تأملی بر چگونگی برنامه ریزی درسی در دوران بیماری کرونا؛ پدیدارشناسی نگرش‌ها و تجربیات زیسته مدیران و معلمان
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
حسین حافظی
1
,
ولید لطیفی
2
,
مهدیه رضائی
3
1 - استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
2 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد برنامه ریزی درسی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
3 - دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: برنامه¬ریزی درسی, بیماری کرونا, پدیدارشناسی, نگرش‌ها, تجارب زیسته, مدیران و معلمان.,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی چگونگی برنامهریزی درسی در دوران بیماری کرونا، مبتنی بر نظرات معلمان شهرستان شوش انجام شد. این پژوهش به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و به لحاظ روش گردآوری دادهها، کیفی و مبتنی بر رویكرد پدیدارشناسی است. جامعه مشارکت کنندگان پژوهش شامل معلمان و مدیران شهرستان شوش میباشد که با استفاده از روش نمونهگیری هدفمند نظری 21 نفر انتخاب شد. ابزار گردآوری دادهها، شامل مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها از روش کدگذاری هفت مرحلهای کلایزی (1978) استفاده شد. یافتههای این پژوهش با توجه به اهداف از قبل تعیین شده، شامل نقش وزارت آموزش و پرورش، اداره کل آموزش پرورش استان خوزستان، آموزش و پرورش شوش، مدیران، معلمان، اولیا، دانش آموزان، شبکههای اجتماعی در برنامهریزی در دوران بیماری کرونا و همچنین ابزار و امکانات مورد نیاز در این دوران و محدودیتهای و چالشهای برنامهریزی در دوران کرونا مشخص میشود. نتایج نشان داد که با شیوع بیماری کرونا، وزارت آموزش و پرورش برنامهریزی و آموزش غیرحضوری و نیمهحضوری را شروع کرد. معلمان به عنوان مجریان اصلی برنامه درسی، در برنامهریزی دوران کرونا تاثبر قابل توجه داشته و در کیفیت آموزش و یادگیری دانشآموزان نقش اساسی دارند.
The aim of this study was to investigate how to plan curriculum during coronary heart disease, based on the opinions of teachers in Shush. This research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of data collection method, qualitative and based on phenomenological approach. The population of the study participants includes teachers and managers of Shousha city, which was selected using theoretical purposive sampling method of 21 people. Data collection tools included semi-structured interviews. Claizey (1978) seven-step coding method was used to analyze the data. Findings of this study according to pre-determined goals, including the role of the Ministry of Education, Khuzestan Education Department, Shush Education, principals, teachers, parents, students, social networks in planning During coronary heart disease, as well as the tools and facilities required during this period and the limitations and challenges of planning during the coronary period are identified. The results showed that with the outbreak of the coronavirus, the Ministry of Education started distance and part-time planning and education. Teachers, as the main executors of the curriculum, have had a significant impact on planning during the Corona period and play a fundamental role in the quality of teaching and learning for students
AAAS. (2005). 2061 Connections. Available online at http://www.project2061.org/ publications/2061Connections/2005/2005-11a.htm (accessed January 28, 2021)
Alshamrani, M. (2019). An Investigation of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Education. Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland.
Amrollah, O., and azadi ahmadabadi, G. (2021). The Barriers to Virtual Implementation of the Country's Official Curriculum during the Global Outbreak of Coronavirus. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(61), 1-26.
Arkorful, V., and Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages, and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. Int. J. Instruct. Technol. Distance Learn. 12, 29–42.
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: a case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, 113–115. Doi:10.1002/ hbe2.191
Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., and Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through stem-rich tinkering: findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Sci. Educ. 99, 98–120. Doi: 10.1002/sce.21151
Brown, J. C., and Livstrom, I. C. (2020). Secondary science teachers’ pedagogical design capacities for multicultural curriculum design. J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 31, 1–20.
Chugh, R., Ledger, S., and Shields, R. (2017). Curriculum design for distance education in the tertiary sector. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 18, 4–15. Doi: 10.17718/tojde.306552
Colaizzi, P. F., Valle, R. S., & King, M. (1978). Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it, 48-71.
Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C. P., Brennan, R. T., Kelly, G. J., Tunis, C. S. A., and Gentry, C. A. (2019). The impact of engineering curriculum design principles on elementary students’ engineering and science learning. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 57, 423–453. Doi: 10.1002/ tea.21601
De Oliveira, M. M. S., Penedo, A. S. T., and Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance education: advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia 29, 139–152. Doi: 10.5585/dialogia. n29.7661
Duncan, R. G., and Rivet, A. E. (2013). Science learning progressions. Science 339, 396–397. Doi: 10.1126/science.1228692
Durksen, T. L., Chu, M. W., Ahmad, Z. F., Radil, A. I., and Daniels, L. M. (2016). Motivation in a MOOC: a probabilistic analysis of online learners’ basic psychological needs. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 19, 241–260. Doi: 10.1007/s11218-015-9331-9
Gandolfi, A. (2021). Planning of school teaching during Covid-19. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 415, 132753. Doi.org/10.1016/ j.physd.2020.132753
Gul, R., & Khilji, G. (2021). Exploring the need for a responsive school curriculum to cope with the Covid-19 pandemic in Pakistan. Prospects, 51:503–522. DOI: 10.1007/ s11125-020-09540-8
Hajizadeh, A., Azizi, G., and Keyhan, G. (2021). Analyzing the opportunities and challenges of e-learning in the Corona era: An approach to the development of e-learning in the post-Corona. Research in Teaching, 9(1), 204-174.
Hu, W. (2017). “The core competence,” in Science Subject and Its Connotation, ed. J. Yang (Shanghai: East China Normal University Press).
Hu, W. (2019). The construction of a curriculum system integrating Maker and STEM under the guidance of thinking teaching theory. China Educ. Inform. 2, 27–34.
Karalis, T. (2020). Planning and evaluation during educational disruption: Lessons learned from Covid19 pandemic for treatment of emergencies in education. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(4), 125-142. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.3047.
Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., and Belanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E Learn. Digit. Media 15, 191–216. Doi:10.1177/ 2042753018785180
Lelliott, A., and Rollnick, M. (2009). Big Ideas: a review of astronomy education research 1974–2008. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 32, 1771–1799. Doi: 10.1080/09500690903214546
Lemay, J., and Moreau, P. (2020). Managing a curriculum innovation process. Pharmacy (Basel) 8:153. Doi:10.3390/ pharmacy8030153
Li, J., Wong, S. C., Yang, X., and Bell, A. (2020). Using feedback to promote student participation in online learning programs: evidence from a quasi-experimental study. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 68, 485–510. Doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09709-9
Mansouri, M., Saberi, R., and Tavan, A. (2021). Corona Philosophical Challenge in Curriculum Development from the Perspective of Analytical Philosophy. Journal of Recent Advances in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Education, 4(40), 262-273.
Martin, F., and Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learn. 22, 205–222.
Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., and Vílchez-González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Sci. Educ. 103, 799–822. Doi: 10.1002/sce.21522
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2020b). Notice on Using Information to Support Education and Teaching during Epidemic Prevention and Control Period. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Available online at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202002/t20200214_421005.html (accessed March 6, 2020)
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020a). Guidance on the Organization and Management of Online Teaching in Colleges and Universities during the Epidemic Prevention and Control Period. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Available online at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202002/t20200205_418138.html (accessed March 6, 2020).
Naciri, A., Baba, M. A., Achbani, A., and Kharbach, A. (2020). Mobile learning in higher education: unavoidable alternative during COVID-19. Aquademia 4: e20016.
OECD. (2018). the Future of Education and Skills 2030. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf (accessed January 1, 2021).
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/b25efab8-en
Ouyang, F., Chang, Y.-H., Scharber, C., Jiao, P., and Huang, T. (2020). Examining the instructor-student collaborative partnership in an online learning community course. Instruct. Sci. 48, 183–204. Doi:10.1007/ s11251-020-09507-4
Plummer, J. D., Palma, C., Flarend, A., Rubin, K., Ong, Y. S., Botzer, B., et al. (2015). Development of a learning progression for the formation of the solar system. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 37, 1381–1401. Doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1036386
Radović-Marković, M. (2010). Advantages and disadvantages of e-learning in comparison to traditional forms of learning. Ann. Univ. Petroşani Econ. 10, 289–298.
Ramrathan, L. (2021). School curriculum in South Africa in the Covid-19 context: An opportunity for education for relevance. Prospects 51, 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09490-1
Salimi, S., and Fardin, M. (2020). The Role of Corona Virus in Virtual Education, with an Emphasis on Opportunities and Challenges. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 8(2), 49-60. Doi: 10.30473/etl. 2020.53489.3249
Shafiei Epourvari, N., and Yari Dehnavi, M. (2021). Neglecting the hidden curriculum during the Corona. Quarterly Journal of New Advances in Educational Management, 1(3), 159-180.
Sintema, E. J. (2020a). E-Learning and smart revision portal for Zambian primary and secondary school learners: a digitalized virtual classroom in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Aquademia 4: e20017.
Sintema, E. J. (2020b). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: implications for STEM education. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 16: em1851.
Srivastava, P. (2019). Advantages & disadvantages of e-education & e-learning. J. Retail Market. Distrib. Manag. 2, 22–27.
Taha, M. H., Abdalla, M. E., Wadi, M., & Khalafalla, H. (2020). Curriculum delivery in Medical Education during an emergency: A guide based on the responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish. https://doi.org/ 10.15694/mep.2020.000069.1
Tan, L. S., Koh, E., Lee, S. S., Ponnusamy, L. D., and Tan, K. C. K. (2017). The complexities in fostering critical thinking through school-based curriculum innovation: research evidence from Singapore. Asia Pacific J. Educ. 37, 517–534. Doi:10.1080/02188791. 2017.1389694
Van Lancker, W., and Parolin, Z. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making. Lancet Public Health 5, e243–e244.
Vijayan, R. (2021). Teaching and Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Topic Modeling Study. Educ. Sci. 11, 347. https:// doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070347
Wong, R. (2020). When no one can go to school: does online learning meet students’ basic learning needs? Interact. Learn. Environ. 1–17. Doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1789672.
Yao, J.-X., and Guo, Y.-Y. (2018). Core competencies and scientific literacy: the recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 40, 1913–1933. Doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1514544
Zhou, L., Wu, S., Zhou, M., and Li, F. (2020). ‘School’s Out, But Class’ on’, the largest online education in the world today: taking china’s practical exploration during the covid-19 epidemic prevention and control as an example (March 15, 2020). Best Evid. Chin. Edu. 4, 501–519. Doi: 10.15354/bece.20.ar023
