• صفحه اصلی
  • بررسی عوامل موثر بر رفتار استفاده از کودهای زیستی به وسیله کشاورزان استان البرز

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : 12483 بازدید : 86 صفحه: 105 - 118

10.22034/jest.2018.12483

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

بررسی عوامل موثر بر رفتار استفاده از کودهای زیستی به وسیله کشاورزان استان البرز

محورهای موضوعی : کشاورزی و محیط زیست

فاطمه شفیعی 1 (استادیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری* (مسوول مکاتبات))
احمد رضوانفر 2 (استاد گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی دانشگاه تهران)
مهدیه السادات میرترابی 3 (دانشجوی دکتری ترویج کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی دانشگاه تهران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/11/02 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/02/08 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/01/01

کلید واژه: محیط زیست, کشاورزی پایدار, کشاورزی زیستی,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: امروزه مصرف کودهای زیستی به‌عنوان جایگزین کودهای شیمیایی به همراه کاهش خطرهای زیست محیطی، رفتار زیست محیطی کشاورزان را تحت تأثیر قرار داده است. بنابراین، هدف این مطالعه، بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر رفتار استفاده از کودهای زیستی به وسیله کشاورزان استان البرز بود. روش بررسی: جامعه آماری تحقیق کشاورزان استفاده‌کننده از کودهای زیستی بودند که 45 نفر از آن‌ها به روش نمونه‌گیری انباشتی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. ابزار جمع آوری داده‌ها پرسش‌نامه بود که روایی محتوایی آن با کسب نظر از پانل متخصصان و پایایی مقیاس‌های آن با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ (بالاتر از 7/0) بررسی و تأیید شد. یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که رفتار زیست محیطی کشاورزان درخصوص استفاده از کودهای زیستی از سطح متوسط بیش‌تر بود. هم‌چنین، بین سطح زیر کشت، میزان ادراک زیست محیطی و اقتصادی اثرات استفاده از کودهای زیستی و میزان عوامل انگیزشی برای مصرف کودهای زیستی با کل مؤلفه‌های تشکیل دهنده رفتار زیست محیطی کشاورزان مورد مطالعه رابطه مثبت و معنی‌داری وجود داشت. بحث و نتیجه گیری: بر اساس نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون مشخص شد که متغیرهای میزان ادراک زیست محیطی و اقتصادی اثرات استفاده از کودهای زیستی، میزان عوامل انگیزشی برای مصرف کودهای زیستی، میزان سطح زیر کشت و میزان دسترسی به ادوات مورد نیاز برای استفاده از کودهای زیستی، حدود 43 درصد از تغییرات متغیر وابسته را تببین کردند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background & Objective: Nowadays consumption of bio fertilizers as alternative of chemical fertilizers with decreasing environmental hazards has been affected farmers' environmental behavior. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the components of Alborz province farmers’ environmental behavior about bio fertilizers application. Method: The statistical population was farmers who were using bio-fertilizers that 45 of them were studied by snowball sampling method. The research instrument was a questionnaire that validity of it was obtained by a panel of experts and reliability of scales examined by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (greater than 0.7). Findings: The result indicated that farmers’ environmental behavior about using of bio fertilizers was more than intermediate level. In addition, there is a significant and positive correlation between a total of constitutive components of environmental behavior of the farmers and cultivated area, rate of environmental and economic perception of bio fertilizers application effects and rate of motivation factors for bio fertilizers consumption. Discussion and Conclusions: The results of regression analysis revealed that the variables of: rate of environmental and economic perception of bio fertilizers application effects and rate of motivation factors for bio fertilizers consumption, cultivated area, the rate of access to devices needed for use of bio fertilizers explained about  43% of variation of the dependent variable.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. USDA. 2009.Organic agriculture research and extension initiative. US Department of agriculture. Retrieved from http:// www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/rfas/pdfs/PAS_OREI_RFA.pdf. 10/20/214.
    2.
  2. Hole, D.G., Perkins, A.J., Wilson, J.D., Alxander, I.H.,Grice, P.V., and Evans, A.D. 2005. Does organic farming benefit biodiversity?Journal of Biological Conservation, 122(1) 113-130
    3.
  3. Aghili, S.M., Khoshfar, Gh.R., Salehi, S., 2009. Social Capital and Environmental Responsible Behaviours in the North of  Iran (Case Study: Gilan, Mazandaran and Golestan Provinces). J. Agric. Sci. Natur. Resour., Vol. 16 (Special issue 1-a). (In Persian).
    4.
  4. Lockeretz, W. 2007. Organic farming: an international history, CABI. Publication, 282 Pages.
    5.
  5. Asadi Rahmani, H., Khavazi, K., Asgharzadeh, A., Rejali, F., Afshari, M., 2012. Biofertilizers in Iran: opportunities and challenges. Iranian journal of soil research. Vol.26 No.1, pp. 78-87. (In Persian).
    6.
  6.  Khosravi, H,. 2013. Biofertilizers Containing Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: Strengths and weaknesses. Journal of land management. Vol. 1 No.1, pp. 33-46. (In Persian).
    7.
  7.  Nemati, A., Golchin, A., Besharsti, H., 2015.Effects of Biological Fertilizers on Yield and Growth Indices of Tomato in Cd Contaminated Soil. Iranian journal of soil research Vol 29, No, 1, pp. 24-38. (In Persian).
    8.
  8. Hojattipor,S., Jafari Haghighi., B.,  Drostkar, M., 2014. The effect of integration of biological and chemical fertilizers on yield yield components and growth indexes of wheat. Journal of plant ecophysiology. Vol. 5 No.15, pp. 37-50. (In Persian).
    9.
  9. Fifth Development Program Law, 2010. Islamic Consultative Assembly. (In Persian).
    10.
  10. Abbasi, E., Akbari, M,. 2012. An Investigation of the Willingness Intention of lergymen towards Participation in Agriculture and Natural Resources Extension and Education Programs. Iranian journal of Agricultural economics and development research. Vol. 42-2 No.3, pp. 467-479. (In Persian).
    11.
  11. Sommer, L., 2011. The Theory of Planned Behavior and the Impact of Past Behavior. International Business & Economics Research Journal. Vol.10(1), pp.91-99.
    12.
  12. Adebayo, S.A., Oladele, O.I., 2012. A Review of Selected Theories and Their Applications to Information Seeking Behavior and Adoption of Organic Agricultural Practices by Farmers. Life Science Journal .Vol.9(3), pp.20-35.
    13.
  13. Ramayah, T., Jantan, M., 2004. Technology Acceptance: An Individual Perspective. Current and Future Research In Malaysia. Review of Business Research, Vol.2(1), pp.103-11.
    14.
  14. Ajzen, I., 2011. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), pp.1113–1127.
    15.
  15. Sabzyan Molaiee, KH., Ajili, A., Mohammadzadeh, S., Yazdanpanah, M., Foorazani, M., 2015.Examine the Attitudes and Behaviors of farmers to Apply Integrated Pest Management by using the Developed Theory of Planned Behavior. Agricultural Extension and Education Research. Vol. 8 , Issue 3, No.2 , pp. 57-70. (In Persian).
    16.
  16. Nazifi, A.,2014. An Investigation of the Willingness Intention of vegetablegrowers of Ray County towards use of biofertlizrs. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis. Agriculture and Natural Resources College. University of Zanjan. (In Persian).
    17.
  17. Menati Zadeh; M., Zamani; Gh., Karami, E., 2015. Modeling farmers’ environmental behavior in Shiraz County by using Value-Belief-Norm theory .Iranian journal of Agricultural economics and development .Vol. 45, Issue 4, pp. 613-624. (In Persian).
    18.
  18. Poursaeed, R., 2011. Investigation of Environmental Attitude and Behavior of Farmers in Ilam Province’s by Using New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, Vol.2, No. 1, pp. 65-72.
    19.
  19. Sarvaramini, Sh., Golzardi, F., Vaziritabar, Y.,  Vaziritabar,Y., Sadat Asilan, K., Ebadi, S.Z., 2015. Investigating attitudes and behaviors about chemical herbicides utilization among farmers in the central district of Karaj. Journal of Research in Ecology, Vol.2(3), pp. 027-038.
    20.
  20. Adesina, A. A., 1996. Factors affecting the adoption of fertilizers by rice farmers in Cote d'Ivoire. Journal of Nutrient Cycling in Agro ecosystems, Vol.46 No. 1, pp. 29-39.
    21.
  21. Srinivas, A., Bhalekar, D.N., 2013.Constraints faced by farmers in adoption of biofertilizers. Intentional Journal of Scientific Research,  Vol. 2,  No.4, pp. 9-10
    22.
  22. Veisi, H., BagheriToulabi, S., 2012. Factors Influencing Pro-environmental Behaviour in Agriculture. International Conference on Ecological, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Jan. 7-8, 2012 Dubai.
    23.
  23.  Navah, A., Forotan kia, Sh., 2011. An Investigation of the relationship between rational action and environmental behaviors (the case of Andimeshk urban community). Journal of environment scientific and engineering. Vol. 51 No.4, pp. 78-69. (In Persian).
    24.
  24. Talape, Y. L., Kale, S. M., Chawane, C. B., Jadhav, A. J., Nagalwade, L. D., 2011. Knowledge of farmers towards biofertilizers and its determinants in Nagpur district. Journal of Soils and Crops, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 78-81.
    25.
  25. Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Dean, M., Lampila, P., Saba, A., Lähteenmäki, L., Shepherd, R., 2008. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite, Vol.50 No. 2, pp.443-454.
    26.
  26. Blaikie, N., 2013. Designing social research:the logic of anticipation. Translated by Hassan Chavoshyan. Ney publication.
    27.
  27. Davis, F. D., 1985. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology(.
    28.
  28. Ahmed, N., Englund, J. E., Åhman, I., Lieberg, M., Johansson, E., 2011. Perception of pesticide use by farmers and neighbors in two periurban areas. Science of the Total Environment, 412, pp.77-86.
    29.
  29. Karami, E., Mansoorabadi, A., 2008.Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviors: a gender analysis of Iranian farmers, Environment, development and sustainability. Vol. 10 No. 6, pp.883-898.
    30.
  30. Niemeyer, K., Lombard, J., 2003. Identifying problems and potential of the conversion to organic farming in South Africa. In Meeting of the Agricultural Economic Association of South Africa (AEASA), Pretoria, South Africa.
    31.

 
 

 

 

_||_

  1. USDA. 2009.Organic agriculture research and extension initiative. US Department of agriculture. Retrieved from http:// www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/rfas/pdfs/PAS_OREI_RFA.pdf. 10/20/214.
    2.
  2. Hole, D.G., Perkins, A.J., Wilson, J.D., Alxander, I.H.,Grice, P.V., and Evans, A.D. 2005. Does organic farming benefit biodiversity?Journal of Biological Conservation, 122(1) 113-130
    3.
  3. Aghili, S.M., Khoshfar, Gh.R., Salehi, S., 2009. Social Capital and Environmental Responsible Behaviours in the North of  Iran (Case Study: Gilan, Mazandaran and Golestan Provinces). J. Agric. Sci. Natur. Resour., Vol. 16 (Special issue 1-a). (In Persian).
    4.
  4. Lockeretz, W. 2007. Organic farming: an international history, CABI. Publication, 282 Pages.
    5.
  5. Asadi Rahmani, H., Khavazi, K., Asgharzadeh, A., Rejali, F., Afshari, M., 2012. Biofertilizers in Iran: opportunities and challenges. Iranian journal of soil research. Vol.26 No.1, pp. 78-87. (In Persian).
    6.
  6.  Khosravi, H,. 2013. Biofertilizers Containing Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: Strengths and weaknesses. Journal of land management. Vol. 1 No.1, pp. 33-46. (In Persian).
    7.
  7.  Nemati, A., Golchin, A., Besharsti, H., 2015.Effects of Biological Fertilizers on Yield and Growth Indices of Tomato in Cd Contaminated Soil. Iranian journal of soil research Vol 29, No, 1, pp. 24-38. (In Persian).
    8.
  8. Hojattipor,S., Jafari Haghighi., B.,  Drostkar, M., 2014. The effect of integration of biological and chemical fertilizers on yield yield components and growth indexes of wheat. Journal of plant ecophysiology. Vol. 5 No.15, pp. 37-50. (In Persian).
    9.
  9. Fifth Development Program Law, 2010. Islamic Consultative Assembly. (In Persian).
    10.
  10. Abbasi, E., Akbari, M,. 2012. An Investigation of the Willingness Intention of lergymen towards Participation in Agriculture and Natural Resources Extension and Education Programs. Iranian journal of Agricultural economics and development research. Vol. 42-2 No.3, pp. 467-479. (In Persian).
    11.
  11. Sommer, L., 2011. The Theory of Planned Behavior and the Impact of Past Behavior. International Business & Economics Research Journal. Vol.10(1), pp.91-99.
    12.
  12. Adebayo, S.A., Oladele, O.I., 2012. A Review of Selected Theories and Their Applications to Information Seeking Behavior and Adoption of Organic Agricultural Practices by Farmers. Life Science Journal .Vol.9(3), pp.20-35.
    13.
  13. Ramayah, T., Jantan, M., 2004. Technology Acceptance: An Individual Perspective. Current and Future Research In Malaysia. Review of Business Research, Vol.2(1), pp.103-11.
    14.
  14. Ajzen, I., 2011. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), pp.1113–1127.
    15.
  15. Sabzyan Molaiee, KH., Ajili, A., Mohammadzadeh, S., Yazdanpanah, M., Foorazani, M., 2015.Examine the Attitudes and Behaviors of farmers to Apply Integrated Pest Management by using the Developed Theory of Planned Behavior. Agricultural Extension and Education Research. Vol. 8 , Issue 3, No.2 , pp. 57-70. (In Persian).
    16.
  16. Nazifi, A.,2014. An Investigation of the Willingness Intention of vegetablegrowers of Ray County towards use of biofertlizrs. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis. Agriculture and Natural Resources College. University of Zanjan. (In Persian).
    17.
  17. Menati Zadeh; M., Zamani; Gh., Karami, E., 2015. Modeling farmers’ environmental behavior in Shiraz County by using Value-Belief-Norm theory .Iranian journal of Agricultural economics and development .Vol. 45, Issue 4, pp. 613-624. (In Persian).
    18.
  18. Poursaeed, R., 2011. Investigation of Environmental Attitude and Behavior of Farmers in Ilam Province’s by Using New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, Vol.2, No. 1, pp. 65-72.
    19.
  19. Sarvaramini, Sh., Golzardi, F., Vaziritabar, Y.,  Vaziritabar,Y., Sadat Asilan, K., Ebadi, S.Z., 2015. Investigating attitudes and behaviors about chemical herbicides utilization among farmers in the central district of Karaj. Journal of Research in Ecology, Vol.2(3), pp. 027-038.
    20.
  20. Adesina, A. A., 1996. Factors affecting the adoption of fertilizers by rice farmers in Cote d'Ivoire. Journal of Nutrient Cycling in Agro ecosystems, Vol.46 No. 1, pp. 29-39.
    21.
  21. Srinivas, A., Bhalekar, D.N., 2013.Constraints faced by farmers in adoption of biofertilizers. Intentional Journal of Scientific Research,  Vol. 2,  No.4, pp. 9-10
    22.
  22. Veisi, H., BagheriToulabi, S., 2012. Factors Influencing Pro-environmental Behaviour in Agriculture. International Conference on Ecological, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Jan. 7-8, 2012 Dubai.
    23.
  23.  Navah, A., Forotan kia, Sh., 2011. An Investigation of the relationship between rational action and environmental behaviors (the case of Andimeshk urban community). Journal of environment scientific and engineering. Vol. 51 No.4, pp. 78-69. (In Persian).
    24.
  24. Talape, Y. L., Kale, S. M., Chawane, C. B., Jadhav, A. J., Nagalwade, L. D., 2011. Knowledge of farmers towards biofertilizers and its determinants in Nagpur district. Journal of Soils and Crops, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 78-81.
    25.
  25. Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Dean, M., Lampila, P., Saba, A., Lähteenmäki, L., Shepherd, R., 2008. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite, Vol.50 No. 2, pp.443-454.
    26.
  26. Blaikie, N., 2013. Designing social research:the logic of anticipation. Translated by Hassan Chavoshyan. Ney publication.
    27.
  27. Davis, F. D., 1985. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology(.
    28.
  28. Ahmed, N., Englund, J. E., Åhman, I., Lieberg, M., Johansson, E., 2011. Perception of pesticide use by farmers and neighbors in two periurban areas. Science of the Total Environment, 412, pp.77-86.
    29.
  29. Karami, E., Mansoorabadi, A., 2008.Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviors: a gender analysis of Iranian farmers, Environment, development and sustainability. Vol. 10 No. 6, pp.883-898.
    30.
  30. Niemeyer, K., Lombard, J., 2003. Identifying problems and potential of the conversion to organic farming in South Africa. In Meeting of the Agricultural Economic Association of South Africa (AEASA), Pretoria, South Africa.
    31.

 
 

 

 

سکوی نشر دانش

سند یا سکوی نشر دانش ،سامانه ای جهت مدیریت حوزه علمی و پژوهشی نشریات دانشگاه آزاد می باشد

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]