پیش بینی خیانت‌های زناشویی بر اساس سیستم‌های بازداری و فعالسازی رفتاری و الگوهای ارتباطی زوجین

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه تعالی مشاوره و روان درمانی

سارا عرب ¹ (کارشناسی ارشد، گروه روانشناسی بالینی، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی سمنان. ایران.)
عاطفه ناظریه ² (کارشناسی ارشد، گروه روانشناسی، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز سمنان، ایران.)
افسانه دهقان ³ (کارشناسی ارشد، گروه روانشناسی ، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مازندران. ایران.)
محمدرضا حبیب‌نیا ⁴ (دکتری روانشناسی ، گروه روانشناسی، واحد بین الملی کیش، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، هرمزگان، ایران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/04/25 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/07/04 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/09/01

کلید واژه: الگوهای ارتباطی, خیانت‌های زناشویی, سیستم‌های بازداری, فعالسازی رفتاری,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف خیانت‌های زناشویی بر اساس سیستم‌های بازداری و فعالسازی رفتاری و الگوهای ارتباطی زوجین انجام شد.روش : روش تحقیق حاضر توصیفی از نوع، همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری مورد مطالعه این پژوهش دانشجویان متاهل مقاطع کارشناسی، کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه تهران بود. که از بین آنها براساس فرمول حجم نمونه گرین (1992) 248 نفر که ملاک‌های ورود به پژوهش را داشتند با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق پرسشنامه نگرش به خیانت مارک واتلی (2006)، پرسشنامه سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری کارور و وایت (1994) و پرسشنامه الگوهای ارتباطی ریچی و فیتزپاتریک (1994) جمع‌آوری شد و به منظور بررسی فرضیه‌ها و تحلیل داده‌ها از رگرسیون همزمان استفاده شد.یافته ها: بررسی نتایج پژوهش نشان داد خیانت زناشویی با سیستم بازداری رفتاری رابطه منفی و معنادار و با سیستم فعالسازی رفتاری رابطه مثبت و معنادار است. (01/0=p ). همبستگی خیانت زناشویی با جهت گیری گفت و شنود منفی و با جهت گیری همنوایی مثبت و معنادار است (01/0=p ). همچنین سیستم فعالسازی رفتاری سهم یگانه بیشتری در پیش بینی خیانت زناشویی دارد.نتیجه گیری: براساس نتایج بدست آمده خیانت‌های زناشویی را می‌توان براساس سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری و الگوهای ارتباطی زوجین در دانشجوبان متاهل پیش‌بینی کرد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Predicting Marital Infidelity based on Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Systems and Couples' Communication PatternsPurpose: The current research was conducted with the purpose of marital infidelity based on behavioral inhibition and activation systems and couples' communication patterns.Methodology: The present research method was descriptive, correlational. The statistical population studied in this research was married undergraduate and graduate students of Tehran University. Among them, based on Green's (1992) sample size formula, 248 people who met the criteria for entering the research were selected by simple random sampling. The research data was collected through Mark Watley's (2006) betrayal attitude questionnaire, Carver and White's behavioral brain systems questionnaire (1994) and Ritchie and Fitzpatrick's communication patterns questionnaire (1994) and simultaneous regression was used to examine the hypotheses and analyze the data.Findings: Examining the research results showed that marital infidelity has a negative and meaningful relationship with the behavioral inhibition system and a positive and meaningful relationship with the behavioral activation system. (p = 0.01). The correlation of marital infidelity with the orientation of dialogue and listening is negative and with the orientation of conformity is positive and significant (p=0.01). Also, the behavioral activation system has a greater unique contribution in predicting marital infidelity.Conclusion: Based on the obtained results, marital infidelity can be predicted based on brain behavioral systems and couples' communication patterns in married students.

منابع و مأخذ:

Abdullahi Magarshin R. (2006). The relationship between inhibition and activation systems with implicit memory bias in depressed people. Master's thesis. Tabriz, Tabriz University. [Link]

Bahadri Jahormi S, Payan S & Dashbozorg Z. (2016). Prediction of desire for extramarital relationships among nurses based on moral intelligence and some underlying factors. Medical Ethics, 41(11), 58-67. [Link]

Bakhtiari A, Hosseini S, Arefi M & et al. (1400). The mediating role of marital intimacy in the relationship between attachment styles and attitudes toward marital infidelity. Counseling Research (News and Counseling Research), 20(77), 122-140. [Link]

Carver CS, White TL. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social psychology. 67(5):319-333. [Link]

Couch LL & Sandfoss KR. (2009). An Analysis of BIS/BAS Connections to Reactions after Romantic Betrayal. Individual Differences Research, 7(4). [Link]

Dawe S, Loxton NJ. (2004). the role of impulsivity in the development of substance uses and eating disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 28(3):343-51. [Link]

DeAngelis B. (1992). Are you my missing one? (Translated by Hadi Ebrahimi, 2015). Tehran: No Andish publishing house. [Link]

Fitzpatrick MA, Ritchie LD. (2007). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20: 275-301. [Link]

Franken IH, Muris P, Georgieva I. (2006). Gray's model of personality and addiction. Addictive behaviors, 31(3):399-403. [Link]

Ghasemi Z, Mirzania Z, Hayati M. (2017). The effectiveness of the psychoeducational program based on Guttman's systemic-behavioral approach on marital boredom and irrational communication beliefs of married women with attitudes towards marital infidelity. Recent Advances in Behavioral Sciences, 21(3), 1-18. [Link]

Gray JA, McNaughton N. (2003). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the function of the sept hippocampal system. Oxford university pres, 327:195-261. [Link]

Hanerparvan N, Qadri Z, Ghobadi K. (2011). Comparison of communication patterns and marital conflicts in married women working in state banks and housewives in Shiraz. Women's Sociology Quarterly, 2(3): 103-122. [Link]

Javidi N, Soleimani A, Ahmadi Kh & et al. (2012). The effectiveness of emotion-oriented couple therapy on improving couples' communication patterns. Journal of Behavioral Science Research, 11(5): 1-9. [Link]

Jensen MP, Ehde DM & Day MA. (2016). The behavioral activation and inhibition systems: implications for understanding and treating chronic pain. The Journal of Pain, 17(5), 529-e1. [Link]

Koerner AF, Fitzpatrick MA. (2009). Understanding family communication patterns and familyfunctioning. The roles of conversation orientationand conformity orientation. Annals of the International Communication Association, 26(1), 36-65. [Link]

Koerner AF, Maki L. (2014). Family Communication Patterns and Social Support in Familie of Origin and Adult Children Subsequent Intimate Relationships. The International ssociation For Relationship Research Conference, Madison. Communication Year Book, Research Quarterly, 36(4): 433-440. [Link]

Koesten J, Anderson K. (2004). Exploring the influence of family communication patterns, cognitive complexity, and interpersonal competence on adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of family competence, 4(2): 99-121. [Link]

Lavner JA, Karney BR, Bradbury TN. (2016). Does couples' communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication? Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 680-694. [Link]

Millner Vaughn S. (2008). Internet Infidelity: A Case of Intimacy with Detachment. The Family Journal, 16(1): 78-82. [Link]

Mohammadi N. (2007), Psychometric characteristics of scales of behavioral inhibition and activation system in students of Shiraz University, Shahid University bimonthly scientific-research journal, 15(8): 56-49. [Link]

Parandi A, Atefi M, Moradi A. (2015). The role of family functioning and couples' communication patterns in predicting marital satisfaction. Bi Quarterly Journal of Pathology and Counseling, 2(1): 54-65. [Link]

Pourmohammedrezai Jirajishi M, Mirzamani Bafghi M. (2012). The relationship between the activity of brain-behavioral systems, social support and depression. Social Welfare Scientific Research Quarterly, (7) 26:223-23. [Link]

Qaragozlu N, Muradtasheti M, Atadakht A. (2017). Comparing the effectiveness of face-to-face and virtual cognitive-behavioral couple therapy on post-traumatic stress disorder in extramarital relationships. Counseling Research, 65(17), 186-206. [Link]

Rezvanizadeh A, Aslani Katuli A. (2015). Prediction of extramarital relationships based on attachment styles, self-esteem and narcissism among married students. Journal of New Advances in Behavioral Sciences, 1(2): 36-45. [Link]

Serrano-Ibáñez ER, Ruiz-Párraga GT, Esteve R & et al. (2018). Validation of the Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS) in Spanish adolescents. Psychothema, 30(1), 130-135. [Link]

Shahandeh M, Agha Yousofi A. (2011). Comparing brain systems of behavioral inhibition/activation and locus of control of male and female students. Quarterly Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(6): 87-80. [Link]

Sharafuddin H, Salehizadeh A. (2015). The fields of extramarital relations in Iran; A case study of Tehran city. Social Cultural Knowledge, 27(7): 117-138. [Link]

Yousefi N, Karimipour B, Amani A. (2016). Examining the model of religious beliefs, conflict resolution styles and marital commitment with attitudes towards marital infidelity. Applied Counseling Quarterly, 1(6): 47-64. [Link]