The Effect of Verbalization on Young Learners’ Speaking Performance: Collective versus Idiosyncratic Changes
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language StudiesSomayeh Akbari 1 , Parisa Daftarifard 2
1 - Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Young learners, Rasch model, sociocultural theory, Verbalization, speaking performance,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigated the role of verbalization in the development of young learners’ speaking ability and vocabulary knowledge at Cambridge English Movers level A1 through quasi experimental design. A total number of 60 participants between the ages of 5 and 6 years old were selected based on convenient sampling and had comparable scores on the listening section of the Mover Exam. Participants were divided into two experimental and control groups and were taught for ten sessions. The participants in the experimental group practiced verbalization strategy during the course of the study, whereas the young learners in the control group did not. The data, then, were subjected to both parametric and nonparametric analyses for collective results and Rasch model for idiosyncratic investigation. The results of Mann-Whitney U tests and Independent T-Test indicated there was no significant difference between experimental and control groups in their speaking performance. This showed that verbalization strategy had no significant effect on the language learners’ speaking performance when their speaking proficiency was concerned collectively. However, the results of Rasch repeated measure analysis indicated some idiosyncratic growth in the experimental group
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Berns, M. (1992) Sociolinguistics and the teaching of English in Europe beyond the 1990s.World Englishes 11, 3-14.
Bowels, M. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second Language research. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching language to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chien, T. W. (2008). Repeated measure designs (time series) and Rasch. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 22 (3), p. 1171. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt223b.ht
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Contrastive analysis of speech acts: What do we do with the research findings? Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 33, 81–92.
Daftaripard P., Lange R. (2009). Theoretical complexity vs. Rasch item difficulty in reading tests. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 23(2), 1212-1213.
Denney, W. and Turner, M. C. (1979). Facilitating cognitive performance in young learners: A comparison of strategy modeling and strategy modeling with overt self-verbalization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 119-131.
Diaz. M . R ., & Winsler. A., & Atencio . J. D.,& Herbers . K. (1992). Mediation of self regulation through the use of private speech .Int.Jnl of Cognitive Education & Mediated Learning, Vol. 2, No. 2.
Fernyhough, C., &Meins, E. (2009). Private speech and theory of mind: Evidence for developing interfunctional relations. In A., Winsler,C., Fernyhough,I. Montero, (Eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation (pp. 95-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fogal, G.G. (2015). Pedagogical stylistic and concept-based instruction: An investigation into the development of voice in the academic writing of Japanese university of English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Toronto, Ontario.
Frazier, E. (2013). Concept-based teaching and Spanish modality in heritage language learners: A Vygotskyan approach. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. The university of Massachusetts Amherst.
Gal'perin, P. I. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In M. Cole, & I. Maltzman (Eds.), A handbook of contemporary soviet psychology (pp.249-273). New York: Basic Books.
Garcia, P. N. (2012). Verbalizing in the second language classroom: The development of grammatical concept of aspect. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Garcia, P. N. (2015). Verbalizing in the second language classroom: Exploring the role of agency in the internalization of grammatical categories. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, and G. Vitanova (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 213-231).
Harris, K. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students. Focus on Exceptional Young learners, 15, 1-16
Kao, Y. (2014). Vygotsky's theory of instruction and assessment: The implications of foreign language education. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA.
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory of language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15 (1), 11-33. DOI: 10.1177/1362168810383328
Lavasani, M. (2016). The impact of mediational artefacts on EFL learners’ listening performance: Systemic theoretical instruction (STI). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, IAU, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran).
Lavasani, M. & Birjandi, P. (2015). The role of verbalization in listening conceptual formation among Iranian EFL learners: A STI perspective. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 18(1), 95-126.
Lee, H. (2012). A concept-based approach to second language teaching and learning: Cognitive linguistics-inspired instruction of English phrasal verbs. Ph.D. dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA.
Lidstone, J. S. M., Meins, E., & Fernyhough, C. (2010). The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning in middle childhood: Evidence from a dual task paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 438–451.
Meier, Daneil .R (2007).Learning from young young learners in the classroom: Art and science of teacher research. New York: Teacher College Press.
Negueruela, E. (2003). Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 Development: A Sociocultural approach to teaching learning and researching L2learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: The Pennsylvania state university, University Park, PA.
Negueruela, E., &Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis, 79-102.
Piaget, J. (1926). Language and thought of the child. London: Paul Kegan.
Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on young learners’ achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48- 58.
Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 208-223.
Schunk, D. H. (1986).Verbalization and young learners’ self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 347-369.
Serrano-Lopez, M., & Poehner, M. (2008). Materializing Linguistic Concepts through 3- D Clay Modeling: A Tool-and-result Approach to Mediating L2 Spanish Development. In J. P. Lantolf, & M. E. Poehner (Eds.). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 321- 346). London, England: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Swain, M. (2006).Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrne (Ed.), advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp.95--‐108).London: Continuum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. New York: Plenum Press.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge of university press
Winsler, A., & Naglieri, J. (2003). Overt and covert verbal problem-solving strategies: Developmental trends in use, awareness, and relations with task performance in young learners aged 5 to 17. Child Development, 74, 659–678.
Winsler, A.,Diaz, R, M,. Atencio, .J, McCarthy, E, M, & Chaby,L,.A.(2000). Verbal self-regulation over time in preschool young learners at risk for attention and behavior problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 875-886.
Zuengler, J. and Miller, E. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 35-58.
