واکاوی مؤلفه‌های همدلی تعاملگرایانه زوجین در روابط بینفردی با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون
محورهای موضوعی : خانواده
سیدمحمدصادق سهروردی
1
,
مجتبی شاهنوشی
2
,
رضا اسماعیلی
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی مدیریت فرهنگی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان(خوراسگان)، ایران
2 - دانشیار، گروه مدیریت فرهنگی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه مدیریت فرهنگی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: همدلی, روابط بین¬فردی زوجین, تحلیل مضمون,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی مضامین و مؤلفه‌های همدلی تعاملگرایانه در روابط بینفردی زوجین ایرانی با استفاده از رویکرد کیفی پژوهش و روش تحلیل مضمون به انجام رسیده است. مشارکتکنندگان پژوهش پانزده نفر از اساتید رشتههای ارتباطات و مشاوره شاغل در دانشگاههای آزاد و دولتی و همچنین کارشناسان رسانه و مشاوران خانواده در شهر اصفهان با تجربه کاری بیش از ده سال بود که با روش نمونهگیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمعآوری دادهها مصاحبه نیمهساختیافته بود. به منظور تحلیل دادهها از رویکرد شبکه مضامین استفاده شد. یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد که همدلی تعاملگرایانه (به عنوان مضمون فراگیر) دارای پنج مضمون سازماندهنده «خودتعاملی همدلانه»، «دگرتعاملی همدلانه»، «همذاتپنداری هدفمند»، «چارچوبمندی ارتباطی» و «پذیرندگی آگاهانه» است. این مضامین در تعامل با یکدیگر شبکه مضامین همدلی تعاملگرایانه زوجین در روابط بینفردی زوجین را شکل دادهاند. به طور کلی، نتایج پژوهش بیانگر این بود که همدلی تعاملگرایانه میتواند کیفیت روابط بینفردی زوجین را تقویت نماید.
This Study sought to identify the themes and components of interactional empathy in the interpersonal relationships of Iranian couples. Empathy between couples is important in the sense that its lack can have many negative consequences both at the micro level (relationships between couples), at the institutional level (family), and at the macro level (society). This research was based on a qualitative approach and a thematic analysis method. The research participants were 15 members of the faculty of communication and counselling working in public and Azad University, as well as media experts and family counsellors with more than ten years of work experience, which were selected by purposive sampling. The data analysis approach was the Theme network presented by Attride-Stirling (2001). Data analysis was done based on three-stage thematic coding. The findings show that interactional empathy (as a global theme) has five organizing themes "empathetic self-interaction", "empathic other-interaction", "targeted identification", "communicative framework", and "conscious acceptance". These themes, in articulated interaction with each other, form the network of interactionist empathy themes of couples in the interpersonal relationships of couples. The research results generally show that interactive empathy can strengthen couples' interpersonal relationships.
Abdi, M.R., Nejati, V., Zabihzadeh, A., Mohseni, M. and Mohammadi, R. (2011). Comparing the abilities of empathy and mind reading in couples applying for divorce and the normal group. Journal of Thought and Behavior in Clinical Psychology, 7(25), 76-67. (In Persian)
Alaedini, Z., Moeeini, S., & KajbaF, M.B. (2018). Effects of affective and cognitive empathy induction on couples’ behavior and outcomes in conflicts. Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 13 (2), 130-139. (In Persian)
Ali, F., Amorim, I. S., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and individual differences, 47(7), 758-762.
Alimohammadi, F., & Aghajani, A. (2021) Predicting quality of marital life based on couples commitment, and empathy in married students of Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 8 (4), 135-145. (In Persian)
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
Busby, D. M., & Gardner, B. C. (2008). How do I analyze thee? Let me count the ways: Considering empathy in couple relationships using self and partner ratings. Journal of Family Process, 47(2), 229-242.
Cramer, D., & Jowett, S. (2010). Perceived empathy, accurate empathy and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 327-349.
Cramer, D., & Jowett, S. (2010). Perceived empathy, accurate empathy and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 327-349.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Journal of Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.
Heavy, C. L, Larson. B. M, Zumtoble. O.C & Christensen, A. (1996). The Communication Patterns Questionnaire: The Reliability Validity of a Constructive Communication Subscale. Journal of marriage and family, 58: 796-800.
Hoffman ML. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
John, N.A., Seme, A., Assegid Roro, M., & Tsui, A.O. (2017). Understanding the meaning of marital relationship quality among couples in peri-urban Ethiopia. Journal of Culture, health & sexuality 19(2), 267-278.
Naderi, L., Molavi, H., & Nory, A. (2015). The Prediction of Marital Satisfaction of Couples in Isfahan Based on Empathy and Forgiveness. Journal of Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology, 16 (4), 69-75. (In Persian)
Plopa, M., Kaźmierczak, M., & Karasiewicz, K. (2019). The quality of parental relationships and dispositional empathy as predictors of satisfaction during the transition to marriage. Journal of Family Studies, 25(2), 170-183.
Ramezani, A., Ghamari, M., Jafari, A., & Aghdam, G. F. (2020). The effectiveness of a ToM training program in promoting empathy between married couples. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 19(1), 1-25. (In Persian)
Rosen, N. O., Bois, K., Mayrand, M. H., Vannier, S., & Bergeron, S. (2016). Observed and perceived disclosure and empathy are associated with better relationship adjustment and quality of life in couples coping with vulvodynia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(8), 1945-1956.
Sadeghi Fasaei, S., & Malekipour, Z. (2013). Gender Analysis of Distance in Marital Relationship: Examples and Contexts Formation. Woman in Development & Politics, 11(1), 1-28.
Shuper Engelhard, E. (2019). Embodying the couple relationship: kinesthetic empathy and somatic mirroring in couples therapy. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(2), 126-147.
Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. Journal of The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3-21.
Tao, P., Coates, R., & Maycock, B. (2012). Investigating marital relationship in infertility: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Journal of reproduction & infertility, 13(2), 71.
Ulloa, E. C., Hammett, J. F., Meda, N. A., & Rubalcaba, S. J. (2017). Empathy and romantic relationship quality among cohabitating couples: An actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of The Family Journal, 25(3), 208-214.
