Effect of Differentiated Instruction on Linguistic and Rhetorical Features of Narrative Writing Performance across Different Levels of Proficiency
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Hadis Toofani Asl
1
(Department of Foreign Languages, Shanghai University. Shanghai, China.)
کلید واژه: Level of proficiency, Rhetorical features, Linguistic features, Narrative, Differentiated instruction,
چکیده مقاله :
This study intended to explore the linguistic and rhetorical features of written narratives produced by language learners of different levels of proficiency. A large and comprehensive number of linguistic and rhetorical features were analyzed adopted from Hinkel (2002). Learners from a mixed-age group in a private language institute in Iran took part in this study. Three levels of B1, B2, and C1 learners were assigned into two conditions: Differentiated Instruction (DI, N = 84) that received individualized writing instruction according to each writer’s needs and skills and Traditional Instruction (TI, N = 76) that presented the features followed by some exercises. Results revealed that both C1 and B2 learners used more accurate linguistic features, while only C1 learners were successful in employing rhetorical features. In TI, however, C2 learners implemented a restricted number of linguistic and rhetorical features. Significant differences were found between DI and TI groups in each proficiency level. A comparison of the effect sizes, however, indicated that DI was less effective in the case of rhetorical features.
Calderon, M., Slavin, R., & Sanchez, M. (2011).Effective instruction for English learners. The Future of Children, 21(1), 103-127.
Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. Research Studies in Music Education, 27(1), 44-54.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The role of cohesion, readability, and lexical difficulty. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 115-137.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523-545.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Förster, N., Kawohl, E., & Souvignier, E. (2018). Short- and long-term effects of assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in general education on reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 56, 98-109.
Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104, 396-407.
Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2013). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 1-22.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007).The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
Heaton, J. (1975). Beginning composition through pictures. Harlow: Longman.
Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Houtveen, A. A. M., Booij, N., de Jong, R., & Van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (1999). Adaptive instruction and pupil achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(2), 172–192.
Hu, Z., Brown, D., & Brown, L. (1982).Some linguistic differences in the written English of Chinese and Australian students. Language Learning and Communication, 1, 39–49.
Huebner, T. A. (2010). Differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 67(5), 79-81.
Joseph, S., Thomas, M., Simonette, G., & Ramsook, L. (2013). The impact of differentiated instruction in a teacher education setting: Successes and challenges. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(3), 28-40.
Khezrlou, S. (2018). Form-focused instruction in CALL: What do learners think? RELC, 1-17.
Khezrlou, S. (2019). Task repetition and corrective feedback: The role of feedback types and structure saliency. English Teaching and Learning, 1-21.
Khezrlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 65, 104-116.
Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136-160.
Kormos, J. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 148-161.
Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). “Completely Different Worlds”: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 39-70.
Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing. London: Routledge.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319–333.
McCarthy, S. J., & Ro, Y. S. (2011). Approaches to writing instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 6(4), 273 -295.
McKensie, L., & Tomkins, G. E. (1984). Evaluating students’ writing: A process approach. The Journal of Teaching Writing, 3(2), 201-212.
Meara, P. (2002). The rediscovery of vocabulary. Second Language Research, 18, 393–407.
Mendieta, J. (2013). Narrative research: An alternative approach to study language teaching and learning. FOLIOS, 37, 135-147.
Parr, J. M., & Jesson, R. (2012). If students are not succeeding as writing: Teach them to self assess using a rubric. In D. Lapp & B. Moss (Eds.), Teaching that supports engagement and rigorous learning (pp. 174-188). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity issues in narrative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(4), 471–486.
Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, R. L. (2006). The process approach to writing instruction: Examining its effectiveness. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 275-290). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985).A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Sadler, D. R. (1983). Evaluation and the improvement of academic learning. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 60-79.
Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). Teacher educators’ perceptions and use of differentiated instruction practices: An exploratory investigation. Action in Teacher Education, 34, 309-327.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning; A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention & awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 9–64). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657–675.
Smit, R., & Humpert, W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1152-1162.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). What does it mean to be smart? Educational Leadership, 54(6), 20-24.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2008). The goals of differentiation. Education Leadership, 66(3), 26-30.
Watts-Taffe, S., Laster, B. P., Broach, L., Marinak, B., McDonald-Connor, C., & Walker-Dalhouse, D. (2012). Differentiated instruction: Making informed teacher decisions. The Reading Teacher, 66(4), 303-314.
