Investigation Effect of Different Level of Fertilizer and Biologic Fertilizer on Basil Varieties Crop Production at Greenhouse in Khuzestan Province (Southwest of Iran)
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Crop Nutrition Science
Naser Zarifinia
1
(Assistant Professor of Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Safiabad Agricultural, Research and Education and Natural Resources Center, Vegetable Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Dezful, Iran.)
کلید واژه: Yield, Protein, Humic acid, dry matter, water use efficiency,
چکیده مقاله :
BACKGROUND: Application of bio-fertilizers, especially the plant growth promoting bacteria, is most important strategy for the integrated management of the plant nutrition in the sustainable agriculture system with sufficient input. OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to examine the changes of plant production and Economic value of basil in response to apply different level of fertilizer and cultivar. METHODS: This research was carried out via combined split plot in time experiment based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications along 2017-2018 year in greenhouse condition. Main factor included five fertilizer and bio fertilizer combinations [F1: Humic acid (4 kg.ha-1) + Complete fertilizer (N-P-K: 100-180-250), F2: Phosphorus bio fertilizer (500 gr.ha-1) + Complete fertilizer (N-P-K: 100-180-250), F3: Humic acid (4 kg.ha-1) + Phosphorus bio fertilizer (500 gr.ha-1) + Complete fertilizer (N-P-K: 100-180-250), F4: Humic acid (4 kg.ha-1) + Phosphorus bio fertilizer (500 gr.ha-1), F5: Control (None use of Humic acid and Phosphorus bio fertilizer) contain Complete fertilizer (N-P-K: 100-180-250)]. The sub-factor was the basil variety, including green (C1) and purple basil (C2). RESULT: According result of analysis of variance effect of different level of fertilizer and cultivar on studied traits was significant at 1% probability level. Interaction effect of treatments (instead fertilizer × cultivar) was not significant. Mean comparison of different level of fertilizer revealed F4 had the highest amount of measured traits. Also C1 cultivar was superior to C2 cultivar. Compare interaction effect of treatment showed C1 × Phosphorus bio fertilizer × Humic acid with nonuse complete fertilizer had the highest amount of studied traits. CONCLUSION: Generally based on result of current research F4 treatment [Humic acid (4 kg.ha-1) + Phosphorus bio fertilizer (500 gr.ha-1)] by achieve 26.8 t.ha-1 wet yield, 2.1 t.ha-1 dry yield, 92.5 kg.m-3 and 48.5 Million Toman was the best treatment and can be advised to producers in studied region.
Alizadeh, A. 2004. Plant soil water relationship. Publications of Imam Reza Univ. 472 pp.
Behbahani, M. and M. Khayam Nekoui. 2013. Investigating the effect of phosphate dissolving bacteria on potato yield in greenhouse conditions. Ministry of Jihad Agriculture. Deputy of Agriculture and Vegetable Office. Pub. Agri.Sci. 290 pp.
Bolandnazar, S. A., S. Khorsandi. and S. Adlipour. 2014. The effect of biofertilizer (phosphate 2) on yield and some qualitative traits of edible onion (Allium cepa L). Agricultural Knowledge Sust. Prod. 24(2): 19-30.
Bremner, J. M. and G. A. Breitenbeck. 1983. A simple method for determination of ammonium in semi micro Kjeldahl analysis of soils and plant materials using a block digester. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 14: 905-913.
Chamani, A., A. Shahbazi, S. Mostafavi, H. Pourbirami. and A. Younes. 2012. Investigating the effect of different cultivation substrates including vermicompost, peat and coconut shell on the growth and flowering characteristics of cloves. Agricultural Knowledge Sust. Prod. 22(3): 127-136.
Cheraghi, Y., F. A. Mohyedi. and M. Kalhor. 2016. Effects of organic and chemical fertilizers on yield components of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Inst Integrative Omics App. Bio-Tech. J. 7(8): 82-86.
Dastmozd, Gh. R., H. R. Ebrahimi. and B. Jafari Haghighi. 2015. Combined application of vermicompost and NPK fertilizers on Wheat production in Marvdasht. Res. J. Fish. Hydrobiol. 10(10): 153-156.
Eydizadeh, Kh., A. Mahdavi Damghani, H. Sabahi. and S. Soufizadeh. 2010. Effects of Integrated application of biofertiliser and chemical fertilizer on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) in Shushtar. Agroecology. J. 2(2): 292-301. (Abstract in English)
Eidy-Zadeh, Kh., A. Damghani Mahdavi, F. Ebrahimpur. and H. Sabahi. 2012. Effects of amount and method organic fertilizers combined with the chemical fertilizer application on yield and yield components of corn. Electronic J. Crop Prod. 5(3): 35-21.
Fallahi, J., A. Koochaki. and P. Rezvanimoghadam. 2010. Evaluation of biological fertilizerson qualitative and quantitative yields of German chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) Iran. J. Field Crop Res. 7(1): 127-135.
Gewaily, E. M., I. Fatma, T. El-Zamik, T. El-Hadidy, H. I. Abd El-Fattah. and S. H. Salem. 2006. Efficiency of bio-fertilizers, organic and inorganic amendments application on growth and essential oil of marjoram (Majorana hortensis L.) plants grown in sandy and calcareous soils. Zagazig J. Agric. Res. 33: 205-230.
Gulshan, A. 2017. The effect of Mycorrhizae and Humic acid on some characteristics of savory medicinal plants at different levels of urea fertilizer. Explorers J. 7: 9-15.
Hashemi Dezfuli, AH. 1994. The concept of water use efficiency. J. Pajouhesh Va Sazandgi. 7(25): 34-37.
Heidari, M. and S. Khalili. 2014. The effect of Humic and phosphorus fertilizer on yield of seed and Flower, photosynthetic pigments and amounts of mineral elements in hibiscus (Hisbiscus sabdariffa) Iran. J. Field Crop Sci. 45(2): 191-199.
Hojattipor, E., B. Jafari. and M. Dorostkar. 2014. The effect of integration of biological and chemical fertilizers on yield, yield components and growth indexes of wheat. J. Plant Echophysiol. 5(15): 36-48. (Abstract in English)
Khoshkhoi, M., B. Shaibani, A. Rouhani. and A. Tafazoli. 1991. Principles of Horticulture. Shiraz Univ. Pub. 556 pp.
Koochaki, A., L. Tabrizi. and R. Ghorbani. 2008. Effect of biofertilizers on agronomic and quality criteria of hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis L.). Iran. J. Field Crop Res. 1(6): 588-91.
Madani, H., M. A. Malbobi. and H. Hasan Abadi. 2013. The effect of Fertilizer 2 phosphate biofertilizer on the yield and other agricultural characteristics of potato. Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Arak University. 291 pp.
Mehrabi Bashrabadi, H. 2008. Economic study of greenhouse crop production in Kerman province. J. Agricultural Sciences of Techniques and Natural Resources. 12(11): 421-414. (Abstract in English)
Pourhadi, M. 2011. Effect of biofertilizers on yield and essential oil of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). J. Herb Drug. 2(2): 137-148.
Ranjbar, M. 2013. The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and Fertilizer 2 on phosphorus absorption, growth and yield of edible onion. Master's Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, Univ. Tabriz. 77 pp.
Rezaee Chianeh, I., A. Pirzad. and A. Fargami. 2015. The effect of bacteria suppliers’ nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur on seed yield and essential oil of cumin (Cuminum cyminumL.). J. Sust. Agri. Prod. Sci. 24(4): 71-83.
Shadab Niazi, P., R. Monaem. and A. Azadi. 2017. Effect of vermicompost on yield and forage quality in intercropping of maize and mung. J. Agri. Sci. 9(5): 233-240.
Sturz, A. V. and B. R. Christie. 2003. Beneficial microbial Allelopathies in the root zone: The management of soil quality and plant disease with rhizobactria. Soil Till. Res. 72(2): 107-123.
Talaei, G. H., M. Amini Dehaghi. and B. Shakati. 2014. Effects of biological fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative yield of cumin medicinal plant (Cuminum cyminum L.). Inter. J. Bio. Sci. 4(11): 257-264.
