پیش‌بینی اخلاق تحصیلی براساس 5 عامل شخصیت با نقش میانجی درگیری تحصیلی و شیفتگی تحصیلی
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه تعالی مشاوره و روان درمانی
خسرو شکیبا راد
1
,
هوشنگ جدیدی
2
,
علی تقوائی نیا
3
,
ذکراله مروتی
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، سنندج، ایران - - دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، سنندج، ایران
2 - استادیار دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، سنندج، ایران - - دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، سنندج، ایران
3 - دانشیار گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه یاسوج
4 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.
کلید واژه: ابعاد شخصیت, اخلاق تحصیلی, درگیری تحصیلی, شیفتگی تحصیلی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: اخلاق تحصیلی نقش غیرقابل انکاری را در تصمیم‌گیری‌ها و رفتارهای نهایی فراگیران ایفا می‌کند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف پیش‌بینی اخلاق تحصیلی براساس 5 عامل شخصیت با نقش میانجی درگیری تحصیلی و شیفتگی تحصیلی دانش آموزان مقطع متوسطه دوم انجام شد. روش: روش پژوهش از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعۀ پژوهش را کلیه دانش¬آموزان ( دوره متوسطه) شهر سنندج که در سال تحصیلی 1399-1400 مشغول به تحصیل بودند تشکیل دادند که از بین آن‌ها ازطریق روش نمونه‌گیری دردسترس 384 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای این پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه¬های اخلاق تحصیلی (AEQ)، پنج عاملی نئو (NEO- FFI)، درگیری تحصیلی (EEQ) و شیفتگی تحصیلی (FSS) بود. تحليل داده‌ها به روش آماری معادلات ساختاری و با استفاده از نرم افزارهای آماری SPSS-24 و AMOS-22 انجام شد. یافته¬ها: یافته¬ها گویای آن بود که اثر مستقيم روان رنجورخويی، برون‌گرايی، پذیرا بودن، توافق پذیری و وجدانی بودن، درگیری تحصیلی و شیفتگی تحصیلی بر اخلاق تحصیلی معنادار بود (01/0 P <). همچنین نتایج نشان داد که روان رنجورخويی، برون‌گرايی، پذیرا بودن، توافق پذیری و وجدانی بودن از طریق واسطه¬گری درگیری تحصیلی و شیفتگی تحصیلی دارای اثرغيرمستقيم بر اخلاق تحصیلی بودند(01/0 P <). نتيجه گيري: بنابراین معلمان و دست اندرکاران حوزه آموزش در برنامه‌های آموزشی می‌توانند با بهبود درگیری تحصیلی و شیفتگی تحصیلی.، اخلاق تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان را بهبود بخشند.
Purpose: Academic ethics plays an undeniable role in the final decisions and behaviors of learners. The aim of this research was to Prediction of Academic Ethics based on Five Personality Factors with the mediating role of Educational Engagement and Academic Flow. Methodology: The research method was correlational. The study community included all high school girls' students of Sanandaj City in 2019-2020, that among them 384 students selected as samples by available sampling. Research questionnaires included: academic ethics (AEQ), five personality factors (NEO- FFI), educational engagement (EEQ), academic flow questionnaire (FSS). Data analysis was performed using path analysis statistical method and by the SPSS-24, and AMOS-22 software. Findings: Finding showed that the direct effect of neuroticism, extroversion, receptiveness, agreeableness and conscientiousness and educational engagement and academic flow was significant(P<0/01). Also, the results revealed that neuroticism, extroversion, receptiveness, agreeableness and conscientiousness has an indirect effect on academic ethics through the mediation of the educational engagement and academic flow(P<0/01). Conclusion: Therefore, teachers and practitioners in the field of education in educational programs can improve the academic ethics of students by improving academic engagement and academic flow.
Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
Bohloli, F., & Mahmoud Fakhe, H. (2021). The Effectiveness of Moral Intelligence on Psychological Well-Being and Academic Ethics of Female Students in the Corona Epidemic. Journal of Research in Educational Science, 15(55), 203-216.
Carmona-Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Current Psychology, 40, 2938-2947.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). The ethics of educational and social research. In Research methods in education (pp. 111-143). Routledge.
Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Talaee, E.(2020). Effectiveness of gamification-based E-Learning environment on Students' Academic Engagement in English Language learning. Studies in Learning & Instruction, 21(1), 296-277.
Ghadami, G., Zare, M., & Rahimi, M. (2020). The Role of Personality Traits and Family Communication Environment in Academic Engagement with Passion Mediation. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 7(2), 9-20.
Golparvar, M. (2009). The relationship between ethics and educational justice and avoiding scientific fraud. The Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 5(1, 2), 57-66.
Haririzade, F., Barzegar Bafrooei, K., Zandevanian, A.(2023). Investigating the relationship between time perspective and academic engagement with the mediation of self-efficacy in students. Advances in Cognitive Sciences, 25 (1), 46-59.
Head, G. (2020). Ethics in educational research: Review boards, ethical issues and researcher development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72-83.
Jackson, S. A., Marsh, H. )1996(. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35.
Jalili, F., Arefi, M., Ghomrani, A., & Manshaee, G. (2019). The effectiveness of Self-determination Education on Academic Motivation and Academic Flow of Farhangian University Students in Birjand. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 16(34), 27-58.
Mammadov, S. (2022). Big Five personality traits and academic performance: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Personality, 90(2), 222-255.
Mohanna, S., Talepasand, S., & Rostami, S. (2020). Educational identity, internal motivation and self-efficacy as predictors of deep cognitive engagement. Journal of Research in Educational Science, 14(48), 7-22.
Nouraldi, M. (2021). Relationship between personality traits and social support, life satisfaction and students' academic performance. Management and Educational Perspective, 3(2), 99-127.
Rijavec, M., & Ljubin-Golub, T. (2019). Academic flow and burnout in college students: an eight-month longitudinal study. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 10.15405.
Sabzian, S., & Garavand, H. (2022). Presenting a causal model of the effect perceptions of classroom quality and educational justice on academic cheating with regard to the mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 19(46), 84-63. [Persian]
Shirzadi, M., Sheikhol Eslami, R. (2022). Academic Moral Civility: The Mediating Role of Academic Engagement in the Relationship between Academic Motivation and Academic Incivility. Ethics in Science and Technology,16 (1) ,51-59.
Stricker, J., Buecker, S., & Pietrowsky, R. (2022). Alignment of the personality inventory for ICD-11 with the five-factor model of personality. Psychological Assessment, 34(7), 711.
Suri, H. (2020). Ethical considerations of conducting systematic reviews in educational research. Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application, 41-54.
Wang, Y., Wang, S., & Wang, M. (2022). What drives students’ Internet ethical behaviour: an integrated model of the theory of planned behaviour, personality, and Internet ethics education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(3), 588-610.
Yosefi Afrashte, M., Rezaei, S., & Sadeghi, T. (2021). The Relationship between Academic Well-being and Learning Approaches and educational fascination in Zanjan University of Medical Sciences Students. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 28(2), 287-293.
Zerang, R. (2011). The relationship between learning styles and academic engagement with the academic performance of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad students. Master's thesis in educational psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
