A Relationship between Social Capital and the Feeling of Security in Tehran
محورهای موضوعی :
Mansour Haghighatian
1
(Assistant Professor of I.A.U. of Dahaghan)
Ali Reza Sanatkha
2
(Ph.D. Student of Sociology)
Javad Moeinedin
3
(Associate Professor of Kerman University)
Shirin Shiri Aminloo
4
(Educated from Sociology)
کلید واژه: Economic, Security, Psychological, Within group social capital, Out group social capital, Commercial social capital, Political Security,
چکیده مقاله :
This paper tries to analyze the relationship between social capital(separating this capital to there areas, within group, out group and communicational) to the feeling of security. Through mixed cluster and classified sampling 22 restricts of Tehran and more than 2000 people were chosen totally. The results show that there is a significant relationship between the place of living, marriage, occupation, and age with the feeling of security. No direct effect was found in within group of social capital, but the effect of the within group social capital on security is negative(-36%). Out group social capital has a positive effect(+27%) on the security. Commercial social capital has no direct effect on security but it has negative direct effect on security but it has negative direct effect(-%8) on security.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1986) The Forms of Capital inBaron, S. Field, J. Schuller, T. (eds.) (2000) Social Capital - Critical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
15. Coleman and Hoffer (1987) "High School and Beyond http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_capital.
16. Coleman, J. (1988) Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital American Journal of Sociology 94 Supplement S95-S120. University of Chicago.
17. Freitag, Markus. (2003). Beyond Tocqueville: the origins of social capital in Switzerland, European Sociological Review, 19(2):217-232.
18. Fukuyama, F. (2001) Social Capital, Civil Society and Development, Third World Quarterly, 22, 1, 7-20.
19. Halpern, D. (1999) Social capital: the new golden goose. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Cambridge University. Unpublished review.
20. Harper ,Rosalyn (2011/1/1), Social Capital review of the literature, www.statistics.gov.uk/socialcapital/downloads/soccaplit.
21. Kawachi, I. Kennedy, B. Lochner, K. Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997) Social Capital, Income Inequality, and Mortality American Journal of Public Health 87 (9) 1491-1498.
22. Portes, A. (1998) Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology Annual Review of Sociology (24)1-24.
23. Putnam, R.D. (2000), Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of American community, New York, Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.
24. Putnam, R (1995) Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital Journal of Democracy 6(1) 65-78.
25. Putnam, R. (1993) The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life The AmericanProspect, no 13.
26. Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone - The Collapse and Revival of American Community NewYork: Simon & Schuster.
27. Putnam, R. D. (1993a) Making Democracy Work: civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
28. Putnam, R. D. (1996) Who Killed Civic America? , Prospect, 7, 24, 66-72.
29. Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of American community, Simon and Schuster, New York.
30. Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of American community, Simon and Schuster, New York.
31. Putnam, R. D. )2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
32. Putnam, R. D. 1993 Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33. Putnam, R. D. 2000 Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
34. Putnam, Robert D. (January 1995). "Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital". Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65–78. http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/assoc/bowling.html.
35. Putnam, Robert( 2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
36. Putnam, Robert. (2000), "Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community" (Simon and Schuster).
37. Putnam, Robert.( 2002). “Robert Putnam’s response.” Austin American Statesman, Special Report – Cities of Ideas: Prosperity and its price, April 28, 2002. Retrieved October 18, 2005 (http://www.statesman.com/specialreports/content/specialreports/ citiesofideas/0428putnam.html.).
38. Putnam,r(2000) bowling alone:the collapse and revival of American community,simon and schusteer,new york.Stone, Wendy and Jody Hughes(2011/1/1) Measuring Social Capital: Towards a standardised approach, http://www.aes.asn.au/conferences/2002/PAPERS/Hughes.pdf.
39. Voicu ,Bogdan(2011/1/1),Eastern Europeans and their lower levels of Bridging Social Capital: Between individual and societal determinants, www.iccv.ro/valori/conferinte.html.
40.Woolcock, M.. (2001) . The place of social capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes. ISUMA Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2 (1) 11-17.
