Impact of Using Web-quests on Learning Vocabulary by Iranian Pre-university Students
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
Masoud Asgari
1
(English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran)
Hadi Salehi
2
(English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran)
کلید واژه: vocabulary learning, Attitude, Computer-assisted language learning, Web-quest,
چکیده مقاله :
Web-quests are internet-based technology applications in which groups of students follow a specific set of steps toward the completion of a final project on a specific subject or a multi-disciplinary subject. The present study aimed to investigate the impacts of using web-quests on learning vocabulary by Iranian pre-university students. The sample of the study consisted of 72 students assigned into two groups. One of the groups represented the control group, and included 23 students; the other group represented the experimental group and comprised 49 students. The two groups were chosen from a population of pre-university students in Chadegan, Isfahan, Iran. The web-quest strategy was used in teaching the experimental group, while the traditional method was used with the control group in the second term of the school year 2015-2016. An Oxford Placement Test (OPT), a vocabulary pretest, a vocabulary posttest, and an attitude questionnaire were the data elicitation tools employed in this study. The collected data were analyzed using independent-samples t test, which was used to determine the existence of possible significant differences between the groups both before and after the instruction. The results indicated that there were statistically significant differences between both groups in favor of the experimental group. The conclusion, thus, could be that the students in the experimental group, who used the web-quest resources for learning vocabulary, performed significantly better than the students in the control group, who learnt vocabulary through traditional method of learning vocabulary. Finally, questionnaire data analyzed via one-sample t test indicated that the experimental group learners had a positive attitude towards the treatment they experienced in the experiment.
Alfadda, H., Almasri, M., & Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2011). A preliminary study of the effect of web-quests on the writing performance of Saudi female (EFL) elementary school students. Jalt Call Journal, 7(3), 373-390.
Castronova, J. (2002). Web-quest in wonderland: The eighth grade comes to the edge. Learning & Leading with Technology, 30(1), 22-27.
Chatel, R., & Nodell, J. (2002). Web-quests: Teachers and students as global literacy explorers. Retrieved October 9, 2016, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED471843.pdf
Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition. London: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, V., & Cowen, J. (2008). Literacy for children in an information age, teaching Reading, writing, and thinking. California: Wadsworth Publishing
Crystal, D. (1988). The English language. London: Penguin Books.
Dodge, B. (1995). Web-quests: A technique for Internet-based learning. The Distance Educator, 1(1), 10-13.
Dodge, B. (1997). Some thoughts about web-quests. Retrieved October 18, 2016 from http://WebQuest.sdsu.edu/about_WebQuests.html.
Dodge, B. (1998). The web-quest page. San Diego State University. Retrieved October 18, 2016 from http://WebQuest.sdsu.edu.
Dodge, B. (1998). Web-quests: A strategy for scaffolding higher level thinking. Retrieved October 18, 2016 from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/necc98.htm.
Dodge, B. (2001). Focus: Five rules for writing a great web-quest. Learning & Leading with Technology, 28(8), 6-9, 58.
Dutt-Doner, K., Wilmer, M., Stevens, C., & Hartmann, L. (2000). Actively engaging learners in interdisciplinary curriculum through the integration of technology. Computers in the Schools, 16, 151-166.
Harley, B. (1996). Introduction: Vocabulary learning and teaching in a second language. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 3-11.
Hassanien, A. (2006). An evaluation of the web-quest as a computer-based learning tool. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 11(2), 235–250.
Hassanien, A. (2006). Using web-quest to support learning with technology in higher education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 5(1), 41-49.
Hsu, T. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). Effects of a structured resource-based web issue-quest approach on students' learning performances in computer programming courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3).
Jahromi, Z. B., Mosalanejad, L., & Rezaee, R. (2016). The effect of web-quest and team-based learning on students’ self-regulation. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 4(2), 80.
Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.
Laborda, J. G. (2009). Using web-quests for oral communication in English as a foreign language for tourism studies. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 258–270.
Lou, Y., & MacGregor, K. S. (2001). Learning with Internet resources: Task structure and group collaboration. In R. S. Burkett, M. Macy, J. A. White, & C. M. Feyton (Eds.), Preservice teacher education: Proceedings of SITE 2001. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Retrieved September 24, 2003, from ERIC database (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED457833).
Lou, M. (2010). Web-quest [An experimental study on web-quest in promoting non-English majors’ learner autonomy]. Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education. 29(4), 148-150.
Macgregor, K., & Lou, Y. (2005). Web-quest learning: How task scaffolding and web site design support knowledge acquisition. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 161-175.
Milson, A. J. (2001). Engaging students in historical inquiry using Internet resources. Paper presented at the National Council for the Social Studies, September 25, 2011, from ERIC database (ERIC) Document Reproduction Service No. ED 462360).
Monroe, E. E., & Orme, M. P. (2003). The nature of discourse as students collaborate on a mathematic Web-Quest. Retrieved September 6, 2003, from center.uoregon.edu/con/necc _pdf_ upload/necc2003_RP_handouts/MONROE Orme.pdf.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sanders, J. (2006). E-learning for GP educators. Oxford: Radcliffe- Oxford Publishing.
Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, L., & Willing, K. (2001). Computer activities for the cooperative classroom. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.
Shen, Z. (2008). The roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in EFL reading performance. Asian Social Science, 4(12), 135-137.
Shoebottom, P. (n.d.). How to learn vocabulary. Retrieved March 15, 2014, from a guide to learning English: http://esl.fis.edu/learners/advice/vocab.htm
Shoebottom, P. (n.d.). Types of vocabulary. Retrieved March 18, 2014, from a guide to learning English: http://esl.fis.edu/learners/advice/vocab_types.htm.
Stevenson, A. (2010). Oxford dictionary of English. Hong Kong: China Translation & Printing Services Ltd.
Turville, J. (2008). Differentiating by student learning preferences, strategies and lesson plans. New York: Eye on Education, Inc.
Warda, M. H. M. A. (2016). Can collaborative learning maximize the effectiveness of web-quest used in learning educational psychology at Al Majmaa University? Journal of Research in Curriculum, Instruction and Educational Technology, 2(4), 117-144.
Williams, S., & Williams, E. (2003). Wild about web-quests: Using web-quests in the classroom and loving them. Presentation to the Georgia Association for Gifted Children.
Zheng, R., Perez, J., Williamson, J., & Flygare, J. (2008). Web-quests as perceived by teachers: Implications for online teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 295-304.
