Revisiting Reflection Levels among Iranian EFL Teachers: The Interactional Effects of Teachers’ Experience and their Academic Degree
محورهای موضوعی : language teachingپروین رضایی 1 , هانیه دواتگراصل 2 , نادر اسدی 3
1 - گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، واحد اهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهر، ایران
2 - گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، واحد اهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهر، ایران
3 - گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، واحد اهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهر، ایران
کلید واژه: Teaching Experience, academic degree, levels of reflection,
چکیده مقاله :
The present mixed-method study examines the effect of Iranian EFL teachers’ teaching experience and academic degree on five dimensions of reflective teaching. In this line, a 29-item Likert scale Reflective Teaching Questionnaire composed of practical, metacognitive, critical, cognitive, and affective dimensions was administered to a convenient sample of 142 male/female B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. EFL teachers with 4-30 years of teaching experience. Moreover, a semi-structured interview was conducted with 16 EFL teachers yielding more in-depth triangulated data on their reflection levels and the related problems. The MANOVA results indicated the significant effect of teachers’ experience and academic degree on their reflective teaching with the least effect reported on the affective dimension. The results indicated significant interaction of the two research variables with the dimensions of reflective teaching. Moreover, the interview results indicated that lack of time, prescribed syllabi, and ineffective teacher training programs were the main obstacles of reflective teaching. The findings may bear implications for Iranian curriculum developers, materials writers, teacher trainers, administrators, and EFL instructors.
پژوهش تلفیقی (کمی-کیفی) حاضر پنج بعد تدریس فکورانه معلمان زبان انگلیسی در ایران را با توجه به مدرک تحصیلی و سابقه تدریس آن ها بررسی می کند. در این راستا، پرسشنامه تدریس فکورانه مشتمل بر 29 گویه حاوی پنج بعد عاطفی، شناختی، انتقادی، فراشناختی و عملی به یک نمونه 142 نفری در دسترس معلمان مرد و زن ایرانی ارائه شد؛ طوریکه معلمان شرکت کننده در نظر سنجی دارای مدارک تحصیلی کارشناسی، کارشناسی ارشد و دکترا و با سابقه تدریس چهار تا 30 سال بودند. همچنین با 16 نفر از معلمان مصاحبه تدریس فکورانه به عمل آمد تا داده های عمیق و قابل اعتماد تری از اولویت ها و روش تدریس فکورانه آنان به دست آید. تحلیل مانوا ( MANOVA) بر روی داده های حاصل از تکمیل پرسشنامه نشان داد که تدریس فکورانه به شکلی معنی دار تحت تاثیر سابقه تدریس و مدرک تحصیلی می باشد. علاوه براین، تحلیل آماری نشانگر تعامل معنی دار این دو عامل مذکور با ابعاد تدریس فکورانه بود. نتایج مصاحبه ها هم حاکی از این موضوع بود که کمبود وقت، سر فصل دروس تجویز شده و اجباری، کتاب های درسی، و برنامه های آموزش غیراثربخش موانع عمده تدریس فکورانه معلمان ایرانی می باشند. یافته های تحقیق می تواند برای برنامه ریزان درسی، تهیه کنند ه های مطالب درسی، مربیان و معلمان تربیت معلم و آموزشگران زبان انگلیسی در ایران مفید باشد.
Abednia, A., Hovassapian, A., Teimournezhad, S., & Ghanbari, N. (2013). Reflective journal writing: Exploring in-service EFL teachers ‘perceptions. System, 41, 503-514.
Ahmad, SH., & Khan, W. (2013). How reflective practice improves teachers’ classroom teaching skill? Case of community-based schools in District Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Social Sciences and Humanities, 4 (1), 73-81.
Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35 (2), 192-207.
Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English Language
Teaching Reflection Inventory. System, 38, 211-227.
Ansarin, A., Farrokhi, F., & Rahmani, M. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers’ reflection levels: The role of gender, experience, and qualifications. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 140-155.
Ashraf, H., & Zolfaghari, S. (2018). EFL teachers’ assessment literacy and their reflective teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 425-436.
Bartlett, L. (1990). Teacher development through reflective teaching. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan. (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 202-214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers believes. System 39(3), 370–380.
Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5 (1), 43–51.
Cirocki, A., & Widodo, H. P. (2019). Reflective practice in English language teaching in Indonesia: Shared practices from two teacher educators. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 15-35.
Copeland, W. D., Birmingham, C., La Cruz, E. D., & Lewin, B. (1993). The reflective practitioner in teaching: Toward a research agenda. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(4), 347-359.
Dağkıran, I. (2015). Post-method pedagogy and reflective practice: Current stance of Turkish EFL teachers. İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, Ankara.
Dahmardeh, M., & Kim, S. D. (2020). An analysis of the representation of cultural of medical sciences. Journal of Research and Development in Medical Education, 9 (17), 2-7.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A re-statement of the relation of reflective thinking in the educative process. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Creating a motivating classroom environment. In J. Cummins & C. Davidson, (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching. 2(219-231). New York, NY Springer.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From theory to practice. London and New York: Continuum.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). ‘Keeping SCORE’: Reflective practice through classroom observations. RELC Journal, 42(3).265-272.
Freeman, D. (2016). Educating second language teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gheith, E., & Aljaberi, N. (2018). Reflective teaching practices in teachers and their attitudes toward professional self-development. International Journal of Progressive Education,14 (3), 161- 180.
Gordijn, F., Eernstman, N., Helder, J., & Brouwer, H. (2018). Reflection methods Practical guide for trainers and facilitators. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research.
Hassan S. A., & Mojtaba, F. (2018). Inhibitors to EFL teachers’ reflective teaching and EFL learners’ reflective thinking and the role of teaching experience and academic degree in reflection perception. Reflective Practice, 19 (1), 46-67.
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11 (1), 33 -49.
Jung, J. (2012). The focus, role, and meaning of experienced teachers’ reflection in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17, 157-175.
Kömür, Ş., & Gün, S. (2016). English language teachers’ reflective practices for understanding their teaching processes. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 14-27.
Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning Learning about Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53 (1), 33-43.
Mahmoodi, M. H., & Ghaslani, R. (2014). Relationship among Iranian EFL teachers’ emotional Intelligence, reflectivity and burnout. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6 (1), 89– 116.
Mathew, P., Mathew, P, Prince, M., & Peechattu, J. (2017). Reflective practice: A means to teacher development. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology, 3(1), 126-131.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. (2nd edition). London New Delhi: Sage
Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development (pp. 17.27). Rutledge: London and New York.
Moradkhani, S., & Shirazizadeh, M. (2017). Context-based variations in EFL teachers’ reflection: The case of public schools versus private institutes in Iran. Reflective Practice, 8(2), 206-218.
O’Donnell, A. M., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. K. (2012). Educational psychology. Reflection for action. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Ojure, L. & Sherman, T. (2001). Learning Styles. Education Week: American Education's Newspaper of Record, November issue.
Pazhoman, H., & Sarkhosh, M. (2019). The relationship between Iranian English high school teachers’ reflective practices, their self-regulation and teaching experience. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 995-1010.
Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2007). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ beliefs and their classroom practice. The Teacher Trainer, 21(3), 17-19.
Pollard, A., Anderson, J., Maddock, M., Swaffield, S., Warin, J., & Warwick, P. (2008). Reflective teaching: evidence-informed professional practice. (3rd edition) Continuum International Publishing Group.
Rezaee, A., Seyri, H. (2021). Teacher Agency in the Context of Curriculum Reform in the Iranian Educational System. Foreign Language Research Journal, 11(1), 27-46. doi: 10.22059/jflr.2021.319705.812.
Shirazizadeh, M., & Moradkhani, S. (2018). Minimizing burnout through reflection: The rocky road ahead of EFL teachers. Teaching English Language, 12(1), 135–154.
Tillema, H., (2000). Belief changes toward self-directed learning immersion in practice or reflection on action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5- 6), 575-591.
Unal, Z., & Uhan, A. (2012). The impact of years of teaching experience on the classroom management approaches of elementary school teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 41-60.
Usman, L. (2012). Teacher qualification and students’ performance in science, mathematics and technology subject in Kenya: Internal Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies. 2(2), 231-378.
Wellington, B. (1991). The promise of reflective practice. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 4-5.
Zeichner, K.M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 3-9.
