Comparison of Three Concrete Structural System Using AHP Method
محورهای موضوعی : ایمنی زیستی
Ahmad Kalantari
1
(Department of Civil Engineering, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran)
Zahra Sabzi
2
(Department of Civil Engineering, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran)
کلید واژه: structural system, Large Panel, 3D Panel, ICF, AHP method,
چکیده مقاله :
For selecting the appropriate structural concrete prefabricated system, construction managers have to identify and extract the most important and most effective features. This paper addresses how the best system can be selected using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. This method has been utilized for selecting the appropriate structural system among three pre-fabricated concrete construction system, including Large Panels, 3D Panels and Insulating Concrete Formwork (ICF). These systems considered to examine the importance of the criteria of efficient construction including cost and time, technical specifications and performance facilities. In this paper expert choice program has been used to approach the best system.The result of this study shows that the cost of production the pre-construction percentage, and the weight of elements and moreover the less need for heavy machinery and modularity of components have the maximum rank among the performance criteria. In addition, 3D Panel has been selected as the most appropriate structural system, and then ICF system and Large Panel have been selected as the second and third choice, respectively.
1.Fleming, C. J., and King, G. E. M., “The Development of Structural Adhesives for Three Original Uses in South Africa., RILEM
International Symposium, Synthetic Resins in Building Construction, Paris; 1967: 75-92.
2.Wolf, R., and Miessler, H. J., “HLV-Spannglieder in der Praxis. Erfahrungen Mit Glasfaserverbundstaben”, Beton, 1989 (2): 47-51.
3.Meier, U., “Bridge Repair with High Performance Composite Materials”, Material und Technik; 1987(4): 125-128.
4.Rostasy, F. S. (1987). Bonding of Steel and GFRP Plates in the Area of Coupling Joints. Talbrucke Kattenbusch, Research Report No. 3126/1429,
Federal Institute for Materials Testing,Braunschweig, Germany.
Fardis, M. N., and Khalili, H., “Concrete Encased in Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic”, ACI JOURNAL,
Proceedings; 1981, 78 (6): 440-446.
5.Katsumata, H., Kobatake, Y., and Takeda, T., “A Study on the Strengthening with Carbon Fiber for Earthquake- Resistant Capacity of Existing Concrete Columns. Proceedings from the Workshop on Repair and Retrofit of Existing Structures, U.S.-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, U.S.-Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resources,Tsukuba, Japan; 1987: 1816-1823.
6.Nanni, A., “Concrete Repair with Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement”, Concrete International; 1995, 17 (6): 22-26.
7.Neale, K. W., “FRPs for Structural Rehabilitation: A Survey of Recent Progress,” Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials; 2000, 2(2): 133-138.
8.Dolan, C. W., Rizkalla, S. H., and Nanni, A.,“Fourth International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures”, SP-188, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI; 1999.
9.Sheheta, E., Morphy, R., and Rizkalla, S., “Fourth International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures”,1999, SP-188, C. W.
10.Saadatmanesh, H., and Ehsani, M. R., (1998).Second International Conference on Composites in Infrastructure”, ICCI; V. 1 and 2, Tucson, AZ, 1998,
1506 pp.
11.Benmokrane, B., and Rahman, H., “Durability of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction”, University of Sherbrooke, Canada;
1998.
12.Neale, K. W., and Labossière, P., “State-of-the-Art Report on Retrofitting and Strengthening by Continuous Fibre in Canada. Non-Metallic (FRP)
Reinforcement for Concrete Structures”, V. 1, Japan Concrete Institute, Tokyo,Japan; 1997: 25-39.
13.Hassan, T., and Rizkalla, S., “Flexural Strengthening of Prestressed Bridge Slabs with FRP Systems”, PCI Journal; 2002, 47 (1): 76-93.
14.Shield, C. K., Busel, J. P., Walkup S. L., and Gremel, D. D., “Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Reinforced Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-7)”, SP-230, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI; 2005, 1708 pp.
15.ACI 440.2R-17. Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures; 2017.
16.FIB. Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement for RC Structures. FIB, Lausanne, 2001, 138 pp.
17.Chai, Y. H., Priestley, M. J. N. and Seible, F.,“Seismic retrofit of circular bridge columns for enhanced flexural performance”, ACI Structural
Journal; 1991, 88(5): 572-584.
18.Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R. and Li, M. W.,“Strength and ductility of concrete columns externally reinforced with fiber composite straps”,
ACI Structural Journal; 1994, 91(4): 434-447.
19.Nanni, A. and Bradford, N. M., “FRP jacketed concrete under uniaxial compression”, Construction and Building Materials; 1995, 9(2): 115-124.
20.Seible, F., Priestley, M. J. N. and Innamorato, D.,“Earthquake retrofit of bridge columns with continuous fiber jackets. In Design guidelines”,
Advanced composite technology transfer consortium, 2, Report No. ACTT-95/08, University of California, San Diego, USA; 1995.
21.Picher, F., Rochette, P. and Labossière, P.,“Confinement of concrete cylinders with CFRP”, In Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Composite Infrastructures, Tucson, Arizona, USA;1996: 829-841.
22.Matthys, S., Taerwe, L. and Audenaert, K., “Tests on axially loaded concrete columns confined by FRP sheet wrapping”, In Proceedings of the 4th
23.Mirmiran, A. and Shahawy, M., “Behavior of concrete columns confined by fiber composites”,Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE; 1997,123(5): 583-590.
24.Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R., and Jin, L.,“Seismic strengthening of circular bridge piers with fiber composites”, ACI Structural Journal; 1997,93(6): 639-647.
25.Spoelstra, M. R. and Monti, G., “FRP-confined concrete model”, Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE; 1999, 3(3): 143-150.
26.Seible, F., Priestley, M. J. N. and Innamorato, D.,“Earthquake retrofit of bridge columns with continuous fiber jackets. In Design guidelines”,Advanced composite technology transfer consortium, 2, Report No. ACTT-95/08, University of California, San Diego, USA; 1995a.
27.Monti, G., Nisticò, N. and Santini, S., “Design of FRP jackets for upgrade of circular bridge piers”,Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, in
print; 2001.
28.Triantafillou, T. C., “Seismic retrofitting of structures using FRPs”, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials; 2001, 3(1), in print.
29.Minafò, G., Rezaee-Hajidehi, M., & Giambanco, G.,“A Mechanical Approach for Evaluating the Distribution of Confinement Pressure in FRPWrapped Rectangular Columns”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE; 2019, 145(12).DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001673.
30.Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A., Darvishvand, H. R.,Ebrahimi, M., “Economic Analyses for LowStrength Concrete Wrapped with CFRP to Improve
the Mechanical Properties and Seismic Parameters”,<br style=" font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -web J. Constr. Eng. Manage.; 2020, 146(3): 04019117.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-
7862.0001760.
31.Haj Seiyed Taghia, S.A., Darvishvand, H.R., Asadi,S. et al., “A comparative study on the implementation of carbon and glass fibers
wrappings to improve the compressive strength and seismic behavior of concrete”, Asian J Civ Eng 21,2020: 1389–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00285-5.32.ASTM C150-07. Standard specification for portland cement. American Society For Testing And Materials; 2007.
33. ASTM C150-07. Standard specification for portland cement. American Society For Testing And Materials; 2007.
34. ASTM C33-03. Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates; 2003.
35. ASTM C494-05. Standard specification forchemical admixtures for concrete. American Society For Testing And Materials; 2005
36. ASTM C469. The Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression; 2014.
37. ASCE 41-13. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings; 2013.
38.Matlab Computer programming language v-2017.
