تاثیر فعالیت های صنعتی بر کیفیت زندگی ساکنان نواحی کارکردی مسکونی هم‌جوار (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 16 شهر تهران)
محورهای موضوعی : آلودگی صنعتی
فاطمه سادات حسینی نژاد
1
(دانش آموخته دکترای برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات) )
مظفر صرافی
2
(استاد برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. )
کلید واژه: فعالیت صنعتی, نواحی کارکردی مسکونی, کیفیت زندگی, ارزیابی اثرات.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: نواحی مسکونی هم‌جوار با فعالیت های صنعتی در شهرها، همواره تحت تاثیر ویژگی های محیطی این فعالیت ها بوده و کیفیت زندگی ساکنان نیز متاثر از این صنایع است. در این مقاله دو فعالیت صنعتی نسبتا آلاینده(کارخانه روغن نباتی قو و نیروگاه بعثت) در منطقه 16 شهر تهران به عنوان مورد پژوهش انتخاب شده و چگونگی تاثیر آن‌ها بر کیفیت زندگی ساکنان هم‌جوار با این فعالیت ها از ابعاد عینی و ذهنی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. هدف از این پژوهش شناسایی چگونگی تاثیر این فعالیت های صنعتی بر کیفیت زندگی ساکنان هم‌جوار است. روش بررسی: در این پژوهش از فن ارزیابی اثر و چهار منبع اطلاعاتی شامل اسناد رسمی موجود، برداشت میدانی، مصاحبه و پرسش‌نامه(به تعداد 385 عدد) با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی سیستماتیک استفاده شده و در تحلیل داده ها، روش های آمار توصیفی به کار رفته است. یافته‌ها: فعالیت های منتخب دارای اثرات مثبت و منفی بر "قلمروهای کیفیت زندگی" افراد، در ابعاد عینی و ذهنی و در زمینه های مختلف(مانند محیط زیستی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی، کالبدی و ترافیکی) بوده اند؛ مطالعه کیفیت زندگی کلی ساکنان نشان داد که با وجود اثرات منفی این صنایع، 38 درصد از ساکنان، از کیفیت زندگی کلی خود راضی بوده اند. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به اینکه کیفیت زندگی کلی فرد، درنتیجه ترکیب رضایتمندی از قلمروهای مختلف با اولویت بندی ذهنی وی مشخص می شود، میزان رضایتمندی ساکنان از کیفیت زندگی کلی خود، نشان دهنده این موضوع است که از دید ساکنان، تاثیر مثبت فعالیت های صنعتی در زمینه های اقتصادی و اجتماعی، به علاوه رضایتمندی نسبی از سایر قلمروهای کیفیت زندگی، تا حدودی توانسته اثرات منفی این فعالیت ها را در زمینه های محیط زیستی، ترافیکی و کالبدی در قلمروهای مربوطه پوشش داده و میزان نارضایتی ساکنان را از زندگی در هم‌جواری این فعالیت ها کاهش دهد.
Background & Objectives: Residential areas adjacent to industrial activities in the cities, are always influenced by environmental characteristics of these activities and also the residents’quality of life is affected by them. In this paper, two relatively polluting industrial activities (Ghoo vegetable oil factory and Besat power plant) in district 16 of Tehran are selected as the case studies and the impact of these activities on neighboring residents’ quality of life have been surveyed. The objective of this study is to identify how these activities have effects on neighboring residents’ quality of life. Material and Methodology: This study has used “Impact assessment” technique and four sources of information, including existing official documents, field studies, interviews and questionnaires (385 pieces by applying systematic random sampling method). The descriptive statistics is used for data analysis. Findings: These selected industrial activities have positive and negative impacts on neighbors’ quality of life in objective and subjective dimensions and in different fields (such as environmental, social, economic, physical and traffic). The survey of the general quality of life, indicated that, despite the negative effects of these industries, 38% of residents were satisfied with their general quality of life (due to their life conditions). Discussion and Conclusion: According to the fact that general quality of life is determined as a result of combining satisfaction with various domains in accordance with individual subjective prioritization, satisfaction of adjacent neighbors indicates that from the neighbors point of view, the positive impacts of industrial activities in economic and social fields, in addition to the relative satisfaction from other domains of quality of life, have covered their negative impacts in environmental, traffic and physical fields in related domains and have decreased their dissatisfaction with quality of life in adjacent residential areas.
1. Ardeshiri A. Evaluating urban services using economic valuation techniques: Towards better urban environmental quality and promotion of sustainable development (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University).2014.
2. Byrne, J., Environmental justice and Ecological justice. In B.D. Solomon (ed), Encyclopedia of Geography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.2010.
3. Diener E, Suh E. Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social indicators research. 1997 Jan; 40:189-216.
4. Ko MC, Choi SO. The effects of community quality of life on local policy decisions. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2015 Dec; 10:667-87.
5. Das D. Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social indicators research. 2008 Sep; 88:297-310.
6. Pukeliene V, Starkauskiene V. Quality of life: Factors determining its measurement complexity. Engineering Economics. 2011 Apr 28;22(2):147-56.
7. Velibeyoğlu H. Assessing subjective quality of urban life at neighborhood scale. Izmir Institute of Technology (Turkey); 2014.
8. Marans RW, Stimson RJ, editors. Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011 Aug 31.
9. Baumann F. The next frontier—human development and the anthropocene: UNDP human development report 2020. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2021 Mar 24;63(3):34-40.
10. Floková L, Hübelová D, Kozumpliková A, Caha J, Janošíková L. Multi-perspective quality of life index for urban development analysis, example of the city of Brno, Czech Republic. Cities. 2023 Jun 1; 137:104338.
11. Kim H, Roh S. Relationship between residential district and health-related quality of life in Chungnam industrial complex area. Environmental Health and Toxicology. 2016;31.
12. Kouass DP, Soumahoro SI, Yeo S, Kouame AD, Sokodogo AM, Serigbalet AG, Yeo NB, Moumouni A, Yao GH, Ebouat ME, Tiembre II. Environmental realities and health consequences for people living in the vicinity of an industrial plant: The case of the town of Bouake in 2019. International Research Journal of Public and Environmental Health. 2023 Dec;11(1):8.
13. Mata C, Lappharat S, Chusiri Y, Khumjorhor M, Taneepanichskul N. Effect of residential proximity to the lignite-fired power plant on depression, sleep quality, and morning salivary cortisol in the elderly. Science of The Total Environment. 2022 Mar 10; 811:151346.
14. Meng Q, Hu D, Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhang L, Wang Z. Do industrial parks generate intra-heat island effects in cities? New evidence, quantitative methods, and contributing factors from a spatiotemporal analysis of top steel plants in China. Environmental Pollution. 2022 Jan 1; 292:118383.
15. Szemik S, Gajda M, Kowalska M. The review of prospective studies on mental health and the quality of life of physicians and medical students. Medycyna Pracy. 2020 Jul 24;71(4):483-91.
16. De Vor F, De Groot HL. The impact of industrial sites on residential property values: A hedonic pricing analysis from the Netherlands. Regional Studies. 2011 May 1;45(5):609-23.
17. Talebian, SA, Fazeli M, Daghagheleh A. The social effect of industrial development in the Assaluyeh District.2008. (In Persian)
18. 18.Cranmer Z, Steinfield L, Miranda J, Stohler T. Energy distributive injustices: Assessing the demographics of communities surrounding renewable and fossil fuel power plants in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science. 2023 Jun 1; 100:103050.
19. Parsons G, Heintzelman MD. The Effect of Wind Power Projects on Property Values: A Decade (2011–2021) of Hedonic Price Analysis. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics. 2022 Jun 12;16(1):93-170.
20. Palacios J, Eichholtz P, Kok N, Aydin E. The impact of housing conditions on health outcomes. Real Estate Economics. 2021 Dec;49(4):1172-200.
21. Gündoğdu S, Fidan F. The Effect of Industrial Landscape on the Urban Identity in Zonguldak. Planlama. 2022 Sep 1;32(3).
22. Alba Dorado MI, Cano Sanchiz JM. Improvements and methodological innovations in the application of the Historic Landscape Characterisation methodology to industrial heritage landscapes. City, Territory and Architecture. 2024 Jan 2;11(1):1.
23. Wu Y, Liu Y. Transforming Industrial Waterfronts into Inclusive Landscapes: A Project Method and Investigation of Landscape as a Medium for Sustainable Revitalization. Sustainability. 2023 Mar 13;15(6):5060.
24. Guerrero SE, Pulikanti S, Wieghart B, Bryan JG, Strow T. Modeling Truck Parking Demand at Commercial and Industrial Establishments. Transportation Research Record. 2023 Jan;2677(1):1157-68.
25. Amidi, A. Sampling theory and its application (1). University Publishing Center.2009. (In Persian)
26. Naghshe Moheet engineering Consultation.Detailed plan of district 16 of Tehran city, Housing and urban planning organization of Tehran province. 2004. (In Persian)
27. Qu Vegetable Oil Factory managers’ interview. 2015.
28. Besat Power Plant managers’ interview. 2015.
29. Department of Environment of Tehran County. Environmental file of Qu Vegetable Oil factory. 2015. (In Persian)
30. Company of Urban Industries and Jobs Organization. Environmental file of Qu Vegetable Oil factory. 2015.(In Persian)
31. Department of Environment of Tehran County. Environmental file of Besat Power plant. 2015. (In Persian)
32. Company of Urban Industries and Jobs Organization. Environmental file of Besat Power plant. 2015.( In Persian)
33. Tehran Air Quality Control Company. 2016. (In Persian)
34. www.epa.gov
35. Questionnaires of Residents in residential functional areas adjacent to the selected industrial activities (Qu vegetable oil factory and Besat power plant). 2015.
36. Tehran Municipality Database. 2006. (In Persian)
37. Center for Statistics of Iran . Population and Housing Census, Total Results of Tehran City.2006. (In Persian)
38. Field studies.2015.
