The Comparison of Computer Assisted Teaching and Traditional Explicit Method in Learning / Teaching English Vocabulary.
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies
Essa Dodangeh
1
(Abhar)
کلید واژه: Context, Vocabulary,
چکیده مقاله :
This review surveys research on second language vocabulary teaching and learning since1999. It first considers the distinction between incidental and intentional vocabulary learning.Although learners certainly acquire word knowledge incidentally while engaged in variouslanguage learning activities, more direct and systematic study of vocabulary is also required.There is a discussion of how word frequency counts and information on word meaning fromcomputer corpora can inform the selection of words to be studied, with a particular focus onspoken vocabulary. This leads to a consideration of learner dictionaries and some researchevidence on how effectively students can use them to understand the meanings of words.Then classroom research on teaching vocabulary is discussed. Another significant topic is thedesign of computer-based language learning programs to enhance opportunities for learnersto expand their vocabulary knowledge. Finally, a summary of recent work on vocabularytesting is presented. Second language learners are typically conscious of the extent to whichlimitations in their vocabulary knowledge hamper their ability to communicate effectively inthe target language, since lexical items carry the basic information load of the meanings theywish to comprehend and express. This gives vocabulary study a salience for learners that maybe lacking in the acquisition of other features of the language system. However, languageteachers are often unsure about how best to incorporate vocabulary learning into theirteaching. Traditional techniques of presenting new words in class or requiring students tomemorize lists of vocabulary items seem old-fashioned in the context of current task-basedlanguage programs.The debate in SLA about the need to focus on form in classroom communication activities(see Doughty & Williams, 1998) has centered almost entirely on the acquisition of grammar,but there are similar issues involved in finding a place for the systematic study of vocabularyin the language curriculum.
[1] Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. & Sorensen, C. (2010).Introduction to research in education.
Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
[2] Bell, H., (2009). The messy little details: a longitudinal case study of the emerging
lexicon. In: Fitzpatrick, T., Barfield, A. (Eds.), Lexical Processing in Second Language
Learners: Papers and Perspectives in Honor of Paul Meara (pp. 111- 127).Multilingual
Matters, Bristol, England.
[3] Bogaards, P.&Laufer, B. (Eds.), (2004). Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection,
Acquisition and Testing.Benjamins, Amsterdam.
[4] Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
[5] Churchill, E., (2008). A dynamic systems account of learning a word: from ecology to
form relations. Applied Linguistics 29 (3), 339-358.
[6] Coady, J., Huckin, T. (Eds.), (1997).Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A
Rationale for Pedagogy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[7] D'Acierno, M. R. (1990). Three Types of Bilingualism. Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language (24th,
Dublin, Ireland, March 27-30, 1990).
[8] Decarrico, J. S. 2001. Vocabulary Learning and Teaching.Celce-Murcia, M. (ed.).
Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, pp. 285-299. Boston:
[9] Heinle&Heinle.
[10] Dale, E. (1965). Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings. Elementary
English, 42, 895-901.
[11] DeCarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and Teaching.In M. C. Murcia (Eds.)
Teaching English as a Second Language. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
[12]Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning:
Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53(S1), 3-32.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 6, NO. 1, Summer 2017
67
[13] Fleming, D. (1967). Attitude: The history of a concept. Perspectives in American
History, 1, 285– 365.
[14] Gairns, R. & Redman, S.(1986).Working with words.CUP.
[15]Genesee, F. (2009).Preface. In J. Cenoz (Ed.), Toward multilingual education. Basque
educational research from an international perspective (pp. 1-2). Toronto: Multilingual
Matters.
[16]Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P.Cole&J.L.Morgan(Eds.), Syntax and
semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
[17]Griffiths, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press.
[18] Halliday, M. A. (1970). Language structure and language function. New horizons in
linguistics, 1, 140-165.
In the name of God
[21]Hymes, D. (1971). On communicative competence. Philadelphia: University of
Pennsylvania Press.
[22]Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.),
Sociolinguistics (pp. 35-88). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
[23]Kamalian, A., &Sayadian, S. (2014). The role of short text messaging in Iranian EFL
vocabulary learning and motivation. Science, 2(4), 101-107.
[24]Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture
naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations.
Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.
[25]Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006).Understanding language teaching: from method to postmethod.
New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[26]Laufer, B., (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second
language: same or different? Applied Linguistics 19 (2), 255-271.
[27]Laufer, B., Paribakht, T., (1998). The relationship between passive and active
vocabularies: effects of language learning context. Language Learning.48 (3), 365-391.
[28]Lightbown, P., Spada, N. (1993). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
[29]Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of
research.Tesol Quarterly, 17(3), 359-382.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 6, NO. 1, Summer 2017
68
[30]Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, Motivation, and Second Language
Learning: A Meta– Analysis of Studies Conducted by Gardner and Associates. Language
learning, 53(1), 123-163.
[31]Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. In
Language teaching and linguistics: Abstracts, 13, 4, 221-246.
[32]Meara, P., (2002). The rediscovery of vocabulary. Second Language Research 18 (4),
393-407.
[33]Monaghan, P., & Mattock, K. (2012).Integrating constraints for learning word–referent
mappings.Cognition, 123(1), 133-143.
[34]Nagy, W. E. & Scott, J. A. (2000).Vocabulary process. In M, Kamil, P, B, Mothensal,
P.D. Pearson, and R. Barr, (Eds.), Handbook of reading research volume III (pp 269-284).
Mahon, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[35] Nation, I. S. P. & Macalister, (2010).Language Curriculum Design. Routledge: Taylor &
Francis.
[36] Nation, I. S. P. (1990).Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
[37] Nation, I. S. P., (2001).Learning Vocabulary in Another Language.Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, England.
[38]Oxford, R.(1990).Language learning strategies. Newbury House.
[39] Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in
reading comprehension.Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des
languesvivantes, 56(2), 282-308.
[40]Richards, J. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.
Baddeley A. (1990) Human Memory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London. Chapelle C.A.
(2001) Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching,
Testing and Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Norbrook H. & Scott P.
(2003) Motivation in mobile modern foreign language learning. In MLEARN 2003: Learning
with Mobile Devices (eds J. Attewell, G. Da Bormida, M. Sharples & C. Savill-Smith), pp.
50–51. Learning and Skills Development Agency, London. Available at: http://
www.lsda.org.uk/files/pdf/1421.pdf (last accessed 7 June 2006). Prensky M. (2005) What can
you learn from a cell phone? Almost anything! The Innovate Gateway 1 (June/July).
Available at: http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php? view=article&id=83 (last accessed 7
June 2006). Read J. (2000) Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
UK. Roschelle J., Sharples M. & Chan T.W. (2005) Introduction to the special issue on
wireless and mobile technologies in education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
21,159–161. Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 6, NO. 1, Summer 2017
69
(2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24, 425–438. Al-
Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2
vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 202–
232. Bauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of
Lexicography, 6, 253–279. Beglar, A., & Hunt, A. (1999). Revising and validating the 2000
word level and the university word level vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 16, 131–162.
Bogaards, P. (2000). Testing L2 vocabulary at a high level: The case of the Euralex
French tests. Applied Linguistics, 21, 490–516. Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical
knowledge and listening
comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14–31.
Burns, A., & de Silva Joyce, H. (2001a). Researching and teaching vocabulary in the
AMEP. Prospect, 16, 20–34.
Burns, A., & de Silva Joyce, H. (Eds.). (2001b). Teachers’ voices 7: Teaching
vocabulary. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and
Research, Macquarie University.
Cameron, L. (2002). Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language.
Language Teaching Research, 6, 145–173. Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1997). Second
language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Conrad, S. (2002). Corpus linguistic approaches for discourse analysis. Annual
Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 75–95. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list.
TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238. Chan, A. Y. W., & Taylor, A. (2001). Evaluating learner
dictionaries: What the
reviews say. International Journal of Lexicography, 14, 163–180.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary
acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 80, 183–198.
Chung, T. M., & Nation, P. (2003). Technical vocabulary in specialised texts.
Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 103–116.
de Ridder, I. (2002). Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks
affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension, and the reading
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 6, NO. 1, Summer 2017
70
process? Language Learning and Technology, 6, 123–146.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language
acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fowle, C. (2002). Vocabulary notebooks: Implementation and outcomes. ELT Journal, 56,
380–388.
