نقش تعدیل‌گری ادراک تأیید اجتماعی در رابطه بین قصد آسیب جنسی با آسیب جنسی نسبت به زنان در محیط کار
محورهای موضوعی : روان شناسی
منیره سادات حسینی
1
,
علی مهداد
2
,
مجید صفاری نیا
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی عمومی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد ساوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساوه، ایران.
2 - دانشیار، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم ترییتی و روان‌شناسی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.
3 - استاد گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم ترییتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: محیط کار, آسیب جنسی نسبت به زنان, قصد آسیب جنسی, ادراک تأیید اجتماعی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی نقش تعدیل‌گری ادراک تأیید اجتماعی دررابطه بین قصد آسیب جنسی با آسیب جنسی نسبت به زنان در محیط کار بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش را مردان شاغل سازمان‌های بانکی، بورس و بیمه در شهر تهران تشکیل داده‌اند. نمونه پژوهش 273 نفر بود که از جامعه مذکور به شیوه در دسترس انتخاب شدند. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است. ابزار پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه آسیب جنسی زنان فیتزجرالد، گلفاند و دراسگو (1995)، پرسشنامه قصد آسیب جنسی حسینی، مهداد و صفاری‌نیا (1400) و پرسشنامه ادراک تأیید اجتماعی (1400) بود. داده‌ها از طریق روش‌های ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و الگوسازی معادلات ساختاری تحلیل شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که بین قصد آسیب جنسی با آسیب جنسی زنان رابطه مثبت و معنادار وجود دارد (05/0≥p). هم‌چنین، نتایج نشان داد که ادراک تأیید اجتماعی، رابطه بین قصد آسیب جنسی با آسیب جنسی را تعدیل می‌کند. به‌عبارتی در مردان شاغل با ادراک تأیید اجتماعی پایین، قصد آسیب جنسی به آسیب جنسی زنان منجر نمی‌شود اما در مردان شاغل با ادراک تأیید اجتماعی بالا، قصد آسیب جنسی منجر به آسیب جنسی زنان می‌شود. بنابراین، برای پیشگیری از وقوع آسیب جنسی زنان در محیط کار، نیاز به همکاری اعضای سازمان در شناخت آسیب جنسی، عدم مدارا با وقوع آن و هم‌چنین اقدامات مداخله‌ای سازمانی در جهت مقابله با تبدیل قصد به رفتار است.
The aim of this research was investigating the moderating role of social approval perception on relationship between intention to sexual harassment and sexual harassment towards women in workplace. The research statistical population included all bank offices, stock exchange, and insurance agencies male employee in Tehran city. The sample consisted 273 individuals whom were selected based on convenience sampling procedure among the population. The research was applied one concerning the object and correlational descriptive with respect to method. The data collected via the implementation of Fitzgerald & et al. Sexual Harassment of Women (1995), Hosseini, Mehdad & Saffarinia Intention to Sexual Harassment (2022) and Hosseini, Mehdad & Saffarinia Social Approval Perception (2022) questionnaires. Data were analyzed by using Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling (SEM). The finding showed that there was a significant positive relationship between intention to sexual harassment with sexual harassment of women (p≤0.05). Moreover, social approval perception could significantly moderate the relationship between intention to sexual harassment and sexual harassment of women (p≤0.05). In other words, in men with low social approval perception, the intention to sexual harassment did not lead to sexual harassment of women, but in men with high social approval perception, the intention to sexual harassment led to sexual harassment of women. With considering the moderating role of social approval perception in relationship between intention to sexual harassment and sexual harassment of women, to prevent sexual harassment of women at workplace, there is a need for cooperation of the organization’ members in recognizing sexual harassment of women, intolerance with its occurrence, as well as organizational intervention policies to deal with the transformation of intention in to behavior.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2018). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, & B. T. Johnson (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes: Volume 1: Basic principles (2nd Ed., pp. 197-255). New York: Routledge. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178103
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akers, R. L., & Jennings, W. (2009). Social learning theory. In J. Miller (Ed.), 21st century criminology: A reference handbook (pp. 323-332). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412971997
Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press. URL: https://www.worldcat.org/title/social-learning-and-social-structure-a-general-theory-of-crime-and-deviance/oclc/36557052
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytical review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499. URL: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
Antonatos, A. (2003). Extending a model of sexual harassment in organizations. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Surrey United Kingdom. United Kingdom. URL: https://www.proquest.com/openview/64c885e3ec0e6928d988b878ee60d386/1?pqrigsite=gscholar&cbl=51922&diss=y
Basile, K. C., D'Inverno, A. S., & Wang, J. (2020). National prevalence of sexual violence by a workplace-related perpetrator. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 58(2), 216–223. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.09.011
Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2022). Understanding the intention-behavior gap: The role of intention strength. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 923464. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923464
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2021). Charges alleging sex-based harassment (charges filed with EEOC) FY 2010 – FY 2021. URL: https://www.eeoc.gov/data/charges-alleging-sex-based-harassment-charges-filed-eeoc-fy-2010-fy-2021
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. (pp. 1-18). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pubs/book/ch1.pdf
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2009). Predicting and changing behavior: The
Reasoned Action Approach. London: Psychology Press. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020
Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand M. J., &Drasgow F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2
Foster, P. J., & Fullagar, C. J. (2018). Why don’t we report sexual harassment? An application of the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40(3), 148–160. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2018.1449747
Goldberg, C. B., Rawski, S. L., & Perry, E. L. (2019). The direct and indirect effects of organizational tolerance for sexual harassment on the effectiveness of sexual harassment investigation training for HR managers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(1), 81–100. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21329
Hameduddin, T., & Lee, H. (2022). Sexual harassment and employee engagement: Exploring the roles of gender, perceived supervisory support, and gender equity climate. Review of Public Personnel Administration, URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221095404
Heymann, J., Moreno, G., Raub, A., & Sprague, A. (2022). Progress towards ending sexual harassment at work? A comparison of sexual harassment policy in 192 countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2(1), 1-22. URL: 10.1080/13876988.2022.2100698
Hosseini, S., Mehdad, A., Safarinia, M. (2022). The effect of attitude towards sexual harassment on sexual harassment in workplace: Meditating role of intention to sexual harassment. Quarterly Social Psychology Research. under press. [Persian]. DOI 10.22034/SPR.2022.326711.1715
Ioannou, M., Kassianos, A. P., & Symeou, M. (2019). Coping with depressive symptoms in young adults: Perceived social support protects against depressive symptoms only under moderate levels of stress. Frontiers in psychology, 2780. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02780
Joo, Y. K., & Kim, B. (2022). Selfish but socially approved: The effects of perceived collision algorithms and social approval on attitudes toward autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-11. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2102716
Knofczynski, G. T., & Mundfrom, D. (2008). Sample sizes when using multiple linear regression for prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 431–442. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407310131
Lizzio-Wilson, M., Klas, A., & Clarke, E. J. (2022). When “good guys” do bad things: Evaluations of sexual harassment allegations against male allies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3684302221094432. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221094432
Lukacena, K. M., Reynolds-Tylus, T., & Quick, B. L. (2019). An application of the reasoned action approach to bystander intervention for sexual assault. Health communication, 34(1), 46–53. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1384356
Mental Health America. (2019). Sexual assault and mental health. Mental Health America. Available at: URL: http://www.mentalhealthamerica.net/conditions/sexual-assault-and-mental-health
Morwitz, V. G., & Munz, K. P. (2020). Intentions. Society Consumer Psychology, 4(1), 26–41. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1061
Perumalswami, C. R., & Jagsi, R. (2020). Sexual harassment in radiology: Prevalence and opportunities for improvement. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 17(2), 298–303. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.09.012
Siuta, R. L., & Bergman, M. E. (2019). Sexual harassment in the workplace. In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management, Published online. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.191
Sheeran, P., & Abraham, C. (2003). Mediator of moderators: Temporal stability of intention and the intention–behavior relationship. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull, 29, 205–215. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239046
YieChoo, E., & Thamseow Ping, N. (2021). Sexual Harassment in Workplace: A Literature Review. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studiesm, 9(18),29-34. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i8/HS2108-023
_||_