Identifying the Factors Affecting Government Support for Iranian Automotive Industry
محورهای موضوعی : Business Strategy
Rasoul Neyshabouri
1
(Department of Entrepreneurship, Ali Abad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ali Abad Katoul, Iran)
Parviz Saeidi
2
(Department of Accounting and Management,Ali Abad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University,Ali Abad Katoul, Iran)
Hosein Didekhani
3
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Ali Abad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ali Abad Katoul, Iran)
Mohammad Reza Hoseini
4
(Department of Economics, Ali Abad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ali Abad Katoul, Iran)
کلید واژه: Government Support, Automotive Industry, Analytic Network Process,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aims to identify the factors affecting government support for Iranian automotive industry. Initially, based on the research literature, a set of factors was identified and designed as an analytic network process model. To investigate the analytic network model using the Delphi method, the opinion of 25 experts associated with government support for the automotive industry was used to answer the designed questionnaire for pairwise comparison. These experts were chosen through snowball sampling. The research result demonstrated that in experts’ opinion, various types of government support are needed to desirably expand this industry. According to the result of this study, a list of priorities has been provided below: 1) Specific support; 2) management information support and advisors; 3) financial support; and finally, 4) legal support. With respect to the result of binary comparison, the sub-criteria of reduced tax exemption for automakers, economic incentives, joint venture and provision of global marketing services have had the greatest weight respectively in the sub-criteria of financial support, specific support, legal support and management information support and advisors.
Amjad, M. (2005). A comparative study of economic development in Iran and South Korea. Tehran: Center for Islamic Revolution Documents.
Bararpour, K. & Araqi, M. (2005). The survival and growth of Iranian automotive companies in a dynamic competitive environment: Iran Khodro Company. Quarterly Journal of Human Sciences Lecturer, 1(10): 25-65.
Chung, H. (2013). Political economy, “industrial policy”. Translated by A. Qoudjani. Mashhad: Novin Tarrahan Azad.
Commission on Macroeconomics-Iran Chamber. (2013). Iranian economy in the absence of development strategy. Tehran: Macroeconomic Commission.
Farzin, M. R. (2009). Investigating the supportive structure of the automotive industry in Iran. Journal of Planning and Budgeting, 62: 61-102.
Industrial Management Organization. (1998). Effects of WTO membership on the automotive industry. First Volume. Tehran: Modirsaz Office.
Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade. (2013). Goals and policies for the development of the automotive industry at 1404 horizon. Iran Industrial Development and Renovation Organization.
Motevasseli, M., Mashhadi Ahmad, M., Nikou Nesbati, A. & Sami’ei Nasab, M. (2013). Revitalizing the institutional economy; a new look at the thoughts of new institutional economists. Tehran: Imam Sadiq (AS) University.
Rezaei, A. (1996). Economic development by looking at the function of supportive policies in the automotive industry of Iran. Master's thesis. Allameh Tabatabaei University, Faculty of Economics.
Renani, M. (1995). Market or non-market? Investigating institutional barriers to the efficiency of the market economic system in the Iranian economy. Tehran: Management and Planning Organization.
Sahebi, S. (2006). Investigating the factors affecting the competitiveness of automotive parts industry in Iran. Master’s thesis, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Faculty of Economics.
Waqar Baher, A. (2014). A comparative study of the experience in the development of the automotive industry in Iran and South Korea with an institutional approach. Master’s thesis in Economics. Allameh Tabatabaei University.
Zebardast, E. (2010). The application of analytic network process (ANP) in urban and regional planning. Fine Arts, Architecture and Urbanism, No. 41: 79-90.
