شایستگی های مهارتی دانش‌آموختگان دکتری برنامه درسی ایران؛ بررسی دیدگاه صاحب نظران و متخصصان برنامه ی درسی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیسمیه شاه طالبی 1 , محمدجواد لیاقت دار 2 , فریدون شریفیان 3
1 - دانشگاه اصفهان
2 - دانشگاه اصفهان
3 - دانشگاه اصفهان
کلید واژه: توانایی توسعه رشته, برنامه‌ی درسی, شایستگی مهارتی, دانش آموختگان دکتری, توانمندی های برنامه ریزی درسی, توانمندی های پژوهشی,
چکیده مقاله :
امروزه دانشگاه ها باید دانش آموختگانی را با مهارت هایی که بتوانند به طور حرفه ای در عصر یادگیری ایفای نقش کنند، تربیت کنند. به همین منظور هدف از مقاله ی حاضر شناسایی مهارت های مورد نیاز دانش آموختگان دکتری برنامه ی درسی می باشد. با توجه به موضوع پژوهش از روش تحقیق کیفی استفاده شد. ابزار مورد استفاده در پژوهش مصاحبه باز و عمیق با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند با 18 نفر از متخصصان، صاحب نظران و اساتید برنامه ی درسی بود و مصاحبه ها تا زمان اشباع اطلاعات ادامه پیدا کرد، سپس محتوای مصاحبه ها پیاده سازی شد و برای تجزیه و تحلیل محتوای پیاده شده از روش تحلیل محتوا و کدگذاری باز استفاده شد. یافته های به دست آمده از پژوهش شامل سه مؤلفه ی اصلی توانایی توسعه رشته (شامل 5 زیرمؤلفه) توانمندی های برنامه ریزی درسی (شامل 8 زیرمؤلفه) و توانمندی های پژوهشی (شامل 9 زیرمؤلفه) بود. با توجه به نتایج پژوهش، فارغ التحصیلان پس از دوره ی دکتری برنامه ی درسی در مجموع باید بر 22 مهارت در زمینه ی رشته برنامه ی درسی تسلط کامل داشته باشند.
Today, university must train graduates that they are to be able the skills to act professionally at the age of learning. Therefore the Purpose of this study is "Identify the skills needed by graduates of the doctoral curriculum", So used method is qualitative method, a kind of descriptive phenomenology and participants include experts and professors of curriculum.The sampling method was based on Purposive sampling and continued up to information saturation. At the end, the number of participants reached to eighteen person and data was collected by using profound interview. For data analysis, content analysis method was used that the resultant findings included major Three component that include: 1) Curriculum planning abilities (including 8sub-components), 2) The ability to develop field (5sub-components) and 3) Research abilities (including 9sub-component).According to results Ph.D. graduates must have taken these skills, of the course Curriculum planning.
Archer, L. (2008). Younger Academics Constructions of Authenticity, Success, and Professional Identity, Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 385–403.
Australian National Training Authority (ANATA).(2002). Australian quality training framework: Guidelines for course developers: A guide to developing VET courses for accreditation under the Australian quality training framework, Melbourne.
Autor, D.; Levy, F. and Murnane, R. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1279-1333.
Blanchard, P.N; Thacker, J.W. (2007). Effective training: systems, strategies, and practices. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson Prentice Hall, 504pp.
Bonder, A. (2003). A blueprint for the future: Competency- based management in the HRDC, HRDC Canada.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Boyd, B L. (2003). Identifying competencies for volunteer administration for the coming decade: A national Delphi study. Journal agriculture education, 44 (4), 324-335.
Boyd, B L. (2003). Identifying competencies for volunteer administration for the coming decade: A national Delphi study. Journal agriculture education, 44 (4), 324-335.
Christie, H. (2009). Emotional journeys: Young people and transition to university. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(2), 123–136.
Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V.E., Hounsell, J., & McCune, V. (2008). ‘A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’: Learning to be a university student. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 567–581.
Colbeck, C. (2008). Professional identity development: Theory and doctoral education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 113: 9-16.
Fallows, Stephen; Steven, Chrisine. (2000). “Building Employability Skills into the Higher Education”. Education Training, 42(2), pp: 75-82, MCB University Press, Available at: http: www.Elmerad- library.com.
Fleishman, E A; wetrogan, L I; Uhlman, C E; Marshall-Miles, J.C. (1995). Developing of prototype occupational information network content model. Utah department of employment security, 1:10-39.
Gardner, S.K; Hayes, M.T & Neider, X.N. (2007). The dispositions and skills of Ph.D. in education: perspectives of faculty and graduate students in one college of education. Innovative Higher education, 31(5): 287-299.
Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline, Carnegie essays on the doctorate. (Vol. 3). Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.
Hall, L. A., & Burns, L. D. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review,79(1): 49-70.
Hong-hua, X; Yan-hua, W. (2009). Training system design for middle- level manager in coal enterprises based on post competency model. Journal of Procedia earth and planetary science, 1, 1764-1771.
Jones, E.A. (2001). Working in partnership with faculty to transform undergraduate curricula. In R.A Voorhees (Ed), Measuring what matters: competency-based
Klein, A L. (1996). Validity and reliability for competency-based systems: reducing litigation risks. Compensation and Benefits Riverview,28: 31-37.
Lee, H. F.; Miozzo, M. and Laredo, P. (2010). Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university. Research Policy, 39 : 869–881.
Mansfileld, R S. (1996). Building competency models. Human resource management, 35(?), 7-18.
McMahon, W. (2011). The impact of human capital on non-market outcomes and feedback on economic development. Available at: https://search.oecd.org/edu/innovation-education/1825169.pdf,pp:1-43.
Mead B A. (2007). Assessment and the basic communication course: A content analysis of assessment instruments. University of Arkansas.
Miguel. B & Maggie. M (2004). Developing Innovation in Online Learning: An Action Research Framework. London: Psychology Press,148pp.
Mirabile, R J. (1997). Everything you wanted to know about competency modeling. Training and developing, August 1997,73-77.
Nerad, M. and Cerny, J. (1999). From rumors to facts: career outcomes of English PhD, s. The Communicator, Council of Graduate School, 33(7): 1-10.
Newsom, R. W. (2011). A Critical analysis of Ph.D. and Ed.D. dissertation abstracts published during 2009 and 2010. PhD thesis, University of North Texas.
ORPHEUS/AMSE/WFME (2012). Standards for PhD Education in Biomedicin and Health Sciences in Europe. Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
Pillai,S and et al.(2012).Enhancing employability through industrial training in the Malaysian context. Higher education, 63,(2),187-204.
Poock, M. C. (2001). A model for integrating professional development in graduate education. College Student Journal. Retrieved April 20, 2012, Available at: http:// findarticles.com/p/articles.
Rudd, E.; Nerad, M.; Morrison, E. and PiccianoJ (2008). Professional Development for PhD Students: Do They Really Need It?. CIRGE Spotlight on Doctoral Education.
Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Steel, m. (2006). Oxford word power dictionary. Oxford: publication by oxford university.
Sweitzer, V. B. (2009). Towards a theory of doctoral student professional identity development: A developmental networks approach, The Journal of Higher Education, 80(1): 1-33.
Wheelahan L, Carter R. (2001). Notional training packages: A new curriculum framework for vocational education and training in Australia. Education & Training, 43 (6): 303- 316. Available from: www.Emerald-library.com.
