بررسی مقایسه ای نظریات ورویکردهای برنامه درسی زیست محیطی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیمحبوبه سلیمان پور عمران 1 , محمد حسین یارمحمدیان 2 , نرگس کشتی آرای 3
1 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد بجنورد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد، ایران
2 - 2استاد مرکز تحقیقات مدیریت و اقتصاد سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
3 - 3استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحــد خوراسگــان (اصفهان)، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: نظریات آموزش زیست محیطی, رویکردهای زیست محیطی, آموزش زیست محیطی, برنامه درسی,
چکیده مقاله :
با گسترش بحران‌های محیط زیست، آموزش زیست محیطی به بخش جدایی ناپذیری از نظام‌های آموزشی تبدیل شده است. از آنجا که اساس مسائل زیست محیطی از نظر ماهیتی، میان رشته‌ای، فرابخشی و کل نگر است، لذا از منظر تئوریک، با رویکردهای متفاوتی می‌توان به آن نگریست و در پی آن، آموزش‌های مربوط به آن را می‌توان از دیدگاه و رویکردهای متفاوتی بررسی نمود. از این رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی و بررسی دیدگا‌ه‌ها و رویکردهای زیست محیطی و آگاهی از اندیشه‌های آموزش و برنامه درسی محیط زیست و مقایسه آنها با یکدیگر و دستیابی به یک دسته بندی کلی در این زمینه بوده است. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی تحلیلی است که با مرور منابع موجود در این زمینه انجام پذیرفته است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد نوع نگرش به مسایل زیست محیطی، آموزش‌های متفاوتی را سبب می‌شود و در یک دسته بندی کلی، رویکردهای زیست محیطی در دو دسته انسان مدارانه و محیط مدارانه و رویکردهای برنامه درسی در دو دسته فنی و سخت و غیرفنی و نرم قرار می‌گیرند و در این طبقه بندی، رویکردهای آموزش زیست محیطی را می‌توان در گروه رویکردهای غیرتکنیکی، انعطاف پذیر و انسان‌گرای برنامه درسی مورد بررسی قرار داد.
Through the development of the environmental crisis, environmental education has become an integral part of the educational systems. Because the basis of the environmental problems is naturally interdisciplinary, multi-sectorial, and holistic, so theoretically it can be seen with different approaches and the related education to this can be considered from different views and approaches. Therefore, the purpose of the current study has been to identify and consider the environmental views and approaches and awareness of education thoughts, environmental curriculum and comparing them together and achieving a general classification in this field. This study has done by using descriptive and analytical method and a lot of references has been reviewed. The results show that type of attitude to the environmental problems causes different education and in a general classification, the environmental approaches are classifying into two groups: human-oriented and environment-oriented. And the curriculum approaches are classifying into two groups: technical & hardware and non-technical & software. In this classification, environmental education approaches can be considered in the group of non- technical, flexible, and human-oriented approaches of the curriculum.
Ahmadi, P. (2009). Interdisciplinary curriculum. Quarterly JournalInterdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities. first year, 3:126-97.
Abedi Sarvestani, A. & Shah vali, M. (2008). necessity and characteristics of research in environmental ethics. Quarterly of Ethics in Science and Technology, Third Year, 3-4:61-56.
Abedi Sarvestani, A. & Shah vali ,M. (2008). Nature and environmental ethics perspective, with emphasis on the Islamic perspective. Ethical Issues in Science and Technology, 1 &2:59-72.
Agenda 21, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1998). (H. refreshing, A. Ayft,Trans). Tehran: Environmental conservation organization Press.(orginal work published 1992)
Bayat, T., Ahmadi, P., & Parsa, A. (2012). Status of environmental ethics in Iranian elementary curriculum. Curriculum Research Quarterly, 9: 62-51.
Benson, J. (2003). Environmental ethics: An Introduction with Readings. Volumes I and II.( M. M. Rostami shahroudi , Trans.).Tehran: Environmental conservation organization Press .
Boroumand ,F. (1991).International Environmental educational, history, basic knowledge and training. preparing and filing: academic education sector, vocational UNESCO. Tehran: Iranian National Commission for UNESCO.
Entezari, Y. (2003). Complexity of environmental education. First Conference on Environmental Education, Environmental conservation organization Press.
Chen, P.J .(1997)."Environmental Educators IT is Time to Design a Whole Curriculum Now" The Journal of Environmental Education, 233-237.
Cridel, T. (2010) .Encyclopedia of Curriculum studies. University of south California .SAGE publication.
Curriculum framework a guide for curriculum development and policy makers.( 2000). Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.
Decker F.W.(2003). Fundumental of Curriculum passion Passion and professionalism.secondediton .stanford university Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishe .Mahwah, New Jersey London,
Drengson, A.(2000) .Education for Local and Global Ecological Responsibility : Arne Næss’s Cross -Cultural, Ecophilosophy Approach.Victoria, British Columbia, Canad. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5:63-75
Daskolia, M.& Agelidou, E .(2005). Kindergarten Teachers’ Conceptions of Environmental Education EvgeniaFlogaitis.Early Childhood Education Journal, 3..
Fathi Vajargah, K. (2008 ).Curriculum toward new identities. Commentary on contemporary theories of curriculum. The first volume. Tehran: Aeezh press.
Fathi Vajargah, K. (2009). Principles and basic concepts of curriculum planning. Tehran: Ball Press .
Ferdousi, S. Mortazavi, Sh., & Rezvani, N. (2008). Relationship between environmental science and conservation practices. Journal of Human Sciences, 53:266-253.
Fahimi, A. &, Mashhadi. A. (2009). Intrinsic value and instrumental value in environmental philosophy (philosophical approaches to human rights strategies.) Quarterly journal of Research philosophical - theological. 41 :195-216.
Ghavidel Rahimi,y. (2007). Gaya theory and the formation of new attitudes in environmental sciences. Environmental Studies Quarterly, 41: 68-55.
Ghazavi, M.; Liaghatdar, M.J.& Abedi, A. (2008). content analysis of science textbooks in elementary school due to the environmental problems. Quarterly of Education,. 95:152-127.
Glloudbalt, D. (1379).Social theory and the environment. Translated Muhammad Hosseini salvation. Journal of Management "urban management" 4: 86-95.
Hassan,A&.ZaidIsmail,M. (2011).The infusion of Environmental Eduction (EE) in chemistry teaching and students awareness and attitudes towards environment in Malaysia. procedica-social and Behavioral Sciences, 15:3404-3409.
Haghshenas, M & Zakeri, M. H. (2008). seeking concepts of environmental ethics in the Islamic teachings. Journal Ethics in Science and Technology, Third Year,. 1& 2:31-23.
Javadi, M. (2008). Anthropocentric in environmental ethics with emphasis on the Islamic perspective. Journal articles and reviews (special Islamic philosophy and theology), 66-47.
Jacobus, R.(2004). 'Understanding Environmental Theology: A Summary for Environmental Educator', The Journal of Environmental Education, 3: 35 - 42.
Keshtiaray, N., Fathi Vajargah, K.,& Zimitat, C.,& Foroughi, A.A.( 2009). Curriculum design experience Phenomenological based approach and that validation in medical groups. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 9: 55 -67.
Kupchella, E. Charles.C.Hyland,M.(1977). Essential curriculum components in Environmental Education. The journal Environmental education , 10-16.
Lahyjanyan, A. (2011). environmental education. Tehran: Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University Press.
Miler, J. (2004). Theory curriculum. (M. Mehrmohamady,trans.). Tehran: samt Press . ohammadi Asl, A. (2004). Women and the Environment. Tehran: Publication and Research shiraze.
Maleki, H. & Salimi, J. (2010). From the discipline system to Interdisciplinary approach in Higher Education Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies in Higher Education. 1:65-95.
Maleki, H. (2005). curriculum planning (guide to action). Tehran:payame Andishe press.
.Mehrmohamady, M. (2009). Theory of multiple intelligences and that implications for curriculum and instruction. Journal of education, 88:31-7.
Mirdamadi, M., Esmaeili, S.,& Bagheri Varkaneh, A.A. (2008). study of high school students' interest in relation to environmental protection. Environmental Science journal 46: 39-21.
Monroe, M. C.; Andrews, E;& Biedenweg, K.(2007). A Framework for Environmental Education Strategies. (EJ884693) Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 3-4 :205-216 .
Marouli ,Ch.(2002). Multicultural Environmental Education: Theory and Practice Technical College of Greece, Pireas1Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7: 26-42.
Mohammadi Ashenany, M.H., Mohammadi Ashenany, A.,& Hasani,E. (2008). Integrating Environmental Ethics With the approach of strategic environmental assessment To achieve sustainable development Journal of of Ethics Science and Technology. 3 &4:70-62.
Marsh, C. J. Willis, G.(2007).Curriculum Alternative Approach, Ongoing Issues, fouredition, University of Rhode Island.
Palmer,J.( 2002). Environmental Education In the 21 st century.( M. Khvrshyddvst ,Trans.). Tehran: samt Press.
Payne, Ph.(2006) Environmental Education and Curriculum Theory. The Journal of Environmental Education, 2: 25 – 35.
Pasha Sharifi, H.( 2005). Preliminary Study Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences . quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 11: 25-21.
Ramsey, J.M. , Hungerford, H. R& Volk, T. L.(1992).Environmental Education in the K-12 Curriculum: Finding a Niche', The Journal of Environmental Education, 23: 35 - 45.
Seif, A.A .(2002). Educational Psychology (Psychology of Learning and educational), Tehran: Agah Press.
Salimi, J.& maleki, H. (2010). Interdisciplinary curriculum design in higher education. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4:39-68.
Shafiee Mazandarani, M. (1997). Impact on the human environment. Qom: Islamic Press Office affiliated to qom Seminary Teachers Society.
Shobeiri, M. & Abdullahi, S. (2009). Theory and Applications of Environmental Education. Payam Noor University Press .
Shahbazi, E. (1993). Promoting school: basic approach in environmental education. Taavon magazine, 19& 20: 49-102.
Simmons , D .( 2010) More Infusion Confusion:A Look at Environmental Education Curriculum Materials.The journal Environmental education , California.SAGE publication 20: 14-18.
Schweitzer, A. (2011).Animality and Environmental Education: Toward an Interspecies Paradigm .Nobel Peace Prize Address, Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16 : 8-13.
Soltani, A., Sargou, Azizu'llah Arbabi, T, A. Dehghani, & Rezai, Mary. (2011). Isfahan school students' attitudes toward science and technology, school science and the environment. Quarterly of Curriculum Studies, 30, 83-73.
Stables, A.(1996). 'Reading the Environment as Text: literary theory and environmentaleducation', Environmental Education Research, 2: 189 – 195.
Soleimanpour Omran, M( 2014)Synthesis based researches (Integrative Inquiry) of environmental education in terms of attention to the integrated and interdisciplinary curriculumJournal of Middle East Applied Science and Technology (JMEAST) ISSN (Online): 2305-0225.Issue 14(4) [Supplementary Part II], September 2014, pp. 636-641
Safarinia, M. (2010). The social psychology of education. Tehran: Payam Noor press.
Sutton, Ph.(2004).Nature Environment and society.palgrave Hampshire and new York.
Tyler, R. (2005). Basic principles of curriculum and training. (A. taghipour zahir,Trans.). Tehran: Agah Press.
Willis, J .M.&Weiser,b.( 2005) ."Technology and Environmental Education :An Integrated Curriculum" . The journal Environmental education, 297-303.
Waktola , D. K.(2009). Challenges and opportunities in mainstreaming environmental education into the curricula of teachers. colleges in Ethiopia', Environmental Education Research, 15: 589 – 605.
Yarmohammadian, M.H. (2002). principles of curriculum planning (curriculum planning nature of philosophical, psychological and sociological, program evaluation, program analysis, program content or textbooks) (third edition). Tehran: Yadvareh Book press.
Yarmohammadian, M.H. (2000). curriculum planning in higher education. Encyclopedia of Higher Education of Iran. Tehran: Persian Encyclopedia Foundation.
