مفهوم عشق و مقایسه آن در دستگاه فکری احمد غزالی و عین القضات همدانی با تأکید بر سوانح العشاق،تمهیدات،نامه ها و لوایح
محورهای موضوعی : زبان و ادب فارسی
ولی اله اسماعیل پور
1
(کارشناس ارشد زبان و ادبیات فارسی (پژوهشگر آزاد))
کلید واژه: mysticism, Sufism, Love (Amour), Savaneh al- Oshshagh, Ahmad Ghazzali, Eyn al-GhozzatHamedani,
چکیده مقاله :
Love (amour) is one ofthe prominent concepts of Iranian-Islamic mysticism which is used widely in Khosravani and later centuries’ mysticism schools. Therefore, according to the subject, three questions have been answered in this article: First, are there any similarities between Savaneh al-oshshagh, Tamhidat, Nameha and Lavayeh in term of love? Second, are these similarities in terms of the notion, indicating impression or influence of these two mystics on each other? Third, which part of this impression or influence is considered as the most? This paper has tried to classify and compare and contrast components of love (amour) from Ahmad Ghazzali and Eyn al-GhozzatHamedani’s point of view. The research result shows that similarities between words, terms and concepts on the one hand and the teacher and student relationship between Ahmad Ghazzali and Eyn al-GhozzatHamedani on the other hand, is the chief reason for the wide and undeniable influence of Ahmad Ghazali’s point of view on Eyn al-GhozzatHamedani. Hence, the majority of these influences are in the field of mystical-amorous styles and approaches.
Love (amour) is one ofthe prominent concepts of Iranian-Islamic mysticism which is used widely in Khosravani and later centuries’ mysticism schools. Therefore, according to the subject, three questions have been answered in this article: First, are there any similarities between Savaneh al-oshshagh, Tamhidat, Nameha and Lavayeh in term of love? Second, are these similarities in terms of the notion, indicating impression or influence of these two mystics on each other? Third, which part of this impression or influence is considered as the most? This paper has tried to classify and compare and contrast components of love (amour) from Ahmad Ghazzali and Eyn al-GhozzatHamedani’s point of view. The research result shows that similarities between words, terms and concepts on the one hand and the teacher and student relationship between Ahmad Ghazzali and Eyn al-GhozzatHamedani on the other hand, is the chief reason for the wide and undeniable influence of Ahmad Ghazali’s point of view on Eyn al-GhozzatHamedani. Hence, the majority of these influences are in the field of mystical-amorous styles and approaches.
_||_
