Improving EFL Learners’ Referential and Expressive Writing through Task-based Instruction in Academic Context
DOR:20.1001.1.23223898.2021.9.36.4.0

محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper

Delaram Pourmandnia ¹ , Ahmad Mohseni ² , Hossein Rahmanpanah ³ , Ali Asghar Rostami Abusaeedi ⁴

1 - Department of English Language Teaching, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of English Language Teaching, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of English Language Teaching, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman , Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/05/25 تاریخ پذیرش : 1399/10/06 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/04/10

کلید واژه: Task-based Instruction, writing skill, Language Functions, expressive writing, referential writing,

چکیده مقاله :

L2/FL writing ability, which per se includes many different types, is considered a major skill in academic settings. However, little research has been done in this area and even less has focused on the effectiveness of task-based writing instruction on the two specific kinds; namely, referential writing and expressive writing. To this end, 60 English Translation sophomores of both genders were selected and divided into two classes after ensuring their homogeneity through the Quick Placement Test (OQPT). For the pre- and post-tests, the participants were required to take IELTS writing tests requiring referential and expressive types of writing. As for the treatment of the study, all participants were instructed based on the same content materials of advanced writing and a task-based framework. The results of the statistical analysis indicated significant improvements in the participants’ writing abilities in referential and expressive written tasks. Besides, the effectiveness of task-based writing techniques was approved in terms of referential and expressive types of language functions in the academic writing of Iranian EFL learners.

چکیده انگلیسی:

l

منابع و مأخذ:

Ahmed, A. M. (2010). Students’ problem with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay writing in Egypt: different perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(4), 211-221.

Bialystok, E. (1983). Communication Strategies: A psychological analysis of second language use. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., PearsonEducation Company.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chappell, V. (2011). What makes writing so important? Retrieved December 27, 2012, fromhttp://www.marquette.edu/wac/ WhatMakesWritingSoImportant.shtml.

Crabbe, D. (2007). Learning opportunities: adding learning value to tasks. ELT Journal, 61(2), 117-125.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Study abroad as foreign language practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology, 208-226. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80.

Ducker, N. (2012). Enriching the curriculum with task-based instruction. Polyglossia, 22, 3-11.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1991). Language, context and text: aspect oflanguage in a social semiotic perspective. Université du Québec à Rimouski. http://www.signosemio.com /jakobson/function-of-language.asp. (Retrieved on May, 15. 2014).

Hébert, L. (2011). The Functions of Language, in Louis Hébert (dir.), Signo [online], Rimouski (Quebec), http://www.signosemio.com/jakobson/functions-of-language.asp.

Holmes, J. (1992). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman Group UK Limited.

Kafipour, R., Mahmoudi, E., & Khojasteh, L. (2018). The effect of task-based language teaching on analytic writing in EFL classrooms. Cogent Education, 5, 1-16.

Klimova, B. (2013). The importance of writing. Indian Journal of Research Paper, 2 (1), 9-11.

McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Nord, C. (2006). Translating for communicate purpose across culture boundaries. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

Nunan, D. (1998). Language Teaching and Methodology. London: Prentice Hall. 

Nunan, D. (2010). A Task-based Approach to Materials Development. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 1(2), 135–160.

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci. E. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. London: Heinemann.

Storch, N. (2009). The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 103-118.

Sundari, H., Husnaini Febriyanti, R., & Saragih, G. (2017). Using task-based materials in teaching writing for EFL classes in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7 (3), 119-124.

Tilfarlioglu, F. Y., & Basaran, S. (2007). Enhancing reading comprehension through task-based writing activities: An experimental study. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 134-152.

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing Task-based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.