس نتایج ارائه شده است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Soundscape as one of the non-visual aspects of urban landscape requires assessment and redesign that needs evaluation of soundscape and identification of problematic areas and then taking the action according to the precise assessments. Naghshe-Jahan square as an urban space that embraces people from different ages and social groups should be assessed in terms of soundscape quality. Method: The research aimed at assessment of the soundscape quality of Naghshe-Jahan square through frequency classification in octave band. St-8851 sound meter was used for field assessments. 429 points in grid mode was assessed and logarithmic sum of low, mid and high frequency bands was calculated and presented in the form of GIS maps with precise spatial coordinates. Findings: By examining the frequency spectrum of single noise sources, different audio domains in the field were determined based on high, mid and low frequency bands. Discussion and Conclusion: Results showed that in the low frequencies, the alignment map was almost homogeneous. At mid frequencies, the pass of horses around the central pool and the entrance of the Qaisariyye Bazar were of high levels, indicating the density of the mid-frequency sound sources, such as human sounds. In high frequencies only the vehicle and gharry paths and water bodies had high sound pressure levels due to the concentration of sound sources with friquencies higher than the 4000 Hz. Finally, strategies and policies were introduced based on the results.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Rainbult, M., Dubois, D., 2005. Urban soundscapes: experiences and knowledge. Cities, vol. 22, pp. 239-350.


2. Botteldooren, D., Coensel, B., De Meur, T., 2004. The temporal structure of the urban soundscape. Sound & Vibration, Vol.  292(1–2), pp. 105–123.


3. Brown, L., 2012. A review of progress in soundscapes and approach to soundscape planning, International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, Vol. 17(2), pp. 73-81.


4. Schafer, M., 1977. The tuning of the world. Alfred A Knopf, New York.


5. Truax, B., 2001. Acoustic Communication. Ablex, Vancouver.


6. Defra, (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs). 2007. Noise Mapping. Gov of UK, UK. 


7. Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Dubois, D., 2006. Recent advances in soundscape research. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, Vol. 92, pp. 5–8.    


8. Truax, B., 1978. The World Soundscape Projects Handbook for Acoustic Ecology. Arc Publications, Vancouver.


9. Foale, K. 2014. A Listener- centered approach to soundscape analysis. PhD Thesis, University of Salford, UK.


10. Decoensel, B., Bockstael, A., Dekoninck, L., Botteldooren, D., Schult-Fortkamp, B., Kang, J., Nilsson, M., 2010. Application of a model for auditory attention to the design of urban soundscapes, 1^st EAA- EuroRegio, Slovenia, 15-18 September.


11. Lin, H., Lam, K., 2011. Soundscape of urban open spaces in Hong Kong. Asian Geographer, Vol. 27(1-2), pp. 29-42.


12. Decoensel, B., Vanwetswinkel, S., Botteldooren, D., 2011. Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise,  Acoust. Soc. Am, Vol. 129 (4), pp. 148-153.


13. Berglund, B., Eriksen, C.A., Nilsson, M.E., 2001. Exploring the perceptual content in soundscapes. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich.


14. Schulte-Fortkamp, B., 2002. The meaning of annoyance in relation to the quality of acoustic environments. Noise Health, Vol. 4, pp. 13–18.


15. Botteldooren, D., Verkeyn, A., 2002. Fuzzy models for accumulation of reported community noise annoyance from combined sources. Acoust. Soc. Am, Vol. 112, pp. 1496–1508.


16. Polli, A., 2012. Soundscape, sonification and sound activism. AI & Soc, Vol. 27, pp. 257-268.


17. Saores L., Coelho, 2011. An investigation on the soundscape of public parks in the city of BELEM, Brazil. 18^th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July.


18. Brambilla, G., Gallo, V., Zambon, G., 2013. The soundscape quality in some urban parks in Milan, Italy. Journal of Public Health,Vol. 10, pp. 2348-2369.


19. Asdrubali, F, DAlessandro, F., Brambilla, G., Gallo V., 2013. Perceived quality of soundscape in three urban parks in Rome. Acoustic Society of America, Vol. 134 (1).


20. Nilsson, M., Jeon, J., Radsten-Ekman, M., Adelsson, O. 2012. A sound walk study on the relationship between soundscape and overall quality of urban outdoor places. Acoustics, Hong Kong.


21. De Coensel, B., Boes, M., Oldoni, D., Botteldooren, D., 2013. Characterizing the soundscape of tranquil urban spaces. Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 19.


22. Feyzi, M., Menaam, A., Ghazizadeh, N., 2014. Evaluation of acoustic comfort of users in urban parks. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol 16. (In Persian)


23. Bach, Sh., Dorostkar, E., Simon, B., 2017. Creating urban soundscape map via grounded theory and Nvivo software: case study of district 12 of Tehran. Journal of Environmental Science, Vol 43 (2), pp. 267-284. (In Persian)


24. Mohsen Haghighi, N., Ghalehnoee, M., 2016. Evaluation of soundscape in urban open spaces, case study of Khayyam pedestrian area. Scientific community of Architecture and Planning of Iran, Vol 12 (in Persian).


25. Shahabian, P., Larimian, F., 2016. Assessment of Soundscape of Valiasr street with an emphasis on people perception of soundscape. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture and Planning, Vol 17. (In Persian)


26. Farina, A., 2014. Soundscape Ecology, Principles, Patterns, Methods and Applications. Springer, London and New York, First Eddition.


27. Payne, S; Davies, W; Mags, A., 2009. Research into the Practical and Policy Applications of Soundscape Concepts and Techniques in Urban Areas (NANR 200). Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.


28. Kang, J., 2006. Urban Sound Environment, Taylor and Francis.


29. Herranz-pascul, K, Aspuru, I, Garcia, L., 2010. Proposed conceptual model of environmental experience as framework to study the soundscape. InterNoise, Lisbon.


30. Brown, A. L., 2011. A review of progress in soundscapes and approach to soundscape planning.  Acoustics and vibration, Vol. 17 (2), pp. 73-81.


31. Nilsson, M., 2007. Soundscape quality in urban open spaces. INTER-NOISE, Istanbul, Turkey, 28-31 August.


32. Yang, W., and Kang, J., 2005. Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Applied Acoustic, Vol. 66, pp. 211–229.


33. Yu, L., and Kang, J., 2008. Effects of social, demographical and behavioral factors on the sound level evaluation in urban open spaces. Acoustic Society of America, Vol. 123, pp. 772–783.


34. Guastavino, C., 2006. The ideal urban soundscape: Investigating the sound quality of French cities. Acta Acust. Acust, Vol. 92, pp. 945–951.


35. Jeon, J. Y., Lee, P. J., You, J., and Kang, J., 2010. Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds. Acoust. Soc. Am, Vol. 127, pp. 1357–1366.


36. Pijanowski, B. C, Villanueva-Rivera, L. J, Dumyahn, SL., Farina, A, Krause, BL., Napoletano, B M., Gage, Stuart H., Pieretti, N., 2011. Soundscape Ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. Bioscience, Vol. 61(3), pp. 203- 216.


37. Kotzen, B, English, C., 2009. Environmental noise barriers. Spon Press, London and New York, Second Edition.


38. Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Fiebig, A., 2006. Soundscape analysis in a residential area: An evaluation of noise and people’s mind. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, Vol. 92(6), pp. 875-880.


39. Golmohammadi, R. 2009. Engineering of Sound and Vibration, Daneshjoo Publications, Hamedan. (In Persian)


40. Mohsen Haghighi, N. Urban Design Emphasizing on the Impact of Sound Scape on the Perception of Urban Spaces, case Study: Naghshe jahan Square in Isfahan. Master of Urban Design, Art University of Isfahan, 2016. (In Persian)


41. Baldinelli, G., Asdrubali, F., D'Alessandro, F., Sberna, A., 2012. Redevelopment of an Urban Open Public Space Using the Soundscape Approach: A Cace Study in CITTA DI CASTELLO. Proceedings of the Internoise, IASME NCAD, USA, New York, Agust 19-22.


42. Vermir,G., 2008. The Application of the Soundscape Approach in the Evaluation of the Urban Public Space.  Acoustics, Paris.