Research on Institutional Quality Conditions and the Export of Intermediate Goods by Developing Countries

محورهای موضوعی : Business Strategy

gholamreza rezaee ¹ (Faculty of economics, Dehaghan branch, Islamic Azad University, Dahaghan, Iran)
farzad karimi ² (Associate Professor in International Economics, Department of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University of Mobarakeh, Mobarakeh, Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/11/14 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/03/22 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/07/09

کلید واژه: Good governance, Intermediate goods, developing countries, Export,

چکیده مقاله :

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of institutional quality on the export ofintermediate goods 3 by developing countries according to good, moderate, and bad institutionalquality conditions. The institutional variable included the World Bank’s average goodgovernance index. The estimation of the model was carried out using panel data for 1997-2021on a sample of 131 developing countries by the application of the Estimated Generalized LeastSquares (EGLS) method. The results show that the institutional quality has an impact on bilateralexports of developing countries only among the pairs of countries with similar conditions ofmoderate institutional quality. Thus, the governments of developing countries having moderategovernance conditions need to prioritize development and extensive reforms concerninginstitutional development to increase their exports of intermediate goods.JFL Classification: F14, O14, O24, Q58

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Álvarez, Inmaculada C., Javier Barbero, Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, and José L. Zofío (2018), “DoesInstitutionalQualityMatterforTrade? Institutional Conditionsina Sectoral Trade Framework, World Development ,103,72–87.


2. Araujo, L., G. Mion, and E. Ornelas. (2016). “Institutions and export dynamics.” Journal of International Economics 98: 2–20


3. Araujo, L., G. Mion, and E. Ornelas. (2016). “Institutions and export dynamics.” Journal of International Economics 98: 2–20


4. Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192


5. Boubakri, N., S. E. Ghoul, and. Saffar. (2015). “Firm growth and political institutions.” Journal of Multinational Financial Management 31: 104–125.


6. Beverelli, Cosimo & Keck, Alexander & Larch, Mario & Yotov, Yoto (2018). "Institutions, Trade and Development: A Quantitative Analysis," School of Economics Working Paper Series2018-3, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University. Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 474-481.


7. Blonigen B.A. and Piger J. (2014). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 47 (3): 775-812


8. de Groot, Henri L. F., Gert-Jan Linders, Piet Rietveld, and Uma Subramanian(2004), “The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns,” KYKLOS, 57 (1), 103–123


9. Dutt, Pushan and Daniel Traca (2010), “Corruption and Bilateral Trade Flows: Extortion or Evasion?,” Review of Economics and Statistics92 (4), 843–860.


10. de Jong, Eelke and Christian Bogmans (2011), “Does Corruption Discourage International Trade?,” European Journal of Political Economy, 27 (2), 385–398.


11. Dutt, Pushan and Daniel Traca (2010), “Corruption and Bilateral Trade Flows: Extortion or Evasion?,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2010, 92 (4), 843–860.


12. Daniel Trefler, “Domestic Institutions as a Source of Comparative Advantage,” Chapter5intheHandbook of International Economics Vol.4, eds. Gita Gopinath, Elhanan Helpman, and Kenneth S. Rogoff, Oxford: Elsevier, 2014, pp. 263–316.


13. Demir, F. and Hu, C. (2015), Institutional Differences and the Direction of Bilateral Foreign Direct Investment Flows: Are South–South Flows any Different than the Rest? The World Economy. Forthcoming


14. Efendic, A., G. Pugh, and. Adnett. (2011). “Institutions and economic performance: AMeta-Regression Analysis.” European Journal of Political Economy 27: 586–599.


15. Ernst, D., & Hart, D.(2007). Governing the Global Knowledge Economy: Mind the Gap. Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. Georgia Tech (10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472890).


16. Francois, Joseph and Miriam Manchin, “Institutions, Infrastructure, andTrade(2013),” World Development, 46, 165–175.


17. Gil-Pareja, Salvador, Rafael Llorca-Rivero, and José Antonio Martínez-Serrano(2017), “Corruption and International Trade: A Comprehensive Analysis with Gravity,” Working Paper WPAE-2017-05, University of Valencia.


18. Go´es, C. (2016). “Institutions and growth: A GMM/IV Panel VAR Approach.” Economics Letters 138: 85–91.


19. Grant, J. H., & Lambert, D. M. (2008). Do regional trade agreements increase members' agricultural trade? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(3), 765-782.


20. Head, K. and Mayer, T. (2013) Gravity equations: workhorse, toolkit and cookbook, CEPR Discussion Papers No. 9322, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, England


21. Hou, Yulin؛ Wang , Yun & Xue, Wenjun(2020), What explains trade costs? Institutional quality and other determinants, Review of Development Economics .


22. Handley, K., & Lim~ao, N. (2017). Policy uncertainty, trade and welfare: Theory and evidence for China and the US. American Economic Review, 2731


23. Lin, J. (2011). "New Structural Economics, A framework for Rethinking Development". The World Bank Research Observer 26(2): 193-220.


24. Rodrik, D. (2011). "Comments on New Structural Economics by Justin Lin". The World Bank Research Observer 26(2): 227-229


25. Levchenko, A. A. (2007). “Institutional Quality and International Trade.” Review of Economic Studies 74:791–819.


26. Levchenko, A. A. (2011). “International trade and institutional change.” Working Paper 17675, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research


27. Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Márquez‐Ramos, L.(2018) Exports and governance: Is the Middle East and North Africa region different? The World Economy , 173-174.


28. Nunn, N (2007). Relationship-Specificity, Incomplete Contracts and the Pattern of Trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2007; 122 (2) : 569-600


29. Nunn, N., & Trefler, D. (2014). Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics 4 (pp. 263–315). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier-North Holland


30. Yu, M. (2010). “Trade, democracy, and the gravity equation.” Journal of Development Economics 91: 289–300.


31. Rini,S and Sri ,A and Tri,W(2018), The Role of Governance Quality in Increasing Intra-ASEAN Trade, MPRA Paper No. 85258(https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85258).


32. Worldbank. (2019). The World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) software. The Worldbank.