Explaining the process of changing the public sector accounting system

محورهای موضوعی : Agriculture Marketing and Commercialization

saeid balanejad ¹ (Ph. D. Student of Accounting, Department of Accounting, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.)
Khosro Faghani Makerani ² (Department of Accounting, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan)
jamadroudi gorganli ³ (Assistant Professor of Accounting, Department of Accounting, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/04/19 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/08/18 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/09/10

کلید واژه: social security organization, Public Sector Accounting, Structural Theory,

چکیده مقاله :

The purpose of this study is to provide a scientific explanation and forecast of the process of changing the public sector accounting system for the Social Security Organization. Using the constructivist theory approach, change the public sector accounting in the Social Security Organization according to the characteristics of active/passive agency and supportive / non-supportive structure with the methodology of the research, identify and use the directional qualitative content analysis method They have been classified and analyzed. The results of the questionnaire data and its content analysis and interpretation of categories based on construction theory indicate that human resources are cognitive, emotional and behavioral in terms of their growth and development in changing public sector accounting. And the organization makes no effort to force people to change. In this way, the characteristics of the agency are passive and the organization is unsupportive. In this situation, the conditions for changing the public sector accounting in the Social Security Organization are "very unfavorable". Strategies for changing public sector accounting in the Social Security Administration should shift from passive and unsupportive agencies that ensure the failure of change to active agencies and supportive structures and change the situation to "very favorable" conditions. Public sector accounting stakeholders should strive to create the necessary context, activate agencies, and create and revitalize the necessary support. By reviving the features of the support structure, the Social Security Administration can transform the situation from "failure of change" to "success of the change."

منابع و مأخذ:

• Akrami, Seyed Rahmatollah, Ali Activist Qayyumi and Mohammad Hossein Ghadirian Arani (2017) Transition from Cash Accounting to Commitment in the Public Sector: Required Time Period, Third Year Government Accounting, No. 2 (6 in a row), Spring and Summer 1996, Pages 9 - 18


• Baert, P. (2010). Social theory in the twentieth century. Maiden, MA: Polity


• Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of know-ledge.London: Penguin.


• Coad, A., Jack, L. & Kholeif, A. (2016). “Strong Structuration Theory in Accounting Research”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(7), 1138 – 1144.


• Coad, A.F. & Glyptis, L.G. (2014). “Structuration: A Position-Practice Perspective and an Illustrative Study”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25, 142-161.


• Coad, A.F. & Herbert, I.P. (2009). “Back to the Future: New Potential for Structuration Theory in Management Accounting Research?” Management
  Accounting Research, 20, 177-192.


• Conrad, L. (2014). “Reflections on the Application of and Potential for Structuration Theory in Accounting Perspective”. Accounting Forum, 32(1),
  30-45.


• Dadshi, Iman and Iman Garnema and Mir Hamid Sadat Salmasi (1397)


• Danaee Fard, H. (2010). Theory Building:Foundations and Methodologies. Tehran: Samt Press (in Persian).


• Englund, H. & Gerdin, J. (2016). “What Can (Not) a Flat and Local Structuration Ontology Do for Manage-ment Accounting Research?”.A Comment on Coad, Jack, and Kholeif. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13(2), 252-263.


• Englund, H. & Gerdin, J. (2014). “Structuration Theory in Accounting R e s e a r c h: A p p l i c a t i o n s a n d Accou-ntability”. Critical Perspectives
  on Accounting, 25(2), 162-180.


• Englund, H., Gerdin, J. & Burns, J. (2011). “25 Years of Giddens in Accounting Research: Achievements, Limitations and the Future”. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 494-513.


• Ghazi Moradi, Narjes (2016) Problems of Accrual Accounting in Universities and Higher Education Institutions, Public Accounting Quarterly, 2 (4), 15-24.


• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.


• Helden, Jan van, Pawan Adhikari, Chamara Kuruppu (2021) Public sector accounting in emerging economies: a review of the papers published in the first decade of Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, ISSN: 2042-1168 .


• Jack, L. (2017). Accounting and social theory: an introduction. Abingdon:


• Jack, L. (2013). Accounting communications inside organisations, in Jack,
  , Davidson, J. and Craig, R., Editors, The Routledge Companion to Accounting Communication, Abingdon: Routledge.


• Jack, L. & Kholeif, A. (2008). Enterprise “Resource Planning and a Contest to Limit the Role of Management Accountants: A Strong Structuration.


• Jalaipoor, Hamid Reza; Mohammadi, Jamal (1378) late theories of sociology. Tehran: Publishing.


• Lasse Oulasvirta (2021) a consistent bottom-up approach for deriving a conceptual framework for public sector financial accounting, PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rpmm20.


• Karbasi Yazdi, Hossein; Tarighi, Ali (2009) Evaluation of the benefits of accrual accounting systems in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Auditing Knowledge, 7, 16-27.


• Kurdistani, Gholamreza Kurdistani, Nizamuddin Rahimian, Shahrokh Shahrabi (2016) Identifying barriers to the transition to accrual accounting in the public sector (based on studies by the International Standards Board for Public Sector Accounting), 16th year audit knowledge, No. 65, pp. 47-75.


• Parker, J. (2006), “Structuration’s Future? From all and everywhere’ to ‘Who did What, Where, When, How and Why?” Journal of Critical Realism, 5, 122-138.


• Parker, J. (2000). Structuration. London: Open University Press.


• Rahmani, Ali; Rezaei, Mehdi (2011) Accrual Accounting lays the groundwork for performance auditing in the public sector, Journal of Political-Economic Information, 283, 262-271.


• Mehrani, Kaveh Ali Mahmoudi, Ali Rahmani, Abu Ali Vaddahir (2015) Explaining the process of changing public sector accounting with the approach of structuring theory (Case study: University of Tehran) Public Accounting, Fourth Year, No. 2 (8 in a row), Spring and Summer 1997, Pages (54_77).


• Ritzer, George (2004) Sociological Theory in Contemporary Times. Translated by Mohsen Thalasi, Tehran: Scientific Publications.


• Ritzer, G. (2007). Contemporary sociological theory and its classical roots: the basics (2ndedition). New York: McGraw-Hill. Research”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(2), 128-134


• Roberts, J. (2014). “Testing the Limits of Structuration Theory in Accounting
  Research”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(2), 135-141.


• Roberts, J. & Scapens, R.W. (1985). “Accounting Systems and Systems of
  Accounting: Understanding Accounting Practices in Their Organizational
  Contexts”. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10, 443-456.


• Sajjadi, Seyed Hossein. Shiri, Yahya. Mohammadi, Nahid (2017) International Accounting, Tehran, Termeh Publications.


• Stones, R. (2015). Why current affairs need social theory. Palgrave Macmillan:Basingstoke.


• Stones, R. (2005). Structuration theory. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.


• Stones, R. (2001). “Refusing the Realism Structuration Divide”. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(2), 177-197.


• Stones, R. (1996) Sociological Reasoning: towards a past-modern sociology,
  Palgrave Macmillan, Basin-gstoke.


• Stones, R. & Jack, L. (2016). “The Bridge between Ontological Concepts and Empirical Evidence: An Interview with Rob Stones”. Accounting, Auditing
  & Accountability Journal, 7(29), 1145 -1151.


• Taliban, the power of God; Hassani, Mohsen (2011) Accrual accounting and effective factors in its application in government organizations, Auditor Bimonthly, 55, 66-73.


• Veliquette, A. (2013). “StructurationTheory’s Relevance to HRD: A Review and Application”. Human Resource Development Review, 12 (2), 199-219.


• Yavari, Ali; Ahmadi, Iraj; Rozahaei, Mansour (2013) The Necessity of Applying Accrual Accounting in Amin University of Law Enforcement Sciences, Development of Human Resources Management and Support, 2 (28), 129-148.


• Zare, Iman, and Reza Gholami Jamkarani (2019) Anthony Giddens's theory of construction and its role in determining the organizational accountability model in the accounting system, Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing, Volume 8, Number 30, Summer 2019.